Paid marshalls a good thing?

Paid marshalls a good thing?

Author
Discussion

LaSarthe+Back

Original Poster:

2,084 posts

214 months

Monday 22nd October 2007
quotequote all
Reading on Autosport that Di Montezemolo would like to see professional stewards employed at race meetings instead of "amateurs at large". Would you think this is a good thing, in that they know what they are doing/looking for, and how to do it.

Or is it a bad thing because the unpaid amateur will have passion for the sport and is not susceptible to unscrupulous behaviour from certain parties.

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/63587

LaSarthe+Back

Original Poster:

2,084 posts

214 months

Monday 22nd October 2007
quotequote all
Well, yes, that's what I was hinting at, but given that Autosport had not made any such angle of it, I wondered if there was something I'd not considered.

LaSarthe+Back

Original Poster:

2,084 posts

214 months

Monday 22nd October 2007
quotequote all
flemke said:
LaSarthe+Back said:
Well, yes, that's what I was hinting at, but given that Autosport had not made any such angle of it, I wondered if there was something I'd not considered.
In the article, he is quoted as using the word "stewards". Do you think he meant "marshals"?
Sorry, my mistake. I meant the people who make race (and championship) deciding calls.

Again, sorry. smile