RE: Audi TT Quattro Sport: Spotted

RE: Audi TT Quattro Sport: Spotted

Thursday 6th September 2018

Audi TT Quattro Sport: Spotted

The original TT wasn't for everyone, but the limited edition run-out model has wider appeal



The Mk1 Audi TT has long been a divisive subject among car enthusiasts. Its simple design wasn't necessarily to everyone's taste, nor its habit of going very quickly in the most benign way possible (once its habit for spinning round and round very quickly had been corrected, of course). There are exceptions, though. The sight of the limited edition Quattro Sport, for example, which ought to have the car's critics doing their own version of an abrupt about face.

Tasked with fulfilling the first generation TT's potential in a run-out edition ahead of the Mk2's launch, the Quattro Sport stuck to a tried and tested formula: more power, less weight. Naturally, the job was handed over to the performance specialists at quattro GmbH who set about turning the 225hp put out by its 1.8-litre inline-four into 240hp, then bringing its 1,440kg curb weight down to 1,390kg by removing the rear seats, parcel shelf, spare tyre and climate control.


Additionally, they added a brace bar to increase torsional rigidity, fatter rear tyres to up the traction, relocated the battery to the back of the car to improve balance, and added stiffer, lower suspension to enhance the handling. To top it all off they wrapped it in the body kit from the range-topping V6 model, added a set of very pretty multi-spoke wheels, chucked some Recaro bucket seats inside, and painted the roof black.

The result was 0-62 in 5.9 seconds - a couple of tenths better than standard - and a limited top speed of 155mph. It wasn't just about the on paper performance, though, with both real world pace and driver engagement also greatly improved by quattro GmbH's modifications.


The ad for today's Spotted is rather lacking in detail, but the salient facts are all there. Just 64,000 miles makes this a remarkably fresh example, and a fiver under ten grand isn't an unreasonable valuation. The photos show it to be an immaculately preserved example, too, with the Misano Red paint still good as new and the interior, wheels and trim all apparently unscathed.

Only 800 examples were made for the UK market, with Howmanyleft estimating that just 574 remain. That rarity, combined with its reputation for being at the pointiest end of the Mk1 TT range, make it hard to imagine its values becoming much softer. Priced from £29,335 new, the Quattro Sport may not have depreciated to the same extent as standard TTs, then, but even at its current price it still represents arguably better value for money.


SPECIFICATION - AUDI TT QUATTRO SPORT

Engine: 1,781cc, 4-cylinder, turbocharged
Transmission: 6-speed manual, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 240@5,700rpm
Torque (lb ft): 236@2,300-5,000rpm
MPG: 30.1
CO2: N/A
First registered: 2006
Recorded mileage: 64,000
Price new: £29,335
Yours for: £9,995

See the original ad here.

Author
Discussion

David87

Original Poster:

6,658 posts

212 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
I had one of these years ago and it was actually a pretty decent car. I haven’t driven any other Mk1 TT so I don’t know how much better it is, but it was a pretty nice package. Mine wasn’t the best example and it was black, which was a shame as you lost the lovely contrast roof and the painted Recaro seat backs didn’t stand out as much. The red is what I really wanted!

1781cc

576 posts

94 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
Qusttro Sport? was that the super-rare misspelled edition?

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

198 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
There was a thread recently about a white one of these with an MOt fail list pages long for IIRC £6k. Cat D too .... as such you’d be pretty bold to buy that one over this given repair cost is significantly more than the price difference.

Only 800 ever made too so really appealing.

Deerfoot

4,902 posts

184 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
Only 800 ever made too so really appealing.
Not very appealing at £10,000 though..

Filibuster

3,156 posts

215 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
I love the original TT Design!
Also imho they weren't so bad to drive either. I had an early (but with ESP and spoiler) 225 Quattro for a weekend, and I thought it was quite good to drive.
Also a later FWD 180 I have driven very briefly has left a good impression with me. But then again, I'm no driving god and I didn't expect a razor sharp sports car!

If you throw some uprated ARB at it and fit decent suspension and rubber, they are even much better still. Basically you end up with a Quattro Sport, like the one spotted. If you want, you can even fit a performance Haldex module and end up with an more rear biased setup.
And since the 1.8T engine has great potential, you can end up with a very fast car indeed!

thall4

2 posts

206 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
1781CC - the first thing I wanted to comment. All hail the Qusttro

greenarrow

3,595 posts

117 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
Its a rare car but at this price point so many more appealing possibilities!

