RE: Ariel Atom 4: Driven

RE: Ariel Atom 4: Driven

Thursday 4th October 2018

Ariel Atom 4 | UK Review

Ariel's Atom is bigger and faster than ever - but does it still deliver the same bang?



Brake pedal, clutch pedal, fuel cap: those are the three things on the Ariel Atom 4 that have been carried over from the Atom 3.5. Everything else you see is new.

These are the biggest changes to the two seat sports car from Somerset since it was first launched at the turn of the century, although it's still unmistakably an Atom. A bigger, more muscular, caricatured version of its spidery former self, sure, but it couldn't be any other way.

Seeing old and new Atoms together brings home how the 4 has matured. Ariel liked the large diameter of the tubing it used on the prototype titanium chassis so much that it has adopted a similar cross section, although still in steel, because titanium is so expensive and Ariel had to assemble some kind of argon-filled sterile tent to weld in.


Wheel diameters are up by an inch front and rear, and are wider at the back to accommodate the additional torque that has arrived Atom's new engine - the 2.0-litre turbocharged unit from the latest Honda Civic Type R. Ariel used to offer the old naturally aspirated Civic Type R engine, and throw a supercharger on it for those who wanted more power, which was pretty much everyone in the end.

The new engine probably doesn't want for any more induction than it already gets. Attached to the back of an Atom 4 it makes 320hp at 6,000rpm but, as significantly, 310lb ft from 3,000rpm. The old Atom 3.5R, making 350hp at 8,000rpm, only made 243lb ft, and you'd want 6,000rpm applied to get it. There was nothing wrong with that, mind: it was a sports car, so working it was the point, wasn't it? We'll see.

The Atom 4 is a touch longer than the 3.5, although it's still only 3,520mm, but no wider, which I'm glad about because at 1,880mm it's quite big for a lightweight car. The overall weight is up to 595kg, around 20kg higher than previously. Ariel finds a surprising number lot of its buyers are tall, which is perhaps because they can't fit into anything similar.


Suspension changes are significant, too; for the first time since the Atom's introduction there major alterations to the geometry, aimed at reducing dive and squat. There are double wishbones with inboard springs and dampers - standard units or two adjustable upgrades, of which our test car had the middle set.

And there are three wheel options - standard, forged and carbon fibre, although Ariel says the weight difference isn't as big as it used to be, owing to better designed standard wheels. Tyre options are all Avon now, in ZZS or (as here) grippier ZZR, of 195/50 R16 at the front and 255/40 R17 at the rear. There'll be two exhaust possibilities, standard and a freer breathing one like the test car's. Specify no options and the base price is just under £40,000 on the road. Production Atom 4s arrive in the spring and will, soon after, be homologated for small-volume European type approval.

Now, while you could turn up the performance volume to some way past 11 on an old Atom by specifying the supercharger, this time the options - initially, at least - are to turn the Atom 4's power down. The full quota of power comes on level 3 on a dial on the slick new dashboard, with the turbo at 1.3 bar of boost pressure. You can turn that down to 290hp (0.6 bar) or 220hp (0.3 bar). Or extend your right foot less. Up to you.


On full whack, which is where I suspect you'll leave things most of the time, the claimed performance is pretty mega: 0-60mph in 2.8sec, 0-100mph just 6.8sec, and a top speed of 162mph, if you're inclined to take it there, which I doubt I would be. The aero is improved a bit, mind, but this remains a crash-helmet-at-speed car.

Inside, the Atom 4's seats are still plastic and waterproof but there's a little padding and, more significantly, they're now separated left and right, which has allowed more sculpting and shoulder support. You'll still need an allen key to adjust them, but it doesn't take long.

The driving position is terrific, and Ariel has clearly worked on the fit and finish and control weights, although it usually does, to be fair. The engine fires to a slightly fizzy idle, though less abrasive than before, and the smoother throttle response afforded by a turbo makes the Atom easy to manoeuvre at low speeds. Once it's rolling you can pretty much forget first gear.


The six-speed manual H-pattern 'box is precise and easy, the steering at slow speeds is still heavy, though not as weighty as, say, a Caterham's. The rack is slightly slowed from the Atom 3.5, while the turning circle is improved too, but Ariel's people say the big change to the steering comes at speed, where it kicks less and responds less adversely to bad surfaces.

And they're right. At a stroke the Atom has become a more sophisticated, easy riding car than the Atom 3.5 was. The ride control is seriously impressive, closer to a Lotus Elise than a Caterham now, and ditto the steering response. It's still alive, immediate and responsive, but filters out more bad bits while retaining road feel and precision. Braking is easily modulated and the stoppers are powerful - with less than 600kg to haul, and so exposed to the open air, I can't imagine they'd fade, despite a performance level that has crossed a line well into ludicrous territory.

I reckon the Atom 4 feels about as quick as a Ferrari 488 GTB in a straight line, and if there is a leggier response to the engine than with a supercharger - and there is - the fact that there's so little inertia means it doesn't last long. In second and third gear, by the time you've registered the shift lights are on, you'll be into the rev limiter. There's an extraordinary urgency to it, from any speed, in pretty much any gear.


Is it less tuneful than a naturally aspirated car? Perhaps, though there are whooshes, whistles, sucks and blows (steady) and they're quite endearing.

Is there less involvement from the fact that you don't have to work it? Not so much. There's just always loads of oomph to exploit a chassis that has made a step change from former Atoms; less skittish, less wild, less inclined to fall into oversteer in the manner of, say, Caterhams or a Toyota GT86. This might sound daft, but on the road it also feels not unlike a 488 GTB in its handling stance: firmly pliant, evenly balanced, willing to turn, able to be straightened on the throttle, and resistant to roll.

I think Ariel has made a real step-change here. Previous Atom iterations have been, slowly but surely, getting more mature and capable, but this time there's a major leap. It's still a bit wide for a lightweight car, though that matters less now the steering is calmer and more accurate at speed, and it's still less practical than a much smaller Caterham, because you can't put a hood on it - though there will be a screen. But the leap is tremendous. The Atom 4 might be the best driver's car I've been in this year.


SPECIFICATION - ARIEL ATOM 4

Engine: 1,996cc, 4cyl, turbo petrol
Transmission: 6-speed manual, rear-wheel drive
Power: 320hp at 6,500rpm
Torque: 310lb ft at 3,000rpm
0-62mph: 2.8sec
Top speed: 162mph
Weight: 595kg
MPG: 30mpg (est)
CO2: (tbc)
Price: £39,950







Author
Discussion

Omega1987

Original Poster:

38 posts

72 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2018
quotequote all
I drive a turbocharged hothatch myself and love it but for cars this small and light, I think natural aspiration or supercharging is more in keeping with their character.... That said I've not driven the new Atom so what do I know.

Edited by Omega1987 on Tuesday 2nd October 21:40

macky17

2,212 posts

189 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2018
quotequote all
What I’d want to know you don’t mention: when the boost arrives mid-corner, will it try to kill you? I’d have thought you’d want a totally linear power delivery in an Atom....

Krikkit

26,527 posts

181 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2018
quotequote all
macky17 said:
What I’d want to know you don’t mention: when the boost arrives mid-corner, will it try to kill you? I’d have thought you’d want a totally linear power delivery in an Atom....
The engine is a pretty linear thing by all accounts, so a good match for something like this.

The benefits of 21st century turbo tech!

Porsche911R

21,146 posts

265 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2018
quotequote all
macky17 said:
What I’d want to know you don’t mention: when the boost arrives mid-corner, will it try to kill you? I’d have thought you’d want a totally linear power delivery in an Atom....
The old one tries to kill you anyway so nothing new there.
Has a lot of short falls the Atom which is a shame.
I wonder if the longer wheel base makes for a better drive at the limit.

donkmeister

8,166 posts

100 months

Wednesday 3rd October 2018
quotequote all
Porsche911R said:
The old one tries to kill you anyway so nothing new there.
Has a lot of short falls the Atom which is a shame.
I wonder if the longer wheel base makes for a better drive at the limit.
From the short drives I had in a supercharged Atom I felt it was capable of killing me and was keen to remind me, but the actual death sentence was very much left in my hands.
A sublime car but every input needs to be metered and tempered... No flooring it and hoping the chassis engineers had a stroke of genius/luck!
I want one!

donkmeister

8,166 posts

100 months

Wednesday 3rd October 2018
quotequote all
macky17 said:
What I’d want to know you don’t mention: when the boost arrives mid-corner, will it try to kill you? I’d have thought you’d want a totally linear power delivery in an Atom....
They've had VTEC (yo) since the early days so linearity has always relied on the driver's right foot. Not a car for slamming the pedal to the metal, but rather <insert trope about being gentle with a woman> except with your foot.

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 3rd October 2018
quotequote all
Looks good. I’m not sure if a turbo is going to be as much fun but overall another good update to the Atom. It’s what drew me towards them, unlike others they do seem to want to progress? It’ll take a test drive before I’m convinced though, the 3.5 is pretty well sorted and is great because of, not despite it being a little edgy. And the noise, I can’t see any ‘whoosh’ making up for the superchargers scream smile As for traction control, I can’t see the point, such a light car can be easily driven without masses of throttle, again will see on the test drive. The real disappointment are the seats, again. Why the hell cant they just fit some Tilletts and be done with it, bloody ridiculous and imo they’re just being tight. The old ones were crap. Likely at least a 12 month waiting list so plenty of time to think it through biggrin

cookie1600

2,116 posts

161 months

Wednesday 3rd October 2018
quotequote all
I see the driver started out with a flat cap, did it end up blowing into the countryside?!

I'd give one a go, but I wouldn't feel right driving it anywhere with out some sort of a roll-bar. A crash helmet (or cap) won't stop you snapping your head off at the neck.

andy_s

19,400 posts

259 months

Wednesday 3rd October 2018
quotequote all
cookie1600 said:
I see the driver started out with a flat cap, did it end up blowing into the countryside?!

I'd give one a go, but I wouldn't feel right driving it anywhere with out some sort of a roll-bar. A crash helmet (or cap) won't stop you snapping your head off at the neck.
I think the roll bar is integrated into the air intake.

Boydie88

3,283 posts

149 months

Wednesday 3rd October 2018
quotequote all
Not that it would put me off a car like this... but is the 30 mpg right? On a car that weighs next to nothing?
Think I'd still take a Nomad given the choice.

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 3rd October 2018
quotequote all
cookie1600 said:
I see the driver started out with a flat cap, did it end up blowing into the countryside?!

I'd give one a go, but I wouldn't feel right driving it anywhere with out some sort of a roll-bar. A crash helmet (or cap) won't stop you snapping your head off at the neck.
With the 4 the roll bar is underneath the bodywork, it's similar in protection to the previous ones. TBH if you are upside down in one you'll probably have a little bit more to worry about than if there is any dirt in your hair wink There was a 'track' roll bar, I had one but removed it as it looked like a climbing frame. The subject was done to death on the last thread, like anything you sort of accept that if you hit a bus in one you are unlikely to come out of it looking the same as when you went in. That's life.

saxy

258 posts

124 months

Wednesday 3rd October 2018
quotequote all
So what was the reason to go turbo charged? More easy daily driving? Lol

xjay1337

15,966 posts

118 months

Wednesday 3rd October 2018
quotequote all
saxy said:
So what was the reason to go turbo charged? More easy daily driving? Lol
Emissions
Availability of new engines
Performance.

Doubt it's anything to do with being easier to daily drive..........

GFWilliams

4,941 posts

207 months

Wednesday 3rd October 2018
quotequote all
The real question is:

Will this engine become available in the Nomad?

gofasterrosssco

1,238 posts

236 months

Wednesday 3rd October 2018
quotequote all
xjay1337 said:
saxy said:
So what was the reason to go turbo charged? More easy daily driving? Lol
Emissions
Availability of new engines
Performance.

Doubt it's anything to do with being easier to daily drive..........
And ease of upgrade to mentalist / completely undrivable spec for future models - I'm sure ~400bhp isn't more than a few 'bolts on's' and a calibration tweak away with this engine (as with most of the current generation).

beerexpressman

240 posts

137 months

Wednesday 3rd October 2018
quotequote all
cookie1600 said:
I see the driver started out with a flat cap, did it end up blowing into the countryside?!

I'd give one a go, but I wouldn't feel right driving it anywhere with out some sort of a roll-bar. A crash helmet (or cap) won't stop you snapping your head off at the neck.
After just 1 lap with a pro driver, I felt like my neck was about to snap, but that was just the g-forces on cornering...

hondansx

4,569 posts

225 months

Wednesday 3rd October 2018
quotequote all
Sounds great.

Are they available with traction control, like a Lotus?

I want one of these, but my girlfriend is quite an inexperienced driver (on track) so would want her to have a bit of a safety net. Worried it might be a bit of a step up from the current Clio Trophy!

CaptainRAVE

360 posts

112 months

Wednesday 3rd October 2018
quotequote all
I really wanted one of these until I saw one crashed into a wall. Nope.

SidewaysSi

10,742 posts

234 months

Wednesday 3rd October 2018
quotequote all
CaptainRAVE said:
I really wanted one of these until I saw one crashed into a wall. Nope.
Would have thought they are better than a Caterham or motorbike. If you crash, you will probably die. You need to accept that when contemplating this type of car.

If you want safety, get an XC90.

JMF894

5,504 posts

155 months

Wednesday 3rd October 2018
quotequote all
This is 2018 not 1980. Boost doesn't 'suddenly' arrive anymore surely? For those worried about mid-corner throttle response get yersen on a 4 cylinder sportsbike at 8000rpm. That'll teach you a thing or two about dialling it in properly!

That said surely a turbo doesn't fit with a car like the Atom? Interesting to see the quoted mpg at 30mpg. That's worse than the Civic.