PH Footnote: Mid-Engined Aston Martins
How Gaydon is preparing to blaze a new trail in its Second Century
Palmer has already said that the new vehicle, due to arrive in 2021, will be a rival for the Ferrari 488 GTB, the car he considers to be the benchmark in the sector.
Since day one, though, Aston Martin has built front-engined cars. It's as ingrained within the fibre of the brand as four-wheel drive is at Audi. To navigate the somewhat significant issue of not actually knowing how to build a mid-engined car, Aston Martin has been on an aggressive recruitment drive. It's been hiring left, right and centre (or should that be middle?) In fact, if you've spent any meaningful length of time developing such cars, there's a pretty good chance Palmer will be phoning you up sometime soon.
There have been plenty of behind the scenes appointments, too, all of which mean Aston Martin now has a wealth of mid-engined experience within its ranks. This tells us one very encouraging thing; Aston Martin is not moving into this sector lightly. I spoke recently to the marque's Chief Marketing Officer Simon Sproule, who pointed out that the high performance market is heading in only one direction. Wealthy performance car buyers, he says, increasingly want the harder-edged dynamics, exoticism and visual theatre of a mid-engined car.
There are no further details out there just yet. We don't know what the car's underpinnings will be - carbon fibre tub? - nor do we know how it'll be powered. Palmer has promised, though, that the car will not be styled so much by airflow as by the eye. It will bring beauty to the sector, apparently.
It's tremendous news, no doubt, but you can't help but wonder just how many £200,000 (or thereabouts) supercars the market can support. It's getting very crowded in there. The rich keep on getting richer, though, and Aston Martin certainly has the brand kudos to stand toe-to-toe with the established proponents of mid-engined architecture. Given that the car will be straying away from almost 110 years of Aston Martin heritage, perhaps it could be called the Vagabond.
Your cars don't all have to look the same. Why do manufacturers think that's an advantage? (And aren't people who spend £100k on a car irked that it looks like the £30k car?)
And they've had st gearboxes that refuse the change down when asked for god knows how long. Whose engine are they using this time? Why not just buy the whole car from whoever provides the engine? I don't see the point in it.
This is all sorts of wrong. A rival for what will be close to a decade old car, that's not even the market leader now. I hope this was just a clumsy quote.
And they've had st gearboxes that refuse the change down when asked for god knows how long. Whose engine are they using this time? Why not just buy the whole car from whoever provides the engine? I don't see the point in it.
And they've had st gearboxes that refuse the change down when asked for god knows how long. Whose engine are they using this time? Why not just buy the whole car from whoever provides the engine? I don't see the point in it.
1) No one these days is a << insert name of one car company here>> man (or woman) any longer. All modern cars are basically the same, built from the pool of standard components supplied by the massive, multinational Tier1 companies (Bosch, GKN, Valeo, Denso, ZF, Mahle, etc etc). An engineer will move based on "money" and "interest" For example, Chris Goodwin, a smart, driven man, is excused from leaving MAL to go to AML (funny the initials are the same letters!) to get 1) more cash and 2) the rewarding oportunity to help build up a car from scratch, something he's proven he can do at MAL.
2) Aston have recently had a number of high level losses. For example, an AML stalwart Ian Minards, for years a leading figure in PD at AML, snatched away by Dyson to bring some much needed authority and weight to its fledgling (and somewhat challenging) first foray into the automotive market. Refilling those gaps was always going to require someone of equivalent stature, and that means someone from within the industry.
3) The big question though, imo, is considering what the powertrain architecture of a mid-engineed Aston will be. The BIW is easy, AML already do fully stressed 'plate and beam' aluminium structures, and move to a carbon tub is frankly pretty easy these days (with several low volume suppliers of such things). No, the million dollar question is what to power it with! Given the current and accelerating (sic) sea change in passenger car electrification technology, you'd be a brave man to just fit a V8. The flip side question then becomes "is a mid engineed sports EV an Aston Martin?" And if it is, what makes it one, when the two most defining factors of Aston's History have been lost? (Big V engine, at the front). Experience suggests it's very difficult to come up with a BIW architecture that can house, and be optimised for both an ICE and an EV powertrain, so it may have to be 'one or the other'
1) No one these days is a << insert name of one car company here>> man (or woman) any longer. All modern cars are basically the same, built from the pool of standard components supplied by the massive, multinational Tier1 companies (Bosch, GKN, Valeo, Denso, ZF, Mahle, etc etc). An engineer will move based on "money" and "interest" For example, Chris Goodwin, a smart, driven man, is excused from leaving MAL to go to AML (funny the initials are the same letters!) to get 1) more cash and 2) the rewarding oportunity to help build up a car from scratch, something he's proven he can do at MAL.
2) Aston have recently had a number of high level losses. For example, an AML stalwart Ian Minards, for years a leading figure in PD at AML, snatched away by Dyson to bring some much needed authority and weight to its fledgling (and somewhat challenging) first foray into the automotive market. Refilling those gaps was always going to require someone of equivalent stature, and that means someone from within the industry.
3) The big question though, imo, is considering what the powertrain architecture of a mid-engineed Aston will be. The BIW is easy, AML already do fully stressed 'plate and beam' aluminium structures, and move to a carbon tub is frankly pretty easy these days (with several low volume suppliers of such things). No, the million dollar question is what to power it with! Given the current and accelerating (sic) sea change in passenger car electrification technology, you'd be a brave man to just fit a V8. The flip side question then becomes "is a mid engineed sports EV an Aston Martin?" And if it is, what makes it one, when the two most defining factors of Aston's History have been lost? (Big V engine, at the front). Experience suggests it's very difficult to come up with a BIW architecture that can house, and be optimised for both an ICE and an EV powertrain, so it may be 'one or the other'
This is all sorts of wrong. A rival for what will be close to a decade old car, that's not even the market leader now. I hope this was just a clumsy quote.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferrari_488
... and will probably be replaced by the "499" that year
Mid engine rwd , 1200kg sub £200k and sexy as f*** to look at - imho that’s the car Aston have needs for 10 years now to get the brand beyond the “everything has to look like a DB7” phase. They need a new selling point and making a technically excellent car that looks ace would do it for me.
And no, I don’t think there’s the slightest chance of that actually happening, but I wouldn’t be at all surprised if AMG have a less extreme interpretation of the F1 derived power plant on the drawing board somewhere. if you can’t generate your outrage with a bloody great N/A V8 anymore then you’ve got to find another way of stopping people in their tracks.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff