RE: Honda Gold Wing GL1000: PH2 Heroes

RE: Honda Gold Wing GL1000: PH2 Heroes

Monday 5th November 2018

Honda Gold Wing GL1000 | PH2 Heroes

The Gold Wing was somewhat unloved in its day, but a sales revolution over time. Now there's a lot to like



Cars are cars, and bikes are bikes. That was pretty much the size of it in September 1974. Life was simple then. A month later, however, everything had changed - in the eyes of 'proper' motorcyclists, anyway. In October 1974, at the Cologne Bike Show, Honda launched the Gold Wing - and even in Germany you could hear the wailing and gnashing of teeth from British bikers outraged by something that they regarded not as a bike, but as a car missing a couple of wheels. The kerfuffle was mighty.

Two years earlier, in 1972, Kawasaki's twin-cam Z1 had ripped the performance crown away from Honda's groundbreaking CB750 superbike. In that same year, Honda started planning its next flagship bike. The expectation - and, from Honda fans anyway, the hope - was that it would be a huge smack in the eye for Kawasaki. The machine that turned up at the 1974 Cologne Bike Show certainly ticked the 'huge' box. At a time when any bike over 500cc was regarded with a mixture of reverence and fear, the Gold Wing's 999cc capacity was suitably gogglesome, but one look at its 273kg bulk was enough to confirm that this glistening beast was never going to threaten the Z1.


Nobody quite knew what it was threatening, other than the health of anyone attempting to pick up a dropped one, but there was general agreement that the Gold Wing was certainly remarkably large. Bending the scales at 273kg, it was about 50% heavier than Triumph's contemporary Bonneville 750. Even today, that's a fair old weight for a bike. In the early 1970s, when everyone was much littler and we all had spaghetti legs, it was an outlandish figure. By the looks of it, the Gold Wing was a one-way ticket to the hernia clinic.

Much of the Gold Wing's bulk was concentrated within the polished flanks of its flat-four watercooled engine (Japan's first liquid-cooled four-stroke). The flat-four design was alien to anyone too young to remember the 'industry revolutionising' post-war Wooler or the Jowett Javelin, both of which failed. Honda scored a major engineering bullseye by fitting their boxer four with a contra-rotating alternator to quell the torque reaction. To minimise the negative handling effects of the weight, they put the 19-litre fuel tank under the seat and turned the original 'tank' into a cover for the air filter, coolant tank and electrics and, quaintly, a kick start lever (removed from post-1978 models, along with the wire wheels).


On learning that this new Honda would deliver smooth, refined power - pretty much exactly the sort of power that motorcyclists of the time weren't really interested in - plus the uncertain delights of shaft drive transmission, previously restricted to 'boring' tourers like BMWs and Moto Guzzis, the inherently conservative two-wheeled community immediately categorised the Gold Wing as a two-wheeled car. It was the ultimate insult.

Honda carried on anyway. The name of the bike was a big clue as to its intended purpose: effortless and sophisticated long-distance travel on big, straight roads. What Honda had built, three decades on from the demise of Brough and two on from the death of Vincent, was arguably the first 'premium' motorcycle of modern times. It was fast, comfortable and, perhaps most importantly for those who were literally disinclined to grind the footrests everywhere, it legitimised the art of mainly vertical riding.


In its first road test, the American bike mag Cycle World described it as 'the gentleman's choice'. If you understood what it was about, as 13,000 US riders did in 1975 and hundreds of thousands of worldwide riders have done in the 43 years since, the decision to buy a Wing was never that hard.

The current owner of this GL1000 Wing, Patrick Bullimore, was an early Wing adopter. He bought a new GL1000 in 1976, the second year of manufacture, only to sell it two years later to buy a Honda CBX1000 (which he still owns). In 1990, Patrick saw the '76 bike you're looking at here. "It was a non-runner but it had only done 500 miles and was in totally original condition," he recalls. "Even the lacquer on the engine cases was perfect."


He bought it. 20 years later, he took the engine out of the frame and gave it a thorough clean. The carbs were treated to a sonic bath and all the jets were cleaned. "Many fasteners were zinc plated and a few brackets painted," he says. "All the pipework for the water cooling system was corroded, so it was dismantled and repainted in the original silver colour." It became a multiple gold concours winning bike. "Luckily I didn't need too many parts. They're very hard to find now." That explains the only obvious deviation from stock, the blue tacho face, the original green one having been broken.

Today, Patrick's bike is worth maybe £15,000, but it's a notional value as he has no plans to sell. That's understandable, because quite apart from any considerations of financial value, and despite all the development over the last forty-odd years that has seen the Wing grow into an 1800 flat-six (still single-cam, mind), the original GL1000 remains remarkably well fitted to its design task of whisking two people from one end of a continent to another with minimal fuss. "I have very happy memories of riding it down to Spain with my wife and then catching the ferry over to Minorca," says Patrick. "It was so comfortable on the motorways, and there was no chain to worry about."


I've ridden every Gold Wing iteration: the 1000, 1100 and 1200 fours and then the 1500 and 1800 sixes. In 1985 I borrowed a GL1200 Aspencade from Honda US in Los Angeles. By that time, Honda was ten years into the Wing phenomenon. They knew the US touring market inside out, and the 1200 Aspencade was the rolling focus point of that knowledge. To say that 'my' bike was fully equipped was an understatement. As standard, it had a full music system, cruise control and adjustable air suspension via an onboard compressor. That's just the gear I remember. There was a ton of stuff you could get for your Wing, either from the dealer or from the huge accessory aftermarket that sprang up to supply everything from sparkly lighting kits to matching trailers. Owners were only to willing to hang bits onto their bikes to enhance their touring abilities, or sometimes just to individualise them.

By starting off with a naked bike, Honda had left the door wide open for that aftermarket. It would never have happened if the Gold Wing had been launched in 2018, and in fact it wasn't meant to happen in 1974: US fibreglass guru Craig Vetter had built some small fairings for the first Wings, but the moulds were accidentally broken. As it was, fully kitted out factory Wings didn't join the range until the 1100 Interstate appeared in 1980.


Back to 1985 and that Aspencade 1200. I took it south to Ensenada in Mexico and then north to Kamloops in Canada, not on the usual route up the Californian coast but north-east inland via Four Corners in New Mexico. The Mexico-Canada trip of around 2300 miles was despatched over a long weekend. I will admit to being glad to get off the Aspencade by the time I got to British Columbia - even the king and queen back-support seat that came with it wasn't that comfy for really long distances - but I will also add that, after a few evening beers and a night's rest, I had no qualms about getting back on it the next day for the coastal cruise south to LA.

By 1985, the flat four motor was coming to the end of its life. The market's thirst for more power to keep increasingly heavy 'full dress' Wings moving at a respectable rate was adding the unwelcome side effect of driveline harshness in the 1200, which for this reason turned out to be the last four-pot Wing. It's all relative though: even the 'rough' late-model fours are turbine-like compared to the average transverse four. My experience on Patrick's bike suggests that the early 1000s were the sweetest four-cylinder Gold Wings of all - and I could easily be persuaded to leave 'four-cylinder' out of that sentence.


"It's become a classic and I still enjoy taking it out," says Patrick. "It always draws a crowd. It really is a magic carpet ride." To my surprise, I find myself nodding in agreement. Why the surprise? Well, as a footling youth in bike journalism back in those days I too fell into the general anti-Wing sneering. Coming back to the first GL1000 now, seeing and enjoying it in all its accoutrement-free stripped-back glory, I'm beginning to think that this might be the ultimate Gold Wing. The sixes are whizzy-smooth, but cranking the throttle on the 1000 is like pouring molasses out of a stone jar. In period, the non-cammy (and yes, car-like) engine characteristics plus the extreme weight never endeared it to regular bikers, but in today's supersized world, this once outrageously massive feeling machine feels normal and perfectly at home on British roads.

The limitations of shaft drive, rudimentary rear shocks (replaced by air suspension on later models), non-taper roller head bearings on pre-'78 bikes and of course the 1970s spindly-tube chassis mean that you don't want to mess about with throttle settings in the middle of a corner. That will confuse it and get it heaving biliously on its springs. Do it once and you learn not to do it again.


What's really extraordinary about the GL1000, even by 2018 standards, is the refinement. Sadly, this wasn't recognised as a desirable feature for a touring motorcycle back in the late 1970s. Unforgivably, refinement was conflated into a perceived lack of character and was used as one of the sticks to beat the bike with. I feel quite guilty about that.

SPECIFICATION - HONDA GOLD WING GL1000

Engine: 999cc SOHC 8-valve horizontally opposed four
Induction: 4 x 32mm Keihin carbs
Power(hp): 78@7000rpm
Torque(lb ft): 62@5500rpm
Transmission: 5-speed, shaft drive
Weight: 273kg
Top speed: 115mph
Frame: Steel duplex cradle
Seat height: 32in
Wheels: 19in front, 17in rear
Braking: (front) mm twin discs; 200mm drum rear

Author
Discussion

Waploadtabernacle111

Original Poster:

3 posts

97 months

Monday 5th November 2018
quotequote all
My Dad bought his in 76. Unfortunately he has reached an age where he is not comfortable wielding this machine from its standing position. So I am now the proud owner. At the time It was bought, I was busy flailing my H1 Kawasaki 500 2-stroke down the road, uninterested in comfort and all that goes with Wing ownership. Having stripped the carbs to clean the debris and in the process of putting it back on the road. I now realise what a masterpiece of engineering it truly is. PS my present bike is a Super duke 1290...Somethings need to be done.

robsa

2,260 posts

184 months

Monday 5th November 2018
quotequote all
I loved the GL1000 when it came out. As a kid, the opening 'fuel tank' was a real novelty, and of course the 'Crazy little thing called love' video by Queen had one in it. I had a Polistil model of one that the tank actually opened on.

Big love for the original GL1000.

fredd1e

781 posts

220 months

Monday 5th November 2018
quotequote all
Owned one for a couple of years, great fun and could lift its skirts when asked. Frame seems to have a water trap in the lower cross member frame rail where the centre stand mounts as mine rotted out despite the rest of the frame being corrosion free, you notice it when its on the centre stand and both wheels are still on the floor.

Wacky Racer

38,161 posts

247 months

Monday 5th November 2018
quotequote all
All that's wrong with motorcycling, vastly overweight, pig ugly, compare the looks with a Kawasaki Z900 launched the year before, like chalk and cheese.


JMF894

5,504 posts

155 months

Monday 5th November 2018
quotequote all
I was looking at several examples of the early GW in a musem near to me justthe other month. Along with approximately 150 other classic Hondas.

They are sweet in their own retro kinda way but not for me.

LuS1fer

41,135 posts

245 months

Monday 5th November 2018
quotequote all
It's simply pointless trying to compare a GL1000 to any other motorcycle of the era.

When I had a Honda SS50, I commuted to Liverpool and parked it outside Horsemans, the Kawasaki dealer (when you could leave your bike unlocked all day and not lose it). While I drooled over the Z900 and the KH250s in brown and red, in the window, my world changed when a red GL1000 parked next to my little blue SS50.

Roll on 5 years and once I passed my test on my (blue) CB250RSA, I saw a loaded red GL1000 with phenomenally comfortable K&Q seat, perspex screen, box and panniers and just went straight in and bought it. It was an incredible bike. Despite it's weight, it was all low down so the bike simply pivoted around the centre of gravity and was extremely easy to ride. It was practically vibrationless and when you opened the taps, it whined like a turbine and flung you towards the horizon. One or two up, it was the consummate performer and equally effortless to ride.
I used to give people rides on the back who would simply never dream of risking the pillion of a normal bike, including my mate's elderly mother. They simply perched on that seat, leaned against the top box and smiled like The Joker as it shot forward like an intercontinental missile with an eery "Whoooooooooooooo"

Handling was effortless too although it couldn't lean very far but the shaft drive was sublimely smooth. I had the Wing for 2 years until I flung it up a dual carriageway sideways after the Honda rear shocks faded and handed me a terminal tank slapper. The flat four probably saved me my legs and serious injury as the engine showered sparks 6 feet in the air.

