RE:BMW M3 and M4: preview

RE:BMW M3 and M4: preview

Friday 9th May 2014

BMW M3 and M4: preview

10 reasons why we're excited to be driving the new M3 and M4 today



As you read this PH will (hopefully) be on a plane to go and drive the new M3 and M4. Hard life, etc. To get us all up to speed and get all the number crunching out of the way ahead of those all-important driving impressions here are 10 reasons we're particularly excited to be driving the all-new M...


10 - It's not bound by history or sentimentality
Many iconic cars are, to some extent, locked into their past. As long as there's a 911 it'll have a flat six in the rear, a Subaru's not a Subaru without a boxer engine and AMG is honour and duty bound to fit its C63 successor with a sodding great V8 no matter what. But the M3 isn't quite so hamstrung by history. Over the years it's been powered by in-line fours, straight-sixes and V8s. It's gone from being a pure homologation special born on the track to something more luxurious and rounded. And then, in spirit and special cases, back again. It's been a two-door, a four-door and a cabrio. Core elements remain - it's still rear-driven and recognisably evolved from the everyday 3 Series and 4 Series, albeit seriously pumped up. But this freedom from the chains of nostalgia gives BMW greater scope to choose the best bits for the new car, not just the ones fans with one foot in the past demand as a reflex action.

It's bigger and cleverer ... but lighter too
It's bigger and cleverer ... but lighter too
9 - It's got fit, not fat
We'll concentrate on the M4 for a moment and compare it with its outgoing equivalent, the E92 M3 coupe. 56mm longer, there's an additional 51mm in the wheelbase and 66mm of additional width. Track is up by 39mm front and a significant 64mm rear. Given the way things are going and the added complexity of twin turbos and associated cooling and lubrication systems you'd assume a weight penalty. In fact it's significantly lighter; a manual M4 is 83kg trimmer than a manual E92 M3. OK, 1,572kg (by the EU measure, with driver) isn't exactly lightweight but given the complexity and toy count it's not bad and BMW is to be commended for shaving weight wherever possible. The carbon propshaft is 40 per cent lighter, meaning no need for a central bearing, the output shafts from the diff are hollow, carbon fibre is used extensively for body panels, including the roof on both the saloon and coupe (worth 5kg and 6kg respectively) and boot spoiler on the coupe.

8 - There's still a manual - and a reason to have it
Given the way the market is going, from Clio Renaultsports to GT3s, we assumed there'd be no manual option for the M3 and M4. And even debated that in a Tell Me I'm Wrong. Well, we WERE wrong. There is a six-speed manual option - now with rev-matching downshifts - and if you're purist enough to want it you'll be doubly pleased to learn it saves 40kg over the seven-speed M DCT option and is 12kg lighter than the previous transmission. Temptations to tick that M DCT box remain compelling though, not least the wider spread of ratios, gizmos like launch control and Stability Clutch Control (the latter opening the clutch in certain conditions to reduce understeer) and additional improvements to CO2 and mpg. But credit to BMW for at least offering us the choice.

Don't fear the turbo, at least when M's on the case
Don't fear the turbo, at least when M's on the case
7 - It's turbocharging, the M way
After the disappointment of piped in engine noise through the speakers and a general lack of soul in its twin-turbo V8 in the M5 and M6 it'd seem the M division has been listening and worked hard to give the M3's bespoke twin-turbo six the kind of character we associate with previous naturally aspirated motors. The two turbos of the M TwinPower Turbo installation are small and geared for inertia rather than diesel-like torque delivery, even if the 40 per cent torque increase to 406lb ft makes its presence felt from just 1,850rpm. In the E9X you had to wait until 3,900rpm for your relatively meagre 295lb ft... This in addition to a 25 per cent improvement in CO2 - 204g/km for the manual and 194g/km M DCT and 32.1mpg and 34mpg respectively. This isn't a low-rev slugger though; BMW is proud to point out it'll rev to 7,600rpm and describes the engine as 'specifically developed for this purpose' with features like a closed deck block and lightweight forged crankshaft to work with the carbon propshaft for reduced inertia and improved response. The turbos keep spinning even when you come off the throttle too, meaning instant response when you get back on it, and an 'indirect' intercooler mounted on top of the engine and concealed beneath the bonnet's powerdome is designed to maintain charge pressure and temperature even under high loads. Meanwhile a baffled magnesium sump keeps oil where it's needed under high cornering loads and the oil supply to the turbos is geared up 'maintain stable oil circulation' in all conditions. In other words the engine and transmission have been designed to deliver on the promise no matter how hard you're driving. Which brings us to...

M3 with decent brakes - had to happen one day
M3 with decent brakes - had to happen one day
6 - It's got decent brakes at last
For some reason a consistent blind spot in previous M3 development. In a world where even hot hatches get branded Brembo calipers BMW really couldn't afford to drop the ball this time round and while we'll have to see how the standard brakes fair on the track there is at last the option of M Carbon ceramics. A £7,395 option on an M5 just don't expect them to be cheap. But for anyone who's driven an M3 on track and had to back off after just a few laps with a soggy brake pedal and smoking pads it'll be a price worth paying. Plus you get blingy gold calipers to let everyone know how hardcore you are.

 

Forget a carbon bonnet - let's have a clear one
Forget a carbon bonnet - let's have a clear one
5 - Feedback is king
True to say, when we specced our PH Fleet 435i M Sport we reckoned we'd sneaked an M4 Lite on the sly. Perhaps it was this expectation but the driving experience disappointed, from the numb steering to the underwhelming damping and general vagueness. Clearly the M division has decided it needs clear ground between the M3/M4 and even the top of the range regular equivalents, seemingly going all-out to give the new cars the kind of steering response and feedback keen drivers crave. That beautiful sweeping carbon strut brace - just 1.5kg's worth - is the visual clue to the fight to increase stiffness and therefore response and beneath that the forged aluminium suspension components move on ball joints rather than bushings and have additional bracing and fixings between subframe and body to reduce slack. At the back the rear subframe is solidly mounted to the body, so it'll be interesting to see how BMW has tuned that to generate NVH that delivers positive feedback to the driver rather than annoying vibration and clunks. UK cars also get three-mode Adaptive M dampers as standard, the Comfort, Sport and Sport+ modes also adjusting the weighting in the - whisper it - electrically assisted steering.

4 - PH has specced one and we'll be sharing the fun
As you may have gathered, we've run a competition to spec up an official PistonHeads M4 that'll be making public appearances throughout the summer at various events. There'll be opportunities to get up close and personal with the car and, of course, we'll be writing about it extensively. More on this car very shortly...

Promo vid confirms it; skids are still on menu
Promo vid confirms it; skids are still on menu
3 - It's built to go sideways
It wouldn't be a proper M3 if it didn't go sideways and since the introduction of the Variable M Differential on the E46 the car's reputation as a drift king has been sealed. Now, we all know going sideways isn't the be-all and end-all. But, dammit, every now and then it's a lot of fun. So we'll draw your attention to this line in the official press release on the car with reference to the all-new Active M Differential: "The M Dynamic Mode - a sub-function of the Dynamic Stability Control (DSC) system - allows enthusiastic drivers to probe the limits of the new cars while retaining an electronic safety net at all times. The system tolerates greater wheel slip and therefore easy drifting." We'd like to think we're enthusiastic drivers. And easy drifting sounds right up our street. Throw in that aforementioned focus on sharper throttle response via the lightweight crankshaft, fast spooling turbos and carbon propshaft and it's all looking promising. At this point we probably need to hand the keys to that bloke Harris...

Looks the biz; let's hope it lives up to it
Looks the biz; let's hope it lives up to it
2 - Nobody's going to mistake it for an M Sport 3 or 4 Series
For all the M branded gilding available for lesser 3 Series and 4 Series models there has to be absolutely no doubt when you're looking at the real deal. But at the same time there has to be a degree of need to know; an M3 has to be a car you can drive every day drawing the right attention when you want it and slipping under the radar when you don't. Tricky balance to strike but both the four-door and coupe look to have nailed it. And the spec is generous too, UK cars getting aforementioned adjustable dampers as standard and Ferric Grey 19-inch wheels. Brits also get the full BMW Professional Media, heated/powered seats and mirrors, and front and rear parking sensors. Which, for £56,175 for the saloon and £56,635 for the coupe, doesn't actually sound all bad when you consider the outgoing car started at £54,945 for a manual coupe.

Whisper it but the four-door looks cooler
Whisper it but the four-door looks cooler
1 - The M3 is dead - long live the M3!
By creating the 4 Series BMW backed itself into a corner - to keep the M3 name alive it HAD to make a saloon version. And, whisper it, the four-door could actually be the cooler choice, not just because it maintains that celebrated badge. Good as the M4 looks that name still doesn't sound right. And there's something about the way the rear doors accentuate the extra rear track that just makes the saloon look even meaner and more hunkered down...

 



BMW M3
Engine:
2,979cc 6-cyl twin-turbo
Transmission: 6-speed manual/7-speed dual-clutch auto (M DCT), rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 431@5,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 406@1,850-5,500rpm
0-62mph: 4.3 sec/4.1 sec M DCT
Top speed: 155mph (limited)
Weight: 1,595kg/1,635kg M DCT (EU, with driver)
MPG: 32.1mpg/34mpg M DCT (NEDC combined)
CO2: 204g/km/194g/km M DCT
Price: £56,175 (Basic OTR)

BMW M4
Engine:
2,979cc 6-cyl twin-turbo
Transmission: 6-speed manual/7-speed dual-clutch auto (M DCT), rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 431@5,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 406@1,850-5,500rpm
0-62mph: 4.3 sec/4.1 sec M DCT
Top speed: 155mph (limited)
Weight: 1,572kg/1,612kg M DCT (EU, with driver)
MPG: 32.1mpg/34mpg M DCT (NEDC combined)
CO2: 204g/km/194g/km M DCT
Price: £56,635 (Basic OTR)

Official promo vid here

   
   
   
   

 

   
   
   
   

 

Author
Discussion

mlhj83

Original Poster:

160 posts

155 months

Friday 9th May 2014
quotequote all
Nicely done on the accuracy of reporting weight and defining it.

tim milne

344 posts

234 months

Friday 9th May 2014
quotequote all
11. We're going to rinse as much news out of this as possible—like politicians who leak the speeches they're going to make

Catatafish

1,361 posts

146 months

Friday 9th May 2014
quotequote all
tim milne said:
11. We're going to rinse as much news out of this as possible—like politicians who leak the speeches they're going to make
I don't mind. It's the first non-hypercar performance car that I've been interested in for ages...

Mermaid

21,492 posts

172 months

Friday 9th May 2014
quotequote all

Amazing value for money, compared to the competition and all prior M3's.

g3org3y

20,644 posts

192 months

Friday 9th May 2014
quotequote all
Do want.

Matt UK

17,739 posts

201 months

Friday 9th May 2014
quotequote all
Oooh, manual M3 for me please!

jon-

16,511 posts

217 months

Friday 9th May 2014
quotequote all
"The M Dynamic Mode - a sub-function of the Dynamic Stability Control (DSC) system - allows enthusiastic drivers to probe the limits of the new cars while retaining an electronic safety net at all times. The system tolerates greater wheel slip and therefore easy drifting."

This mode has never allowed for enough slip for proper drifting, or anything much more than a slight wiggle, and there's no reason it should in the new M3/4.

As long as they let us turn everything off who cares.

arkenphel

484 posts

206 months

Friday 9th May 2014
quotequote all
OOOhhhh, i'm getting interested now. I'm quite tempted to chop in my E92 M3, but I'll probably wait for the facelift to come out first. I'm not tired of the V8 noise yet....

Mermaid

21,492 posts

172 months

Friday 9th May 2014
quotequote all
arkenphel said:
OOOhhhh, i'm getting interested now. I'm quite tempted to chop in my E92 M3, but I'll probably wait for the facelift to come out first. I'm not tired of the V8 noise yet....
I expect much better fuel consumption on the new one, more torque, better handling. Do like the E92 but expect it will go the way of the E39 M5.

leon9191

752 posts

194 months

Friday 9th May 2014
quotequote all
Mermaid said:
arkenphel said:
OOOhhhh, i'm getting interested now. I'm quite tempted to chop in my E92 M3, but I'll probably wait for the facelift to come out first. I'm not tired of the V8 noise yet....
I expect much better fuel consumption on the new one, more torque, better handling. Do like the E92 but expect it will go the way of the E39 M5.
What it will be a cult classic?

I am holding off buying an E92 to replace my 911 as I think they will come down quite a bit in coming months. Or I could dive straight into one of these!

ManOpener

12,467 posts

170 months

Friday 9th May 2014
quotequote all
Yet again, as with every generation of M3 in which a 4-door was made, it's the better looking option.

jon-

16,511 posts

217 months

Friday 9th May 2014
quotequote all
As someone on the other thread pointed out, that bonnet shut line across the top of the badge is awful.

Thank you EU. Thank you.

kayzee

2,827 posts

182 months

Friday 9th May 2014
quotequote all
ManOpener said:
Yet again, as with every generation of M3 in which a 4-door was made, it's the better looking option.
Totally don't agree with this... either way they should have kept the badging the other way round, seems a shame!

Can't wait to see one, atm I'm not totally convinced. I just love the 1M & E92 so much, but, it does look properly wide and purposeful! Lovely.

brakes

104 posts

141 months

Friday 9th May 2014
quotequote all
Mmmm I'll take the coop in Estoril please.

Schermerhorn

4,343 posts

190 months

Friday 9th May 2014
quotequote all
Saloon - meh

Coupe - looks awesome!

BeirutTaxi

6,631 posts

215 months

Friday 9th May 2014
quotequote all
Don't understand the dig at the previous M3's brakes, it was a road car with brakes designed for the road and they were fine.

Road pads need to work under all sorts of conditions, so you can't really have a dig at BMW for kitting it with pads that need to work at -20 degrees celcius. If you're on a track , then the pads need to be changed because you're using the car outside of the intended environment.

Ceramics aren't necessary on a road car unless you like high disc replacement costs. A well setup system with steel discs and high spec pads will cope fine with no problems.

Edited by BeirutTaxi on Friday 9th May 12:53

gjf764

1,307 posts

176 months

Friday 9th May 2014
quotequote all
Convertible for me please!

Stenn

2,248 posts

135 months

Friday 9th May 2014
quotequote all
Matt UK said:
Oooh, manual M3 for me please!
Same. I wonder how many people will go for the manual box.. a tiny amount I imagine.

DLovett

329 posts

164 months

Friday 9th May 2014
quotequote all
The Autocar review seems lukewarm at best. At the heart and soul of every M car is it's engine, and this one seems a massive turbocharged disappointment.

BeirutTaxi

6,631 posts

215 months

Friday 9th May 2014
quotequote all
DLovett said:
The Autocar review seems lukewarm at best. At the heart and soul of every M car is it's engine, and this one seems a massive turbocharged disappointment.
Reviews don't typically review long term, exaggerate issues or miss the point of the car. Two examples that spring to mind:

>EVO review of the previous generation Audi S8, which to me seemed to criticise a big barge for being a big barge.

> Various Audi suspension complaints. No idea what the issue is, I've been in an RS4, A5 S-line, A3s of various sorts and I've never felt the ride to be uncomfortable.

Edited by BeirutTaxi on Friday 9th May 13:55


Edited by BeirutTaxi on Friday 9th May 13:56