RE: Honda S2000: Spotted

RE: Honda S2000: Spotted

Saturday 19th May 2018

Honda S2000: Spotted

How does a large and prodigious car manufacturer at the top of its game celebrate turning 50?



The Honda Motor Company was officially formed in 1949 and, to mark the firm's jubilee (an event that occurs every 50 years, incidentally), it gave the world the S2000, a rear-wheel drive, two-seat drop-top sports car of prodigious performance, 50/50 weight distribution and impressively low polar moments of inertia.

It had even more than that: for starters there was a wonderful 2.0-litre 16-valve VTEC engine which produced 240hp at 8,300rpm. It was a vivid screamer that could potter all day and then hammer like a racer at the switch of a cam profile. Top speed was 150mph - wonderfully quick - and the 0 to 60mph time was 6.0 seconds - delightfully brisk. Chuck in a slick six-speed 'box and a Torsen limited-slip diff and suddenly things looked decidedly juicy.   


And there was more. The front/mid-engined layout, the low centre of gravity, the wide track, the aluminium double-wishbone suspension, the rigid frame, the high-geared electric power steering, the special Bridgestone tyres, the digital instruments and even a hood that was quick to use. It was all tremendously well thought out and brilliant fun on the road - and it was an 'onda, so it'd never go wrong.

I have to point out at this stage that some thought the on-the-limit handling of the earlier cars too twitchy, and others weren't convinced by that electric steering (later models had minor mods to quell its zest), but punting an S2000 of any vintage down a winding road on a sunny day will still have you laughing out loud - it's a yaw-busting, jaw-aching hoot.


What isn't such a cause for laughter is that some time back you could have picked one up for under £5k, but this one, spied in our classifieds for a mere £7.5k, is about as low as you're going to get now. It's still a good price, though, especially for a car with plenty of history and only 79k on board - this one's also a GT model with a hardtop - and the value's only going to go one way.

An investment in which you can have fun? Sounds like a cause for celebration to me.


SPECIFICATION - HONDA S2000

Engine: 1,997cc, 4-cyl
Transmission: 6-speed manual, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 240@8,300rpm
Torque (lb ft): 162@6,500rpm
MPG: 28.3
CO2: 236g/km
First registered: 2000
Recorded mileage: 79,000
Price new: £25,995
Yours for: £7,500

 

 

Mark Pearson

Author
Discussion

JRaj

Original Poster:

65 posts

73 months

Saturday 19th May 2018
quotequote all
Stunning and looks properly looked after too. Felt so engineered the very first time I drove one. Just right.

Butter Face

30,302 posts

160 months

Saturday 19th May 2018
quotequote all
Seems a reasonable deal (as far as they go now)

SidewaysSi

10,742 posts

234 months

Saturday 19th May 2018
quotequote all
Don't use the word "investment". Some people think they will make money on cars which they probably won't.

Contract Killer

4,382 posts

183 months

Saturday 19th May 2018
quotequote all
There is something special about the S2000, i used to swap my second car every year.

However i bought my S2000 for £4K 4 years ago, its not been the most reliable an needed a few quid spent on it, however when all working its such fun to drive on some fun roads.

I like it so much i just cant bring myself to sell it!!

Berkshire bred

985 posts

75 months

Saturday 19th May 2018
quotequote all
Lovely cars and I was very close to buying one, sadly someone bought it before I could get there.
Personally I think the investment opportunity boat has sailed on these now. A year to 18 months back you could get a tidy one for 5k. The same car now is close to double that and I can't see them going much higher unless it is something particularly special.

I would still love one but I don't think I'm willing to pay the premium for a good one.

rtz62

3,369 posts

155 months

Saturday 19th May 2018
quotequote all
Drove one of these for one of my lads at work, taking it home for him.
Everything seemed like it was designed with a singularity or purpose, and moved with the precision of a well-oiled rifle bolt (if rifle bolts are indeed oiled?).
I have to ask the question I guess, but as people comment on the lack of torque, what is the car like with a supercharger kit from TTS performance?
Either way, one of these is on my radar for myself and SWMBO to use for a long drive into southern France and onto Spain. I’m sure there’s more relaxing cars to do the trip in, but other than a TVR or a Coxster, I can’t think of anything I’d prefer at this price point...

Russian Troll Bot

24,980 posts

227 months

Saturday 19th May 2018
quotequote all
They've certainly held their value well

LHRFlightman

1,939 posts

170 months

Saturday 19th May 2018
quotequote all
I love mine, a 1999 car, I'm the 3rd owner and she's got 118k on the clock. Completely standard although I've removed the air box lid.

Took my 14 year old daughter out for a leisurely drive in mine last night. We found ourselves at the Hindhead tunnel, so we went through it. Three times. biggrin

Laughing her head off she was. I've had mine 5 years this August, it's staying with me until I can't get in it anymore.

AmosMoses

4,042 posts

165 months

Saturday 19th May 2018
quotequote all
They are everything I look for in a car, but some how they don’t grab me?

