RE: Mercedes G350d: Driven

RE: Mercedes G350d: Driven

Saturday 14th October 2017

Mercedes G350d: Driven

We seize a rare opportunity to take the latest G-Wagen nto the mucky stuff...



After nearly forty years the Gelandewagen has carved an impressive, and profitable, niche for itself - one that has precisely nothing to do with what it was conceived for in the early 70s. Back then Mercedes, famously encouraged by the Shah of Iran, was looking to build a very functional off-roader and teamed up with Steyr-Daimler-Puch (a famed Austrian maker of military vehicles) to nail the robust requirements of such a venture.


The G-Wagen's form-follows-function 'styling' is the result. However, much like the Land Rover Defender, the anachronistic look and rugged, go-anywhere appeal of the model meant it struck a chord with well-heeled civilians, and even in the early 80s, Mercedes had begun to pander to their needs. By 1990, and the introduction of the new 463, the trio of diff lock switches would most often be flanked by wood and leather, and by '93 you could have a V8. A year later, the car was officially dubbed the G-Class.

Today, in the UK, an entry-level G350d starts at £92,025 - little wonder then that they're such a rare sight beyond cash-rich city centres. Rarer still that you'd see one tarnished by the muck of a British green lane. Consequently Mercedes, well aware of the fact that its most capable off-roader doesn't typically do anything more challenging than mounting a kerb outside Selfridges, has kindly laid on Stonor Park in the Chiltern Hills for a spot of reasonably serious adventuring.


This is good for two reasons: a) removing the tarmac from beneath the G-Wagen's tyres and replacing it with the soft, nurtured soil of an 850-year-old park does wonders for its previously middling ride and refinement and b) very much like a Defender, the takeaway experience of driving a G350d changes totally when it's presented with an opportunity to show off its latent, landscape-crossing talent.

Naturally it is Land Rover's longest running son which provides the benchmark for the G-Class, but in truth they're rather different beasts. Gaydon's (understandable) reticence at investing any significant money in the Defender is always highlighted by the material superiority of its German rival. The G-Wagen is a comprehensively nicer place to be (i.e. your correspondent fits in it without the need to have his elbow poking out of the window) and all the modern trimmings are offered in recognizably plush Mercedes trim.

At 2.6 tonnes the car is massively more substantial than the Land Rover, but the 245hp 3.0-litre V6 is precisely the sort of potent oil burner that the Defender never received, and compared with Gaydon's sinewy mountain goat, it makes a greased cougar of the G350d. Given the nature of the exercise, Mercedes' instructors have us in low range almost from the get-go, but there's a lingering suspicion that 442lb ft of torque from 1,600rpm would see us across most of the park without ever indulging the transfer case.


Doing so of course is simply involves the push of a button (much like selecting gears on the seven-speed transmission requires the tug of a paddle). But that ought not to give the impression that the G-wagen is automated in the Land Rover Discovery mould: there's no terrain response dial, hill descent control or crawl mode here - there's your low range button, and your three dash-mounted hero switches, one each for the centre, rear and front locking diffs.

This means that for all its opulence and power - and with the drivetrain whirring away in the shortened variant of second or third gear (and on Atturo all-terrain tyres to boot) - the G350d still feels like an enjoyably analogue piece of kit, and primed for just about anything. Where a current Disco or Land Cruiser would molly coddle you down a steep, grassy gradient, in the Mercedes you do it the old fashioned way; letting first gear take all the strain and making steering inputs with kid gloves.


In this respect, the deadweight feel of the G-Wagen's hydraulic rack makes a good deal more sense than it does on the road - but its inherently slow rate of response is still hard to forgive when you don't make it through a 90-degree turn at the first go. This is likely to be the only manoeuvre that ever trips you up though: the G-Class's approach and departure angles are legendarily good (all part and parcel of the original design) and while there're obviously no air springs to impart any additional ride height, there's sufficient in-built ground clearance for nothing at Stonor to make a lasting impression on the car's underside.

Indeed, even when the ruts deepen to proper water-filled welly-toppers, the G350d doesn't really want for anymore than a cautious engagement of the centre diff lock. It barely winces at the freshly dug obstacle meant to show off the traction-finding ability of the front and rear diffs either: the axle-testing pits having not been made quite deep enough to challenge the limits of the articulation, meaning the Mercedes lollops through with the indifference of a well-oiled Panzer.


Obviously this is all rather the point. Evidently neither time, nor any amount of soft furnishings inside, can dull the G-Wagen's embryonic ability to march across the countryside unhindered by anything as mundane as changing conditions. In fact, the subsequent layers of richness and modernity appear less as useless fat at Stonor, but rather as appropriate cushioning; not so thick as to flatten the scenery entirely (as a Range Rover would) but just plump enough to remove the sharp, disconcerting edges. With the Defender dead and the Discovery 4 gone, the G-Class is perhaps the last bonafide way of accessing an appreciably mechanical, deluxe off-roader while simultaneously emptying a large bank account.


MERCEDES-BENZ G350D
Engine
: 2,987cc V6 diesel
Transmission: 7-speed automatic, low-range transfer case, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 245@3,600rpm
Torque (lb ft): 442@1,600-2,400rpm
0-62mph: 8.9 seconds
Top speed: 119mph
Weight: 2,612kg
MPG: 28.5 (NEDC combined)
CO2: 261g/km
Price: £88,800

 

 

 

 

 

 

Author
Discussion

Gareth9702

Original Poster:

370 posts

133 months

Saturday 14th October 2017
quotequote all
Stonor Park? Serious adventuring? Yer
'avin a laff mate.

samoht

5,751 posts

147 months

Saturday 14th October 2017
quotequote all

Interesting distinction you draw between the modern electronically assisted off-roaders and the Defender / G-Wagen's traditional, hands-on style - I'd not considered that before. There is certainly fun in engaging directly with the mechanicals and the terrain yourself, rather than having a control circuit do it for you ;-) That said, I'd have thought a smaller, lighter, cheaper vehicle would be better suited, but I guess if you're that rich you don't care.

Mr.Jimbo

2,082 posts

184 months

Saturday 14th October 2017
quotequote all
Pedant time: You actually were troubling the transfer case, because that's what splits the gearbox output to the front and rear axles. You perhaps weren't troubling the diff lock inside the T case however.

Also, are those tyres standard fit? Unless they're a factory option it seems a bit of a biased test. Cool to see them doing some offroading though, rather than sitting on 24" rims in a rap video somewhere.

Bill

52,864 posts

256 months

Saturday 14th October 2017
quotequote all
Mr.Jimbo said:
Pedant time: You actually were troubling the transfer case, because that's what splits the gearbox output to the front and rear axles.
scratchchin Isn't the point that they were using low range when they probably didn't need to.

PH: where pedants meet. wink

Gandahar

9,600 posts

129 months

Saturday 14th October 2017
quotequote all
Mr.Jimbo said:
Also, are those tyres standard fit?.
You mentioned the war, but I think you got away with it.

How many Jimny's could you buy for £88k that could do the same ?

With a Jimny also you don't care when your dog has been rolling in fox poo either .... you just let it stink biggrin

Mr.Jimbo

2,082 posts

184 months

Sunday 15th October 2017
quotequote all
Bill said:
scratchchin Isn't the point that they were using low range when they probably didn't need to.

PH: where pedants meet. wink
Yeah but to be fair to them, it makes you feel like an off-road god.

The one time I used it I climbed (admittedly a quite steep curve) in a L322 Range Rover 5.0L Supercharged. Considering the amount of torque available, I don't think Low range was really necessary but I was handing the car back the next day and hadn't used it* hehe

  • I doubt rock crawl mode, raised suspension or diff lock was really necessary either, but, when in Rome boxedin

FerdiZ28

1,355 posts

135 months

Sunday 15th October 2017
quotequote all
Gareth9702 said:
Stonor Park? Serious adventuring? Yer
'avin a laff mate.
Don’t tell me

You have a naff old defender with “one life - live it” stuck to it somewhere and it has lorry straps in the back.


