RE: McLaren 720S Track Pack: Driven

RE: McLaren 720S Track Pack: Driven

Friday 2nd November 2018

2020 McLaren 720S Track Pack | UK Review

Is a circuit spec 720 a Super Series too far? Not on your nelly



It says something of the rapid rate of progress at McLaren that the plain old 212mph Super Series is in danger of being forgotten. Alright, perhaps that's a little facetious, but think of the McLarens we've seen since the second-gen Super Series' launch just 18 months ago: Senna, Speedtail, 600 LT. That's in addition to the expansion of MSO's remit and the burgeoning customer motorsport programme; time moves fast in Woking, so best keep up.

Therefore the Track Pack 720S feels as much about keeping the line up fresh and relevant as taking the car onto another plane of performance. Consider it more like a 911 GTS or similar, rather than a diet LT, where the most popular options are bundled together in one added value extras pack for less than they would cost individually. That's the theory, at least. Keen readers will notice there's not a power gain for this circuit minded option; that said, this is a car that'll do 0-100-0mph in less than 10 seconds - surely only lunatics could covet more.


Despite a general cynicism and weariness about the tangible benefits of track focused paraphernalia, there's no denying - irritatingly, because it proves us wrong - that clambering into the Lightweight Carbon Fibre Racing Seat and seeing the titanium harness bar behind does put you right in the mood. Chiefly that's because those seats grab and squeeze and clench everywhere, seemingly making any additional restraint by harness redundant, though there's something as well in seeing a slab of scaffolding that makes the atmosphere feel... racier. There's an argument to say the Track Pack is more of an experience before moving anywhere, which has to be a good sign. Or rather, it would be very hard to imagine sitting in one and then opting for a cheaper car with regular seats and without the bar. Sounds silly, but we all know how important subjective charm is to a car purchase - especially supercars.

You'll know by now that the 720S has great vats of objective ability to support the aesthetic, the Track Pack just better sets a slightly more aggressive tone to appreciate it. While less hardcore than something Longtaily or from the Ultimate Series stable, it's no exaggeration to say that a regular Super Series with some choice options can still feel pretty berserk on the public road. Consider it this way: the power of this McLaren is equal to an E39 M5 plus a Civic Type R together, while weighing only a few kilos more than the latter. It has 200hp more than a Ferrari F50. 720hp is just about three times that of a Golf GTI Performance, all through two rear P Zero Corsas a relatively modest 305mm in width.


So, yeah, there's the potential for that to feel a bit wild and unruly - which it can, with clumsy inputs - but the genius of the 720S has always been in how relatively accessible and usable its outrageous performance seems. Because the car is so trustworthy and the feedback so transparent, it feels far more approachable than its layout would ever suggest; that hasn't changed for the Track Pack, of course, though it's a trait that feels worth highlighting again.

Perhaps the biggest dynamic change for this car is the introduction of the 'Super Lightweight' forged wheels, which must contribute a decent chunk of the 24kg saving. Of course such a minuscule total amount is impossible to detect in a car of this power and weight, though, if pushed for an opinion, the ride probably does benefit from the reduction in unsprung mass. In the Comfort and Sport settings of the Proactive Chassis Control dampers - Track still a tad jiggly and restless for a B-road - there's a sliver more compliance and suppleness than on the heavier wheels. We're talking minute improvements here, naturally, and given the ride was pretty exemplary beforehand it's not a transformation, but seems worth pointing out. They look fantastic, too. Another option worth having...


Broadly speaking then, the 720S is the Super Series we know and love, made a tad more desirable in key areas through judicious option box ticking. You were expecting some kind of surprise? The hydraulically assisted steering remains fantastic, aided here in terms of experience by an Alcantara wheel; the V8 blare is certainly distinctive - if not truly musical - but made more interesting by the sports exhaust; and, while certainly up for debate, the carbon accents of the Track Pack might make this the most appealing 720S yet to look at.

Put simply, this feels like the car you'd probably spec, with McLaren taking the hassle away from having to do it on the configurator - with that fetching titanium bar thrown in, and all for less than the options cost. Win-win, right? Certainly it warrants inclusion and sits comfortably as part of the Super Series line up, the regular 720S still there to be taken down the 'Luxury' line of specification as any owner wishes (the Track Pack derived from a 720S 'Performance'). The Track Pack doesn't undermine the existence of the standard car, and vice versa - for now it probably represents the best and most desirable 720S, for PH tastes that is, on offer to buyers.


However, there is a significant caveat. You want a roadgoing McLaren with a track slant? There's a 600LT, assuming they've not yet all gone. And, to be brutally honest, despite an older interior and engine, the Sports Series feels a more special object and driving experience. As it justifiably should, being the Longtail flagship rather than a mere option pack, but it's hard to think of much where TP significantly surpasses LT - beyond getting you to scarier speeds in less time. This Track Pack is the best 720S McLaren currently on sale, but the 600LT is the best car it currently makes - Senna included. Really that just leaves a very tricky decision to one more prospective McLaren owner. Lucky sods. 


MCLAREN 720S TRACK PACK - SPECIFICATION

Engine: 3,994cc, twin-turbo V8
Transmission: 7-speed SSG, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 720@7,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 568@5,500rpm
0-62mph: 2.9sec
Top speed: 212mph
Weight: 1,419kg (fluids + 90 per cent fuel, 1,283kg dry because it has the lightweight options fitted!)
MPG: 26.4
CO2: 249g/km
Price: £224,700












 

 

Author
Discussion

Iamnotkloot

Original Poster:

1,426 posts

147 months

Thursday 1st November 2018
quotequote all
Looks lovely and it’ll obviously be stellar to drive.....but can McLaren please develop a new engine? Like a musical one, like a V12......you could even cut out the development costs and just re-engineer the F1’s, no-one would complain.

The Surveyor

7,576 posts

237 months

Thursday 1st November 2018
quotequote all
Iamnotkloot said:
Looks lovely and it’ll obviously be stellar to drive.....but can McLaren please develop a new engine? Like a musical one, like a V12......you could even cut out the development costs and just re-engineer the F1’s, no-one would complain.
This is just a option on the standard 720s, offered as a 'pack' at a discounted collective price, thankfully it's not a 'new' car.

The last thing we want to see from McLaren is another new car, and the last thing I want to see from McLaren is a V12. The current Riccardo V8 is a stella engine and delivers performance in spades, it's a turbo engine, it sounds like a turbo engine, and performs like one. If you want music, spec the Bowers & Wilkins stereo.

daveco

4,126 posts

207 months

Thursday 1st November 2018
quotequote all
Iamnotkloot said:
Looks lovely and it’ll obviously be stellar to drive.....but can McLaren please develop a new engine? Like a musical one, like a V12......you could even cut out the development costs and just re-engineer the F1’s, no-one would complain.
I agree but that engine is 25 years old now.

It only took Ricardo 1.5 years to produce the V8, a modern naturally aspirated V12 would probably require less development in relation to cooling etc.

Lamborghini and Ferrari are producing reliable 800hp V12 engines without turbos, surely McLaren want a piece of that pie??

mikey k

13,011 posts

216 months

Thursday 1st November 2018
quotequote all
A while back I drove a 720 on the road, along the same route on the same day I also drove a 650 and a 675LT.
I came away feeling the 720 was ballistic and stopped so quick, but, it felt detached and probably too fast for the road.
I ended up upgrading my 650 to a 675LT, that thing is also ballistic but feels a lot more connected and "talkative".
A few weeks ago I was lucky enough to spend the afternoon chucking a 720 Track Pack round Silverstone with an instructor.
In Track/Track mode it is more mental than the 675, completely different to "normal" mode on the road.
Question is could you use it in Track/Track on the road with out losing your licence in the first 100m?
I'd like to find out, maybe time to get a loaner from my dealer?

hondansx

4,569 posts

225 months

Thursday 1st November 2018
quotequote all
So i'm confused, where does this fit price wise with the 600LT?

GranCab

2,902 posts

146 months

Thursday 1st November 2018
quotequote all
McLaren look at things totally differently to the Italians.

I would hazard a guess that their product development is all based on numbers ... power, performance, lap times, efficiency etc.


Mafffew

2,149 posts

111 months

Thursday 1st November 2018
quotequote all
hondansx said:
So i'm confused, where does this fit price wise with the 600LT?
600LT starts around £185k.

Europa1

10,923 posts

188 months

Thursday 1st November 2018
quotequote all
Iamnotkloot said:
Looks lovely and it’ll obviously be stellar to drive.....but can McLaren please develop a new engine? Like a musical one, like a V12......you could even cut out the development costs and just re-engineer the F1’s, no-one would complain.
If they do, will you buy one?

mikey k

13,011 posts

216 months

Thursday 1st November 2018
quotequote all
Iamnotkloot said:
Looks lovely and it’ll obviously be stellar to drive.....but can McLaren please develop a new engine? Like a musical one, like a V12......you could even cut out the development costs and just re-engineer the F1’s, no-one would complain.
Nothing wrong with the M838T they are using.
Its a race dervied designed light weight durable V8 that is well proven.
It give 30 mpg on the motorway and does sub 3 second to 6 on most of their cars.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McLaren_M838T_engine

The issue is they are crap at exhaust notes.
There are plenty of aftermarket solutions for the whole range that improve that.
Though I think they have made improvements in this area with the Ti system on the 570, the 600LT top exits and I'm sure the 750LT will sound superb.
Shame about the Senna which sounds a bit like a tractor to my ears wink



Gameface

16,565 posts

77 months

Thursday 1st November 2018
quotequote all
The Surveyor said:
The current Riccardo V8 is a stella engine
You'd need to drink a crate of Stella before you could say it sounds good.

mikey k

13,011 posts

216 months

Thursday 1st November 2018
quotequote all
daveco said:
I agree but that engine is 25 years old now.

It only took Ricardo 1.5 years to produce the V8, a modern naturally aspirated V12 would probably require less development in relation to cooling etc.

Lamborghini and Ferrari are producing reliable 800hp V12 engines without turbos, surely McLaren want a piece of that pie??
No its not, the DNA might be but Ricardo and McLaren completely redesigned it 6-7 years ago and are still improving it.
Have a think about the origins of the V8 JLR are still using across their range, that's even older but still works well.

V12's are a dying bred, they cannot deliver the CO2 reductions our eco warriors are demanding.
Lambo and Ferrari (amongst others) are moving from NA V12 to Turbo V8 for these reasons.
For the same reasons manual V12's are now becoming collectible, I know of a manual V12 DBS Volante that recently sold for £160k!

Gameface

16,565 posts

77 months

Thursday 1st November 2018
quotequote all
Extremely disingenuous to say that about Lamborghini simply because of the Urus.

mikey k

13,011 posts

216 months

Thursday 1st November 2018
quotequote all
Mafffew said:
hondansx said:
So i'm confused, where does this fit price wise with the 600LT?
600LT starts around £185k.
Yep 600LT is Sport series
So no active suspension or hydraulic cross linking (traditional dampers and anti roll bars) the active suspension is a must on crappy UK roads. My 675LT rides better than our M140i or Focus ST estate.
No active aero either

Base price is £185k but there are certain options it NEEDS, its easy to get the spec up close to £230k.
I speced a 600LT spider with the Senna seats and some CF, it was £242k!, not much more got me a delivery mileage 675LT spider with a bit of MSO content.

mikey k

13,011 posts

216 months

Thursday 1st November 2018
quotequote all
Gameface said:
The Surveyor said:
The current Riccardo V8 is a stella engine
You'd need to drink a crate of Stella before you could say it sounds good.
laugh

Harsh but fair!

The Surveyor

7,576 posts

237 months

Thursday 1st November 2018
quotequote all
Gameface said:
Extremely disingenuous to say that about Lamborghini simply because of the Urus.
Time will tell.

Given how Porsche have panicked over their engine emissions and wider VW group emissions scandal, I think we are currently seeing the last of the great NA Lamborghini engines.

The Surveyor

7,576 posts

237 months

Thursday 1st November 2018
quotequote all
Gameface said:
The Surveyor said:
The current Riccardo V8 is a stella engine
You'd need to drink a crate of Stella before you could say it sounds good.
In your opinion.... I don't have any issues with the sound of my 570s.

Targarama

14,635 posts

283 months

Thursday 1st November 2018
quotequote all
The Surveyor said:
Gameface said:
The Surveyor said:
The current Riccardo V8 is a stella engine
You'd need to drink a crate of Stella before you could say it sounds good.
In your opinion.... I don't have any issues with the sound of my 570s.
This. My McLaren has a Larini exhaust and sounds brilliant. Just different to the Italian supercars.

chunder

735 posts

246 months

Thursday 1st November 2018
quotequote all
Whats the point of the roll bar hoops, it isn't a convertible, why not just take the bar round at roof height ?

Gameface

16,565 posts

77 months

Thursday 1st November 2018
quotequote all
The Surveyor said:
Gameface said:
The Surveyor said:
The current Riccardo V8 is a stella engine
You'd need to drink a crate of Stella before you could say it sounds good.
In your opinion.... I don't have any issues with the sound of my 570s.
It was more a play on words about Stella/stellar.

But yes, of course it's my opinion. But, you'll concede I'm hardly a lone voice.

My cars have perhaps spoilt me when it comes aural pleasure.

They are among the best sounding around (both have Larini clubsport exhausts).

In my opinion.

The Surveyor

7,576 posts

237 months

Thursday 1st November 2018
quotequote all
Gameface said:
It was more a play on words about Stella/stellar.

But yes, of course it's my opinion. But, you'll concede I'm hardly a lone voice.

My cars have perhaps spoilt me when it comes aural pleasure.

They are among the best sounding around (both have Larini clubsport exhausts).

In my opinion.
Of course, beer

A good mate of mine has a tuned Merci with a custom titanium exhaust and it does indeed sound epic, but if I preferred Lamborghini I'd have bought one. For the same reason I preferred the Speed 6 engine TVR's to the RV8's, didn't sound as good but overall they suited the kind of driving I preferred, like the McLaren suits the kind of driving and use I want better than anything Italian or German. If the funds were available, I'd upgrade to the 720s in a heartbeat, with a quiet exhaust, in a subtle colour, and happily fly under the radar.