RE: Jaguar XJ220 S: You Know You Want To

RE: Jaguar XJ220 S: You Know You Want To

Tuesday 21st March 2017

Jaguar XJ220 S: You Know You Want To

More power and more carbon than standard, and half the price of an F40 - of course you want to!



Despite a recent (and significant) rise in values, the Jaguar XJ220 is arguably still not as revered as its supercar contemporaries. With cars like the Ferrari F50, Bugatti EB110 and McLaren F1 also around at the same sort of time, perhaps it was always going to struggle. But this was once the fastest car in the world, combining huge power and presence with a healthy dose of old fashioned supercar intimidation. People should be clamouring for one, right?

Because an XJ220 was so unassuming before
Because an XJ220 was so unassuming before
Especially an XJ220 like this - the XJ220 S. The best part of 25 years ago TWR took nine XJ220 road cars to make into competition entries, homologating six along the way. This is one of six XJ220 S spec cars.

However it's not entirely clear whether this was an original TWR car. While to spec, it registered fairly late for a 220 and appears to have the work completed by Don Law Racing. Hardly a bad thing given the pre-eminence of Don Law in Jaguar circles, but it does make the car itself a little confusing. If anyone knows more about this car's provenance we'd love to hear it!

Regardless, the spec makes for very exciting reading. It makes 690hp at 7,900rpm thanks to larger turbos, a new ECU and uprated fuel system. Torque is 526lb ft at 5,000rpm. It's claimed to hit 60mph in 2.7 seconds and 150mph in 15 flat. Don't forget that's with a manual gearbox too, which will cloak the acceleration's ferocity to some extent.

In addition to that there are some carbon body parts, competition brakes, split-rim BBS wheels, a straight-through exhaust and that wing. If you feel modern supercars are too soft and accommodating, this could be just the thing for you. It's left-hand drive too, for a bit of extra challenge.

Because an XJ220 was so sluggish before
Because an XJ220 was so sluggish before
Unsurprisingly given this car's specification it has been extremely well cared for over the past 20 years, with a full Don Law service history and just 16,000 miles recorded. It's even been treated to a 'deep boot upgrade' with twice the capacity of standard; combine that with the larger 100-litre tank and you have the perfect car for long weekends away, right?

In all seriousness though, it's hard to think of a more intense, more exhilarating 90s supercar. F40? Well yes, very good point, but it's down 200hp here by the official numbers. That and the fact the most affordable F40 on PH is £800,000 with the same mileage as the Jaguar, against £420,000 for the XJ220. If ever £420,000 could look reasonable value...

Finally, it's worth noting just how far XJ220s have come in recent years. Another XJ220 S was featured on PH ahead of an auction sale in early 2012 - it sold for $230,000, or about £150,000 at the exchange rate then. £150K! At the start of 2014 a low-mileage XJ220would have cost £160,000, which is not far off half what one will cost you now. But while the time may have passed for a 220 as an investment, the McLaren F1 is well into the millions now. There is an upside to being the underdog!


JAGUAR XJ220
Price
: £420,000
Why you should: The ultimate XJ220
Why you shouldn't: The price they used to be...

See the original advert here

[Source: RM Sotheby's]







Author
Discussion

Boydie88

Original Poster:

3,283 posts

149 months

Tuesday 21st March 2017
quotequote all
That is stunning. Worth a Euromillions ticket or two tonight I think.

steve1386

57 posts

172 months

Tuesday 21st March 2017
quotequote all
Fantastic to see these things pop up...however I think it loses something in this form. It's just not as sleek or as pretty as the normal 220 - it almost looks distastefully modified from some angles!

I would still have the F40 if money was no object, which I suspect if you can afford £400 odd grand to blow on a 25 year old car, then you'd be able to afford either!

Dave Hedgehog

14,555 posts

204 months

Tuesday 21st March 2017
quotequote all
yes please biggrin

Krikkit

26,527 posts

181 months

Tuesday 21st March 2017
quotequote all
steve1386 said:
Fantastic to see these things pop up...however I think it loses something in this form. It's just not as sleek or as pretty as the normal 220 - it almost looks distastefully modified from some angles!

I would still have the F40 if money was no object, which I suspect if you can afford £400 odd grand to blow on a 25 year old car, then you'd be able to afford either!
I'd quite like to have both, compare and contrast and all that... biggrin

Vocal Minority

8,582 posts

152 months

Tuesday 21st March 2017
quotequote all
I know this is a very un-PH point of view....but as I am neither man nor talented enough to take advantage of the benefits that the S offers over the 'cooking' XJ220 - I would prefer the elegant lines of the normal one. But with a euromillions win, its definitely a car I would want.

