RE: Jaguar I-Pace eTrophy - Frankfurt 2017

RE: Jaguar I-Pace eTrophy - Frankfurt 2017

Wednesday 13th September 2017

Jaguar I-Pace eTrophy - Frankfurt 2017

How to create excitement around an electric Jaguar SUV? Race it!



Well this is a bit different. As part of Jaguar's ongoing commitment to vehicle electrification - and you better get used to that phrase, if you're not already - it has today announced an electric racing series. Not just any old racing series, either, but one using the I-Pace. Yeah, the crossover.

Gentlemen, start your engin... oh no, wait.
Gentlemen, start your engin... oh no, wait.
The I-Pace eTrophy will be the official support race of Formula E from the start of season five, which begins at the end of 2018. It will therefore race in 10 city centres across the globe and support the launch of the road car, which is due at about the same time.

The ambitious plan is for a grid of 20 cars, with the seats allocated on the old arrive and drive basis. Pay for your seat and Jaguar will look after the car, provide the hospitality and even give you a race suit - all you do is turn up and romp to victory, then party into the daylight in one of the world's greatest cities (the end of that may have been exaggerated).

"Oh yeah, A. Driver? Heard of him. He's good."
"Oh yeah, A. Driver? Heard of him. He's good."
As the world's first international race series with production EVs - although Tesla may have something to say about that - detail on both the eTrophy race car and series are vague at the moment. Gerd Mauser, Jaguar Racing's Chairman, said: "With the launch of the Jaguar I-Pace eTrophy we have strengthened our commitment to battery electric vehicles... Ultimately this innovative series will enhance the technology in our future electric vehicles and benefit our customers."

Jaguar says technical specs will follow next year, along with prices, and the race calendar is still subject to FIA approval. But a one-make production electric series is going to happen, with crossovers. Those slabby sides should make for good door-to-door racing too. And one-make racing is always fiercely competitive. Consider us intrigued, and get ready for more details soon!

 

 

Author
Discussion

PhantomPH

Original Poster:

4,043 posts

226 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
Really wish I could afford a seat in a series like this. (Not that I know what it costs of course, but I cannot imagine it's open to someone with less than a million in the bank!)

Richair

1,021 posts

198 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
FFS. That's it, we're doomed. Sports car racing is dead and soon people will be watching SUV's race around a track, marketing>engineering etc. etc.

It's not April 1st is it?

unpc

2,837 posts

214 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
One make series tend to be a crash fest so it should be an ok watch. Can see this a good support series to Formula E which needs some more depth to liven it up and it's good publicity for a new product. I'd like to see a new tin top EV race or rallycross series open to all manufacturers but I've no idea how you'd set up a set of technical regs for one.

Blayney

2,948 posts

187 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
Wtf is this ste?

hammo19

5,024 posts

197 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
They look good - but I ain't gonna buy one....

akirk

5,394 posts

115 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
Richair said:
FFS. That's it, we're doomed. Sports car racing is dead and soon people will be watching SUV's race around a track, marketing>engineering etc. etc.
At what point is something an SUV or not - it used to be ground-clearance, but that looks like any other normal car - looks to be less ground-clearance than I used to have on the Skoda Octavia Scout...

Cotic

469 posts

153 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
Richair said:
FFS. That's it, we're doomed. Sports car racing is dead and soon people will be watching SUV's race around a track, marketing>engineering etc. etc.

It's not April 1st is it?
Which fast-paced, highly popular sports car racing series is this knocking off the calendar then?

Fetchez la vache

5,574 posts

215 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
Lots of advertising space! biggrin

To be honest I'd be more interested in watching this than Formula-E.

filski666

3,841 posts

193 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
akirk said:
Richair said:
FFS. That's it, we're doomed. Sports car racing is dead and soon people will be watching SUV's race around a track, marketing>engineering etc. etc.
At what point is something an SUV or not - it used to be ground-clearance, but that looks like any other normal car - looks to be less ground-clearance than I used to have on the Skoda Octavia Scout...
Depends on Market. Generally an SUV is defined by ground clearance, approach and departure angles and breakover.

A lot of cars are classified as SUVs as it means a less stringent requirement for federal bumper regulations - which are the opposite of EU bumper requirements which favour pedestrian protection (ie soft bumpers) versus federal which favour protecting the car components such as headlamps from damage (ie hard bumpers). This means you don't have to design separate bumpers for different markets or have ghastly add-on protectors as seen on federal versions of McLaren F1 and Bugatti Chiron

An easy way to achieve this is use of air suspension on US market cars, and a raised "off -road mode" to ensure homologation as an SUV - this means they can be classified as SUVs but in normal use ride a lot lower - similar to a car.

Also bear in mind this is a race car - so the bumpers and sideskirts are deeper and the suspension is lower than the road car











Edited by filski666 on Tuesday 12th September 14:11

SydneyBridge

8,634 posts

159 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
Fetchez la vache said:
Lots of advertising space! biggrin

To be honest I'd be more interested in watching this than Formula-E.
this was my first though- especially if its one short race, with no car changing etc...

akirk

5,394 posts

115 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
filski666 said:
akirk said:
Richair said:
FFS. That's it, we're doomed. Sports car racing is dead and soon people will be watching SUV's race around a track, marketing>engineering etc. etc.
At what point is something an SUV or not - it used to be ground-clearance, but that looks like any other normal car - looks to be less ground-clearance than I used to have on the Skoda Octavia Scout...
Depends on Market. Generally an SUV is defined by ground clearance, approach and departure angles and breakover.

A lot of cars are classified as SUVs as it means a less stringent requirement for federal bumper regulations - which are the opposite of EU bumper requirements which favour pedestrian protection (ie soft bumpers) versus federal which favour protecting the car components such as headlamps from damage (ie hard bumpers). This means you don't have to design separate bumpers for different markets or have ghastly add-on protectors as seen on federal versions of McLaren F1 and Bugatti Chiron

An easy way to achieve this is use of air suspension on US market cars, and a raised "off -road mode" to ensure homologation as an SUV - this means they can be classified as SUVs but in normal use ride a lot lower - similar to a car.

Also bear in mind this is a race car - so the bumpers and sideskirts are deeper and the suspension is lower than the road car
Interesting - thank you...
but fundamentally it means that this is not really an SUV any more!

thiscocks

3,128 posts

196 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
Should be some good fireball crashes

Plinth

713 posts

89 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all

filski666

3,841 posts

193 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
akirk said:
filski666 said:
akirk said:
Richair said:
FFS. That's it, we're doomed. Sports car racing is dead and soon people will be watching SUV's race around a track, marketing>engineering etc. etc.
At what point is something an SUV or not - it used to be ground-clearance, but that looks like any other normal car - looks to be less ground-clearance than I used to have on the Skoda Octavia Scout...
Depends on Market. Generally an SUV is defined by ground clearance, approach and departure angles and breakover.

A lot of cars are classified as SUVs as it means a less stringent requirement for federal bumper regulations - which are the opposite of EU bumper requirements which favour pedestrian protection (ie soft bumpers) versus federal which favour protecting the car components such as headlamps from damage (ie hard bumpers). This means you don't have to design separate bumpers for different markets or have ghastly add-on protectors as seen on federal versions of McLaren F1 and Bugatti Chiron

An easy way to achieve this is use of air suspension on US market cars, and a raised "off -road mode" to ensure homologation as an SUV - this means they can be classified as SUVs but in normal use ride a lot lower - similar to a car.

Also bear in mind this is a race car - so the bumpers and sideskirts are deeper and the suspension is lower than the road car
Interesting - thank you...
but fundamentally it means that this is not really an SUV any more!
to be fair - most cars like this are marketed as "Crossovers" - not SUVs - which means they are cars with slightly higher ride heights and SUV-ish styling. Definitely not SUVs in the original sense of the term - unfortunately that is what happens when big utilitarian vehicles become trendy but people don't want to pay for or need all that ruggedness and off road capability...an SUV-lite wink








akirk

5,394 posts

115 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
filski666 said:
akirk said:
filski666 said:
akirk said:
Richair said:
FFS. That's it, we're doomed. Sports car racing is dead and soon people will be watching SUV's race around a track, marketing>engineering etc. etc.
At what point is something an SUV or not - it used to be ground-clearance, but that looks like any other normal car - looks to be less ground-clearance than I used to have on the Skoda Octavia Scout...
Depends on Market. Generally an SUV is defined by ground clearance, approach and departure angles and breakover.

A lot of cars are classified as SUVs as it means a less stringent requirement for federal bumper regulations - which are the opposite of EU bumper requirements which favour pedestrian protection (ie soft bumpers) versus federal which favour protecting the car components such as headlamps from damage (ie hard bumpers). This means you don't have to design separate bumpers for different markets or have ghastly add-on protectors as seen on federal versions of McLaren F1 and Bugatti Chiron

An easy way to achieve this is use of air suspension on US market cars, and a raised "off -road mode" to ensure homologation as an SUV - this means they can be classified as SUVs but in normal use ride a lot lower - similar to a car.

Also bear in mind this is a race car - so the bumpers and sideskirts are deeper and the suspension is lower than the road car
Interesting - thank you...
but fundamentally it means that this is not really an SUV any more!
to be fair - most cars like this are marketed as "Crossovers" - not SUVs - which means they are cars with slightly higher ride heights and SUV-ish styling. Definitely not SUVs in the original sense of the term - unfortunately that is what happens when big utilitarian vehicles become trendy but people don't want to pay for or need all that ruggedness and off road capability...an SUV-lite wink
you can just see the conversations when they are designing them...

"we need a new SUV - lets take a xyz model and jack it up..."
"yes, good idea, should sell well.. but we need to make sure it handles well"
" oh that's not a problem, the target market won't take it off road, so we will just lower it to handle better..."
"oh, I see - a lowered, jacked up car - sounds great, we will call it a crossover..."

biggrin

dantournay

432 posts

209 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
They did a one make support series with the XJR-15. I know which I'd rather watch

I suppose the Jaguar marketing department will be able to say they won a race at a Formula E event.

TheBishop

46 posts

267 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
Anthing's got to better than formula e, so good luck to them, arrive and drive probably not the best idea tho'

TB

GT119

6,668 posts

173 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
filski666 said:
akirk said:
filski666 said:
akirk said:
Richair said:
FFS. That's it, we're doomed. Sports car racing is dead and soon people will be watching SUV's race around a track, marketing>engineering etc. etc.
At what point is something an SUV or not - it used to be ground-clearance, but that looks like any other normal car - looks to be less ground-clearance than I used to have on the Skoda Octavia Scout...
Depends on Market. Generally an SUV is defined by ground clearance, approach and departure angles and breakover.

A lot of cars are classified as SUVs as it means a less stringent requirement for federal bumper regulations - which are the opposite of EU bumper requirements which favour pedestrian protection (ie soft bumpers) versus federal which favour protecting the car components such as headlamps from damage (ie hard bumpers). This means you don't have to design separate bumpers for different markets or have ghastly add-on protectors as seen on federal versions of McLaren F1 and Bugatti Chiron

An easy way to achieve this is use of air suspension on US market cars, and a raised "off -road mode" to ensure homologation as an SUV - this means they can be classified as SUVs but in normal use ride a lot lower - similar to a car.

Also bear in mind this is a race car - so the bumpers and sideskirts are deeper and the suspension is lower than the road car
Interesting - thank you...
but fundamentally it means that this is not really an SUV any more!
to be fair - most cars like this are marketed as "Crossovers" - not SUVs - which means they are cars with slightly higher ride heights and SUV-ish styling. Definitely not SUVs in the original sense of the term - unfortunately that is what happens when big utilitarian vehicles become trendy but people don't want to pay for or need all that ruggedness and off road capability...an SUV-lite wink
Calling the I-Pace an SUV is misleading.
Jaguar refer to it as an electric sports car, not an SUV.
I have seen it in the flesh at Goodwood, it is noticeably more compact and lower than the F-Pace yet due to the lack of engine and associated gubbins, it is roomier insider. In turn that gives a lower centre of gravity and it probably ends up with dynamic characteristics similar to a sports saloon, one with with 4WD and a very fat torque curve. I wouldn't be surprised if it matches an M5 for performance and handling.

unsprung

5,467 posts

125 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
article said:
Those slabby sides should make for good door-to-door racing too.
"Rubbin' is racin'."

vz-r_dave

3,469 posts

219 months

Wednesday 13th September 2017
quotequote all
It'll be a tire noise fest.....