RE: Porsche Cayenne vs Airbus A380

RE: Porsche Cayenne vs Airbus A380

Monday 1st May 2017

Porsche Cayenne vs Airbus A380

You'll have heard about stump pulling torque before, so how about Airbus pulling?



About a decade ago, you may remember VW used a Touraeg R50 diesel to tow a 747. Quite the achievement it was too, a ballasted SUV using a standard powertrain to pull 155 tonnes of aeroplane down a runway.

If  you think it looks silly here...
If you think it looks silly here...
Well now Porsche has upped the ante as far as silly SUV stunts go. It has used a Cayenne Diesel S to tow an Airbus A380, all 73 metres and 285 tonnes of it, to set a new Guinness World Record. And then did it with a Turbo S too, presumably just to prove the point. To be specific, the record set is for 'Heaviest aircraft pulled by a production car'.

The record was set at Paris Charles de Gaulle airport, using one of Air France's A380s. The driver was Porsche GB technician Richard Payne who, after towing the plane 42 metres for the record, said "I could tell that it was working hard but the Cayenne didn't complain and just got on with it. My mirrors were quite full of Airbus, which was interesting."

... have a look at this!
... have a look at this!
Both cars were mechanically standard, the only modification being a "special towing attachment" that was fixed onto the regular tow bar of each. Talk about testing the durability!

So if your summer holiday is likely to require some very serious towing, the Porsche Cayenne could well be the car for you. Jeep Grand Cherokee Trackhawk, over to you...

 

 

 

 

 

 

Author
Discussion

SIXSM

Original Poster:

334 posts

160 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
Drove a Diesel S a couple of weeks ago, monster torque, seriously deceptively very fast car with a v8 soundtrack - nice! Really impressive car...

h0b0

7,639 posts

197 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all


It's a twin cab so is a family car in the US

grahamr88

421 posts

174 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
Wow, Porsche, that's incredible. What next; can you prove that it's at least as fast as a man, too?

gumsie

680 posts

210 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
grahamr88 said:
Wow, Porsche, that's incredible. What next; can you prove that it's at least as fast as a man, too?
I gotta agree here, I was a little bit unimpressed too. I can pull a car but I certainly couldn't lift one.

hairyben

8,516 posts

184 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
Turn the jet around and fire her up and then we'll see whose most impressive

Evolved

3,571 posts

188 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
Also underwhelmed too as I thought of this. PH loves the Porsche!
gumsie said:
grahamr88 said:
Wow, Porsche, that's incredible. What next; can you prove that it's at least as fast as a man, too?
I gotta agree here, I was a little bit unimpressed too. I can pull a car but I certainly couldn't lift one.

edo

16,699 posts

266 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
SIXSM said:
Drove a Diesel S a couple of weeks ago, monster torque, seriously deceptively very fast car with a v8 soundtrack - nice! Really impressive car...
Its a cracking engine. Ours gives well into the 30's mpg which I think is pretty decent. Sounds good to.

Vee12V

1,335 posts

161 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
Amen.

Evolved said:
Also underwhelmed too as I thought of this. PH loves the Porsche!
gumsie said:
grahamr88 said:
Wow, Porsche, that's incredible. What next; can you prove that it's at least as fast as a man, too?
I gotta agree here, I was a little bit unimpressed too. I can pull a car but I certainly couldn't lift one.

akirk

5,399 posts

115 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
not a scientist, but surely it is only the inertia which is impressive and as long as you have enough torque / the right gearing that shouldn't be an issue, just do it slowly... once moving it is rolling resistance which is not always a reflection of weight... so why is the record for the heaviest plane moved when potentially the weight is not relevant - if it was a lump of metal of a uniform surface area in contact with the ground then weight would make sense - but a plane with wheels?

Matt UK

17,739 posts

201 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
Pfft, agree.

I want to see Porsche do it properly and tow an A380 around the Nurburgring in under 10 minutes.

Or something similarly pointless.

ChemicalChaos

10,404 posts

161 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
Meh. Back in 1989 Land Rover pulled an entire train, which must have weighed as much or more, with a 120hp Discovery....


Trophy-GTA

101 posts

99 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
Should've done it the other way around with the car attached behind the aeroplane and then took the aeroplane around for a spin. Would've made a more interesting article.

patch5674

233 posts

113 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
h0b0 said:


It's a twin cab so is a family car in the US
Not bothered to lift my lazy little fingers to google it, but I am going to assume that that Space Shuttle is possibly actually significantly lighter than an A380.



PenelopaPitstop

2,169 posts

134 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/cars/news/land-rover-pu...

"A Land Rover Discovery Sport pulls three train carriages nearly 60 times its weight - the equivalent of towing a Boeing 757 airliner"

njw1

2,077 posts

112 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
Pfft......My old diesel Mondeo could do that with a bit of old seatbelt.... biggrin

sahajesh

369 posts

154 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
The roof spoiler made all the difference, extra downforce and made the Porsche look good, not.

RenesisEvo

3,616 posts

220 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
akirk said:
not a scientist, but surely it is only the inertia which is impressive and as long as you have enough torque / the right gearing that shouldn't be an issue, just do it slowly... once moving it is rolling resistance which is not always a reflection of weight... so why is the record for the heaviest plane moved when potentially the weight is not relevant - if it was a lump of metal of a uniform surface area in contact with the ground then weight would make sense - but a plane with wheels?
+1 these record attempts come across as very ignorant of basic physics. Airport tractors have a lot of torque and weight because they need to push, as well as pull, and to be able to do it day, day out. For interest, there's one that claims to be 40 tons, with potential for an additional 30 tons of ballast. Power not so easy to find information on; a bit of digging suggests the aforementioned 40t tractor has 482hp at 1900rpm, 1536lb.ft at 1300rpm, from a 12 litre V6 turbodiesel. Imagine the size of the pistons!

CS Garth

2,860 posts

106 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
So now not only is the a303 going to packed with Discoveries pulling caravans but also Cayenne's pulling planes. Brilliant.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

256 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all


FFS, a dinky tractor can do that....wobble

stedale

1,124 posts

266 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
I'd be really impressed if a conveyor belt was involved...





Sorry