Gareth9702

Original Poster:

370 posts

133 months

Sunday 15th October 2017
quotequote all
FerdiZ28 said:
Don’t tell me

You have a naff old defender with “one life - live it” stuck to it somewhere and it has lorry straps in the back.
Not quite. Driving around a uhpark cannot be serious. Being entirely out of contact with any support is when serious starts.

FerdiZ28

1,355 posts

135 months

Sunday 15th October 2017
quotequote all
Gareth9702 said:
Not quite. Driving around a uhpark cannot be serious. Being entirely out of contact with any support is when serious starts.
And that’s fun how?

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 15th October 2017
quotequote all


88k is massive money, they are nice cars but footballer tax has left they stupid priced.

Futse

183 posts

186 months

Sunday 15th October 2017
quotequote all
Gareth9702 said:
Stonor Park? Serious adventuring? Yer
'avin a laff mate.
To be fair, he said 'reasonably' serious... ;-)

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 15th October 2017
quotequote all
Spectularly overpriced for what you're getting. Money for very old rope.

The margins on this model must be amazing.

warch

2,941 posts

155 months

Sunday 15th October 2017
quotequote all
These off roading days are usually very well stage managed (see also The Land Rover Experience) to make sure the vehicle doesn't get stuck in the mud or hydraulic'ed in deep water for example. As pointed out the vehicles pictured are fitted with mud terrain tyres, which you'll rarely see attached to any modern posh roader, simply because they're noisy and have poor on road characteristics.

That said, these are very very good off roaders as standard. I'd agree that 90 grand is way too much money for one, but I suppose that's the market these days, there are plenty of people who can afford this sort of car.

I'd agree that Defenders are horrendous to drive or spend any amount of time in, although they are comparable off road, if only because they're much more likely to have off road tyres as standard, which is the most important factor in cross country ability.

gizlaroc

17,251 posts

225 months

Sunday 15th October 2017
quotequote all
Gareth9702 said:
Not quite. Driving around a uhpark cannot be serious. Being entirely out of contact with any support is when serious starts.
Is that the track leading to Southwold beach?

Trying to get the AA out to Suffolk can be a right 'mare, especially on a Sunday!

richs2891

898 posts

254 months

Sunday 15th October 2017
quotequote all
janesmith1950 said:
Spectacularly overpriced for what you're getting.
And how much is a Range Rover these days , worth the difference, retain as much value, as reliable ?


Edited by richs2891 on Sunday 15th October 16:14

Gareth9702

Original Poster:

370 posts

133 months

Sunday 15th October 2017
quotequote all
gizlaroc said:
Gareth9702 said:
Not quite. Driving around a uhpark cannot be serious. Being entirely out of contact with any support is when serious starts.
Is that the track leading to Southwold beach?

Trying to get the AA out to Suffolk can be a right 'mare, especially on a Sunday!
Some distance from Southwold. It is the Coorong in South Australia!

Derek Chevalier

3,942 posts

174 months

Sunday 15th October 2017
quotequote all
warch said:
I'd agree that Defenders are horrendous to drive or spend any amount of time in, although they are comparable off road, if only because they're much more likely to have off road tyres as standard, which is the most important factor in cross country ability.
Surely the locking diffs of the Merc will make it much more able than the Defender?

warch

2,941 posts

155 months

Sunday 15th October 2017
quotequote all
Derek Chevalier said:
Surely the locking diffs of the Merc will make it much more able than the Defender?
I didn't realise it had front and rear diff locks. Yes that would make it almost unstoppable on the right tyres and much better than any standard Land Rover.

I have had a Land Rover for nearly twenty five years (the same one) but my all time favourite 4x4 is the G Wagen's bigger brother the Unimog.

Olf

11,974 posts

219 months

Monday 16th October 2017
quotequote all
YET ANOTHER G-Class advertorial on Pistonheads.

You guys are shameless in plugging this out-dated heap of overpriced crap. Must be working out for you financially though given you do at least one piece a month on it.

GIYess

1,324 posts

102 months

Monday 16th October 2017
quotequote all
A real pity they don't make a bare bones version. These are one vehicle I really want but I cant even afford a 1980s rust bucket! Great machine.