RE: Driven: BMW 1 Series M Coupé

RE: Driven: BMW 1 Series M Coupé

Tuesday 12th October 2010

Driven: BMW 1 Series M Coupé

BMW teases us with its 'junior M3' - aka the 1 Series M Coupé



Despite the indisputable step up in ability and performance that characterised the arrival of the E92 BMW M3, there are many enthusiasts that lament the passing of its straight-six engined predecessor. BMW has finally acknowledged there's a gaping hole in the M-car range, and that the gap should be filled with something 1 Series shaped.


You'll have seen the images of the mildly camouflaged cars before now, and BMW has even released a few striptease-style photographs to start building momentum to a full reveal of its 1 Series M Coupé in December. Now some weeks ahead of the official launch they’ve let a few hacks loose with a pre-production car in Germany, including yours truly. Yes, this job can sometimes be fun…

It's going to be a looker, thanks in no small part to the deliciously bulbous wheelarches.  I think they're more reminiscent of the 2002 Turbo's than any modern M-car's, though they are also necessary to accommodate the current M3's rear axle.


You can ignore the hand-made (i.e. bodged together) look of the arches on the test car, as the final version will feature a new one-piece metal body panel. One of the pre-production mules has an exhaust similar to the current 135i's - as opposed to the quad-pipe set-up of all modern M-cars - but it was confirmed that the finished product will have four outlets. And yes, 19-inch alloys will be standard - we're told that just one wheel size will be offered.

Christoph Smieskol, one of BMW's engineers responsible for the 1 Series M Coupé, tells us that the company took inspiration from the original M3 in the pursuit of a 'back to basics' approach. Without saying as much, he alluded to the fact that this is as likely to be in the name of keeping the price of the 1 M down. We're crossing our fingers for a showroom price of not much more than £40,000 - downsizing is going to be big in 2011.


That means fewer toys than we've grown accustomed to in our M-cars. The M3's rear differential may be present, but it is unlikely to be offered with different settings. Same goes for the steering and suspension, which does without adaptive damping or any adjustment. The driver can choose between two different throttle maps and the usual multi-stage stability and traction control system, but that's pretty much it. While the 1 M will be sold in the US, no automatic option is planned, so it's the M3's six-speed manual gearbox for all. The 1 Series M Coupé should weigh about 1500kg, and to put that into perspective, it’s the weight of an average bloke less than the current M3 Coupé. Which is a good start, if not quite the featherweight we might have hoped for here on PH.


And any hopes for a high-revving naturally aspirated engine are quelled when the start button is pushed and the familiar straight-six rumble makes its way through the exhaust system. Under the bonnet is a reworked version of the twin-turbocharged 3.0-litre unit that powers the Z4 sDrive35is. BMW has yet to release official power and torque figures, but count on about 350hp and 340lb ft. That's a useful jump up from the 135i's 306hp and 295lb ft - and it's worth remembering that the M3's peak torque is no more than the 135i's.

From the outset it’s torque that defines the new car's performance. The straight-six yowl is accompanied by a relentless shove in the back, and pick-up from low revs is impressively strong. Thankfully, this car is louder than the quick (but a little too cultured for our liking) 135i. From standstill you're into third gear in what should be a five-second 0-62mph time. As in the M3, the gearchange is a tad springy, though it's satisfyingly mechanical and quick across the gate.


Only when you've gone up and down the gearbox a few times do you realise that there was never any danger of running into the rev limiter. The grunt tails off, making it more natural to change up and use the torque than eke out every last horsepower. While there's nothing quite like the thrill of a screaming, naturally aspirated engine, we must be realistic about the times we live in, and turbocharging offers the best balance of performance and economy.

As with the most memorable M-cars through the years, the engine does not steal the show: the 1 M's chassis is a gem. From the moment you get underway the car feels remarkably different to the 135i. The wide, low stance helps with that, but so too does a direct, well-weighted helm - there's even some feel through the thick leather bound rim. The same can be said for the brake pedal, which is firm, but easy to modulate.


More impressive than the stopping power is the stability of the car under heavy braking, even while turning (oh the beauty of testing a high performance car on unfamiliar roads...). There is little in the way of pitch or wallow on the springs; the brakes just shed speed off - and there was little sign of fade after a good thrash through some fast German countryside.

Admittedly German road builders have no interest in challenging suspension engineers, so there were precious few bumps to contend with on our test route, but a couple of surprise mid-corner blemishes were shrugged off with ease, indicating that the 1 M was developed for a wide range of driving abilities and road conditions.


Pushing on further, the limited slip differential helps with traction and endows the car with a real rear-led balance under power. That the front end is so keyed-in helps with this. In short, it won't scare the uninitiated, but experienced drivers should find enough to interest them too.

To call the 1 Series M Coupé a true successor to the E30 M3 is stretching the point. Its relative simplicity owes a little to that car, but it owes a lot more to the economic environment we find ourselves in. The 1 Series should allow the M Division to continue to flourish, by introducing younger (and less financially endowed) buyers to the brand, but first impressions suggest that price alone won't be the only reason to opt for the 1 M.







 

Author
Discussion

kambites

Original Poster:

67,575 posts

221 months

Tuesday 12th October 2010
quotequote all
So it weighs the same as the previous generation M3 (claimed by BMW to be 1495kg I think?); the steering has "some feel" (hardly a glowing endorsement); it has an engine that doesn't like to rev; and it looks like a 1-series. I think I'll give it a miss, thanks...

Shame, I think it had the potential to be a really good car.

Edited by kambites on Tuesday 12th October 11:21

kambites

Original Poster:

67,575 posts

221 months

Tuesday 12th October 2010
quotequote all
Marf said:
I'm sure BMW will very much dislike you cancelling your order.
I wouldn't have considered buying new anyway, but I would have seriously considered one second hand in a few years time if I need a small four-seater and second hand buyers do matter to car makers, since it's them that determine how badly a car depreciates.

Maybe they'll do a CSL type version in a few years' time. driving

Edited by kambites on Tuesday 12th October 11:25

kambites

Original Poster:

67,575 posts

221 months

Tuesday 12th October 2010
quotequote all
bmthnick1981 said:
Agree the market seems not be there - perhaps more 'M cars' are now bought by people who just want the badge rather than the experience. Which is a shame.
I think this is a natural progression for the M division. I have nothing against BMW for producing a car that the market clearly wants - they're a business not a charity. I just think it's a shame that one of the last companies who actually tried to produce drivers' cars has given up, even if I do accept that it was entirely the right thing for them to do from a commercial prospective.

I think the days of (relatively) affordable drivers' cars from mainstream manufacturers are over. That's not really BMW's fault, they're just the messenger.

Edited by kambites on Tuesday 12th October 15:07

kambites

Original Poster:

67,575 posts

221 months

Tuesday 12th October 2010
quotequote all
pilchardthecat said:
Google says it's 1525
Is the new Z4 based on the 1-series or 3-series or neither?

kambites

Original Poster:

67,575 posts

221 months

Wednesday 13th October 2010
quotequote all
Herman Toothrot said:
Absolutely spot on. Performance derivatives should concentrate on how the car drives, weight, throttle response, steering feedback. All modern m/// cars are now are "top of the range" I.e. most expensive. Most expensive as loaded with junk that those who want a real drivers car have no interest in. M/// is now just for those that want to say they have the most expensive, flash looking model.
Unfortunately we have to face up to the fact that we are in a minority - that's not what sells most cars. The M division's job is to produce cars that sell, and obviously they think the AMG approach works better. At least BMW are still offering a manual gearbox (for now).

I think there will always be small volume manufacturers producing drivers' cars; at least for the foreseeable future.

Edited by kambites on Wednesday 13th October 08:40

kambites

Original Poster:

67,575 posts

221 months

Wednesday 13th October 2010
quotequote all
So has anyone put a deposit down for one, and do they intend to actually buy it now they've seen the specs?

kambites

Original Poster:

67,575 posts

221 months

Wednesday 13th October 2010
quotequote all
I guess you could consider the Evora to be a competitor, albeit a much more driver-focused, less practicable one.

kambites

Original Poster:

67,575 posts

221 months

Wednesday 13th October 2010
quotequote all
chippy17 said:
kambites said:
I guess you could consider the Evora to be a competitor, albeit a much more driver-focused, less practicable one.
good call, don't bits still fall off Lotus's though wink
Not quite as often as they used to, I don't think. hehe

kambites

Original Poster:

67,575 posts

221 months

Wednesday 13th October 2010
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]

kambites

Original Poster:

67,575 posts

221 months

Wednesday 13th October 2010
quotequote all
beanbag said:
I also think those stuck in the past need to wake up and accept that pure track cars come in the form of those specifically made for that purpose. The 1 M Coupé, isn't one of those and it was never meant to be.
No-one is asking for a track car. People are lamenting the lack of, for want of a better term, a "driver interaction focused", but still practicable, road car. BMW were probably the last mainstream manufacturer to offer such a thing, and now they don't...

kambites

Original Poster:

67,575 posts

221 months

Wednesday 13th October 2010
quotequote all
Well BMW is clearly producing a car that lots of people want. They could never please everyone, so they've chosen to please the (presumably larger number of) people who want a softer, less driver-centric car. Obviously those of us who wanted the other kind of car will be disappointed, especially because no-one else really offers such a car.

