RE: BMW X4 M40i: Review

Monday 22nd February 2016

BMW X4 M40i: Review

Is the acceptable face of the X4 the one we're not actually able to buy?



Nowhere is the paradox of BMW's M Division more evident than on the launch of the X4 M40i. Because it's the same event as the M2. Throughout there's no sense of the X4 being a lesser product, or a model of reduced importance. It's allocated just as much time in the press conference. On the one hand there's a finely honed and immensely rewarding coupe and on the other there's an SUV-cum-coupe with a sub-five second 0-62 time. Same manufacturer, same brand. Amazing.

Any better from the rea- ... no
Any better from the rea- ... no
Well, almost. As the name implies, the X4 M40i is an M Performance BMW rather than a full house M car. Given how many X6 Ms there are around though, is an X4 M that far off? Perish the thought. For now, the M40i is to the X4 what the M135i is to the 1 Series; a little faster and a little more dynamic than standard while still being fairly closely related. Active differentials and dual-clutch 'boxes are kept back for the full-fat M cars.

For the M40i, its basis is the 35i that isn't available in the UK. In fact, there aren't any petrol X4s offered in the UK. From that 35i, the M40i adds another 60hp and 48lb ft, taking the totals to 360hp and 343lb ft. Pretty big numbers, even in a car that weighs 1,915kg. With the standard eight-speed auto, BMW claims 0-62mph in 4.9 seconds and 155mph. Stateside Golf R owners beware...

Maybe if we try a more flattering light?
Maybe if we try a more flattering light?
Mod classics
The engine is a reworked version of the M135i 3.0-litre in fact, rather than the new modular straight-six as found in the 340i. Just to help the BMW naming confusion a little more... It remains a great engine though, super smooth and revving out eagerly. The noise is classic BMW too, even if the vehicle isn't. It actually sounds less augmented than in the 1 Series, and given how rapid the X4 is to 55mph (honest, officer) there is no reason to doubt that 0-62mph time.

Mooching along a nondescript American road, the M40i is entirely pleasant. The driving position achieves that neat trick of ensconcing the driver while also keeping you sat relatively high. The interior is sumptuous, the gearbox shifts seamlessly and the ride - albeit on well surfaced roads - is just fine.

Or just crop it small in the frame?
Or just crop it small in the frame?
But the X4 M40i is more than just additional power, some Ferric Grey accents and two-tone 20-inch wheels. BMW boasts in its press bumf of stronger springs, recalibration for the adaptive dampers, more negative camber on the front axle and steering "sharpened by M Performance-specific tuning". This on top of additional rear bias for the xDrive four-wheel drive, larger front brake discs and uprated pads at all corners. The overall result, says BMW, is a Sports Activity Coupe with "outstanding handling characteristics."

Shall I compare thee...
Well it's no M2, that's for sure. Of course that's not the most relevant comparison but given it was driven on the same road just about an hour later, that's inevitably where your train of thought picks up. However, given the constraints of its size and mass, it's not half bad. The test cars were fitted with the optional 20-inch wheels and Michelin Pilot Super Sport (yes, same as on the M2) tyres, so grip is just colossal. Pitch it into turns at what appear unfeasible speeds and it gamely clings on, only succumbing to understeer very late on. It's hardly a delicate or fulfilling process but it's a fairly astonishing feat nonetheless. It would be a lie to suggest the rear bias of the xDrive was felt that much but for covering ground really rapidly - with the added advantage of that lofty driving position - the X4 M40i is quite the device.

It's the 'old' turbo six but it's still a good'n
It's the 'old' turbo six but it's still a good'n
A couple of runs through the Cachagua Road do reveal a few weaknesses though. Having experienced the improvements made with the M2's steering, the X4 is a reminder of the bad old BMW systems, very artificially weighted and with odd resistance off centre. And there are those moments when all the M Performance modifications in the world can't save the M40i from the laws of physics; just sometimes it hits a bump and the damping can't quite keep up with all that's being asked of it, an unpleasant lurch the consequence.

For the most part it's very good at the Sports bit of Sports Activity Coupe, then in Eco Pro will coast its way home again with the minimum of fuss. It's quite a box of tricks, the X4 M40i, albeit not a particularly appealing box...

The X4's most appealing view by far
The X4's most appealing view by far
Face value
Yes, the appearance had to feature at some point. It's amazing we've made it this far really. Even on these rims it looks underwheeled, while the body brings together so many angles and surfaces that it's quite a confused overall shape. But then an X4 would never have happened if the X6 hadn't been a success, so judgement on how the X4 looks is probably redundant.

Absurd though it may sound, it does seem surprising that BMW isn't bringing the X4 M40i to Britain. It certainly isn't one for the M purists, but it's a broadly talented car and there are already rivals on sale: see the Porsche Macan GTS and the Jaguar F-Pace V6 S, plus the Audi SQ5 for those willing to consider diesel. They may not be core PH cars, but their current popularity cannot be denied. Or BMW will simply skip the M Performance addition to the X4 range and hit us straight with that X4 M. Be prepared...


BMW X4 M40i
Engine
: 2,979cc turbocharged inline-6
Transmission: 8-speed automatic, all-wheel drive
Power (hp): 360@5,800-6,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 343@1,350-5,250rpm
0-62mph: 4.9secs
Top speed: 155mph
Weight: 1,915kg (unladen EU)
MPG: 27.4 (NEDC combined)
CO2: 199g/km
Price: Not for UK sale, $57,800 (£40,100) in US


 

 


Author
Discussion

Limpet

Original Poster:

2,724 posts

89 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
"quite a confused overall shape" seems both overly wordy and polite, when "truly gopping" would have done nicely. It beats me how could anyone hand over their hard-earned for something so breathtakingly ugly.

rhys92

32 posts

39 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
its not very piston head-y and not even available in the UK, suppose there had to be a catch to the M2 test!!!

the level of performance in big, unsporty cars is quite remarkable, 911s of yesteryear would struggle with that 0-60 sprint time. The BMW range really is merging into one product at the moment

the_hood

356 posts

122 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
There's no arguing with the performance on offer. The looks on the other hand.......

philmots

4,453 posts

188 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
I'm most probably on my own here, but I even think it looks quite good!

I really quite like it, well out of budget but I'd of certainly looked at one as a used buy if they ever brought it here.

Gandahar

5,162 posts

56 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
Don't people still ask the question when buying a modern car

"I want a car that will do this....."

That's why people buy hot hatches, or track day cars or big saloons or an estate or a convertible, or a supercar.

Buy all 6 of the above to have a car for all occasions. But if funds do not go that far who actually starts to look at a car to buy and ends up deciding this ticks all the boxes? The only person who is likely to buy this and be happy is the person who likes the ultimate niche car.

It's not even an A to B car, it is a driveway mock tudor gravel driveway car to match the oversized LED TV....

It's bks.


Advertisement

toppstuff

11,411 posts

175 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
I find this " is this the acceptable face" schtick incredibly irritating.

X6, X5, whatever... all of them are perfectly legitimate and acceptable cars for anyone and everyone to enjoy without prejudice.

Since when did Pistonheads become the anti-freedom of choice Nazis?

Once could argue that a bright rosso / beige Ferrari is a thing of terrible taste. And there are some who would agree.

And there are those who think a X6 or X4 are an attractive package for THEM.

Who are we to argue?


maxxy5

764 posts

92 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
It's like they pick two of their existing models at random to choose which inbred monstrosity to create, X1 crossed with an i8 next?

EricE

1,945 posts

57 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
Pilot Super Sports are nice but I would want the Pilot Sport Cup 2s on a powerful and sporty car like this.
Any word on the Nürburgring time before I rush out and buy one of these? jester

Quhet

1,692 posts

74 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
fking abortion of a car.

These SUV-cupe things really offend me for some reasonlaugh

court

1,418 posts

144 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
Get this bloody engine in the 3er/4er soon to provide competition to the new S4 and C450 dagnammit!

An M440i GC would be a perfect car for me.

r11co

5,699 posts

158 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
Looks like a 3 series that's been on the pies. An obese car for an obese society.

Kawasicki

5,087 posts

163 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
I think it looks pretty bad. Drove this version of the previous model and thought it was good fun.

The lurching from hitting a bump in cars like this is often due to the way the chassis has to be set up to stop rollover.

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

174 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
Gandahar said:
it is a driveway mock tudor gravel driveway car to match the oversized LED TV....

It's bks.
Just like all the rest of the flood of lumpen SUV-type horrors.

rhys92

32 posts

39 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
Ozzie Osmond said:
Gandahar said:
it is a driveway mock tudor gravel driveway car to match the oversized LED TV....

It's bks.
Just like all the rest of the flood of lumpen SUV-type horrors.
lament all you will, but these the lumpen SUV types often fund the cars which we admire

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

174 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
rhys92 said:
lament all you will, but these the lumpen SUV types often fund the cars which we admire
Very true.

Roll up, roll up, step right this way!!

RDMcG

12,327 posts

135 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
I have never understood the concept of the car-bodied 4x4 SUV mixture. . In fact I never really understood the hyper fast SUV. This thing is ugly, and less function the a regular SUV which can take proper luggage, and if you want, can be made to be a sort of performance car.

I have a need for a very robust 4x4 that can tow 6000 lbs ,hammer around in deep Canadian winters, carry Great Danes, and also deliver good performance..have a well used Cayenne S V8 that fills all of those roles. I do recognize that these things are popular but would never in a million years buy one. The all look tall,misshapen, stubby and graceless.

DoubleD

4,631 posts

36 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
BMW are making some hideous looking cars at the moment. X4, X6 and those awful GT things!

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

174 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
IMO these things are in most ways "worse" than normal road cars - except for going off road.

And it seems the "off road" requirements of most owners extend no further than parking with two wheels on the pavement....

whytheory

240 posts

74 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
£40k for a car which has plastic blanks where the indicators were on the 2010 X3, interior is looking its age too.

samoht

687 posts

74 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
rhys92 said:
lament all you will, but these the lumpen SUV types often fund the cars which we admire
And yet McLaren and Ferrari seem to be able to afford to build sports, super and hypercars without selling their soul to raise cash. At least, I don't think those charity collectors I passed in Woking town centre were collecting for the P1 fund.