Just my tuppenceworth.

PurpleAki

1,601 posts

87 months

Tuesday 21st March 2017
quotequote all
Beautiful.

chonok

1,129 posts

235 months

Tuesday 21st March 2017
quotequote all
Look at that interior thoughvomit

They really didn't push the boat out on interiors back then...

F1GTRUeno

6,354 posts

218 months

Tuesday 21st March 2017
quotequote all
Yes please.

Since finding out about the S cars I've been obsessed with them.

For those of you with LamboPower accounts, the one mentioned in the article for sale at an auction back in 2012 has been restored back to it's original pale blue colour, here:

http://www.lambopower.com/forum/index.php?showtopi...


upload foto

That means that along with the yellow one for sale here, the orange one owned by a member of various car forums (including this one I think) and the red one in the Marconi museum in the US, four of the five originals are back to their original spec.

Just need the final black one to be restored to it's original colour and we're sorted.

Don't know where Tom Walkinshaw's special S/C spec car is though, I do know it's not in it's original spec.

Only thing I'd do for this yellow one is have the spokes on the BBS wheels painted yellow like they originally were.

It's a shame IMO that Don Law offer the S bodykit because many of them get confused for an original S but if it means they've got more money to look after them then it's good business for them and better for us enthusiasts to see them well kept.

Edited by F1GTRUeno on Tuesday 21st March 09:13


Edited by F1GTRUeno on Tuesday 21st March 09:14

Gary29

4,159 posts

99 months

Tuesday 21st March 2017
quotequote all
Now THAT is a car!

xjay1337

15,966 posts

118 months

Tuesday 21st March 2017
quotequote all
Remember I saw this car at some Beaulieu supercar event.

DPSFleet

192 posts

161 months

Tuesday 21st March 2017
quotequote all
Great car, great colour and "reasonable" value. Guaranteed rarity and good pension fund. Yes please too. Thinks? Wonder if Jaguar SVO will build some more one day? If so they would be £1.5M I'm sure.

spookly

4,019 posts

95 months

Tuesday 21st March 2017
quotequote all
Want.

I've always had a soft spot for the XJ220. Not sure about the yellow, but I would buy it in a heartbeat if I had the funds.

alanjohnlew

7 posts

221 months

Tuesday 21st March 2017
quotequote all
Last Sunday I was driving my old Berlingo down a minor road in my little Hampshire market town. Several people ran across the road ahead. So I slowed in case someone else crossed and there, parked in the road was a silver XJ220. So good to see one on the road, one of 271 made according to Wikipedia. Quite a coincidence to see this two days later. I WANT ONE!!!!!

smilo996

2,791 posts

170 months

Tuesday 21st March 2017
quotequote all
Looks brilliant in yellow.

That V6 is working hard then: It makes 690hp at 7,900rpm

Always fun to see cars like this turn up on the pages of PH

ChemicalChaos

10,393 posts

160 months

Tuesday 21st March 2017
quotequote all
That rear spoiler really does spoil it IMO.

If it was a regular GT style wing that extended past the uprights to the edges of the car it wouldn't look half as bad, but that one just looks odd

MikeT66

2,680 posts

124 months

Tuesday 21st March 2017
quotequote all
So much more desirable than that hideous Aston Martin Vulcan featured last week - and would leave plenty of cash left over, too.

JTSmith

104 posts

91 months

Tuesday 21st March 2017
quotequote all
Did anyone see the XJ220 at Goodwood last weekend? That was in rather lovely condition!

I happened to meet the lady who owns it, she's got an ace car collection! She was also explaining that she actually drives her cars, apparently putting 12k miles since she bought it!

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 21st March 2017
quotequote all
Aged 13 I was at the NEC Motorshow in 1988 when the XJ220 was launched. I can vivdly recall looking at the 220 and thinking 'That's not an attractive car'.

All these years later and I still feel the same; it's a huge, poorly defined blob IMO. It reminds me of a whaleshark. I admire the technical achievement it was at the time but asethically it's lacking.



ukaskew

10,642 posts

221 months

Tuesday 21st March 2017
quotequote all
Same car presumably?



Also took this at FoS, had no idea there were so few of them...



Edited by ukaskew on Tuesday 21st March 10:43

freeform

53 posts

160 months

Tuesday 21st March 2017
quotequote all
I remember testing one in the '90s...

Sadly, no test track heroics to brag about; it was in our tropical test cell to see if the air-con was up to the job! smile