RE: Volvo V40 T4: Spotted

RE: Volvo V40 T4: Spotted

Sunday 17th June 2018

Volvo V40 T4: Spotted

No, not the slightly uninspiring hatchback. This quick V40 was the 850's hidden gem baby brother!



Right, then, folks: what we have here, and yours for a relatively measly sum, is a turbocharged, bright yellow Volvo estate from the 1990s, finished in yellow.

'Ooh. An 850 T-5R', you're thinking. Well, you would be if this attempt at a suspense hadn't been ruined by the picture above. So no, this is not an 850 T-5R. It's something a little less cool, a little less well-known, but a whole heck of a heap cheaper. This is the Volvo V40 T4 - and it's a car you should buy right now.


OK, so this one isn't technically from the 1990s - it was just designed then - but that's no bad thing. It's a 2000 car, to be exact, which means it's a post-facelift model with the smoked, twin-chamber headlamps. And that's a good thing, even if it's for very little reason other than it looks a little more upmarket than the earlier models.

It won't have escaped your attention that it's finished in yellow. Panama Yellow, to be precise. Think of it as Volvo's Dakar Yellow; a shade that's best described as 'Marmite'. But slathered all over a V40 T4, contrasting with those dark headlamps and the black rubbing strips encircling the car, we're rather partial. Certainly, you won't see another like it out on the road.


Also in common with the 850 is its BTCC link, albeit a slightly more tenuous one. By 2000, Volvo had pulled out of the BTCC, but the year before, the V40's saloon sibling, the S40, was Volvo's touring car of choice, bringing the manufacturer a solid third place in the constructors' championship. Granted, nobody but die-hard motorsport enthusiasts will remember that - but still, the link is there.

This one's done just 85,000 miles, too - and you don't need us to tell you that finding a Volvo from this era with that mileage is a rare thing, and so much the rarer when we're talking performance models. As you'd hope, there's a stack of invoices to back up that mileage, and evidence of lots of TLC through the years.


What of the T4 as a thing to drive, though? It's a bit of a mixed bag, to be honest. That 1.9-litre turbo engine kicks out 200hp and 221lb ft at just 2,500rpm, giving it properly useful poke - enough to drag it to 62mph in a little over seven seconds. Granted, the somewhat woolly steering and tendency for front-driven torque steer mean it isn't all that handy in the corners, but frankly, it is what it is - a comfortable cruiser that's quick in a straight line, and anything else is irrelevant.

Besides, who cares when it's this cheap? And this useful? And this unusual? As an interesting daily for very little outlay, this V40 has bags of appeal; sure, it doesn't have quite the same kudos as its bigger brother, but you'll have spent a fraction of the price and you'll be having almost as much fun. And who knows? Maybe one day it'll be as cool as a T-5R. It's already just as yellow.


SPECIFICATION - VOLVO V40 T4
Engine:
1,855cc 4-cyl turbo
Transmission: 5-speed manual, front-wheel-drive
Power (hp): 200@5,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 221@2,500rpm
MPG: 23.7 (NEDC combined)
CO2: 212g/km
First registered: 2000
Recorded mileage: 85,000
Price new: £19,645
Yours for: £1,895

See the original advert here.

Author
Discussion

CAMELZED

Original Poster:

48 posts

175 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
231.7 mpg. Fantastic!
Did he say it was yellow?

Toyoda

1,557 posts

101 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
Anyone else thinking the asking price isn't exactly cheap?!

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
Ah the traditional Volvo formula of an excellent engine and a car that can't really do it justice. That interior is pure Mitsubishi too, not a hint of design commonality with the cars Volvo actually designed themselves.

These do appear to be quite robust though, well regarded in the shedding community provided you avoid the GDi engine.

snake_oil

2,039 posts

76 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
Toyoda said:
Anyone else thinking the asking price isn't exactly cheap?!
Just how cheap do you want it to be?!

richinlondon

595 posts

123 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
Remembering test driving one when new - appalling understeer and uncomfortable. Can recall the salesman agreeing saying they couldn’t handle the power

budgie smuggler

5,393 posts

160 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
snake_oil said:
Just how cheap do you want it to be?!
It's a 20 year old, not very good car in a not very good colour. I think you'd be nuts to hand over nearly £2k for it

Put it this way, these are both from around the same time, better cars and you could nearly buy them both for the cost of this volvo.


Audi Allroad 2.7 T Quattro 5dr
https://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201...

BMW 3 Series 3.0 330i SE Touring 5dr
https://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201...

snake_oil

2,039 posts

76 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
A part ex to clear with 145k and an Allroad with what looks like collapsed suspension.

Ok.

Have you actually seen the condition of the Volvo?

PaulGT3

375 posts

173 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
Low coolant light showing with engine running on the 330i!

Sparky137

869 posts

182 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
budgie smuggler said:
It's a 20 year old, not very good car in a not very good colour. I think you'd be nuts to hand over nearly £2k for it

Put it this way, these are both from around the same time, better cars and you could nearly buy them both for the cost of this volvo.


Audi Allroad 2.7 T Quattro 5dr
https://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201...

BMW 3 Series 3.0 330i SE Touring 5dr
https://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201...
Audi: whole heap of expensive trouble just waiting to happen.

BMW: Did the seller actually put any effort at all into preparing it for sale? I think not.

The Volvo looks a far better bet than either of these.

JD82

365 posts

136 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
Sparky137 said:
budgie smuggler said:
It's a 20 year old, not very good car in a not very good colour. I think you'd be nuts to hand over nearly £2k for it

Put it this way, these are both from around the same time, better cars and you could nearly buy them both for the cost of this volvo.


Audi Allroad 2.7 T Quattro 5dr
https://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201...

BMW 3 Series 3.0 330i SE Touring 5dr
https://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201...
Audi: whole heap of expensive trouble just waiting to happen.

BMW: Did the seller actually put any effort at all into preparing it for sale? I think not.

The Volvo looks a far better bet than either of these.
This ^ The other two look totally shagged

rayyan171

1,294 posts

94 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
I'd rather get the newer V50/S40 with the T5 engine, doubt its much more than that asking price.

r11co

6,244 posts

231 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
snake_oil said:
A part ex to clear with 145k and an Allroad with what looks like collapsed suspension.
This. Let's find two random German PoS for the same price because badge. Both those cars look like they are one sale away from being parted out for scrap

I'd get the Volvo for its impressive 231.7 mpg. wink

Edited by r11co on Sunday 17th June 11:41

Turbotechnic

675 posts

77 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
I must admit I've got an itch that needs scratching. Always fancied having one... hmmm

RemyMartin81D

6,759 posts

206 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
1ks worth of car tops.

They drive woeful even with standard power. The chassis is just pure ste.

Interesting though.

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
RemyMartin81D said:
1ks worth of car tops.

They drive woeful even with standard power. The chassis is just pure ste.

Interesting though.
Agree. Maybe £1,500 if it's absolutely perfect. As someone else mentioned you can get a 2004 onwards V50/S40 with the LPT T5 for not much more, and that's a much better car in every way.

cooperd5

83 posts

173 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
I had one for a year of bangernomics, fast and useful but no handler by any stretch. I paid £560, ran it a year for about £200 and sold it for £580 :-) Just a bit thirsty, about 28mpg, a long way of 231!
This one looks decent (and better than mine was) but pricy. Maybe £1k max.
They are handy though, got fence panels on mine...

budgie smuggler

5,393 posts

160 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
JD82 said:
This ^ The other two look totally shagged
Totally shagged?! They are 20 year old cars for a grand. Far better cars than the OP, and HALF the price. THat means you have a grand in your pocket for fixes. Or it goes wrong? fk it, buy another and you're still no worse off. Plus they are commonl available, well understood cars and you can find spares and people to work on them easily.

They both have full/long MOT (TBC what that means on the second one admitedly).

And guess what? THey were the very first hits on autotrader! I put NO effort into finding them. There are stloads of cars around this price better than the linked car.

The linked car is rare and in reasonable nick but who cares, it's a crap car in a crap colour.

Edited by budgie smuggler on Sunday 17th June 20:57

FN2TypeR

7,091 posts

94 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
budgie smuggler said:
It's a 20 year old, not very good car in a not very good colour. I think you'd be nuts to hand over nearly £2k for it

Put it this way, these are both from around the same time, better cars and you could nearly buy them both for the cost of this volvo.


Audi Allroad 2.7 T Quattro 5dr
https://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201...

BMW 3 Series 3.0 330i SE Touring 5dr
https://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201...
Absolute lies.

Trevor450

1,755 posts

149 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
That’s a pre facelift car with post facelift lights. The interior and bumper lights are the give away.

I had a phase two car. It was without doubt the worst car I have ever owned.

valiant

10,300 posts

161 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
85k miles? Barely run in!

Car looks in great condition and looks like it would provide many more years of happy motoring. Yeah, the handling is not the sharpest by any stretch but it'll sit on the motorway all day long soaking up the miles.

Yes, it's a bit toppy price wise but I'd happily pay a bit over the odds for a 'shed' in such decent condition more so if I needed it to last a few years.

If I was after an estate and only had £2k to play with, I'd be all over that like a rash especially when compared to the alternatives posted above.