Fuel Pump Question
Discussion
Once you turn the ignition, does the fuel pump then constantly turn, or only as required?? I have a vague idea that this is controlled by a pressure switch in the pump.
More importantly once you turn the key does the fuel pump have a constant power supply to it?
(this is specifically for a 1998 Clio Mk1 Ph3 1.2 D7F 'diet' engine but general adivce is good too!)
More importantly once you turn the key does the fuel pump have a constant power supply to it?
(this is specifically for a 1998 Clio Mk1 Ph3 1.2 D7F 'diet' engine but general adivce is good too!)
Edited by Glade on Friday 5th October 13:08
stevieturbo said:
It will prime for a few seconds initially.
But generally, unless the engine is turning, the pump will be off.
Cheers,But generally, unless the engine is turning, the pump will be off.
Does the fuel pump have a permenant live feed once the ignition is on. Then the fuel pump turns itself on and off using a fuel pressure switch... or does the ECU tell the fuel pump when to operate?
(My remote central locking is shafted and the fuel pump won't operate unless the car is unlocked using the remote. I want to put a wire from a switched live, to the fuel pump relay (fia the fuel cut-out switch) so that it gets switched on by the ignition rather than the central locking/ECU)
Edited by Glade on Friday 5th October 15:05
I have done some research.
If it is a "flow and return" system the fuel pump is always on, pressure is controlled by the fuel regulator, excess fuel is returned to the tank.
If it is a 'returnless' system then the ECU tells the pump the demmand and it pumps accordingly.
Because the car is 1998 french poverty spec I'm guessing it'll be the more basic system. I'm going to stick a multimeter on the fuel pump and see when it has power, and go from there.
If it is a "flow and return" system the fuel pump is always on, pressure is controlled by the fuel regulator, excess fuel is returned to the tank.
If it is a 'returnless' system then the ECU tells the pump the demmand and it pumps accordingly.
Because the car is 1998 french poverty spec I'm guessing it'll be the more basic system. I'm going to stick a multimeter on the fuel pump and see when it has power, and go from there.
stevieturbo said:
Glade said:
I have done some research.
If it is a "flow and return" system the fuel pump is always on, pressure is controlled by the fuel regulator, excess fuel is returned to the tank.
If it is a 'returnless' system then the ECU tells the pump the demmand and it pumps accordingly.
Because the car is 1998 french poverty spec I'm guessing it'll be the more basic system. I'm going to stick a multimeter on the fuel pump and see when it has power, and go from there.
Not sure where you are getting your research from, because you are wrong.If it is a "flow and return" system the fuel pump is always on, pressure is controlled by the fuel regulator, excess fuel is returned to the tank.
If it is a 'returnless' system then the ECU tells the pump the demmand and it pumps accordingly.
Because the car is 1998 french poverty spec I'm guessing it'll be the more basic system. I'm going to stick a multimeter on the fuel pump and see when it has power, and go from there.
ALL modern efi systems run as I described in my first post.
Anyway its irrelavent now because the immobiliser doesn't just cut the fuel pump as i hoped, it disables the injectors too by the looks of things.
Just going to have to hope that the central locking reciever (located by the interior light) doesn't get too badly damaged by the leaky sunroof (a common fault) and leave me stranded At the moment its stuck behind the sunvisor and is starting to get on my tits.
Edited by Glade on Friday 5th October 19:55
GreenV8S said:
That Daddy said:
not convinced of any benefits though
Cost is the only significant benefit I think - you halve the amount of fuel pipe.With a fuel return & regulator the fuel pump is always on at the same [high] level. The pressure is controlled by the regulator rather than the ecu varying (sp?) the load on the pump as in a returnless system. of course i could be wrong.
Stevie: car was free so can't complain. daily hack for the winter. cheap motoring makes it worth it!!
The turd:
stevieturbo said:
Glade said:
I think that with a returnless system, the load on the fuel pump will be less (on average) giving it a longer life.
With a fuel return & regulator the fuel pump is always on at the same [high] level. The pressure is controlled by the regulator rather than the ecu varying (sp?) the load on the pump as in a returnless system. of course i could be wrong.
Regulator is in the tank. So it will make no difference to pump life whatsoever. Its still pumping the same pressures all the time.With a fuel return & regulator the fuel pump is always on at the same [high] level. The pressure is controlled by the regulator rather than the ecu varying (sp?) the load on the pump as in a returnless system. of course i could be wrong.
Only difference is manufacturing costs to assemble a conventional return style fuel system, when it probably isnt needed.
I can't find the article i was reading that mentioned pump life as a benefit now... typical.
http://autospeed.com/cms/A_2636/article.html
[quote]In conventional systems, the fuel pressure regulator uses a diaphragm that’s backed by a spring and an intake manifold connection. This causes fuel pressure to vary with manifold pressure – in other words, when there is a strong vacuum in the manifold (eg at light load cruise) the fuel pressure is lower than at wide open throttle, when manifold vacuum is less.
Gassing Station | Engines & Drivetrain | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff