180hp and 52mpg from Skyactiv-X Mazda 3
Compression and spark ignition 2.0-litre petrol on sale soon - who wants a turbo anyway?
Mazda has already been praised on PH for its commitment to naturally aspirated engines, the 2.0-litre MX-5 unit in particular singled out for its effervescent nature and laudable efficiency. Now Mazda is taking its development of petrol engines one step further, with the Skyactiv-X Mazda 3.
Skyactiv-X has been discussed for a while now, drives having taken place of prototypes with the Spark Plug Controlled Compression Ignition technology that combines - you guessed it - both spark and compression ignition. The ignition technology also works with Mazda's M Hybrid tech to reduce emissions, recycling kinetic energy from braking to supply an electric motor that assists the engine. Today's newss is the announcement of production car specs, and they're as impressive as we've come to expect from Mazda's innovative engine range.
In a Mazda 3 on 16-inch wheels, the 180hp, 165lb ft 2.0-litre Skyactiv-X will return 52.3mpg on the WLTP cycle and emit just 96g/km of CO2. That's unprecedented for a petrol engine; the fact that peak power is delivered at 6,000rpm would suggest it's not simply a turgid petrol tuned for economy, either. With the optional 18-inch wheels, those numbers fall to 50.4mpg and 102g/km. With all-wheel drive, automatic gearboxes and different bodystyles available, not all will sneak under that 100g/km threshold, but it's a mighty achievement nonetheless.
The Skyactiv-X engined cars will go on sale later this year, with UK prices and specs to be released in July. It sounds like fascinating technology, potentially a huge leap forward for petrol engines and promising a future for non-turbo'd or hybridised power units. Wonder if it'll go in an MX-5?
Just this morning on my commute I got 51.8mpg.
26 miles of backroads, M40/M42 and a bit of town. Average 42mph.
I'm guessing the Mazda with that little torque etc making half decent progress and 50mpg would be very hard.
Just this morning on my commute I got 51.8mpg.
26 miles of backroads, M40/M42 and a bit of town. Average 42mph.
I'm guessing the Mazda with that little torque etc making half decent progress and 50mpg would be very hard.
the new mazda engine are NA engine, so to be comparable is unbelievable.
Just this morning on my commute I got 51.8mpg.
26 miles of backroads, M40/M42 and a bit of town. Average 42mph.
I'm guessing the Mazda with that little torque etc making half decent progress and 50mpg would be very hard.
the new mazda engine are NA engine, so to be comparable is unbelievable.
Mazda continue to burnish their reputation for a certain sort of individualism, and I enjoy being part of the Greek chorus here that cheers them on
whilst there are important and desirable attributes of EVs, it's no less inspiring to see progress on the ICE front
imagine this particular Skyativ solution with an average one percent improvement in figures, each year for the next several years; then extend it further by integrating a battery-electric hybrid
Some of us don't like the low-rev torque focus that a lot of the turbo-petrols are now afflicted with, so while a free-revving petrol of any kind is to be applauded, a n/a one is especially welcome.
It makes 225 Nm, a typical 2.0tdi is making 400 Nm these days. So in any given gear, that's half the performance.........
(BTW, i haven't checked but assume the 225 Nm is without the eAssist which may help level the playing field somewhat)
It makes 225 Nm, a typical 2.0tdi is making 400 Nm these days. So in any given gear, that's half the performance.........
(e.g. my 'torque-less' Type R has (+/- a few %) exactly the same wheel-torque as a same-era 320d, and a flatter torque-curve to boot...)
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff