Chinese influencing Hollywood movies

Chinese influencing Hollywood movies

Author
Discussion

HannsG

Original Poster:

3,060 posts

136 months

Friday 28th September 2018
quotequote all
Just watched 'The Meg....'

I get it, ste films. But for me they were enjoyable stop the brain type movies.

However, the Chinese influence. And advertising was so Fukin over bearing.

I honestly believe its just awkward and ruins the movies. Is it because they want to harness the populace in China or are the Chinese literally throwing all the money in the world at Hollywood?

Either way it just seems so forced

lonny

416 posts

245 months

Friday 28th September 2018
quotequote all
Yep, think China is 2nd biggest market now for movies so we’ll see more aimed directly to appeal to them.

Moonhawk

10,730 posts

221 months

belleair302

6,879 posts

209 months

Friday 28th September 2018
quotequote all
If producers need the cash then they will look to influence the Chinese market. Western films getting Chinese releases is small in volume because of the Chinese protecting their industry. I believe India is the second biggest producer of film and may soon become number 1. Hollywood however will survive without Chinese Money but may well 'pander' to a growing Asian market as Americans and Europeans change their film tastes and how the media is received.

P-Jay

10,645 posts

193 months

Friday 28th September 2018
quotequote all
Yep, 'Hollywood' needs to do well in China.

I haven't had the pleasure of 'The Meg' yet, how it is suited to Chinese audiences? The usual tact is to have as little dialogue as possible to cut down on subtitles.

Still, could be worse...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esXqdI7miWA&t=...

ukaskew

10,642 posts

223 months

Friday 28th September 2018
quotequote all
HannsG said:
Just watched 'The Meg....'

I get it, ste films. But for me they were enjoyable stop the brain type movies.

However, the Chinese influence. And advertising was so Fukin over bearing.

I honestly believe its just awkward and ruins the movies. Is it because they want to harness the populace in China or are the Chinese literally throwing all the money in the world at Hollywood?

Either way it just seems so forced
The Meg was largely financed by the Chinese, as are many 'Hollywood' films these days.

I don't really get why it's an issue though, the movie was set in Asia so it doesn't exactly seem out of place to have a significant asian cast. It's not really any different to Working Title making a film in the UK and employing a largely British cast, for example.

Most movies make more money internationally than they do in the US now, so the internationalization of films (which is no bad thing, in my opinion) is only going to increase. Star Wars is one of the few major franchises left that still makes the bulk of its profit from the US. Avengers Infinity War took nearly 70% of its box office internationally, Fast and Furious is now over 80%.


Edited by ukaskew on Friday 28th September 16:54

AshVX220

5,929 posts

192 months

Friday 28th September 2018
quotequote all
P-Jay said:
Yep, 'Hollywood' needs to do well in China.

I haven't had the pleasure of 'The Meg' yet, how it is suited to Chinese audiences? The usual tact is to have as little dialogue as possible to cut down on subtitles.

Still, could be worse...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esXqdI7miWA&t=...
^^^^ Oh my God, what a turd!! There's a lot of "artistic license" and really st Hollywood Gung-Ho in that! biglaugh

bloomen

7,037 posts

161 months

Friday 28th September 2018
quotequote all
ukaskew said:
Most movies make more money internationally than they do in the US now, so the internationalization of films (which is no bad thing, in my opinion) is only going to increase. Star Wars is one of the few major franchises left that still makes the bulk of its profit from the US. Avengers Infinity War took nearly 70% of its box office internationally, Fast and Furious is now over 80%.
I think any audience, regardless of where they are, would prefer something that isn't weirdly stunted and diluted by winking at one foreign audience. I've yet to see an example of it that wasn't jarring. It simply doesn't work.

For it to work it requires stories that benefit from it, not stories that are bent to accommodate it. Stuff like 2012 worked in its own little way simply because it was a global story and you expect it.


Shakermaker

11,317 posts

102 months

Monday 1st October 2018
quotequote all
bloomen said:
I think any audience, regardless of where they are, would prefer something that isn't weirdly stunted and diluted by winking at one foreign audience. I've yet to see an example of it that wasn't jarring. It simply doesn't work.

For it to work it requires stories that benefit from it, not stories that are bent to accommodate it. Stuff like 2012 worked in its own little way simply because it was a global story and you expect it.

I think the global cinema trends would suggest otherwise.

Visiting the cinema in other places, particularly in Asia, is not like going to the cinema in the UK. people talk, a lot, because they can read the subtitles so don't need to listen to it, and the subtitles probably leave out a lot of the subtleties/jokes that are overt to us, probably completely ignored in subtitled versions. Or for all we know they subtitles could be saying that the "hero" is the person of local origin!

For a non-cinema example, I was reading how the man who was the professional voice of Homer Simpson for Spanish speaking countries died a few years ago, and they had to bring in a new actor. However, the old actor had a good enough understanding of English to make all the jokes work in Spanish, whereas apparently the new guy just takes it all literally, and nobody understands it anymore in the same way.

PhilboSE

4,471 posts

228 months

Monday 1st October 2018
quotequote all
AshVX220 said:
P-Jay said:
Yep, 'Hollywood' needs to do well in China.

I haven't had the pleasure of 'The Meg' yet, how it is suited to Chinese audiences? The usual tact is to have as little dialogue as possible to cut down on subtitles.

Still, could be worse...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esXqdI7miWA&t=...
^^^^ Oh my God, what a turd!! There's a lot of "artistic license" and really st Hollywood Gung-Ho in that! biglaugh
Good grief. Has to be a candidate for the worst CGI of recent times. I've seen better video games.

honest_delboy

1,522 posts

202 months

Monday 1st October 2018
quotequote all
Shakermaker said:
I was reading how the man who was the professional voice of Homer Simpson for Spanish speaking countries died a few years ago, and they had to bring in a new actor. However, the old actor had a good enough understanding of English to make all the jokes work in Spanish, whereas apparently the new guy just takes it all literally, and nobody understands it anymore in the same way.
Ay carumba !

Halb

53,012 posts

185 months

Monday 1st October 2018
quotequote all
Modern nobrain (and ph sure loves nobrain) films sometimes get saved in China, and some get made into all time top ten in china


Furious 7, made 350 in the us and 390 in china.
https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&am...

Fate and the furious made 226 in us and 390 in china

FourWheelDrift

88,823 posts

286 months

Saturday 6th October 2018
quotequote all
They are still making bad movies on their own though with dodgy CGI - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJkz1pEBqf8