Any year safe m272 engine

Any year safe m272 engine

Author
Discussion

rongagin

Original Poster:

481 posts

137 months

Wednesday 14th November 2018
quotequote all
Never had a Mercedes and I am trying to learn about my intended purchase of a SLK 350 or maybe 280. The engines seem to have a reputation for timing chain problems, the sprockets seem to wear? However I read that after 2007 Mercedes had cured this problem.
So my questions are.
Has the timing chain problem gone after 2007
Is the timing chain a preventative maintenance, that is to say, change it and tensioners before a problem occurs say at 80k miles?
Lastly any other top tips for the buying of an SLK V6 and is the 200 184 with a pulley change, over 200 bhp I believe, a viable option?
Thanks

rongagin

Original Poster:

481 posts

137 months

Thursday 15th November 2018
quotequote all
Thank you for the response.
Looks like the 2009 model is the best of both worlds, higher power with lower tax. Hopefully with a more reliable engine?
Higher cost but I presume higher value come resale?

rongagin

Original Poster:

481 posts

137 months

Thursday 15th November 2018
quotequote all
timbo999 said:
The R172 SLK 350 is a bloody lovely car with a brilliant engine... just don't buy a red (Fire Opal) one!
Haha why?

rongagin

Original Poster:

481 posts

137 months

Thursday 15th November 2018
quotequote all
AREA said:
M272 issue is down to balance shaft gear wearing.

Quickly looking through my notes on this, from engine number 2729..30 468993 part was improved.


Useful article here: http://www.mercedesmedic.com/check-my-mercedes-ben...
Thank you, does that equate to a year. If I am looking at a car which is miles away how do I match to your engine numbers?

rongagin

Original Poster:

481 posts

137 months

Friday 16th November 2018
quotequote all
Thank you

rongagin

Original Poster:

481 posts

137 months

Wednesday 21st August 2019
quotequote all
I’m the OP, in the end I went for a 2009 facelift 350. It ticked a lot of boxes like 305bhp, lower tax (over £200 cheaper) and supposedly 650 changes/upgrades according to MB. The issues like the timing chain shaft ‘should’ not be a problem.
I am on a couple of slk forums and the r171 especially it seems of 2005/2006 years suffer badly with subframe rusting. This part is £700+ and takes another £300-500 to fit. So check very carefully, they rust right through and literally can split in two. Later cars or earlier seems better.

rongagin

Original Poster:

481 posts

137 months

Thursday 22nd August 2019
quotequote all
mikal83 said:
Which subframe
The rear subframe which is fairly substantial but can rust very badly.