If I was going to buy a TT it would probably be the Mk2 TTs. Much faster than the Mk1 Sport, better all round package with rear seats and I've found for the same money as this TT Sport, a 2008 69,0000 miler on autotrader. Admittedly that car will depreciate further.

...alternatively, if you only need two seats, from 2004, how about a Porsche Boxster 3.2S Anniversary edition, 57,000 miles, £7850- Autotrader. No contest in my book! Or, a 2005 Nissan 350Z, one owner, 28,000 miles, only £5900.

Yep, makes this TT seem a tad expensive IMHO!!

moonigan

2,138 posts

241 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
Nice place to sit and that's about it. Not enough power to pull the skin of a rice pudding and handling that required a significant amount of money to put right.

Futse

183 posts

185 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
moonigan said:
Nice place to sit and that's about it. Not enough power to pull the skin of a rice pudding and handling that required a significant amount of money to put right.
Quite some rice pudding if you need more than 240 horses to pull the skin of it... ;-)

LaurasOtherHalf

21,429 posts

196 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
Has a car ever not been improved by the addition of fixed back bucket seats by the manufacturer?

David87

Original Poster:

6,658 posts

212 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
There was a thread recently about a white one of these with an MOt fail list pages long for IIRC £6k. Cat D too .... as such you’d be pretty bold to buy that one over this given repair cost is significantly more than the price difference.

Only 800 ever made too so really appealing.
They never made them in white. I'm pretty sure the 800 cars were split evenly between silver, red, blue and black.

treeroy

564 posts

85 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
Am I going crazy? This car looks completely different from any mk1 I've seen. Its headlights / bumpers look different. Maybe just because it is clean. Was there a very late facelift?

moonigan

2,138 posts

241 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
Futse said:
Quite some rice pudding if you need more than 240 horses to pull the skin of it... ;-)
It doesn't put anywhere near 240 down on the road. More like 180-200. I may still have the dyno runs somewhere from when I had mine. A really underwhelming car to drive.

Swole

693 posts

121 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
It was arguably the best looking of that TT model but regardless, it was plagued with that awful MK4 Golf chassis. About the best standard car on that platform was the Leon Cupra R, but even that needed suspension work and a diff to get it to a competing standard on a track, or feel nimble enough to blast a B Road.

The 1.8T was pretty reliable but it was over sensitive with nanny electronics that were unreliable and caused consistent power delivery problems from the engine. On top, the turbo hoses were brittle and it liked to eat a water pump or two, along with suspension bushes.

Times have moved on and this in my opinion isn’t special enough to lust for or kneel before, especially not for £10k. Even someone looking to modify it wouldn’t see north of 280hp without significant changes.

Cupramax

10,480 posts

252 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
PH article said:
then bringing its 1,440kg curb weight down to 1,390kg by removing the rear seats
Kerb, FFS.

Jayho

2,014 posts

170 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
I think another big appeal of this over a standard 225 modified would be the gear box? IIRC the gear ratios on this were amended to allow hitting 60 in 2nd gear. A standard TT required the third gear. Hence technically this 240 will be quicker to 60 than a 225 which has been remapped to 260.

g60golfpunk

10 posts

143 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
moonigan said:
It doesn't put anywhere near 240 down on the road. More like 180-200. I may still have the dyno runs somewhere from when I had mine. A really underwhelming car to drive.
Yours must have been knackered then.

996GT3_Matt

200 posts

204 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
LaurasOtherHalf said:
Has a car ever not been improved by the addition of fixed back bucket seats by the manufacturer?
So true! Decent bucket seats and an alcantara steering wheel can make for a huge difference in terms of feel good factor.

DC240

15 posts

97 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
I dont understand the argument "you can get a better car for the money"?

A buyer might not be interested in others (as I wasn't) and specifically wants this car - price is dictated by demand.

You could argue many classics that have become ridiculously expensive to buy - can be bettered for the same or less money. But thats of no interest to the owners.

Edited by DC240 on Thursday 6th September 11:16

moonigan

2,138 posts

241 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
g60golfpunk said:
Yours must have been knackered then.
I stand corrected. I just found the dyno printout from 2010 it was 218.