Defender 90 Rear Bulkhead?

Defender 90 Rear Bulkhead?

Author
Discussion

Doofus

Original Poster:

25,848 posts

174 months

Saturday 16th September 2017
quotequote all
Did any 90 SWs come with the bulkhead behind the front sests, or was that unique to the Utility?

Is it a retro fit item, or would I need to buy a Utility and retrofit the side windows and SW seats and belts?

Doofus

Original Poster:

25,848 posts

174 months

Saturday 16th September 2017
quotequote all
I'm wanting an SW with the bulkhead.

Doofus

Original Poster:

25,848 posts

174 months

Wednesday 20th September 2017
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
Most 90's have the bulkhead. NAS spec where the first to use the tubular. Then I think it was optional or available on TD5 models onwards. Older Tdi's will have it.
I'm looking for a later TDCi, and I've not seen a single SW with a bulkhead...

Doofus

Original Poster:

25,848 posts

174 months

Wednesday 20th September 2017
quotequote all
Crossflow Kid said:
You won't.
Pumas are much more difficult/impossible to convert from utility to SW as the rear tub is significantly different to accommodate forward-facing rear seats.
Bench seats aren't legal in a Puma either.
Interesting, thanks. I guess I'll look at welding a steel mesh or some sort of panel onto the bar in a SW. I don't want the rear seats anyway, so they can live in the garage...

Doofus

Original Poster:

25,848 posts

174 months

Wednesday 20th September 2017
quotequote all
Crossflow Kid said:
Sounds like you're after a utility body but with windows in which case it'd be far more economical and straight forward to buy a van (with bulkhead) and fit windows to it.
Yes. This is what I said before. But would that make the side-facing seats illegal if they aren't legal in a SW? I don't need them, but it would seem silly to render them unusable.

Doofus

Original Poster:

25,848 posts

174 months

Wednesday 20th September 2017
quotequote all
I don't really want them, but why buy a Defender and render the pre-existing seats useless for the next owner? I've seen HTs with rear seats (inward facing), and if I get one of those and put in side windows, then it sounds like I'd be making those rear seats illegal.

I'd be better off buying a SW and welding in a mesh or sheet to create a bulkhead. At least that would be reversible.

Doofus

Original Poster:

25,848 posts

174 months

Wednesday 20th September 2017
quotequote all
SantaBarbara said:
Do you know the history of your vehicle?

Has it always been a civilian spec, or was it ever a military vehicle?
I haven't got one.

Doofus

Original Poster:

25,848 posts

174 months

Wednesday 20th September 2017
quotequote all
Crossflow Kid said:
I think you may need to understand a bit better the seating issue.
Retro-fitted seats have to be compliant for the age of vehcile, and inward-facing seats in a Puma-era wagon aren't.
If you've seen a hardtop with bench seats it's either an older truck or it's non-compliant.
It isn't the windows that cause the issue, it's the type of seats. Rear seats in a Puma MUST face forwards and have three-point belts.
Understood. Thank you. smile