Are non turbo Ferraris going to hold value?
Discussion
Is it just me or are the non turbo Ferrari Californias losing less money now than the California T ? I prefer the noise and character of the non turbos - am I right ? Could it be cheaper to get a California T than an older model in a few years ? The T s are more powerful but it’s basically a fast convertible cruiser , not a track car so I can imagine people going for the non turbo in the future - any one else ?
I tested a Cali T but ended up buying an older one mainly due to the noise ! Also some of the modern touches like not having indicator stalks got on my nerves . .
I think if you purely use the car a weekend toy you can put up with quirks but sometimes a decent stereo and sat nav is nice to have . . I think I often miss this in older cars - not when I’m just cruising around town but stuck in motorway traffic . .
I think if you purely use the car a weekend toy you can put up with quirks but sometimes a decent stereo and sat nav is nice to have . . I think I often miss this in older cars - not when I’m just cruising around town but stuck in motorway traffic . .
I’m tall so there weren’t many Hard top convertibles that I could fit in comfortably for a few hours ! The California is more comfortable than a lot of family cars for me . .
The stereo as a bit ancient though - you’d probably get a more user friendly stereo in a Ford Fiesta of the same age
The stereo as a bit ancient though - you’d probably get a more user friendly stereo in a Ford Fiesta of the same age
Gassing Station | Supercar General | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff