RE: Superformance Ford GT40 | Showpiece of the Week

RE: Superformance Ford GT40 | Showpiece of the Week

Monday 29th July 2019

Superformance Ford GT40 | Showpiece of the Week

One of 20 recreations of the original 1966 Le Mans winner is up for what almost seems like a bargain



The story of Henry Ford's racing team taking on and beating Ferrari at Le Mans is a well-documented one. But fewer people are aware that the Blue Oval's pursuit of success was at first met with problems and reliability issues, to the extent that a less determined manufacturer might have called it quits. Such was the Henry Ford's desire to top the podium in France, however, that the GT40 project was supported not just by a team in the States, but also one on other side of the Atlantic, which did much of the early development work as Ford Advanced Vehicles.

The earliest prototypes for the GT (it had yet to be nicknamed the GT40) were based on the Lola Mk6, the pretty two-door that was already powered by a Ford V8 and had a cutting-edge technical configuration. It represented something of a head start for the Ford programme, giving FAV a solid base to work on - and dramatically shortening the time Henry would have to wait for Ford to take on Enzo.

Nevertheless, a strong start, the early car's small-block V8 - also used by Carroll Shelby's similarly Anglo-American Cobra - was considered underpowered. Back in the sixties there was only one thing for it and it involved displacement. Lots of it. In this case, the small-block was ditched for a big-block eight, the 427 used by the Ford Galaxie road car but race-prepared so it now had 465hp and was located lower in the car's belly thanks to the swapping of a wet sump for dry. Ford had no gearbox capable of withstanding the grunt so a new four-speed was developed and fused to the 7.0-litre unit.


The creation of the MkII provided Ford with its best shot at taking it to the Italians, especially now Shelby headed the race team's operation Stateside and an efficient development and supply chain had been established between the US and British bases. In the run up to the 1965 24 Hours of Le Mans, the MkII was further developed to integrate a longer, more aerodynamic nose, as well as new fins on the engine cover to clean up air flow over the car's rear. The changes made for a rapid machine, so much so that despite being 100kg heavier its rivals, the Fords topped qualifying. But racing is a cruel mistress and gearbox issues prevented either GT from finishing the event.

As we know, it was in 1966 that things finally came together. A further developed GT MkII took wins in Daytona and Sebring, before the squad turned up to the main event in France with an army of eight GT40s piloted by some of the finest drivers of the day. The job was done and done very, very well, but not even a dominant performance could come without controversy. The team had ordered the leading car of Ken Miles and Denny Hulme to let the chasing car of Kiwi pairing, Bruce McLaren and Chris Amon, through for a photo finish win. Miles, who was in the last stint, showed his anger at the decision by only letting McLaren through with metres to go in order to emphasise that it was him and Hulme who were the true winners. A bitter sweet moment in an otherwise fantastic result for Ford; it secured three more consecutive wins at Le Mans.

Although the GT40 evolved in following years, the MkII remains special not just because it was the first to win, but because of its big block V8, which produced 485hp by the time of the '66 Le Mans, was the biggest to be used. The smaller 4.9-litre was deployed in subsequent years when a displacement limit was introduced to slow the cars down - although the GT40's chassis and the sleek aerodynamic design were too much to contend with even then. Not only did the GT40 halt Ferrari's dominance, it ended it, with the Italian marque never reaching the top position of the overall classification again. Its efforts are now, of course, focussed on the GT category.


Ford has celebrated its Le Mans successes on multiple occasions, with the launch of the two modern GT cars. But no other attempt at a recreation of the 1966 car has arguably been closer than the one made by Superformance under licence of Shelby, a continuation from the original run that was produced in just twenty examples three years ago. The model was made using the '66 GT40P monocoque blue prints, with a 7.0-litre V8 and independent suspension like the classic. Finished in the same colour scheme as the McLaren/Amon winner - black with silver stripes - it also has a Gurney bubble (named as such after it was added for 6ft 4 driver Dan!), riveted seats and a Mota Lita steering wheel.

Today's Showpiece is an unused example; the right-hand drive car (as per the original) does come with a few modern additions, including Bilstein shocks with H&R sprins, as well as Wilwood brakes and an air conditioning system. But as far as Le Mans recreations go, this one is up there with the finest and the roar of the V8 and the vintage surroundings ought to provide a convincing throwback to the swinging sixties. Couple that with Shelby's official seal of approval and you're looking at a delivery mileage car that's up for six hundred thousand quid. A bargain, frankly, when you consider that would have barely paid for the first few weeks of Henry's ambitious programme all those years back.


