RE: Porsche Cayenne vs Airbus A380
Monday 1st May 2017
About a decade ago, you may remember VW used a Touraeg R50 diesel to tow a 747. Quite the achievement it was too, a ballasted SUV using a standard powertrain to pull 155 tonnes of aeroplane down a runway.
Porsche Cayenne vs Airbus A380
You'll have heard about stump pulling torque before, so how about Airbus pulling?
Well now Porsche has upped the ante as far as silly SUV stunts go. It has used a Cayenne Diesel S to tow an Airbus A380, all 73 metres and 285 tonnes of it, to set a new Guinness World Record. And then did it with a Turbo S too, presumably just to prove the point. To be specific, the record set is for 'Heaviest aircraft pulled by a production car'.
The record was set at Paris Charles de Gaulle airport, using one of Air France's A380s. The driver was Porsche GB technician Richard Payne who, after towing the plane 42 metres for the record, said "I could tell that it was working hard but the Cayenne didn't complain and just got on with it. My mirrors were quite full of Airbus, which was interesting."
Both cars were mechanically standard, the only modification being a "special towing attachment" that was fixed onto the regular tow bar of each. Talk about testing the durability!
So if your summer holiday is likely to require some very serious towing, the Porsche Cayenne could well be the car for you. Jeep Grand Cherokee Trackhawk, over to you...
Discussion
Also underwhelmed too as I thought of this. PH loves the Porsche!
gumsie said:
Amen.
Evolved said:
Also underwhelmed too as I thought of this. PH loves the Porsche!
gumsie said:
not a scientist, but surely it is only the inertia which is impressive and as long as you have enough torque / the right gearing that shouldn't be an issue, just do it slowly... once moving it is rolling resistance which is not always a reflection of weight... so why is the record for the heaviest plane moved when potentially the weight is not relevant - if it was a lump of metal of a uniform surface area in contact with the ground then weight would make sense - but a plane with wheels?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/cars/news/land-rover-pu...
"A Land Rover Discovery Sport pulls three train carriages nearly 60 times its weight - the equivalent of towing a Boeing 757 airliner"
"A Land Rover Discovery Sport pulls three train carriages nearly 60 times its weight - the equivalent of towing a Boeing 757 airliner"
akirk said:
not a scientist, but surely it is only the inertia which is impressive and as long as you have enough torque / the right gearing that shouldn't be an issue, just do it slowly... once moving it is rolling resistance which is not always a reflection of weight... so why is the record for the heaviest plane moved when potentially the weight is not relevant - if it was a lump of metal of a uniform surface area in contact with the ground then weight would make sense - but a plane with wheels?
+1 these record attempts come across as very ignorant of basic physics. Airport tractors have a lot of torque and weight because they need to push, as well as pull, and to be able to do it day, day out. For interest, there's one that claims to be 40 tons, with potential for an additional 30 tons of ballast. Power not so easy to find information on; a bit of digging suggests the aforementioned 40t tractor has 482hp at 1900rpm, 1536lb.ft at 1300rpm, from a 12 litre V6 turbodiesel. Imagine the size of the pistons!Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff