RE: BMW M2: Review

Friday 22nd April 2016

BMW M2: Review

UK deliveries start this weekend; here's what those picking up their cars are in for... [Updated pics]



The difference between the M2 and apparently similar cars in the BMW range can be measured in just a few hundred metres of rippled, rain-soaked Spanish tarmac. Right when the stomach-churning lurch out of a high-speed compression should have you feathering the throttle to give the rear wheels a chance of keeping traction...

Commit to a bumpy, fast road? You can!
Commit to a bumpy, fast road? You can!
Civilian equivalents like the M235i simply don't have the damping to cope. An M4, meanwhile, would be well out of its comfort zone and unable to put its considerable power advantage to any use whatsoever, beyond a widening of the eyes and whitening of the knuckles. In the M2 there's not a moment's hesitation. Keep it pinned. Grin like an idiot. Repeat to fade.

How does it do this? Simply, because it appears to have been built by and for people who really, really enjoy driving, sod the numbers on the spec sheet. The money invested in hot-rodding the M235i wasn't lavished on the engine. It didn't go on the interior. It didn't go on slavishly benchmarking acceleration times against rivals and making sure the gearing showed the car in its best light in magazine figuring or lap times. It went on nicking the good stuff in the M parts store like the M4's wide track forged aluminium suspension bits. And then binning the electronic gimmickry that makes its big brother so difficult to read.

This rather feels like the kind of car we thought people didn't make any more.

Engine good enough without being superb
Engine good enough without being superb
Fit the bill
The M2 succeeds where many others fail because it's been tuned to let you enjoy its performance. Not view it as some abstract beyond the realms of what traffic law, social responsibility or simply your own talent permit.

As we discovered on the US launch event the N55 engine is gruff and businesslike but has enough six-cylinder character to stand apart from the four-cylinder crowd. It also incorporates a few upgrades from the 'proper' M division S55 to set it apart from other applications. The single, twin-scroll turbo means a lazier initial throttle response than the more angry and immediate twin-turbo set-up in the M4. But the fact it drives through the same rear axle and Active M Differential reveals the advantage this brings in terms of traction. It's far easier to balance the initial power delivery than the M4, making DSC off progress on slippery surfaces much less anxious.

The rain in Spain falls mainly on ... oh
The rain in Spain falls mainly on ... oh
And DSC off you'll need to be if you want to take charge of the rev-matching duties with the six-speed manual's stumpy little shifter. See the recent rant on just this issue but it seems a little daft that you can't choose an auto blipping opt-out without also forgoing your safety nets. Well, it would be if the M2 wasn't such a hoot to slide around and manhandle without electronic interference. This is not just your typical motoring hack hubris either; the M2 isn't communicative in the way cars of 20 years ago might have been but by modern standards it's remarkably open about its intentions.

Wiggle it, just a little bit
The mellower throttle and nicely matched spring and damper rates are very much on your side in this. Keep your foot in over the bumps and you might get a murmur of movement as the wheels momentarily lose their connection to the road. But the passive dampers are much quicker to settle than BMW's usual adaptive equivalents and traction is restored quickly. What would have been a tank slapper in an M4 is little more than a pleasing wriggle through the wrists, with no need to back out of the throttle. This is a good thing!

The best way to appreciate your M2
The best way to appreciate your M2
A benefit of the structural suspension hardware inherited from its big brother is a pin-sharp front axle. Steering weighting is 'correct' rather than brimming with feel but the confidence that the front end will go where you want it just encourages you to carry your speed and get early on the throttle to rotate the car into the corner. It'll showboat as space, denial and tyre budget allow but there's satisfaction in dancing on the cusp of things going properly sideways, safe in the knowledge everything from damping to diff is on your side. It's predictable without being dumbed down, fun at sensible speeds as well as silly ones and accommodating of a broad talent pool.

The gearing and power delivery make sense for fast road pace too. Flicking up and down between third and fourth is plenty for most corners, the engine having sufficient grunt to haul from low revs and make the cross-gate shift down into second unnecessary, leaving you an easy back and forth shift for entertaining cross-country progress. Are you listening Porsche?

You can't see it, but the driver is having a lot of fun...
You can't see it, but the driver is having a lot of fun...
The automatic choice
Of course the big question will be between the manual and the £2,645 M DCT auto. In comparing M235i to M2 this is a bigger difference, the dual-clutch down a ratio on the eight-speed auto but far snappier in its shift when in Sport Plus mode. On the M4 M DCT seems to complete the package, apparently reflected in a take-up beyond 90 per cent. As it stands BMW reckons it'll be 70 per cent for M2, though the UK product manager admits they are anticipating a slight swing back to manual given initial reviews and the proportionally larger premium.

The paddles certainly encourage a harder, faster, stand-it-on-its-nose driving style. But given the rest of the car is about feedback and fun over outright pace the manual seems the more appropriate to its spirit and gets our vote. And if that contradicts the view the M4 is better with M DCT it underlines the differences in their character.

BMW expects around 70 per cent to opt for DCT
BMW expects around 70 per cent to opt for DCT
Against the disappointingly burly 1,570kg kerbweight 370hp and 343lb ft feel just about adequate, the nicely linear power band ending at least 500rpm sooner than you'd really want and tailing off just about where the M4's engine really goes ballistic. Disappointment in that is tempered by the few occasions you ever get to enjoy such talent in everyday use.

Pay up
At lower speeds the initial pedal bite of the M4-donated steel brakes can seem a little fierce, unsettling the balance if you're not careful. In the way of these things it makes more sense as the speeds rise, offering more to lean against than M cars of old. With real heat in them things get a little more vocal but the pedal remains resolute; whether this remains so on track is something we'll be exploring soon.

It's as good as we might have hoped - get one!
It's as good as we might have hoped - get one!
Overall the news remains most certainly good with this first taste of UK spec cars on European (if not home) soil. A slightly busy ride and some tyre roar aside the M2 has enough prestige, refinement, seats, gadgetry and boot space to pass muster as a daily car but is entertaining and special enough to be reserved for weekend fun too. There's a wait but BMW dealers are still accepting orders too, UK supply likely reach around 1,900 cars in total. Along with other driver focused arrivals in the market like the Focus RS, Mustang and more, they're building the cars we said we wanted. Up to the likes of us to buy 'em then!


BMW M2
Engine
: 3.0-litre turbocharged straight six
Transmission: 6-speed manual/7-speed DCT, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 370@6,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 343@1,400-4,750rpm
0-62mph: 4.5sec (4.3sec)
Top speed: 155mph (limited)
Weight: 1,570 kg (EU unladen)
MPG: 33.2 (35.8)
CO2: 199g/km (185g/km)
Price: £44,070 (£46,715)

Figures in brackets for DCT gearbox





Author
Discussion

cerb4.5lee

Original Poster:

10,006 posts

111 months

Sunday 17th April 2016
quotequote all
Would love one of these especially in manual flavour.

Dale487

650 posts

54 months

Sunday 17th April 2016
quotequote all
Better to drive than the M4

4 seats, unlike the Boxster & Cayman - works if you have a family

Plenty quick enough, manual gearbox (Audi & Mercedes take note), 6 cylinder engine & the money has gone on the suspension & drive train.

Is there a better car that covers the day today & performance driving for less than £50k? (Focus RS, may be)

joedesi

49 posts

145 months

Sunday 17th April 2016
quotequote all
Sounds like an awesome little car.

Could you imagine this car with the V8 from the E92 M3? Wow...

Dale487

650 posts

54 months

Sunday 17th April 2016
quotequote all
joedesi said:
Sounds like an awesome little car.

Could you imagine this car with the V8 from the E92 M3? Wow...
I think it would mess up the balance of the handling - too much weight at the front.

p1stonhead

15,562 posts

98 months

Sunday 17th April 2016
quotequote all
Looks fantastic in that first picture!
Advertisement

nickfrog

8,814 posts

148 months

Sunday 17th April 2016
quotequote all
Dale487 said:
Better to drive than the M4

4 seats, unlike the Boxster & Cayman - works if you have a family

Plenty quick enough, manual gearbox (Audi & Mercedes take note), 6 cylinder engine & the money has gone on the suspension & drive train.

Is there a better car that covers the day today & performance driving for less than £50k? (Focus RS, may be)
Less than £45k for that matter. Sounds like a great all rounder for road/track/school runs.

I am not actually sure the V8 would be heavier but I am not sure it would fit.


Edited by nickfrog on Sunday 17th April 11:08

cerb4.5lee

Original Poster:

10,006 posts

111 months

Sunday 17th April 2016
quotequote all
Dale487 said:
joedesi said:
Sounds like an awesome little car.

Could you imagine this car with the V8 from the E92 M3? Wow...
I think it would mess up the balance of the handling - too much weight at the front.
The V8 didn't have enough torque and wasn't very fuel efficient either...hence why it was dropped and consigned to history.

Krikkit

12,524 posts

112 months

Sunday 17th April 2016
quotequote all
Dale487 said:
joedesi said:
Sounds like an awesome little car.

Could you imagine this car with the V8 from the E92 M3? Wow...
I think it would mess up the balance of the handling - too much weight at the front.
With the turbo gubbins I bet there's not much between the engines in terms of weight.

EricE

1,945 posts

60 months

Sunday 17th April 2016
quotequote all
I think the interior is the biggest let down of this car. Even sport auto supertest berated the uninspired seats, cheap looking leather, pointless removal of "M" buttons, lack of a decent Oil temperature gauge, etc. I suppose something has to give.
Still, looks a bit expensive compared to an M135i (JUNIOR SUPERCAR!!!) with an aftermarket LSD.

nickfrog

8,814 posts

148 months

Sunday 17th April 2016
quotequote all
EricE said:
Still, looks a bit expensive compared to an M135i (JUNIOR SUPERCAR!!!) with an aftermarket LSD.
And with the M2/M3/M4 front LCAs at just £300 + geo...

But I don't think it competes with it tbf.

Clivey

4,574 posts

135 months

Sunday 17th April 2016
quotequote all
Why did my comment end-up in it's own thread that's become detached from this article? That's not the first time it's happened.

chrispmartha

3,015 posts

60 months

Sunday 17th April 2016
quotequote all
I really like the look of these but...

In day to day driving, sitting in almost exactly the same interior, with a similar engine would it be that much different to my current M135i? Would it really be worth the extra cost? And would it feel special enough or not enough of an upgrade?

Sam All

3,101 posts

32 months

Sunday 17th April 2016
quotequote all
Guaranteed to attract a lot of debate. If supply becomes plentiful a more objective view will surface.

I like the car, but would like the M2 CSL more.

Nickbrapp

2,171 posts

61 months

Sunday 17th April 2016
quotequote all
46k and no led indicators at the rear.

Patrick Bateman

10,164 posts

105 months

Sunday 17th April 2016
quotequote all
cerb4.5lee said:
The V8 didn't have enough torque and wasn't very fuel efficient either...hence why it was dropped and consigned to history.
It was dropped because it didn't have enough torque??

Nothing to do with the fact that every BMW engine is now turbocharged.

DSC off to allow for some rev matching/heel and toe makes absolutely no sense.

Joratk

409 posts

41 months

Sunday 17th April 2016
quotequote all
No mention of the angled, off-centre driving position?

kambites

54,330 posts

152 months

Sunday 17th April 2016
quotequote all
It sounds like they've done a very good job considering what they had to play with, as indeed the M-division almost always do. Not my sort of car, but I can see the appeal.

TNH

466 posts

78 months

Sunday 17th April 2016
quotequote all
Nickbrapp said:
46k and no led indicators at the rear.
Suspect you are being sarcastic but the rear light units are LED.

Looks and sounds great, think I will be replacing my M235i with one if I can get hold of one...

georgeq

110 posts

57 months

Sunday 17th April 2016
quotequote all
I sat in one of these at the local dealer in Munich. Exterior looks epic in blue and the rest of the recipe is perfect. 6 Cylinder, RWD, e-Diff, compact dimensions.

My let down was the weight and the overall feel of the interior. Unlike with most M cars I've sat in it doesn't have the slightest hint of luxury to it, if anything it felt like an alternative to the M135/M235 standard alcantara interior but not like a step up. At 1570kg it's clearly not "stripped out" or "focused", just cheap and disappointing.
Maybe the target audience won't mind but I think it looked out of place in a £50000 BMW. Overall still an epic car and I hope we will see more like it.

Dan Trent

1,815 posts

99 months

Sunday 17th April 2016
quotequote all
Apologies if discussion of interior quality didn't feature too highly in the review... tongue out

Dan

(Can't take credit for action depicted in photo this time but yes it does and we're taking an M2 to Anglesey in May and I trust there'll be opportunity for a reconstruction.)