New Renault Sport Megane spied on the Nurburgring
Is another FWD record being planned?
When the previous-gen Clio was replaced by the current car, its range of abilities was broadened but its raw edge was lost. While it would be understandable for that to happen to an extent with this Megane - how many of the previous model did you actually see on the road - let's hope the magic is not smothered quite as much as with the smaller car.
So far we know the Megane will be five-door only, have a dual-clutch gearbox option and be revealed at the Frankfurt motor show. Here we have our first look at the car on the Nurburgring and the roads around it; Meganes and the Nordschleife of course have some history, with both the R26.R and Trophy-R claiming FWD lap records in their time. Could Renault Sport now be attempting the record with the first of a new generation, rather than the last?
We'll have to wait and see, but the test laps have at least afforded us a better look at the car. New details that have emerged on this mule include a rather dubious fake exhaust/diffuser combo but also big Brembo brake calipers and some more aggressive (disguised) front intakes. There are also a selection of wheels on show here, suggesting there could be a more focused track package of wheel and tyre.
Whatever is offered, this is going to be a different Renault Sport Megane to the cars we have become used to. Will that make it a better Renault Sport Megane? We can't wait to find out!
[Photos: S. Baldauf/SB-Medien]
The latest batch of FWD hot hatches seems to be shaping up nicely with the new highly praised CTR revealed and the i30n and Megane not too far away. Incidentally, all have 5 doors!
I honestly don't think people care anymore. New cars are getting so big now that having 2 massive doors just seems a bit silly for the sake of it looking a bit less "family". Hatchbacks have practicality in mind for the most part anyway.
I prefer 3 doors myself but it's not really a deal breaker anymore. Not for a new car anyway.
I think Renault are aware of how the Clio 4 was received and what the New Megane RS has to live up to. Doubt itll be as fast as some of the new hot hatches but hopefully be fun and somewhat engaging to drive like the outgoing 275.
I really do want the Megane to be the king of Hot Hatches again but it'll be very tough, the manufacturers have upped there game, hell even Hyundai are getting into to game and from what I've read in Evo Magazine, that is shaping up to be a cracker.
I prefer 3 doors myself but it's not really a deal breaker anymore. Not for a new car anyway.
Cars grow with the new tech.
Crash regs grow to keep pace
Cars grow to keep in line with crash regs
SUVs
Crash regs grow to cater for SUVs
Cars grow to keep in line with crash regs
Car weight continues to grow to allow for even more (mostly pointless imo) car tech
Crash regs change to cater for car weight
Cars grow to cater for crash regs
Big cars need design tricks to keep them looking in any way decent.
Massive headlights
floating roof lines
blacked out pillars
Huge door mirrors
complex creases and panel shut lines
massive wheels
massive doors...or additional doors
"Hot hatches" started out as 3 door.
now they're 5 door
It's not particularly shallow to bemoan the change if you don't like it... yes they're meant to be a mix of practicality and 'sportiness'... fine...so give us choice maybe? the mass majority direction isn't always the right one.... every lazy driver chooses DCT so now we can't have a manual? I think a few cars recently have shown there is still room for the stick....
I know I won't be happy the day the top of the line Lamborghini goes forced induction, fully auto, ev and 4 door....
that'll be fine for the majority though right...so equally as acceptable?
The mass market sectors are struggling to hold on to 'style'
I prefer 3 doors myself but it's not really a deal breaker anymore. Not for a new car anyway.
Cars grow with the new tech.
Crash regs grow to keep pace
Cars grow to keep in line with crash regs
SUVs
Crash regs grow to cater for SUVs
Cars grow to keep in line with crash regs
Car weight continues to grow to allow for even more (mostly pointless imo) car tech
Crash regs change to cater for car weight
Cars grow to cater for crash regs
Big cars need design tricks to keep them looking in any way decent.
Massive headlights
floating roof lines
blacked out pillars
Huge door mirrors
complex creases and panel shut lines
massive wheels
massive doors...or additional doors
"Hot hatches" started out as 3 door.
now they're 5 door
It's not particularly shallow to bemoan the change if you don't like it... yes they're meant to be a mix of practicality and 'sportiness'... fine...so give us choice maybe? the mass majority direction isn't always the right one.... every lazy driver chooses DCT so now we can't have a manual? I think a few cars recently have shown there is still room for the stick....
I know I won't be happy the day the top of the line Lamborghini goes forced induction, fully auto, ev and 4 door....
that'll be fine for the majority though right...so equally as acceptable?
The mass market sectors are struggling to hold on to 'style'
If you don't like it there's always the used or classic market.
I'm trying to remember the last Golf R 3 door I saw....actually they are nearly all 5 doors...but is it a problem? Not really.
We are so spoilt for choice nowadays with good cars - the 'warm' hatches like the Fiesta ST, Suzuki Swift Sport can still have 3 doors and a wide appeal, but for a proper performance hatch, 3 doors are as dead as flicky out indicators.
If you don't like it there's always the used or classic market.
I'm trying to remember the last Golf R 3 door I saw....actually they are nearly all 5 doors...but is it a problem? Not really.
It is movement along a direction of change
but it not betterment when building bigger and bigger and heavier and heavier vehicles use more resources, more fuel, that require more and more 'systems' to negate the damage they do anything they hit, when the structures required limit the visibility out of them... when the on board tech requires you to 'not' look where you're going, to require computers to compensate for the sheer weight of thing and manage the torque and damper settings to allow it remain in control....to offer up systems that negate the need for a driver at all....
If that's 'progress' we're not in need of 'hot hatches' at all....
So yes... the used market is certainly where it stays for me...
If you don't like it there's always the used or classic market.
I'm trying to remember the last Golf R 3 door I saw....actually they are nearly all 5 doors...but is it a problem? Not really.
It is movement along a direction of change
but it not betterment when building bigger and bigger and heavier and heavier vehicles use more resources, more fuel, that require more and more 'systems' to negate the damage they do anything they hit, when the structures required limit the visibility out of them... when the on board tech requires you to 'not' look where you're going, to require computers to compensate for the sheer weight of thing and manage the torque and damper settings to allow it remain in control....to offer up systems that negate the need for a driver at all....
If that's 'progress' we're not in need of 'hot hatches' at all....
So yes... the used market is certainly where it stays for me...
Building cars that use more resources and fuel etc.....erm.....cars are getting more fuel efficient across the board, if you hadn't noticed?
Progress....cars are faster, more fuel efficient, have more "creature comforts" and are much safer than cars of yesteryear. So in objective terms, I don't think one can deny progress. For those who prefer NA engines, more "involving" feeling steering etc then perhaps, but that's subjective.
So, from an objective point of view I'd like to think I've outlined a few reasons how these cars have shown progress. How would you show that they haven't? You've mentioned weight, but that's not really true. Have you got any others?
Using more resources to build - materials
Reduced visability
Increased systems to counter the above
in fact other than.. yes, modern engines are more efficient...I'm sticking with all that I previously wrote.
Bigger, heavier, technically more complicated for no good reason, increased levels of resource to build.
A bulb has not changed it's size, so why has the lamp unit?
How come a car now really requires an 18" rim to look anywhere near proportional?
Why do we need a computer to decide if it's dark enough to put our lights on?
For the record I couldn't care less - the last hot hatch I had was a 205 gti...
I guess it's profits vs choice.
And for cars of this kind of sector, it ain't worth their while offering less doors, or a manual... The general public want lazy, soft, auto everything products...they're tools for a job.
Sadly then when it comes to making a little halo model the engineers have limited options to funk it up...
Using more resources to build - materials
Reduced visability
Increased systems to counter the above
in fact other than.. yes, modern engines are more efficient...I'm sticking with all that I previously wrote.
Bigger, heavier, technically more complicated for no good reason, increased levels of resource to build.
A bulb has not changed it's size, so why has the lamp unit?
How come a car now really requires an 18" rim to look anywhere near proportional?
Why do we need a computer to decide if it's dark enough to put our lights on?
New 5 series, new 7 series, new MX5, new Audi A5 and Lamborghini Huracan.
Over to you.
Fingers crossed it has an epic chassis and aggressive price otherwise it might be a bit of an also-ran in the generic 5dr / 4 pot turbo hot match market.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff