RE: Oral sex causes crash
Monday 9th May 2005
Oral sex causes crash
Police warn of distractions while driving
Police in Romania found a car crash was caused because a couple were having oral sex while driving. The driver lost control on a crowded road in Craiova, Dolj county, and collided with an oncoming car, according to Editie Speciala newspaper.
The young man, whose identity was not revealed, admitted to police that he was having a "hell of a time" at the time of the crash. Police said the couple were still in their car, fully naked, when officers reached the scene of the accident.
A police spokesperson said, "We hope they have learned their lesson now - not to do anything distracting while driving."
Three people needed medical help after the crash -- the report doesn't say if they included the police and onlookers.
Discussion
FANTASTIC
Every credit to her
Quite nights on the M6 are best....
Plenty of road and space if needed....
Of course i stuck to the speed limit...and was not engaged in oral conversation with passenger or mobile phone...so not breaking the law..eyes on the road both hands on the wheel etc..
How could i refuse
Definately do it again
Hee Hee
Every credit to her
Quite nights on the M6 are best....
Plenty of road and space if needed....
Of course i stuck to the speed limit...and was not engaged in oral conversation with passenger or mobile phone...so not breaking the law..eyes on the road both hands on the wheel etc..
How could i refuse
Definately do it again
Hee Hee
Alicatt said:
sidesauce said:
Rob_F said:
Cars are tame anyway, more fun trying to have sex on public transport (not in toilets) ...
Rob.
Quite. Not to mention safer....
And bouncier
Did this on a train out of Leeds at around 9pm , as we were both blathered I think we thought is was quieter than it actually was, cant tell you what happened off the train though......
Phil
Although it specifies the young man was having a…
…it doesn’t actually specify that he was driving, it merely implies it.
But what if it was in fact HER who was driving? And she was not “on the receiving end” shall we say!? Or he was driving but was not “receiving”!?
Specifics, we need specifics!
It may well have been that they were both on the receiving end in which case… bravo
Editie Speciala said:
"hell of a time" at the time of the crash.”
…it doesn’t actually specify that he was driving, it merely implies it.
But what if it was in fact HER who was driving? And she was not “on the receiving end” shall we say!? Or he was driving but was not “receiving”!?
Specifics, we need specifics!
It may well have been that they were both on the receiving end in which case… bravo
Gassing Station | The Pie & Piston Archive | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff