Lupo 3L

Author
Discussion

Lord Pikey

Original Poster:

3,257 posts

216 months

Monday 16th November 2015
quotequote all
Does anyone on here have a Lupo 3L ? Im trying to find out just how economical they are at autobahn speeds (130kph)? Also, is it reving its nuts off at that speed?

I reeeealy fancy one, after reading the sales gumph that VW produced on them im looked. They really went to town on the details to make the car as fuel efficient as possible.

All the small tweaks are in here

http://www.volkspage.net/technik/ssp/ssp/SSP_218.p...

Edited by Lord on Monday 16th November 09:29

Triumph Man

8,698 posts

169 months

Monday 16th November 2015
quotequote all
I don't, but I agree that they are a brilliant little thing! Europe only though weren't they? And yes, the attention to detail is great. Really like the cars that came out of the Piech era. This, the Phaeton, The Veyron. There's something to be admired about obsessive attention to detail no matter how large or small the car.

graham22

3,295 posts

206 months

Monday 16th November 2015
quotequote all
Wasn't there a similar thread on here before (or in the VAG section), seem to remember lots of people expecting to see a VR6 Lupo.

lufbramatt

5,346 posts

135 months

Monday 16th November 2015
quotequote all
They did an Audi A2 3L too which (as an industrial designer) I've always thought was quite cool. Used much of the same running gear as the Lupo I believe. LHD only though frown

andy-xr

13,204 posts

205 months

Monday 16th November 2015
quotequote all
The 3 litres is fuel use measurement rather than engine size??

Johnnytheboy

24,498 posts

187 months

Monday 16th November 2015
quotequote all
andy-xr said:
The 3 litres is fuel use measurement rather than engine size??
Sadly, it would appear so.

Lord Pikey

Original Poster:

3,257 posts

216 months

Monday 16th November 2015
quotequote all
Its the metric version of mpg. Liters per 100km. The aim was to make a car that can achieve 3l of fuel for 100km traveled.

There is a anecdote that Renault got wind of VW plan to make a 3L lupo and thats how the Clio V6 came about!

I think PHer cptsideways has a 3L, i hope he spots this post so i can pick his brain

eldar

21,781 posts

197 months

Monday 16th November 2015
quotequote all
Johnnytheboy said:
Sadly, it would appear so.
As it says in the linked PDF. 3 litres/100km, or 94MPG.

Quhet

2,426 posts

147 months

Monday 16th November 2015
quotequote all
I sat behind a tatty one in traffic a couple of months back. It had British plates on but was LHD so I guess a few made it over here.

I'm sure the diesel Arosa had absurdly low fuel consumption too, something like 70-80 mpg

Krikkit

26,535 posts

182 months

Monday 16th November 2015
quotequote all
lufbramatt said:
They did an Audi A2 3L too which (as an industrial designer) I've always thought was quite cool. Used much of the same running gear as the Lupo I believe. LHD only though frown
A nice curio, but didn't the A2 have a backbreaking ride?

lufbramatt

5,346 posts

135 months

Monday 16th November 2015
quotequote all
May have had for it's time, but can't imagine it being any worse than many of todays cars that have silly low profile runflats as standard.

normalbloke

7,461 posts

220 months

Monday 16th November 2015
quotequote all
This thread title had so much hope, the reality has shaken me to the core......

louiebaby

10,651 posts

192 months

Monday 16th November 2015
quotequote all
Lord said:
There is a anecdote that Renault got wind of VW plan to make a 3L lupo and thats how the Clio V6 came about!
I always thought it was the other way round. VW heard about plans for a 3 litre Clio, and decided to try and get a Lupo out first.

simoid

19,772 posts

159 months

Monday 16th November 2015
quotequote all
louiebaby said:
Lord said:
There is a anecdote that Renault got wind of VW plan to make a 3L lupo and thats how the Clio V6 came about!
I always thought it was the other way round. VW heard about plans for a 3 litre Clio, and decided to try and get a Lupo out first.
I like the latter better: seems to have more romance biggrin

Pistachio

1,116 posts

191 months

Monday 16th November 2015
quotequote all
I drove one in Sweden once (rental car) which had studded tyres (winter time) and in the rain you could drift the back end it was a hoot :-)

LeoZwalf

2,802 posts

231 months

Monday 16th November 2015
quotequote all
Worth a read, it is a little curio car smile
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_Lupo#Lupo...

3l/100km = 94 UK MPG
830kg
Different bodywork from the normal Lupo for improved aerodynamics.

simoid

19,772 posts

159 months

Monday 16th November 2015
quotequote all
LeoZwalf said:
Worth a read, it is a little curio car smile
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_Lupo#Lupo...

3l/100km = 94 UK MPG
830kg
Different bodywork from the normal Lupo for improved aerodynamics.
Favourite bits:

In 2001, a Japanese economy driver, Dr Miyano, used it to set a new world record for the most frugal circumnavigation of Britain in a standard diesel production car, with an average fuel economy figure of 119.48 mpg. In November 2003, Gerhard Plattner covered a distance of 2,910 miles through 20 European countries in a standard Lupo 3L TDI. He achieved his aim of completing this journey - which started in Oslo, Norway and finished in The Hague in The Netherlands - with just 100 euros worth of fuel. In fact, all he required was 90.94 euros, which corresponds to an average consumption of 2.78 litres per 100 km (101.6 mpg).

According to the Lupo 3L instruction manual, the 3L engine also runs on Rapeseed Methyl Ester (RME) without any changes to the engine.

Does that mean you can run it on basically biodiesel some people make themselves for about 30-40p/l? That would be only a couple of pence per mile in fuel surely eek

Triumph Man

8,698 posts

169 months

Monday 16th November 2015
quotequote all
Interesting that it "freewheels", I always thought that it was more economical to let a car roll in gear with your foot off the throttle (i.e the wheels turn the engine and no fuel is injected) than knock it into neutral or dip the clutch and coast (as a small amount of fuel will be burned to keep the engine idling). Although I suppose coasting is easier on the flat or a very very slight downhill incline with less mechanical friction to overcome.

kambites

67,580 posts

222 months

Monday 16th November 2015
quotequote all
Quite a lot of automatics free-wheel these days. Even a few manuals do, it's a very odd feeling when you're expecting engine braking.

simoid

19,772 posts

159 months

Monday 16th November 2015
quotequote all
Triumph Man said:
Interesting that it "freewheels", I always thought that it was more economical to let a car roll in gear with your foot off the throttle (i.e the wheels turn the engine and no fuel is injected) than knock it into neutral or dip the clutch and coast (as a small amount of fuel will be burned to keep the engine idling). Although I suppose coasting is easier on the flat or a very very slight downhill incline with less mechanical friction to overcome.
I assume they tested it to see, or maybe they just did it "because they could" biggrin Perhaps it's because the car is so light, frugal engined and aerodynamic with low rolling resistance it's a special case.