RE: Ford Ranger Raptor | UK Drive

RE: Ford Ranger Raptor | UK Drive

Thursday 12th September 2019

2020 Ford Ranger Raptor | UK Review

Dune jumping in North Africa is all well and good, but does the £50k Ranger add up in BoJo's Britain?



Phew, that was close - memory suggested the Ford Ranger Raptor was in danger of being the slowest pick up - and likely vehicle - ever driven on PH. Handily it zips to 62mph ahead of a Hilux (thank the 10-speed auto for that, against the six-speed the Toyota had when tested), even if it's said to be a thrilling 106mph dead heat at the top end. At which point an Isuzu D-Max will streak on to 112mph. Just FYI.

That said, the Raptor must set a record for price to performance on PistonHeads; without wishing to sound like another record (of the broken kind), the Ranger's mismatch of punchy aesthetic and puny performance is impossible to avoid, be that in the comments, the spec sheet or the driver's seat. From the outset the Raptor is the guy who's all arms and chest but can't squat his bodyweight; the looks are impressive and attention grabbing, though actual heavy lifting is out of the question. (That's not as bad a joke as it seems, either, because the Raptor has a reduced carrying and towing capacity over standard.)

This is not simply a game of Top Trumps, however, and we all know by now that there's much more to driving in general, and to this pick up specifically, than the bare numbers. Money has been invested in widening the tracks, installing extremely fancy Fox Racing dampers, larger BF Goodrich tyres, more powerful brakes, increasing approach and departure angles and so on. This is not simply a cosmetic exercise. Though arguably it succeeds on that score.


We've been made aware of the Raptor's ability before - an extensive and comprehensive assessment that involved, um, throwing it off dunes in Morocco. Now, though, a chance for a proper test: real British roads, involving (but not limited to) making room on small country lanes for others cars, actually merging into traffic on dual carriageways, scurrying through villages and other niggly tasks that probably aren't front of mind in a 5,400mm, 2.5-tonne pick-up when you're playing at Dakar.

Before we get there though, Ford UK insists on a reminder of what its pick-up will do when you're along way from the beaten track. Like when you're in a felled forest, for example. Or next to a rally driver on a test stage. Turns out low-range, off-road mode and knobbly tyres are fairly handy when it comes to the former (who knew?) and the Raptor feels more than quick enough when you're apparently allergic to braking. Point being of course that this is an all-wheel-drive pick-up that can hack it off road - probably more so than most of cars sold on the basis of their suitability for 'lifestyle' adventures.

And you know what? The Ranger is perfectly alright on the road, too. Fears of a truck buck-a-rooing its way down a high street simply never materialise, the Ranger's coil-spring/Watt's linkage back axle ably supported by the Fox dampers and delivering decent composure. It's certainly not immune to the odd shudder - it's a body-on-frame pick up, after all - and remains a fairly cumbersome corner-taker for that reason, but it's more than liveable. For a pick up, the ride is uncannily good, not only smothering the normal imperfections, but also dismissing kerbs, verges, potholes and anything else below the knee with ease.

Moreover, while the Raptor isn't exactly brimming with accelerative gusto, the 10-speed auto always keeps the twin-turbo diesel at the right revs for optimum performance. It'll cruise adeptly at not much more than idle, swiftly drop gears if an overtake is needed, and responds nicely to inputs from the lovely metal paddles as required - though that's pretty seldom, really, with 10 gears to choose from. Consequently, the performance isn't as inhibiting as might have been expected (even if it's still a little hard to level with the price) because the gearbox is so well calibrated. Just use more throttle than you think it'll need, and everything will be fine...


As for the Raptor's sheer size on UK roads, that could be a little trickier to get accustomed to. Of course against the F-150 Raptor it'll seem like little more than a die-cast model, but there's no escaping the fact that 15cm of additional width to accommodate the new tracks isn't going to make an already sizeable vehicle feel wieldy. And while it could be argued that the raised ride height helps with visibility, it also makes the driver even more aware of how much Ranger there actually is and how much space it's using up. Don't be surprised to find it flummoxed by a width restrictor. Or a parking space...

Here's the nub though: those that like the Raptor concept are going to adore the execution. Because it looks brilliant, all attitude and arches, yet isn't so silly as to be totally daft. It absolutely does the business dynamically, too, unequivocally off-road and more than adequately on it. And finally, while a little less tangible, the Raptor feels stoic and resilient, like it would gladly lap up punishment for season after season and year after year. There's not a squeak or a rattle anywhere at any point, even being flung around a stage. For those that value (and/or need) engineering integrity over the squidgiest of soft touch plastics, that's going to be important.

Granted, a V6-powered Amarok is going to offer better on-road performance for a similar outlay - but the Raptor doesn't advertise itself as the sensible choice. Instead it's great fun; a truck to make you smile without making so much mischief that it works against its everyday usability. And besides, the money invested underneath feels worth every penny when clambering over tree stumps, surmounting rocks or not getting stuck in the mud. Look beyond the butch facade and the spec sheet of the Ranger Raptor and there's real ability, as well as appeal, to be found throughout. Of course a four-cylinder diesel pick up won't be on the top of many shortlists for £50,000 - but any buyer with even a superficial interest should take a look. Prepare to be won over.


