Shed of the Week | Saab 9-3 'Aero' cabriolet
What better Shed for a sunny summer's day than a swift Saab?
When Saab first started putting serious turbo boost into its motors, many a sage journo commented at the time that 200hp was without question the practical upper horsepower limit for front-wheel drive cars. End of.
Eeeh, how things have changed, as Shed's post-mistress commented on a very hot day recently when she accidentally stumbled upon the great man in his workshop, naked and bent spread-eagled over an A35 engine bay.
A bit of an old hippie, Shed's always been one for letting it all hang out. In the hope that it might generate some extra whizz in their love life, he once told Mrs Shed that he was a libertarian. Unfortunately for him, Mrs Shed is not the sharpest tool in the box. In a fit of misplaced jealousy she marched straight round to the local library and smacked the comely assistant upside the head with her wildebeeste handbag. Ever since then Shed has refrained from using words of more than three syllables in her company.
Anyway, if Shed could get away with it he'd happily use this week's Shed for a spot of in-the-buff naturist motoring. He's always been partial to a fast Swede, and particularly a topless one. This remapped 9-3 certainly ticks his box.
Nowadays you young drivers don't have to make sure both of your front wheels are on similar surfaces before you recklessly boot your FWD hot hatch into hyperdrive. If you did that in one of the first turbo Saabs with your right hand front tyre on a wet bit of tarmac and your left-hand front on a dry bit, arm-knotting amounts of torque steer were very much on the menu, alongside the pickled herring.
Those early journos didn't foresee the advances in traction control that, right now, mean a 320hp front-drive Civic is a production reality. Saab probably did foresee those advances, but even though they hadn't arrived by the time the first high-boost Turbos bombed onto the stage, it didn't stop them putting out cars that in poor or changeable conditions could only really be driven quickly and safely (at the same time) by Swedes, or of course Finns. You needed the other sort of ESP - extra-sensory perception - to anticipate and deal with the crude power step. Turbo really meant something back then.
The 9-3 was not warmly received when it went on sale in 1999. Whatever you think about the politics, the B/H slant four petrol motor that the 9-3 inherited from Saabs dating back to 1981 was not only strong enough to run right through to 2003 but also man enough to take big hits from the tuning stick. This car is claimed to be putting out 270hp. We won't bore you with the details of how it achieves that because the vendor is happy to do that in his ad, but a recently fitted recon turbo plus a Stage 3 hop-up from the highly respected German engine tuning and suspension firm Hirsch are bullet points worth highlighting.
Hirsch upgrades were/are expensive, but they were good. Shed seems to remember that they were an official part of the Saab offering and therefore didn't invalidate your warranty. Last of the line performance 9-3s like the Turbo X 9-3 effectively had Hirsch upgrades thrown in.
It's not so much about power with remapped Saabs as it is about lag reduction and torque curve en-fattening. A Stage 3 with the correct downpipe should deliver getting on for 380Nm, or around 280lb ft. That will get you down the road pretty smartly almost irrespective of which of the intermediate gears you're in, as long as the tacho has 2000rpm or more on it. The other good thing about even quite strong retunes on already fast Saabs is that they don't seem to have much effect on the fuel consumption.
It's also cheering to see that the vendor hasn't neglected the handling side of the equation. 270hp would be a bridge too far on a stock chassis, so the work done on this one might mean that the allegations of a handling character bypass that are normally levelled at this model can be set aside. The seller's reassurances about sludging, or the lack of it, make good reading too. The ad has a nice oily whiff of marque and model knowledge about it.
You might be the sort who wonders why this car's factory turbo failed. Shed on the other hand is the sort who likes to see a new(ish) turbo on the service history, paid for by somebody else. The 5-speed manual is presumably original, which is a pity in one way as it was never much cop to use, but at least the mileage is low so hopefully there's more life in it yet.
