RE: Audi SQ2 | Driven

Sunday 16th June 2019

2020 Audi SQ2 | UK Review

Audi's 300hp compact SUV ought to be manna from heaven for a captivated UK market...



In my weaker moments, or perhaps when the weather has been foul for weeks and the roads are in a terrible state, I sometimes think the car I'd like to tool around in is a compact SUV with a bit of poke. The recipe just seems to make sense to me, at least for the car you use on a daily basis. I like the security of four-wheel drive in very wet weather. I like being sat up a little higher to have a better chance of spotting the lunatic in the car in front before he doesn't spot you. And with more ground clearance, I also like merely thumping through potholes rather than actually falling into them.

But this is all theoretical. I haven't yet driven a single small-to-medium sized performance SUV that I would particularly like to live with, which might be because nobody has built a really good one yet (the more potent versions of Porsche's Macan are probably the exception, which is great if you're looking to spent upwards of £60,000).

With more or less the same powertrain that makes the VW Golf R one of the best and most effective hot hatches you can buy, the Audi SQ2, I though to myself, might just be the car to change all that. I was busily persuading myself of the SQ2's merits and preparing for it to be the compact performance SUV I had been waiting for, right up until the moment I drove it. And it isn't. Chuck it on the pile.


You'll have your own view on this but I don't love the way the car looks. Although I do like its relative subtlety, because even with quad exhausts and contrasting black body trim and 'quattro' stickers along its flanks, it still doesn't look like a car that'll out accelerate a Ferrari F355. With 300hp from its 2-litre turbocharged engine (the same unit that serves in more VW Group compact performance cars than anybody has the time to count), four-wheel drive and a rapid-fire dual-clutch gearbox, the SQ2 is a seriously punchy machine.

Just as it is in various SEATs and Volkswagens the drivetrain is pretty much beyond reproach. The engine is strong and fizzy, the gearbox both responsive in manual mode and well-mannered when left in auto, while traction even in the wet is absolute. Drive with a little care and you'll even squeeze decent fuel efficiency from the SQ2.

But it has a previous-generation cabin. Anybody familiar with the latest Audi stuff will spot that immediately. Models like the A1 and A8 have gone all ultra-slick and modern with sharp angles and integrated digital screens. So the SQ2's cabin feels a little dated, but it's still mostly very good. The material and build quality are both fine and Audi's MMI infotainment system, combined with Virtual Cockpit (the full-width display within the instrument binnacle), makes for about as intuitive a car media system as you'll find anywhere. What isn't so good is rear seat space. The SQ2 is 66mm shorter than a Golf and any adult who attempts to spend meaningful time in the rear of the cabin will be well aware of it.

And to drive? Actually, there is plenty the SQ2 does rather well. It has sharp and accurate steering, for instance, so when you make a lunge for an apex you feel the car respond as one, not in the disjointed way of most taller cars. Here there is no sense of the front end responding instantaneously and the rear half a second later. Body roll is reasonably well contained and there's plenty of grip as well, all of which means you can hoof the SQ2 along a twisting road with a fair degree of enthusiasm. It doesn't simply fall to pieces the moment you starting wringing it out.


Nor does it ever come to life and really sing, though. There isn't a hot hatch on sale today that wouldn't be more fun to drive along a country road, because no matter how well set-up a sporty compact SUV is, a taller ride height and an elevated centre of gravity will always be limiting factors.

What would really wind me up about the SQ2 in daily use though is its lumpy ride. To make this sort of car handle at all it needs to be tied down by some fairly robust suspension components, like heavy springs and taut anti-roll bars. (Curiously, you cannot spec the SQ2 with adaptive dampers.) While its ride is a long way from being unreasonably firm, it is nonetheless too unyielding given the car's modest appetite for fun. I can forgive a busy ride when a car is a real firecracker.

And therein lies the fundamental compromise at the heart of the sporty SUV. If you jack a car up by four or five inches, you make it both less comfortable and less fun to drive. Those are not prices worth paying, in my view, for a loftier view of the road and a little more ground clearance. I will continue longing for a compact SUV with a bit of poke, one that is as fun to drive as a good hot hatch. But I'm not yet convinced I will ever drive one.


SPECIFICATION - AUDI SQ2

Engine: 1984cc, 4 cyls, turbo
Transmission: Seven-speed dual clutch, all-wheel drive
Power (hp): 300@5,300rpm
Torque (lb ft): 295@2,000rpm
0-62mph: 4.8 secs
Top speed: 155mph
Weight: 1510kg
CO2: 159g/km
MPG: 40.4mpg
Price: £37,245

Inspired? Search for an Audi Q2 here












Author
Discussion

PokiGTA

Original Poster:

86 posts

191 months

Sunday 16th June 2019
quotequote all
The SUV. Only made more ridiculous by a performance version.

Here in Australia, the SUV is the scourge of the road. Klugers, Pathfinders, Pajero Sports, Everests, etc. Most are based on ladder chassis utes with a wagon body. Terrible handling, stupid tyres that create pot holes, horrendous economy and they take up most of the road. Not to mention driven by people with no concept of situational awareness. The only thing worse is a ute like a brand new Toyota Hilux dual cab that is used as the family bus.

Surely the better option is a slightly used RSQ3? has the same drivetrain as the RS3 but with the ride height that mums apparently love.

PorkRind

3,053 posts

206 months

Sunday 16th June 2019
quotequote all
Well i never, another dullfest from audi with Haldex ruining any semblance of rearward drive. You have to be an estate agent to buy one of these i reckon ! Cockgoblins !

GhellopeSir

70 posts

81 months

Sunday 16th June 2019
quotequote all
Hideous

GTEYE

2,096 posts

211 months

Sunday 16th June 2019
quotequote all
So it’s basically an expensive T-Roc? In the metal, the Q2 doesn’t have much real presence, it looks a bit cheap to me.

Edit: by cheap I mean cheaply engineered (no adaptive dampers). One of those cars with only a veneer of quality.

As said an upgrade from a Mini for an estate agent.

Golf R for me thanks.

chelme

1,353 posts

171 months

Sunday 16th June 2019
quotequote all
Boring car. Boring article.

This is the trouble with blinkered eyes and sheep like mentality.

I mean, did Dan Posser even imagine life outside the box within this context?

A Stelvio with 2.0 and 276bhp would give the driver immense fun, for what is an SUV, look good and offer a comparable ingerior.

Instead he has to in a tunnel vision way think only of VAG products....Yawn.

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 16th June 2019
quotequote all
An apt colour.

Dull & grey.

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 16th June 2019
quotequote all
Cut it some slack, it wasn’t made to rip down Spa at 200mph, it was just made to travel up the Autobahn/M25 at a nice speed in comfort with a high ride height and practical size

It wasn’t built for most PH’ers

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 16th June 2019
quotequote all
The design just looks so very American, square, straight lines everywhere and cheap.

The first Q2 I saw just looked naff, no improvements here.

Mike335i

5,008 posts

103 months

Sunday 16th June 2019
quotequote all
I agree with the sentiment in the article, a fast but comfort orientated SUV would make more sense instead of it being sporty.

CS Garth

2,860 posts

106 months

Sunday 16th June 2019
quotequote all
A very competent little car for the right buyer - someone who wants an elevated driving position, doesn't want the heft of a full size SUV, perhaps finds the higher access point helpful if they are older but still wants a bit of poke.

981C

1,097 posts

149 months

Sunday 16th June 2019
quotequote all
Oi! Where's my port injection?

Carl_Manchester

12,230 posts

263 months

Sunday 16th June 2019
quotequote all
This is no ordinary SUV.

It is an pig ugly SUV.

andrewparker

8,014 posts

188 months

Sunday 16th June 2019
quotequote all
chelme said:
A Stelvio with 2.0 and 276bhp would give the driver immense fun, for what is an SUV, look good and offer a comparable ingerior.
I like the Stelvio, but it’s a fair bit bigger than a Q2. I’d be looking at the X2 M35i.

Meridius

1,608 posts

153 months

Sunday 16th June 2019
quotequote all
PorkRind said:
Well i never, another dullfest from audi with Haldex ruining any semblance of rearward drive. You have to be an estate agent to buy one of these i reckon ! Cockgoblins !
Its a pretty pointless car in the lineup but they're hardly going to make a RWD mini SUV are they.

TomTVR500

254 posts

162 months

Sunday 16th June 2019
quotequote all
Have you tried an RS Q3? Far superior car to the SQ2 to drive and ride in at least. Oh and that 5 cylinder noise... stunning.

kambites

67,587 posts

222 months

Sunday 16th June 2019
quotequote all
TomTVR500 said:
Have you tried an RS Q3? Far superior car to the SQ2 to drive and ride in at least. Oh and that 5 cylinder noise... stunning.
Isn't it £10k more expensive? hardly a fair comparison.

Water Fairy

5,510 posts

156 months

Sunday 16th June 2019
quotequote all
This is a great car.

For the person its aimed at.

For the rest of us we can go buy something else.

And chill.

Tim bo

1,956 posts

141 months

Sunday 16th June 2019
quotequote all
Oh dear. I'm not sure what's happened to me. Maybe I slept a bit funny.

I hate SUVs with something close to obsession.

Crossovers even more. They are satan's demonic ejaculate. Hate them.

Audis leave me cold. Bland to look at, bland to drive.

Yet, this SQ2 looks ... really quite good to me. I actually like it.

weeping

I think I'll go and have a quiet lie down.

dunnoreally

970 posts

109 months

Sunday 16th June 2019
quotequote all
A relative of mine has a well-specced boggo Q2 and has some serious complaints about the driving position. As in, more than half an hours driving and their back starts hurting quite badly. They're a former semi-pro rugby player too, so not usually one to complain about a bit of discomfort.

Makes me think that, while a fast one might sound good on paper, in practice harder suspension and bigger wheels won't do it any favours. I'd accept this sort of thing in, say, a Caterham, but not in something that's meant to be a practical commuter with some added fun.

Krikkit

26,538 posts

182 months

Sunday 16th June 2019
quotequote all
sleepera6 said:
Cut it some slack, it wasn’t made to rip down Spa at 200mph, it was just made to travel up the Autobahn/M25 at a nice speed in comfort with a high ride height and practical size

It wasn’t built for most PH’ers
It sounds like the suspension is way too stuff to be comfortable. Might be alright on a butter smooth but of autobahn (which is rare enough), but it won't be nice thumping down expansion joints and tramlining on the M25.