They are growing on me more and more each day though.

jwwbowe

576 posts

172 months

Saturday 19th May 2018
quotequote all
Stunning cars, regret selling mine a 2004 GT, would be worth a lot more than what I sold it for now! The engine is fantastic but the gearbox is perfect, anyone who moans about lack of torque must never of have driven one as it just means you get to change down more often using that lovely shift! Be aware of them in the wet though, not for a inexperienced driver with lead boots. Also be careful how those hard tops are stored when off the car, they warp if stored as pictured in this add for long periods, they came with a stand but you can build one if it doesn't have the stand included, really a two person job to take it on and off without scratching the car, but make a massive difference on long motorway journeys worth having.

sideways man

1,316 posts

137 months

Saturday 19th May 2018
quotequote all
AmosMoses said:
They are everything I look for in a car, but some how they don’t grab me?
My thoughts exactly. I've only had a passenger ride around Llandow circuit in one, it didn't feel quick and the engine note wasn't great either. Shame, as before that day I would certainly have considered one.


andySC

1,191 posts

158 months

Saturday 19th May 2018
quotequote all
I had a 2004 in Navy Blue Pearl (looked great when polished, grim & dull the rest of the time). It was a great car and I kept it for a few years. They really are quite frenzied when you get on it, the gearshift is probably the best I’ve used too. My Mrs reckoned it was like her old MX5 that’d been on a course of steroids. Lively buggers though, even though mine was the later car with the revised set up it still managed to let go when I least expected it, exiting a roundabout onto an uphill motorway slip road suddenly found myself facing the wrong way. Not the best way to start the working week. I’d be tempted into another one, in fact I saw a 2008 car for £11995 yesterday at a local garage. Other than fuel, tyres and a service the car didn’t cost anything, nothing broke and felt as though it never would.

Puddenchucker

4,090 posts

218 months

Saturday 19th May 2018
quotequote all
I used to own one and it never really gelled with me.
When just pootling around (hardly the point of a car like this) it was fine, no more difficult to drive than a warm hatchback, apart from slightly worse visibility with the roof up, or perhaps more pertinently an MX-5.
When hammering it, it sounded brilliant, but if I recall correctly, by the time the engine hit 9k RPM in 2nd, you were already over the 60 limit and changing into 3rd dropped you the bottom of the VTEC point, so you may as well just shift straight into 6th.

Mine also had far too may rattles after only a year of ownership and around 10k miles.

Having said that, I still miss it a little bit......But not enough to want to own another one.

Edited by Puddenchucker on Saturday 19th May 10:34

s m

23,223 posts

203 months

Saturday 19th May 2018
quotequote all
It makes me smile to see it described as 'delightfully brisk'

Usually faster older stuff than that is described as 'woefully slow these days' by many on here - I'm sure they must test F1 cars or something


unsprung

5,467 posts

124 months

Saturday 19th May 2018
quotequote all
LHRFlightman said:


Took my 14 year old daughter out for a leisurely drive in mine last night. We found ourselves at the Hindhead tunnel, so we went through it. Three times. biggrin

Laughing her head off she was.
priceless


slipstream 1985

12,220 posts

179 months

Saturday 19th May 2018
quotequote all
I'm going to go against the grain here but i didn't like it. Drove a mates one (well looked after as well) Gearing was too tall and steering was artificial. It put me off rwd NA cars for a while but luckly I had a drive in a bigger engined NA car which I loved. I suspect closer gearing across the range even if it limited the speed to 140 would be much better.

9k rpm

521 posts

210 months

Saturday 19th May 2018
quotequote all
slipstream 1985 said:
I'm going to go against the grain here but i didn't like it. Drove a mates one (well looked after as well) Gearing was too tall and steering was artificial. It put me off rwd NA cars for a while but luckly I had a drive in a bigger engined NA car which I loved. I suspect closer gearing across the range even if it limited the speed to 140 would be much better.
Gearing too tall? It pulls 4K rpm at 70mph in 6th. I wouldn’t want it much shorter!

mrfunex

545 posts

174 months

Saturday 19th May 2018
quotequote all
Regarding the lack of torque...

For a 2.0litre car, it’s about average.
For a 240bhp car, it’s low (NA, you’d usually be looking at a 3.0 V6 for this sort of power)

However, it’s got a gearbox with a lovely action. Use it, and the revs, and an S2000 can be a wonderful thing. Not perfect, but don’t imperfections add to the charm?

Bonefish Blues

26,726 posts

223 months

Saturday 19th May 2018
quotequote all
Bought one, admired it in many respects, but not for me. It lasted 3 months before I sold it on, the shortest period I've ever owned a car.

NorthernSky

983 posts

117 months

Saturday 19th May 2018
quotequote all
Bonefish Blues said:
Bought one, admired it in many respects, but not for me. It lasted 3 months before I sold it on, the shortest period I've ever owned a car.
What were your reasons? Please articulate further.