Banned without enough explanation.

Banned without enough explanation.

Author
Discussion

Blukoo

Original Poster:

3,812 posts

198 months

Saturday 26th July 2014
quotequote all
I have been a member of the Pistonheads forum since the 21st of November 2007.

That's 6 years, 8 months, and 5 days.

I have been a long term contributor of images in the threads, "Random Photos" (from Part 1 - Part 4 if I remember correctly), and "Why are there so few car photographs?".

The past few months have seen me receive multiple emails from the "noreply@pistonheads.com" team with notification of removal for several images I have posted.

Like most photographers, I rarely upload an image without a watermark in order to protect my media. Unfortunately the chosen watermark was classed as inappropriate and I received an email which stated,


"Hi,

Your reply to the topic 'Why are there so few car photographs?' has been removed for the following reason:

Sorry but your posting style is now deemed as advertising and this post has therefore been removed,

Regards,
PistonHeads".


The email was rather vague and addressed "noreply" so I was unable to discuss the issue and therefore I was also unable to prevent a repeat situation.


Thirty three minutes later I received the following email for another post;


"Hi,

Your reply to the topic 'Random Photos : Part 4' has been removed for the following reason:

Your post has been deemed an advert and therefore removed.

Regards,
PistonHeads"



Once again, the email was vague and I was unable to reply to the sender to find out what rules I had broken.

It was only after making a separate thread in the "Photography & Video" sub-forum when I realised the issue was the inclusion of my contact details in my watermark.

Assuming this is the issue, and it had been pointed out to me earlier then I could have rectified the problem.


Now I know I need to edit my watermark, I'd like to be allowed access to the "Random Photos" and the "Why are there so few car photographs?" threads forum.

Blukoo

Original Poster:

3,812 posts

198 months

Monday 28th July 2014
quotequote all
Big Al. said:
Murray, I've raised a report regarding this subject (in general) I don't expect too many mods to be about over a sunny weekend, and Nathan is on his hols.

We do see some inconsistencies in policy in some forums and we've asked HM to address these and perhaps come up with a standard set of rules.
I just want to be unbanned for two of my favourite topics frown

Blukoo

Original Poster:

3,812 posts

198 months

Wednesday 13th August 2014
quotequote all
Any development on this situation?