SPECIFICATION - FORD RANGER RAPTOR

Engine: 1,996cc 4-cyl twin-turbo, diesel
Transmission: 10-speed automatic, switchable four-wheel drive with low-range
Power (hp): 213@3,750rpm
Torque (lb ft): 369@1,750-2,000rpm
0-62mph: 10.5sec
Top speed: 106mph
Weight: 2,510kg (minimum kerb weight)
MPG: 31.7 (WLTP combined)
CO2: 233g/km
Price: £48,784 (inc. VAT)

Search for a Ford Ranger here












Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

54 months

Thursday 12th September 2019
quotequote all
0-60 over 10... Has to be the most disappointing car of the year!

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

54 months

Thursday 12th September 2019
quotequote all
The only things that matter are can it be driven angrily? How do they tailgate? Do you get proper vape stream? There are a couple near me and I can only postulate the driver is always late, given the way they’re driven.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

54 months

Thursday 12th September 2019
quotequote all
loveice said:
It is a high speed...
Stop right there. No it isn't. What it is is a massive missed opportunity to chuck in one of their brilliant Ecoboosts. Real shame. So much for badge snobbery I'll probably end up just getting a Ranger fx4 to replace my Touareg.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

54 months

Thursday 12th September 2019
quotequote all
So it's a styling trim level, basically.

What an absolutley pointless thing, unless you think one of those laughable "sporty" Transit vans with the halfords-esque fake exhaust hanging down like the balls on a dog doesn't quite make you look like enough of a bellend.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

54 months

Thursday 12th September 2019
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
I agree, I suspect once rolling it probably doesn't feel that slow, it might also have some deliberate power reducing gubbins or delay off the line to protect the drivetrain, which will impact a timed 0-60mph run.
Yes I agree that it'll probalby be detuned in 1st and 2nd (lots of things are) and it may well have traction issues too - all the pickups I've driven are very keen to break rear wheel traction when the load bed is empty. The slowness is really not a problem in one being sold as a tool, but it is a problem for one styled like this being sold TOO tools.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

54 months

Thursday 12th September 2019
quotequote all
A diesel Raptor, how quaint.

FFS, just no.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

54 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
stickleback123 said:
300bhp/ton said:
I agree, I suspect once rolling it probably doesn't feel that slow, it might also have some deliberate power reducing gubbins or delay off the line to protect the drivetrain, which will impact a timed 0-60mph run.
Yes I agree that it'll probalby be detuned in 1st and 2nd (lots of things are)...
Why? The regular Ranger does 0-60 in under 7. The reason this is so comically slow is that it’s got a pathetic engine.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

54 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
Zetec-S said:
GroundEffect said:
fblm said:
stickleback123 said:
300bhp/ton said:
I agree, I suspect once rolling it probably doesn't feel that slow, it might also have some deliberate power reducing gubbins or delay off the line to protect the drivetrain, which will impact a timed 0-60mph run.
Yes I agree that it'll probalby be detuned in 1st and 2nd (lots of things are)...
Why? The regular Ranger does 0-60 in under 7. The reason this is so comically slow is that it’s got a pathetic engine.
Huh? The 3.2 I5 diesel is 0-60 in over 10 seconds. The "normal Ranger" I presume you mean the 2.3 EcoBoost that North America gets?
Also a bit confused by those figures... a normal Ranger as quick to 60 as a Fiesta ST???
Pretty sure they are referring to the US spec 2.3 petrol turbo. Although I don't know what other changes it went through. But that aside, the torque profile diesel and petrol engines is different.
Pretty sure the Ranger uses the same 10 speed from the F150 (10R80) which is good for 650ftlb. The 2l diesel couldn't pull the skin off a rice pudding.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

54 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
Zetec-S said:
Also a bit confused by those figures... a normal Ranger as quick to 60 as a Fiesta ST???
Correct. USA Ranger is 2.3 Ecoboost, 0-60 in 6.8

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

54 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
Zetec-S said:
That's not really a "normal" Ranger...
It 100%, just not for our market. In fact in the USA it's the only engine option I believe. And I suspect they will sell more Ranger's there than they do here.
True but to be fair to Zetec the US numbers are suprisingly miserable. Amazingly they sold over 50k in EU last year and they are only on track to sell 60k in the US this year. By contrast they sell 80k F150's a month! Americans think little trucks are gay.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

54 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
meatballs said:
Would imagine there might be some suprise speeding fines for doing 70 on a dual carriageway if not.
If it got up to 70 that would be a surprise! hehe

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

54 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
AdeTuono said:
Mine does...(admittedly it's not new, but that's the reason I've kept it.
Nice. I've got first dibs on my neighbours V8 Raptor. It sounds epic biggrin

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

54 months

Saturday 14th September 2019
quotequote all
AdeTuono said:
I don't keep my motors long, generally, but I've had my Raptor for nearly 6 years and have no intention of getting rid in the foreseeable. Even at 12mpg, I grab the keys to it before any of my other vehicles.
My neighbour is the same: he’s got 3 other cars and they have all come and gone except the Raptor... He lost it on a 40mph roundabout and took out about 20 feet of armco; he was able to reverse off and drive home hehe perfect school run car.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

54 months

Monday 13th September 2021
quotequote all
Stupid looking things , inappropriate for uk roads imo.
Watching owners trying to park ,turn or even drive on A roads is amusing…