Generally speaking Shed reckons this car will get you about the place in a very pleasing manner. Shame about the cyclist hitting the front wing and screen, but there are plenty of other cyclists who haven't hit it. No, we don't know what's means by that, either.
The car was MOT'd last month, with the only advisory being a bit of edge wear on the offside front tyre, acceptable enough in such a poky car. You can never be 100 per cent sure but the history does seem to indicate a car that's had whatever it's needed, whenever it's needed it. Some structural corrosion in the nearside rear was picked up and addressed in September 2017. Shed doesn't want to tell you your business, but prospective buyers might want to check the offside rear area.
Don't go expecting old-school Saab quality on the inside, especially in this car which appears to have a cigar burn on the passenger seat, or shake-free driving on a bumpy road with the top down. If it's rigidity you're after, look elsewhere (but not between Shed's legs when he's bent naked over an A35).
Which takes us back to the opening anecdote, and a real headline about a drugs bust that Shed saw in a newspaper the other day. 'Dealer had crack in buttocks', it said. Well, it made Shed laugh anyway.
Recon turbo is a worry because you’re at the mercy of whoever did the recon. Also polybushing is a worry because it will have ruined what little NVH prevention the car had in the first place. But for £1300? Great fun.
I remember the Dealer Principle admitting that the convertible was a terrible drive. I think he mentioned something about SAAB basically just chopped the roof and had not made the necessary structural changes.
I had few dealings with this version thankfully...the next version was a much better car.
I cant imagine firmer suspension, lopping the roof off and giving it another 100 plus bhp has helped a great deal in the handling department.
Best to think that they still look good, has a good turn of (straight line) speed and is bargain basement money. Its nice you can get something fairly interesting for that kind of money.
Get the little bits done, and dont get carried away with the cheques the engine writes as the rest wont cash them
Dynamically the worst car I’ve ever driven, comically bad.
I can’t imagine cutting the roof off, giving it more power and less compliant suspension will have improved it.
But..., over time, these have grown on the purists and offer excellent value. Yes, you'll get scuttle shake but nothing like as bad as mine. Yes. you'll get turbo lag but that's just how they are, sir.
The worst thing is probably the torque steer, because these have transverse engines whereas the older ones had longitudinal, so equal length driveshafts - something not mentioned by Shed in the article.
For the money this is a fantastic summer smoke, in a good colour combination too.
GM bought a majority stake in Saab in the early '90s and removed almost all of the "Saabness" that made the marque what it was. Engines sort of carried over (in that they didn't use anybody else's, except the diesels which were GM's own) but the chassis became far more generic and, yes, did share much with the Vectra.
Don't think of this as a hot-hatch baiting supercar: consider it a swift summer funmobile and enjoy while the sun shines.
Very similar just didnt get the sport seats, 205BHP engine as standard and had normal suspension (I think)
Should be a blast though with the engine and suspension upgrades
GM bought a majority stake in Saab in the early '90s and removed almost all of the "Saabness" that made the marque what it was. Engines sort of carried over (in that they didn't use anybody else's, except the diesels which were GM's own) but the chassis became far more generic and, yes, did share much with the Vectra.
Don't think of this as a hot-hatch baiting supercar: consider it a swift summer funmobile and enjoy while the sun shines.
I did like the looks of the thing, very comfortable seats, and it was pretty quick. I didn’t like the chassis flex, it was worse when you went through a pot holed road which the UK pretty much is, needed some mechanical TLC as it made a Loud whirring noise on start up for a few minutes and taking it around a corner at some speed was interesting. Once summer was over, I looked to sell it and with the buyer coming along, trying the hood and that decided to give up on that particular moment. Anyone buying these, get a steering clamp as the bulkhead can crack, most probably have by now though for those who don’t know about the issue.
I tried to get the car serviced but at the time, only Saab specialists could do it and they charged insane prices, they probably thought how Saab owners would pay to keep those cars on the road they can charge what they like.
Would I have another? No but I do like SAAB in general, understated cars.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff