RE: Lotus Exige S Automatic: Review

RE: Lotus Exige S Automatic: Review

Thursday 5th February 2015

Lotus Exige S Automatic: Review

Would you ever want an Exige S with an automatic gearbox? PH takes a drive to find out



Things ain't what they used to be is a rose tinted refrain we're often guilty of here on PH. True enough when it comes to electric power steering and other gadgetry.

And, thankfully, also true when it comes to automatic transmissions in sports cars. Remember the little sigh of dismay at the sight of a Tiptronic shifter in an otherwise desirable 911? Or the jerky, ponderous shifts of early-gen automated manuals in supercars of not so long ago?

Exige's pace bordeline alarming on B-roads
Exige's pace bordeline alarming on B-roads
Rubbish weren't they.

Previously disguised behind the euphemistic 'IPS' Intelligent Precision Shift moniker on the Evora, for the slushmatic version of the Exige S Lotus has come clean. Automatic by nature, Automatic by branding. No trickery, no hiding behind abbreviated badging. It's a traditional torque converter auto, offered as a £2,000 option over and above the entry level £53,000 of the manual Exige S.

Could've been worse though. Given the cars the 3.5 V6 is used in by Toyota it's fortunate the Exige is available with an Aisin six-speed slusher and not the CVT many Japanese brands seem to favour in overseas markets. Small mercies and all that. But what's it like?

A welcome sight in a hot Lotus? Discuss
A welcome sight in a hot Lotus? Discuss
Mix and match
To sit in the familiarly snug cabin of a hardcore Lotus, to hear the commendably harsh and purposeful sound of a supercharged V6 gnashing away behind your head and to heave on a surprisingly heavy non-assisted wheel ... and then hear the slurred nerrrrrrrrr-nerrrr-nerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr of an automatic gearbox as you pull away is frankly a little disturbing. Imagining such a thing in the more rounded Evora isn't, truth be told, quite so huge. Seemingly so for buyers too, the IPS version actually accounting for a little over half of worldwide sales since introduction. But in an Exige?

Let's face facts though. There's no off-the-shelf dual-clutch transmission that'd fit a big transverse V6 like the Toyota unit. And even if there was the complexity, weight and expense would make it untenable. Lotus has found a race sequential that'll work in GT4 spec Evoras using the same basic installation but even for the hardcore Exige that'd be asking a bit much for road use, never mind the cost. Nope, if it was going to build the two-pedal Exige it was going to have to use Toyota's preferred six-speeder. And do the best with it possible, this including improvements to CO2 and mpg, a tenth off the 0-62 time, a minimal weight penalty of 7kg over the manual car (weight gained in the gearbox is offset by the loss of gear linkages and the clutch gubbins) and a Hethel lap time that matches the manual.

Dinky shift paddles are a tactile delight
Dinky shift paddles are a tactile delight
Smoothly does it
Early impressions on the road appear to confirm worst expectations though. The chasm between the Exige's feral appetite for speed along twisting B-roads and the gearbox's sluggish nature seems yawning, the transmission seemingly left puffing and panting in the car's wake. Like a three-legged race pairing Usain Bolt with the fat kid from sports day this doesn't seem a natural partnership.

Sometimes it holds a gear too long, others it lazily upshifts two ratios just as you were happily settled in the gear you wanted. Lotus claims the engineers went "back to the drawing board" with the calibration compared with the Evora's IPS but there's no escaping this is an auto of the old school and not always up to speed with the Exige it's fitted to.

Even in these conditions grip is impressive
Even in these conditions grip is impressive
There is salvation of sorts with a twist of the Dynamic Performance Management switch into Sport. This sharpens throttle response, relaxes the stability control and gives you the option of a faster acting auto mode or full manual one, willing to let you run into the rev limiter if you ignore the familiar three-stage shift lights. Gears are held longer in automatic mode and pre-emptive downshifts - accompanied with a crisp blip - happen right when you'd want them. Upshifts are still a little ponderous in manual mode but downshifts occur much more quickly and a hint of that famous Lotus B-road flow returns.

Hold on to your hats
Good lord this is a very rapid motor car too. It might be shared with 50 shades of beige Toyotas but after the Lotus upgrades the 3.5-litre V6 is brawny, charismatic and feels just ever so slightly too much for the car. In an entirely good way. It'll haul from low revs, has a mid-range bellow like Brian Blessed stubbing his toe on a door frame and keeps pulling all the way to the redline. No four-cylinder Exige ever felt this explosive.

350hp V6 feels unburstable at all revs
350hp V6 feels unburstable at all revs
The non-assisted steering is heavy and the chassis settings pretty uncompromising, making it a surprisingly physical car to hustle along. But even on slush covered Norfolk back roads it finds tons of grip, the super positive turn-in matched with impressive corner exit traction. All achieved by good old-fashioned suspension set-up and calibration work, not electronic flattery of course. Still the gearbox struggles to keep up though and you can't help but dream of how would it be with a PDK-like ability to rattle through the shifts on demand.

Back at Hethel the snow and ice on the track has melted enough to allow a few laps of the southern half of the expansive test track. And here the Exige's balance, adjustability and pace really shine. With DPM in Race and the ability to lean hard on the clever 'learning' traction control you can left-foot brake deep into the corners and even if the shift comes later than anticipated it's smooth enough not to unsettle the car. And in automatic mode - the odd premature upshift aside - it reads your gearing requirements pretty well, multiple downshifts blatted through on the hard stop from the back straight and into the cut-through to the pits.

Feels more like it out on the test track
Feels more like it out on the test track
Should we be harder on Lotus for the shortcomings of the transmission compared with the dual-clutches offered in many rivals? It would seem harsh, not least for the clear reason there's no obvious alternative Lotus could have chosen. And to deny itself an opportunity to sell to those who want an auto would be daft. Lotus needs to shift more cars and this is a relatively cost effective way to broaden the potential customer base, if not here then definitely in markets where two-pedal cars are the default choice.

Globally Lotus reckons up to a third of Exiges could eventually be automatics. It might not be entirely to our tastes but if it contributes to recent modest upswings in sales and helps the bottom line just a little bit it'd be churlish to complain too loudly.

Couple of laps of Hethel; one in manual, one in auto


LOTUS EXIGE S AUTOMATIC
Engine:
3,456cc V6, supercharged
Transmission: 6-speed automatic, rear-wheel drive
Power: 350@7,000rpm
Torque: 295@4,500rpm
0-62mph: 3.9sec (manual 4.0sec)
Top speed: 162mph (manual 170mph)
Weight: 1,182kg (manual 1,176kg)
MPG: 29.4mpg (manual 28mpg)
CO2: 222g/gkm (manual 236g/km)
Price: £55,000 before options (manual £53,000)
[Note - figures for coupe; car driven/photographed is Roadster version]











   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   

Photos: Max Earey

 

Author
Discussion

BibsTLF

Original Poster:

790 posts

207 months

Thursday 5th February 2015
quotequote all
IPS = Intelligent Precision Shift, not Independent Precision Shift!

limpsfield

5,885 posts

253 months

Thursday 5th February 2015
quotequote all
As the last line says " It might not be entirely to our tastes but if it contributes to recent modest upswings in sales and helps the bottom line just a little bit it'd be churlish to complain too loudly."

And cue lots of people who would never buy a Lotus, even if it had unicorn leather, saying how bad it is.

I quite fancy one of these as the next car and it would be manual. This new-ish Exige v3 as soft top is a stunning thing.

Edited by limpsfield on Thursday 5th February 15:15

Dan Trent

1,866 posts

168 months

Thursday 5th February 2015
quotequote all
Ahem, updated and independence has made way for intelligence.

Cheers,

Dan

dukebox9reg

1,571 posts

148 months

Thursday 5th February 2015
quotequote all
Does seem strange that the auto has a limited top speed.

Cant think of many other cars let alone sports cars that have an auto version with a restricted top speed.

Dan Trent

1,866 posts

168 months

Thursday 5th February 2015
quotequote all
Sorry, that figure is for the Roadster which is restricted to 145mph. Auto coupe is 162mph, 170mph for the manual.

Spec box now updated accordingly. Obviously the car driven/photographed was a Roadster.

Cheers,

Dan

Snoggledog

7,028 posts

217 months

Thursday 5th February 2015
quotequote all
Isn't the copy ever read before being published?

article said:
Given the cars the 3.5 V6 is used in by Toyota....

kambites

67,561 posts

221 months

Thursday 5th February 2015
quotequote all
Sounds much as you'd expect from putting a slush-box auto in an Exige really.

Still if it helps Lotus to sell more cars in the East and gives a few people here who otherwise couldn't drive one a chance, I suppose it has to be a good thing. The rest of us can still buy the manual. smile

otolith

56,121 posts

204 months

Thursday 5th February 2015
quotequote all
I think most of the people who would really be bothered that it isn't a DSG would buy the manual anyway.

HeMightBeBanned

617 posts

178 months

Thursday 5th February 2015
quotequote all
Nothing to do with the autobox, I'm afraid, but how does the manual gearchange in the V6 Exige compare with the gearchange in the Evora?

The Evora was widely slated at launch for its crap manual gearchange and modifications have been applied to improve it. Is the Exige the same, better or worse?

jon-

16,509 posts

216 months

Thursday 5th February 2015
quotequote all
Automatic Exige.


Oddball RS

1,757 posts

218 months

Thursday 5th February 2015
quotequote all
I see it responds promptly to the paddle movements..................

Dan Trent

1,866 posts

168 months

Thursday 5th February 2015
quotequote all
HeMightBeBanned said:
Nothing to do with the autobox, I'm afraid, but how does the manual gearchange in the V6 Exige compare with the gearchange in the Evora?

The Evora was widely slated at launch for its crap manual gearchange and modifications have been applied to improve it. Is the Exige the same, better or worse?
It feels better than the Evora for sure, with a more precise gate and less slop in the lever. It's definitely one area they've improved over the years in the Elise platformed cars.

Cheers,

Dan

Sampaio

377 posts

138 months

Thursday 5th February 2015
quotequote all
As long as it makes them sell cars... Anything but the rumoured "Evora-based SUV"...

driftingphil

138 posts

147 months

Thursday 5th February 2015
quotequote all
For some reason the video reminds me of watching someone play a console racing game and playing it on auto. Kinda pointless, i wonder how many they will sell...

braddo

10,466 posts

188 months

Thursday 5th February 2015
quotequote all
I guess one has to test how it drives when left in auto and driven hard, but I can't imagine ever doing that. As with DSG/PDK transmissions, I always envisage that I would use auto mode only when pottering. I would always shift manually with the paddles for actual fun driving.

cerb4.5lee

30,585 posts

180 months

Thursday 5th February 2015
quotequote all
Not a massive auto or twin clutch fan and that video only helps to remind me why...

daytona365

1,773 posts

164 months

Thursday 5th February 2015
quotequote all
Surely an automatic would always be in the wrong ratio to negotiate corners ? Or am I 40 years behind auto evolution ?!

tram50

82 posts

140 months

Thursday 5th February 2015
quotequote all
Oddball RS said:
I see it responds promptly to the paddle movements..................
I did read in a previous article that the shift time was 240ms. My Clio 200 EDC claims to do it in 150ms and I tend to believe the times now having seen the video. There is a noticeable delay between pulling the paddle and hearing the shift.

Twoshoe

854 posts

184 months

Thursday 5th February 2015
quotequote all
Snoggledog said:
Isn't the copy ever read before being published?

article said:
Given the cars the 3.5 V6 is used in by Toyota....
Why, what's wrong with it?

sad61t

1,100 posts

210 months

Thursday 5th February 2015
quotequote all
The Lee Enfield rifle could shoot at 15 rounds per minute in highly trained hands. The AK47 will have a similar effect after a few minutes familiarisation.

I for one welcome our full auto overlords and will have a roadster in blue with the muzzle rise compensator er sorry, Convenience Pack.