RE: PH Origins: Intermittent wipers

RE: PH Origins: Intermittent wipers

Monday 16th July 2018

PH Origins: Intermittent wipers

How a simple circuit prompted lawsuits that generated tens of millions of dollars in compensation



Robert Kearns, an American engineer, was thoroughly fed up with windscreen wipers. His 1962 Ford Galaxie 500 convertible, like most cars of the era, had two-speed wipers; one setting was a fairly pedestrian but continual sweep, while the other was a flat-out mode designed for tackling downpours.

Problems arose, observed Kearns, if you were driving in light rain. In these kinds of conditions not much water would accumulate on the windscreen between wiper sweeps. The wipers would chatter and screech their way across the glass as a result, often smearing it. Besides exacerbating wear and tear on the wiper blades and mechanism itself, the repetitive motion of the wipers could also prove hypnotic - distracting to the driver from the road ahead.

What was needed was a system that would permit the wiper to linger in its parked position for a few moments before beginning its next sweep. This would allow enough water to build up on the screen to permit smooth and effective operation - and also give the driver's eyes and mind a break from the monotonous motion of the mechanism.

Kearns was well positioned to invent such a device. He had worked for an engineering firm when he was younger, served in the US Army as a corporal in various intelligence-related groups and later worked for several other specialist tool manufacturers. He had also graduated from the University of Detroit with a degree in mechanical engineering and went on to earn a masters degree in engineering mechanics.


While further studying for a PhD in engineering, Kearns set about developing a new wiper system in the basement of his Detroit home. Progress was slow, given the energy he was otherwise pouring into his degree, but - after countless experiments - Kearns finally settled on a design he was happy with.

Kearns wasn't the only one who had spotted the need for an intermittent system, though. A team of engineers at Trico, an American firm that specialised in wiper systems, had applied for a patent on an 'electric windshield cleaner' that featured 'intermittent operation' earlier in 1958. It was pneumatically operated and complicated, though - and other similar concepts, based on either electric or mechanical operation, were either far too involved or unreliable and unmarketable.

The genius of the system designed by Kearns was that it only featured a handful of common and inexpensive electronic components - including a single transistor, one capacitor and a variable resistor. These worked together to deliver a dwell period at the end of each wiper sweep and, thanks to the variable resistor, the delay between sweeps could be easily adjusted by the driver to suit the conditions. Kearns even envisioned an automatic rain-sensing mode, as well as a version that could automatically adjust the interval based on the drag experienced by the blades.

Because the system was affordable and simple, it could easily be mass produced and fitted to all manner of cars. For Kearns, the dream was to own a factory that would produce these systems and supply all manner of companies - and, with a functioning prototype of his 'windshield wiper system with intermittent operation' to hand, he began marketing it to automotive manufacturers.


Kearns had always been a fan of Ford so, with the system installed in his Galaxie, he arranged a demonstration in 1963. It transpired that the company itself had also been experimenting with intermittent systems but Ford's own setup - as well as a prototype supplied by Trico - was unreliable. Ford was intrigued by Kearns's concept and, after some significant endurance testing, announced it would begin using the intermittent wiper system in 1969.

Ford, in order to produce the system, set about working with Kearns so the details of his circuit could be fully understood and refined for production. Not long after, however, Ford ceased talks with Kearns and indicated that it no longer had any interest in the intermittent wiper system. Fortunately, by 1967, the patent on the circuit designed by Kearns had been granted and published - securing him the rights to his bespoke design and, hopefully, putting him in a profitable position.

It came as a shock and a surprise to Kearns when, in 1969, Ford about-faced and introduced the first electronic intermittent wiper system. General Motors soon followed, as did Chrysler, and before long the system was installed in millions of cars - and all were using systems based on the circuit designed by Kearns. Much to his further disappointment, in 1976, Kearns found that his invention had made it around the globe - as a Mercedes-Benz intermittent wiper system was also found to be using his circuit.

As his aspirations of being a major supplier crumbled, Kearns went to war with Ford. His 1978 suit against the company initially sought some $141 million in damages but Ford fought back, claiming there was nothing new about the design - because it was all based on existing components. Kearns justifiably argued otherwise, because it was the way in which the parts were combined that was the innovative component of his patent.

He started a case against Chrysler in 1982, too, and ultimately filed claims against a total of 26 manufacturers - including Honda, Nissan, Peugeot, Ferrari, Alfa Romeo and Isuzu. For Kearns, it wasn't about money - it was about rightful ownership of the idea and ensuring that the patent system did its job to protect and credit those innovating and bringing new ideas to market. He consequently pursued those involved relentlessly, battling the substantial legal teams of numerous major manufacturers.


Predictably, as the manufacturers had nothing but time and money on their hands, these cases were protracted. By 1990, the original damage claim against Ford had risen to $325 million - based on the fact that, between 1971 and 1988, the company had sold almost 21 million intermittent wiper systems. The profit was mooted to be in the region of $557 million; Ford tried to settle the case for $30 million but Kearns rejected the offer, as the company reputedly wouldn't give him the credit for the original design.

In late 1990, 12 years after he filed his first case against Ford, the jury finally ruled in his favour - stating that Ford had 'unintentionally' infringed on his patent. The payout was $10.2 million and, in 1992, Chrysler was also commanded to pay Kearns $11.3 million in damages. The company appealed but, in 1995, its protest was rejected and Chrysler had to pay out $18.7 million plus interest.

Drained of his energy, having done nothing but tackle the manufacturers for so long, Kearns failed to file the appropriate paperwork and meet the required court orders to continue the rest of his cases. The remaining lawsuits were subsequently dismissed in 1996 but, by this point, Kearns had spent much of the money he had been awarded on legal fees - and intermittent wipers were being used around the world, by countless manufacturers, in tens of millions of cars.

There were other hefty prices to pay; his wife left him during the course of all the legal battles, Kearns himself had suffered a nervous breakdown and all of his business partnerships had long evaporated in the background. The fight to get credit for his invention and prove the patent system worth its while had, pushed to its conclusion, consumed everything in his life.

Kearns later died of brain cancer, aged 77, on 9 February 2005. Despite the trials and tribulations, he still had a Ford parked outside his home when he died. Few today would be aware of the struggle that took place over his intermittent wiper design but, in 2008, the whole arduous affair was turned into a film called Flash of Genius - which, at the very least, showcased to a wider audience how one individual doggedly fought to protect innovators around the world.

 

 

 

 

 

Author
Discussion

V8 FOU

Original Poster:

2,974 posts

147 months

Monday 16th July 2018
quotequote all
Very interesting. Touch of the Tucker story there.

In 1973 I was a bench engineer in a hi-fit shop (remember those?). Radiospares, now RS components, introduced the 555 timer chip. This was if I remember, the first commercially available integrated circuit. Being a car nut then I saw the potential for a variable wipe system. I built a prototype and with the use of a relay managed to get it working sucessfully on my Riley 1.5!! made some for the boss and the staff and quite a few more for others. But as with most innovations people were indifferent. "Just use the switch" Very PH!!! Even in 1973!

Still use that chip for various things now.

CABC

5,577 posts

101 months

Monday 16th July 2018
quotequote all
Good movie, def worth seeking out.

Konan

1,836 posts

146 months

Monday 16th July 2018
quotequote all
V8 FOU said:
Very interesting. Touch of the Tucker story there.

In 1973 I was a bench engineer in a hi-fit shop (remember those?). Radiospares, now RS components, introduced the 555 timer chip. This was if I remember, the first commercially available integrated circuit. Being a car nut then I saw the potential for a variable wipe system. I built a prototype and with the use of a relay managed to get it working sucessfully on my Riley 1.5!! made some for the boss and the staff and quite a few more for others. But as with most innovations people were indifferent. "Just use the switch" Very PH!!! Even in 1973!

Still use that chip for various things now.
There is no GCSE electronics project that can't make use of a 555!

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

126 months

Monday 16th July 2018
quotequote all
The article said:
Kearns even envisioned ... a version that could automatically adjust the interval based on the drag experienced by the blades.
In production by 1970, for sure. Citroen SMs definitely had this, and probably weren't unique. The increased drag on a drier screen needed more current than on a wet screen, which caused a bimetal strip to heat up more, AIUI, which then took more time to cool and trigger the next wipe.

nicholasm

145 posts

185 months

Monday 16th July 2018
quotequote all
About halfway through the article, I thought "this is great stuff. It should be made into a film."

I just hope Robert Kearns' family got royalties from Flash of Genius without having to go to court.

unsprung

5,467 posts

124 months

Monday 16th July 2018
quotequote all
PH article said:
his wife left him during the course of all the legal battles, Kearns himself had suffered a nervous breakdown and all of his business partnerships had long evaporated in the background. The fight to get credit for his invention and prove the patent system worth its while had, pushed to its conclusion, consumed everything in his life.
the sort of casual, cynical exploitation that people hear about, or experience, at various times in their lives

if you were fortunate enough to talk with family and friends who lived during the first half of the 20th century, it was even worse

and people wonder why, in our advanced Western societies, some people and organisations remain so vehement on matters legal and justice




pycraft

778 posts

184 months

Monday 16th July 2018
quotequote all
Is respect for this patent the reason BMW seem to steadfastly refuse to put an intermittent setting on their wipers? Of is it just to be annoying?

sideways man

1,316 posts

137 months

Monday 16th July 2018
quotequote all
Interesting story with a great human element ,not talking about Ford here.....
Sometimes engineers can get lost in the story of vehicle development, how about a series of articles on the faces behind a name and I don’t mean Colin Chapman or Louis Renault but the little guys with a great idea.

Triumph Man

8,691 posts

168 months

Monday 16th July 2018
quotequote all
pycraft said:
Is respect for this patent the reason BMW seem to steadfastly refuse to put an intermittent setting on their wipers? Of is it just to be annoying?
They do have intermittent wipe? Unless they have auto wipers in which case this replaces intermittent.

pycraft

778 posts

184 months

Monday 16th July 2018
quotequote all
Triumph Man said:
They do have intermittent wipe? Unless they have auto wipers in which case this replaces intermittent.
Mine has "auto wipers", if by "auto" we mean "wipes the windows once every 15 minutes if it's in the mood". It's rubbish. My wife's Mini is exactly the same. Can't see why they couldn't manage automatic and intermittent...

Mr Tidy

22,333 posts

127 months

Monday 16th July 2018
quotequote all
I'm not too sure about the timelines - my Dad bought a 1970 Fiat 125 in 1972 and that had intermittent wipers (I remember it because I bought it from my parents in 1977). But IIRC the Fiat 125 went on sale in 1968 - but maybe the earliest ones didn't have that feature?

But it's still a shame that the guy who came up with the idea seemingly didn't get the credit he was due. frown



EDLT

15,421 posts

206 months

Tuesday 17th July 2018
quotequote all
pycraft said:
Triumph Man said:
They do have intermittent wipe? Unless they have auto wipers in which case this replaces intermittent.
Mine has "auto wipers", if by "auto" we mean "wipes the windows once every 15 minutes if it's in the mood". It's rubbish. My wife's Mini is exactly the same. Can't see why they couldn't manage automatic and intermittent...
My Civic has auto wipers that are terrible and I used to have a 306 with auto wipers and they were ste too.

Evilex

512 posts

104 months

Tuesday 17th July 2018
quotequote all
Unfortunately, the best intermittent wipers I've encountered were two systems on... Fords.
One was a variable intermittent system with six different durations accessible via a control on the wiper stalk (Escort Mk 5)
The other was on the Puma (and presumably it's Fiesta relatives).
Turn the wipers on to intermittent. Turn them off. Turn them on again... That's the interval between wipes. Worked a treat.

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

126 months

Tuesday 17th July 2018
quotequote all
Evilex said:
Unfortunately, the best intermittent wipers I've encountered were two systems on... Fords.
One was a variable intermittent system with six different durations accessible via a control on the wiper stalk (Escort Mk 5)
The other was on the Puma (and presumably it's Fiesta relatives).
Turn the wipers on to intermittent. Turn them off. Turn them on again... That's the interval between wipes. Worked a treat.
That latter setup is common in higher-spec mid-80s VWs, and couldn't be easier to retrofit into a wide swathe of 80s stuff from other manufacturers - it's just a drop-in swap of the relay for a "99".
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/282922436097

motco

15,956 posts

246 months

Tuesday 17th July 2018
quotequote all
pycraft said:
Is respect for this patent the reason BMW seem to steadfastly refuse to put an intermittent setting on their wipers? Of is it just to be annoying?
My 16 year old Z3 has flick-wipe and intermittent wipe. Admittedly the latter works only when the car is stationary and is a part of the low speed setting.

Triumph Man

8,691 posts

168 months

Tuesday 17th July 2018
quotequote all
TooMany2cvs said:
Evilex said:
Unfortunately, the best intermittent wipers I've encountered were two systems on... Fords.
One was a variable intermittent system with six different durations accessible via a control on the wiper stalk (Escort Mk 5)
The other was on the Puma (and presumably it's Fiesta relatives).
Turn the wipers on to intermittent. Turn them off. Turn them on again... That's the interval between wipes. Worked a treat.
That latter setup is common in higher-spec mid-80s VWs, and couldn't be easier to retrofit into a wide swathe of 80s stuff from other manufacturers - it's just a drop-in swap of the relay for a "99".
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/282922436097
My BMW E34 5 series has that function, and it's a brilliant idea - once you know about it!

Triumph Man

8,691 posts

168 months

Tuesday 17th July 2018
quotequote all
pycraft said:
Triumph Man said:
They do have intermittent wipe? Unless they have auto wipers in which case this replaces intermittent.
Mine has "auto wipers", if by "auto" we mean "wipes the windows once every 15 minutes if it's in the mood". It's rubbish. My wife's Mini is exactly the same. Can't see why they couldn't manage automatic and intermittent...
With the mini, if it's anything like my girlfriend's Countryman, you have to enter the OBC to change the sensitivity. I have to say I find the auto wipers in my E39 quite good, although they won't go to full speed during a deluge. I'm not sure whether that's normal or they're broken...

Lewis Kingston

240 posts

77 months

Tuesday 17th July 2018
quotequote all
Mr Tidy said:
I'm not too sure about the timelines - my Dad bought a 1970 Fiat 125 in 1972 and that had intermittent wipers (I remember it because I bought it from my parents in 1977). But IIRC the Fiat 125 went on sale in 1968 - but maybe the earliest ones didn't have that feature?

But it's still a shame that the guy who came up with the idea seemingly didn't get the credit he was due. frown
No, you're not mistaken – there are references to a 'Special' version of the 125 that seemingly arrived in November 1968 at the Turin motor show (I can't find earlier mentions of it, at least). This featured an intermittent system, which was then later rolled out into other cars.

The Ford system predates it slightly, however, as those were in catalogues by at least October 1968, for the 1969 model year cars – and listing/production may have started even earlier than that; in any case, although Kearns' system had been in development for a long time, the Fiat's set-up was certainly among the first of its kind in production.

The kicker, alas, is that Fiat was one of the companies sued by Kearns (it was one of the later cases that was ultimately dismissed). I can only assume, as there's no documentation otherwise, that the circuit the company was using was the same.

The reason Mercedes is cited, volume of production and prominence aside, is that Kearns viewed it as a 'great' company and reputedly the discovery it was using his design was what triggered his breakdown.

Perhaps he didn't find out Fiat was using his circuit until later down the line. There's very little around on the Fiat case, though, so it's hard to say.

Edited by Lewis Kingston on Tuesday 17th July 10:09

grumpynuts

956 posts

160 months

Tuesday 17th July 2018
quotequote all
Auto wipers are a PIA, and never work that well. I prefer an old school adjustable intermittent wipe when it is only spitting and 2 speed constant wipers when raining harder. It's all you need. Every car I've tried with auto wipers has them all over the place and going full speed when I don't want them to. Another annoying feature is 3 wipes when you activate the screen washers. I want to decide how many sweeps the wipers do when I clean the screen, not the car, and often the 3rd wipe creates a smear when 2 wipes would've been perfect. They call it progress.

Conscript

1,378 posts

121 months

Tuesday 17th July 2018
quotequote all
grumpynuts said:
Auto wipers are a PIA, and never work that well. I prefer an old school adjustable intermittent wipe when it is only spitting and 2 speed constant wipers when raining harder. It's all you need. Every car I've tried with auto wipers has them all over the place and going full speed when I don't want them to. Another annoying feature is 3 wipes when you activate the screen washers. I want to decide how many sweeps the wipers do when I clean the screen, not the car, and often the 3rd wipe creates a smear when 2 wipes would've been perfect. They call it progress.
Whereas I think they are great. My own car has manual intermittent wipers which I find myself having to fiddle with every so often when it's raining. Girlfriend's car has auto wipers and they work brilliantly. If it starts raining, you just switch the wipers on and forget about them.

Interesting article by the way. Intermittent wipers are so ubiquitous that it's one of those things I've never really thought about the history of, they're just something I take for granted. More articles like this please smile