BMW will just have to hope that they can poach enough AMG customers to replace the people they've lost at the other end of the spectrum. I have no reason to believe that they will not be able to.

kambites

Original Poster:

67,575 posts

221 months

Wednesday 13th October 2010
quotequote all
Dagnut said:
RudeDog said:
Dagnut said:
So comparing it to the Cayman S.

The 135i had the Cayman S licked around a circuit, this car is lighter, more powerful with a better chassis set up and an M3 diff. So for those of you claiming it to be a "mini grand tourer", whatever the fk that is, I willing to bet this car will be savagely quick on a circuit as well as the road
Which circuit did the 135i have the CS licked on?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3comQxPNWI
That's a Cayman, not a Cayman S, isn't it?

kambites

Original Poster:

67,575 posts

221 months

Wednesday 13th October 2010
quotequote all
Dagnut said:
Sorry how is this car "softer", what are people comparing this car to? a E30 M3 Evo?
The E36 wasn't hardcore or driver focused or the E46 for that, matter both where comfortable compliant cars.
I wasn't attempting to compare it to anything in particular, just to what I had hoped (but not really expected) they would produce. By "softer", I didn't mean suspension compliance, I meant lack of focus. The article picks up on the torque curve designed not to encourage you to rev the engine and (via a rather backhanded complement) the lack of steering feel. That was the kind of thing I meant.

I wasn't only referring to this car, really, either. All of the current M-cars are engineering master-pieces. They're just, in one way or another, rather... dull.

ETA: This is by no means a "BMW" problem, all modern cars are going the same way. I just wish someone would buck the trend.

Edited by kambites on Wednesday 13th October 15:47

kambites

Original Poster:

67,575 posts

221 months

Wednesday 13th October 2010
quotequote all
The small increase in risk from driving a car built like the E30 is a small price to pay for a car that I'd actually enjoy driving. I don't exactly make a habit of crashing.

I can understand how many people who prefer the safety, but those of us who wouldn't don't even get the choice. Well I suppose we do, we can always buy old cars.

Edited by kambites on Wednesday 13th October 15:56

kambites

Original Poster:

67,575 posts

221 months

Wednesday 13th October 2010
quotequote all
Better for you...

I find even the Elise abit too sensible and refined for a daily driver. hehe

kambites

Original Poster:

67,575 posts

221 months

Wednesday 13th October 2010
quotequote all
chippy17 said:
but with modern technologies can a car not be lighter and safe

is it all the mod cons that weigh the car down?
For all the advances in the materials used in high end cars, mainstream models still use much the same chassis designs and materials that they have for 40 years, just with much more metal for strength. Just try picking up a modern car door to get an idea of the weight of a side impact beam...

Unless someone comes up with a way of producing carbon fibre cheaply, I can't see that changing any time soon.

Edited by kambites on Wednesday 13th October 16:21

kambites

Original Poster:

67,575 posts

221 months

Wednesday 13th October 2010
quotequote all
From a business perspective I'm sure this was the right car to build. That doesn't mean I can't be annoyed with it from a selfish perspective, though.

kambites

Original Poster:

67,575 posts

221 months

Thursday 14th October 2010
quotequote all
Wolands Advocate said:
What is it about BMWs that really get the keyboard warriors going? It's almost comical.
Well they do kind of ask for it with their "the ultimate driving machine" tag.

Edited by kambites on Thursday 14th October 11:25

kambites

Original Poster:

67,575 posts

221 months

Wednesday 20th October 2010
quotequote all
aeropilot said:
havoc said:
pilchardthecat said:
According to my local dealer these are going to be "just over £40k" so probably about £45kish with a few options.
Same as a 6mth old M3 then.
laugh

I haven't found one much under 2 years old for £40k....let alone 6 months old.
http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/1842662.htm ? He did say 45k.

Edited by kambites on Wednesday 20th October 14:11

kambites

Original Poster:

67,575 posts

221 months

Wednesday 20th October 2010
quotequote all
E21_Ross said:
seriously?! that's terrible. old man manages to average 19-20mpg in his M3 and that's a mix of town and motorway and he doesn't exactly drive like a granny.
In my experience, normally aspirated engines tend to get much closer to their "official" figure than turbocharged ones.