I later rebuilt the bike but then the clutch failed and I was poor and out of cash. I swopped it for a £100 Cortina Mk 1... but ever single person who went on it still has fond memories of it, as do I. Being only 5'6 and then 10 stone, it was still wieldy enough for me and I could get it on the main stand quite easily.

I wanted a GL1100 but never got round to it. Now, I see these massive monstrosities that they now call Gold Wings and they leave me colder than a dead kipper and I could never imagine trying to wrestle one of these behemoths anywhere. It's stupid. That is why I think the original Wing is an unsung hero. Kawasaki tried to usurp it with the ugly Z1300 but failed, even with six cylinders (which the Honda CBX was then touting).


dougflump

38 posts

169 months

Tuesday 6th November 2018
quotequote all
One of my favorite motorcycles..maybe number 1, my first big bike was a GL1000K1 with a Jardine exhaust WOW fantastic muted howl and such a comfy bike, handled much better than tests said, in fact for the weight handled very well indeed, sooooo smooth, nothing I've owned since has been as smooth, owned ridden bought and sold around 2000 bikes since then and still the Wing stands out, thanks Honda !

W12JFD

378 posts

165 months

Wednesday 7th November 2018
quotequote all
What an enjoyable article - more like this please!

tdm34

7,370 posts

210 months

Thursday 8th November 2018
quotequote all
Brilliant article, brilliant bike, ahead of its time, i've ridden an original K1 and it's the smoothest most refined thing i've thrown a leg over....

And to get the weight thing into perspective a New Suzuki 650 Burgman weighs in at 281 kgs!

Cupramax

10,480 posts

252 months

Thursday 8th November 2018
quotequote all
Article says rear drum brake, pictures say different???

LuS1fer

41,135 posts

245 months

Thursday 8th November 2018
quotequote all
Cupramax said:
Article says rear drum brake, pictures say different???
Single disc. People sometimes look at the shaft drive housing and think it looks like a drum.

Patkin

5 posts

116 months

Thursday 13th June 2019
quotequote all
I just bought a beautifully restored 1976 model, drooled over these back in the day when all I could afford was a Suzuki T500. Looking forward to entering it into a couple of shows.

loquacious

1,150 posts

157 months

Thursday 13th June 2019
quotequote all
Having seen one of these 'back in the day' and being the only one of my friends that liked it, it was perhaps inevitable that I would own one someday. That day came in about 2007 when I was tasked with road testing one for a Classic Bike magazine. At the time, I owned an R1, a KH250, a 'Boost' Thunderace, a 1969 T120 Bonneville (with many modifications) a rare Yamaha GTS and a GL1500 GoldWing! Oh, and a motley selection of dirt bikes...

About two days later I was lacking a GTS and the proud owner of an ancient GoldWing

I loved the GL1000: it was smooth, fastish and very comfortable. It also had zero ground clearance (I debated removing the centre stand but thought that was a bit 'out of character' for the bike) and terrible, wooden brakes. I used it quite a lot over the next few years and even though she was an elderly lady, she never let me down but then, I never used it if the weather looked even remotely, British!

939 by david towerss, on Flickr

The GTS that was swapped for...

920 by david towerss, on Flickr

This fat old lass!

LuS1fer

41,135 posts

245 months

Thursday 13th June 2019
quotequote all
You had to use the mainstand as leaving it on the sidestand caused oil to somehow get into the cylinders so you got a puff of blue smoke on that side. It was well-documented at the time.

I'm pretty sure I've still got a set of K2 clutch plates somewhere that didn't fit the K1.