RE: Audi RS5 Sportback Sport Edition | Driven

RE: Audi RS5 Sportback Sport Edition | Driven

Friday 21st June 2019

2020 Audi RS5 Sportback Sport Edition | UK Review

You can now buy the 450hp RS5 Sportback in the UK - question is, should you?



Since it switched to a twin-turbocharged V6 in 2017, the Audi RS5 has failed to captivate us in quite the same way its V8-powered predecessors did. Effortlessly rapid, good-looking and brimming with tech, the present-day model most certainly is. But exciting to drive? Not when its rivals include the Mercedes-AMG C63 coupe and the BMW M4. Now, though, with the launch of the Sportback in the UK - a roomier, five-door take on the 450hp RS5 theme - there's an additional opportunity for the model to finally evolve into an exciting RennSport distance shrinker, potentially one with a wider talent bandwidth than the competition.

Moreover, in 2019, the RS5 Sportback can claim to be an exclusive option choice given that just 250 examples are being made (there'll be 250 coupes for 2019 as well), before the car is briefly pulled out of production to be WLTP-ified. It's available exclusively in higher-spec Sport Edition trim, too, so all cars come with 20-inch anthracite alloy wheels, tinted glass and lots of black trim, as well as the more vocal Audi Sport exhaust system. Inside, the manufacturer's still impressive and functional Virtual Cockpit cabin comes finished with Nappa leather and Alcantara trimmings, contrasting diamond stitching on a pair of RS Super Sports seats and a panoramic glass sunroof. In its class, it's second to none.

Naturally, the addition of two doors behind the centre line and space for up 1,300 litres of luggage means that the RS5 Sportback is 35kg heavier than the coupe at 1,720kg. But Audi claims that there's been no measurable impact on straight-line performance; the 443lb ft made available by the 2.9-litre V6 still sprinting the RS5 from 0 to 62mph in 3.9 seconds - which, conveniently, is identical to the C63 saloon and Alfa Romeo Giulia QF - and onto a limited top speed of 155mph. Key to the motor's elasticity is the arrival of that maximum twist from 1,900rpm and peak power at 5,700rpm, giving the eight-speed Tiptronic gearbox a lighter workload.


With the powertrain set to Comfort mode, two of the four exhaust exits (there are two smaller tips inside those wide-bore surrounds) are blanked off with valves so the V6 is hushed and hunkered down behind its vast reserves of torque. From behind the wheel, you could easily forget you're in something of the RS variety - which perhaps gives the Audi a USP over its louder, more permanently brash rivals. At low pace in town, the ride is good over large bumps like sleeping policemen, but a little busy over cracks and drain covers, most probably because of the thinness of the rubber wrapped around the 20-inch wheels.

Our test car didn't come with the optional Dynamic Chassis Control hardware, so switching to Dynamic mode on a country route has no effect on the damping rates. The engine and gearbox, on the other hand, sharpen up substantially, with the V6's volume also raising (presumably with acoustic help through the speakers) alongside the more bassy note exhaling through all four tips. The V6, which places its twin turbos between the cylinder banks to reduce lag, is so sweetly responsive that metering out the sound and fury is a pleasure. Inevitably, the engine can't match the thunder of AMG's V8, and it doesn't sound nearly as racey as Alfa's own V6. But its voice is certainly purposeful, especially when backed by subtle snaps and crackles from the exhaust as the quick-shifting gearbox briefly cuts the ignition.

On a warm summer afternoon, the quattro all-wheel drive system provides almost unbreakable traction so you're prevented from using the motor's tractability to exercise the sort of silliness the rear-wheel drive alternatives will permit. But the front end of the RS5 is so keen, even with the shift of weight distribution rearwards in the Sportback, that it feels completely neutral as you pitch it into a corner at speed. Follow that with a heavy dose of throttle and there's even a faint hint of rear slip, but it's quickly gathered up as the front axle tugs the car forward. Point-to-point pace is therefore very high, potentially higher than in the AMG and QF because of the straightness of the Audi's progress - but without any of the engagement or adjustability they put front and centre.


Even with its standard suspension the RS5 Sportback possesses very good lateral body control, although the heavy-duty thud sent through the struts on rough and lumpy surfaces emphasises the weight of those 20-inch wheels. The mass of the Sportback body also appears to give the shocks a pretty hard time over crests and dips, where it lifts and ducks and generally feels a little too loosely held, so you're encouraged to back off a little until the tarmac smooths out. Coupled with the familiar numbness of the RS5's steering, it demotivates any proper exploration of the car's limits and instead gives it the demeanour of a potent, if firm, grand tourer. Engage with it in this manner and the Sportback makes more sense.

It will give you more to applaud, too. After all, the car can carry four in comfort, five in relative comfort, has more maximum luggage space (with the seats down) than its rivals, is no more difficult to drive around town than a regular A5 and bridges a nice gap between being discreet and eye-catching. It's not even particularly thirsty if you behave. The problem, of course, is that in the place of an 'A' the Sportback gets an 'R' and an 'S' and those letters really ought to add up to something when you're in the mood for taking no prisoners - if for no other reason than because it's where the competition gets really, really interesting. For all its smarts, the Sportback's two extra doors still aren't enough to excuse it from this shortfall.


SPECIFICATION - AUDI RS5 SPORTBACK

Engine: 2,894cc, V6 biturbo
Transmission: eight-speed tiptronic, Quattro permanent all-wheel drive
Power (hp): 450@5,700 - 6,700rpm
Torque (lb ft): 443@1,900 - 5,000rpm
0-62mph: 3.9sec
Top speed: 155mph (optional 174mph)
Weight: 1,720kg
MPG: 31.4 (NEDC combined)
CO2: 207g/km
Price: £68,985

Inspired? Search for an Audi RS5 here












Author
Discussion

foxhounduk

Original Poster:

493 posts

180 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
I think the coupe looks immense. This sportback, in my opinion, not so much. My brother in law has a regular A5 and its very cramped in the back, i'm 5'10" and I can hardly fit. The Alfa QF which the article mentions (I used to own a QF btw) is much more spacious in the back and would be the more useful 3.9s circa £60k 4 door.

Edited by foxhounduk on Friday 21st June 06:57


Edited by foxhounduk on Friday 21st June 06:59

Nerdherder

1,773 posts

97 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
A lesser engined Quattro version of the A5 Sportback does make sense as stylish business miles muncher. The mentioned competition in this article seems more desirable to me.

PorkInsider

5,888 posts

141 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
article said:
...and, until it went out of production, the BMW M4...
Erm... they're still making them.

SidewaysSi

10,742 posts

234 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
I predicted the conclusion, read the article and proved myself correct.

Audi are nothing if not consistent.

Court_S

12,937 posts

177 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
I guess it would make a great daily driver but I can’t help thinking that for £70k, I’d want a bit more of an emotional reaction to it.

This misses the mark for me, not that I’m in the market.

pti

1,699 posts

144 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
Doesn't do a lot for me, I'm afraid. Not that I'm the target market, but my money would be going elsewhere.

I'm sure it's a lovely daily driver but like most Audis it seems too clinical.

ocrx8

868 posts

196 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
RS models normally look muscular. In the pictures above, this one doesn’t.

big_rob_sydney

3,403 posts

194 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
Sounds like:

Audi = competent
c63/QF = hooligan

Sorry, but for me, between these 3, its the Alfa every time.

Shuthan_S5

256 posts

129 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
I have the S5 coupe, never been a fan of the sportback version of the A5 especially from the side profile. I haven't seen many current shape RS5's about so must say a lot about the sales of it. As much as I like the looks of the RS and was looking at them initially, I personally don't see the point of them especially for the price they go for, with options you will be hitting near £80,000. I just didn't feel they are special enough over the S5 to warrant the huge price difference. I personally think the S5 is fast enough for literally near half the cost.

Shiv_P

2,747 posts

105 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
IMO looks good, it does sound good, it doesn't handle too badly it seems (other reviews say the RS4 avant is actually good) and it's quick with a fantastic interior. They will sell well despite not being the PH default choice of power oversteer around all roundabouts.

cayman-black

12,646 posts

216 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
For that money, i would take the Alfa its just a shame it's not offered with four wheel drive.

Terminator X

15,082 posts

204 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
Insanely fast but ultimately unlovable as the car is way too quiet from the factory. My RS4 got to 60 in 3.3s but sounded worse than the same age S5, go figure.

TX.

FWDRacer

3,564 posts

224 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
Bloated overwrought garbage that the market has an insatiable appetite for. It'll be a marketeers success story/numbers wet dream but I can't see anyone looking back fondly in 20 years and calling it an icon or game changer.

Audi peaked at the original V8 RS4/Mk1 TT/Mk1 R8 and haven't contributed anything really significant into the performance car gene pool since.

JohndoePH

23 posts

60 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
Shuthan_S5 said:
I personally think the S5 is fast enough for literally near half the cost.
I've also got an S5, unless you want to risk loosing your license every day you can't use all of the performance most of the time on the public highway anyway... As an everyday car (especially if you have to cover any sort of distances regularly) it is a brilliant machine.

9k rpm

521 posts

210 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
I’d rather have an X3M thanks! getmecoat

Shiv_P

2,747 posts

105 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
FWDRacer said:
Bloated overwrought garbage that the market has an insatiable appetite for. It'll be a marketeers success story/numbers wet dream but I can't see anyone looking back fondly in 20 years and calling it an icon or game changer.

Audi peaked at the original V8 RS4/Mk1 TT/Mk1 R8 and haven't contributed anything really significant into the performance car gene pool since.
Well apart from
C6 RS6 - reviewed as too heavy etc but a twin turbo V10 with massive tuning potential meant owners loved them
C7 RS6 - fantastic
Mk2 R8 V10 - fantastic
RS3/TTRS - one of the best sounding set of cars on sale
C6 S6 - V10
D3 S8 - V10 - Ronin - loved


Twoshoe

854 posts

184 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
9k rpm said:
I’d rather have an X3M thanks! getmecoat
Stop it! That was another thread!

Tuvra

7,921 posts

225 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
Audi wheels have gone awful looking lately frown

Gio G

2,946 posts

209 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
I have owned my RS5 coupe for a year now and I absolutely love it. Like most of the magazines that reviewed it, the more positive feedback came from those with long term tests..They effectively stopped making them for the UK back in September/October of last year and only recently opened up the books for ordering, so if you did want one, you could not order it, hence low sales.

I looked at Alfa QF, however test drove it in damp weather and ended up just constantly lighting up the back tyres, but still an awesome car. I also wanted a coupe and Alfa did not release one. The BMW M4 around my way are very common place and wanted something little different.

As TX has said, it does not shout it's aggression and bring too much attention to itself, which I am fine with, as it is a very fast GT car and does everything I need it to do with comfort and pace. For me it feels special to drive and do look back it at after I have parked it...appreciate it is not everyone's cup of tea, but glad they have limited them smile


cerb4.5lee

30,614 posts

180 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
The Crack Fox said:
Terminator X said:
Insanely fast but ultimately unlovable
Perfect summary.
I'm in this camp too and the performance of the RS models always grabs my attention...but I'm not sure that I really want one.