Tell me all about the Toyota mk3 MR2

Tell me all about the Toyota mk3 MR2

Author
Discussion

Jaguar steve

Original Poster:

9,232 posts

223 months

Sunday 4th January 2015
quotequote all
Mrs JS has just done a bit of unscheduled off roading in her MG TF and I'm guessing it'll be written off when the assessor has a look tomorrow.

One slightly less obvious choice for a replacement is a MR2 - any thoughts or advice? Seem to be a few quite reasonable examples about between 3-4 grand.

...and no, an MX5 won't do. Good ones are over budget.

Fattyfat

3,308 posts

209 months

Sunday 4th January 2015
quotequote all
Just sold my 2002 pre facelift.

I'd be looking at a 2003 onwards, engine less prone to borkage apparently (precats, rings and oil usage - google it) and has a 6 speed box, larger rear tyres and IIRC different suspension geo.

Other than that look for water ingress into the headlamps, crusty rear cross members and sticky brake calipers. Clutches don't seem to last a lifetime but are cheap. These cars are tyre sensitive, correct sizes and decent brands pretty essential

Brilliant to drive. Not at all quick, nippy at best. Usual checks for accident damage and repair, still can bite with the mid engine layout in inexperienced hands. Doesn't rot anything like a MX-5 though.

Water tight roof with a proper glass screen, well screwed together and being a small Toyota you know it'll be pretty reliable (issues mentioned aside) Faff all storage, just the 'frunk' and some space behind the seats.

Hardtop, leather and AC would be desirable in my book.


Robert Elise

956 posts

158 months

Sunday 4th January 2015
quotequote all
i like your style. Mrs has an off in an FF and you think about a mid-engined MR2
Nice choice of fun car though. MK3 well sorted.

Rickyy

6,618 posts

232 months

Sunday 4th January 2015
quotequote all
Robert Elise said:
i like your style. Mrs has an off in an FF and you think about a mid-engined MR2
Nice choice of fun car though. MK3 well sorted.
An MG-TF has an MR layout, the same as an MR2.

budfox

1,510 posts

142 months

Sunday 4th January 2015
quotequote all
I owned one for a couple of years and it was my most regretted car sale when it went. (Promised son a car when he was 17, didn't want 3 cars in the household).

Mine looked great (in a VERY rare deep metallic green), was faultlessly reliable, great fun to drive, cheap to insure and economical too.

I'd have one over an MX-5 in a heartbeat unless I absolutely had to have a small sports car with a boot.

The last 300 were branded TF300 and you might well find one of those, there always a few for sale. They have a nice exhaust, 1/2 leather and a few other bits.

Look out for lacquer coming off of the alloys. They all suffered from that.

soad

33,775 posts

189 months

Sunday 4th January 2015
quotequote all
+ Great fun to drive.
More minimalist than previous version.
Goes and handles just like a sports-inspired roadster should.

- Virtually no luggage space.
A broken rear window means replacing the whole hood.
Dangerous hidden corrosion to rear crossmember.

Robert Elise

956 posts

158 months

Sunday 4th January 2015
quotequote all
Rickyy said:
Robert Elise said:
i like your style. Mrs has an off in an FF and you think about a mid-engined MR2
Nice choice of fun car though. MK3 well sorted.
An MG-TF has an MR layout, the same as an MR2.
oops, for some reason i thought of zr /zt. always think of the roadsters as just MGFs.
MR2 will do nicely then.

Willhire89

1,398 posts

218 months

Sunday 4th January 2015
quotequote all
PM me if you would like to try one - we are as North in Essex as you can be

Black on an 03, 6 speed, three owners, factory hardtop, original wheels, leather, 80k, AC


Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

259 months

Sunday 4th January 2015
quotequote all
IMO the MR2 is a great little car. Absolutely loved it when I had a drive of one. Personally I wouldn't cross the road for an MG.

rallycross

13,420 posts

250 months

Sunday 4th January 2015
quotequote all
Terrific little cars and much better to drive than the old MG ( have owned both).

Ideally get a 2004 onwards model with 6 speed and hardtop and leather.

Great handling, cheap to run, good MPG and robust ( my last one was on 140,000 miles but drove just as well as my previous one which had only done 39,000 miles).

Noisy on the move without the hard top, as long as you have somewhere to store it in summer.
Air con is a rare option on these but no big deal on convertible, leather is a nice option the cloth seats are horrible.

Engine warning light is common on these for the vvc controller - fiddly to fix but not expensive.

Escy

4,077 posts

162 months

Sunday 4th January 2015
quotequote all
They are excellent cars. Even better when fitted with the 190bhp engine out of a Corolla T-Sport, it gives them the straight line speed and the noise to match the chassis. censoredwink



nono Not allowed.

Edited by Big Al. on Monday 5th January 17:42

vtecyo

2,122 posts

142 months

Sunday 4th January 2015
quotequote all
Great with the 190 engine. Pretty wasted without it imo.

james_gt3rs

4,816 posts

204 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
Fantastic car. Super turn-in and balance plus good brakes = nice track car for not much money.

Bennet

2,130 posts

144 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
Fattyfat said:
Not at all quick, nippy at best.
Are you the type just doesn't regard 0-60 in 7.9 seconds quick, or is there something in the nature of the power delivery that makes you say this?

cirian75

4,444 posts

246 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
Escy said:
They are excellent cars. Even better when fitted with the 190bhp engine out of a Corolla T-Sport, it gives them the straight line speed and the noise to match the chassis. censoredwink

Price ?

Speedracer329

1,507 posts

190 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
Fatty's post has it all covered IMO, brilliant little car that inspires confidence with great handling. As previously said zippy rather than quick but it doesn't feel underpowered at all.
I understand peoples concerns with the early cars possible engine issues but if you choose carefully you can get an early car without issues for silly cheap money, as did I.
The later 6 speed gearbox is desirable & is a straight forward fit into an early car. I managed to find a 6 speed from a 2006 car with only 31k for £200 & it does improve motorway travel & economy. I average 34mpg in town & 39/40mpg on a run.
I don't think luggage space is as bad as people say either, the 2 bins behind the seats create lots of room, I can get a weeks shopping of 6 carrier bags in there, & there is also use able space in the drunk too if required.

Craikeybaby

11,081 posts

238 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
Fattyfat said:
Just sold my 2002 pre facelift.

I'd be looking at a 2003 onwards, engine less prone to borkage apparently (precats, rings and oil usage - google it) and has a 6 speed box, larger rear tyres and IIRC different suspension geo.

Other than that look for water ingress into the headlamps, crusty rear cross members and sticky brake calipers. Clutches don't seem to last a lifetime but are cheap. These cars are tyre sensitive, correct sizes and decent brands pretty essential

Brilliant to drive. Not at all quick, nippy at best. Usual checks for accident damage and repair, still can bite with the mid engine layout in inexperienced hands. Doesn't rot anything like a MX-5 though.

Water tight roof with a proper glass screen, well screwed together and being a small Toyota you know it'll be pretty reliable (issues mentioned aside) Faff all storage, just the 'frunk' and some space behind the seats.

Hardtop, leather and AC would be desirable in my book.
This pretty much covers it. I've had my 2004 model for 18 months now. It doesn't feel as quick as my Dad's TF 160, but the MR2 feels more like a sports car should.

The only downside is luggage space, but it isn't as bad as people on forums make out - 2 of us went to Le Mans (including camping gear) in mine.

Patrick Bateman

12,582 posts

187 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
Escy said:
They are excellent cars. Even better when fitted with the 190bhp engine out of a Corolla T-Sport, it gives them the straight line speed and the noise to match the chassis. censoredwink

Now that sounds more appealing, hadn't heard of that engine swap before.

Escy

4,077 posts

162 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
cirian75 said:
Escy said:
They are excellent cars. Even better when fitted with the 190bhp engine out of a Corolla T-Sport, it gives them the straight line speed and the noise to match the chassis. censoredwink

Price ?
4k

Patrick Bateman

12,582 posts

187 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
Bloody Cardiff?? Useless.

How many are going about with this engine swap? I've glanced at these MR2's before but always wished they'd had more oomph.

~190bhp/tonne should do it.