See the full ad

Inspired? Search for a Ford GT40 here

Author
Discussion

Turbobanana

Original Poster:

6,308 posts

202 months

Monday 29th July 2019
quotequote all
I'll go clear space in the garage.

No, sod it - this can go in the living room.

MCBrowncoat

894 posts

147 months

Monday 29th July 2019
quotequote all
Turbobanana said:
I'll go clear space in the garage.

No, sod it - this can go in the living room.
I hear that.

Can I have my mk2 in chassis 1016 livery though?


Augustus Windsock

3,374 posts

156 months

Monday 29th July 2019
quotequote all
Excuse my ignorance but what is the difference between this and a ‘standard’ Superformance GT40?
I can’t attest to the noise and ferocity of this creature but someone around the. Hesterfield area owns a white Superformance Daytona Coupe and it looks and sounds magnificent. And takes up so little roadspace it’s unbelievable!

Fastdruid

8,656 posts

153 months

Tuesday 30th July 2019
quotequote all
The prototypes weren't "based on the Lola Mk6 GT".

The GT40 *is* related to the Lola Mk6 GT because Ford engaged Eric Broadley (of Lola who designed the Mk6 GT) for design and development of their new car.

The prototype Mk6 GT was used as a test mule with parts being gradually replaced with the "GT40" bits but the actual prototype GT40's were totally different.

Augustus Windsock said:
Excuse my ignorance but what is the difference between this and a ‘standard’ Superformance GT40?
The engine. Superformance GT40's don't come with one. The Shelby GT40 however comes with a Shelby prepared Aluminium block 427 FE.

Fastdruid

8,656 posts

153 months

Tuesday 30th July 2019
quotequote all
Pistonheads said:
no other attempt at a recreation of the 1966 car has arguably been closer than the one made by Superformance under licence of Shelby
Sorry but just no.

The Superformance continuation cars are very nice but the devil is in the detail and they are very careful with how they word things. eg

Superformance said:
two thirds of the rolling chassis's parts are interchangeable with that of an original car, including the 'monocoque" style chassis.
Note they say interchangeable but that does not mean identical. The chassis is simplified for ease of construction, parts are made from fabricated steel rather than cast etc. Fibreglass is just fibreglass rather than carbon fibre reinforced (yes really, one of the first uses of it back in the 60's.)

They're not as bad as the Mk5 GT40 (eg https://www.carandclassic.co.uk/car/C916332) but still not the same as the originals, if you want something really close then you need to go Gelscoe, Holman Moody, Mirage, Classic Car Developments/David Brown etc.

For the money (for a new one, not this example) however the Superformance is probably the closest thing you'll get to the originals.You'd spend a lot more on the additional bit of "originality" and probably never notice you were missing it. Not sure how much a new one is but a google suggested you could pick up a ex-demonstrator Mk1 (ie with engine+gearbox) for £155k.


Edited by Fastdruid on Tuesday 30th July 02:07

soad

32,915 posts

177 months

Tuesday 30th July 2019
quotequote all
I prefer a later model, Ford GT. Cheaper too.

Church of Noise

1,459 posts

238 months

Tuesday 30th July 2019
quotequote all
Gorgeous!
But at 600 kGBP, they must be smoking something particularly strong... (or I'm missing the point)

Fastdruid

8,656 posts

153 months

Tuesday 30th July 2019
quotequote all
Church of Noise said:
Gorgeous!
But at 600 kGBP, they must be smoking something particularly strong... (or I'm missing the point)
It's one hell of a premium for what is little more than a Shelby badge and a number...

Personally I'd go for a brand new one or get Gelscoe to make me a more original one for half the price!

sideways man

1,321 posts

138 months

Tuesday 30th July 2019
quotequote all
In my dreams, I’ve a garage containing a new ‘Jaguar XJ 13 ‘ and a new ‘GT40’.
That’s it, no more cars needed ever. Who cares about shopping and traffic jams laugh

Vee12V

1,335 posts

161 months

Tuesday 30th July 2019
quotequote all
How is this considered a bargain when you can let them build an exact same car for 150 to 200k?

Blackpuddin

16,595 posts

206 months

Tuesday 30th July 2019
quotequote all
dribble

tgx

147 posts

151 months

Friday 2nd August 2019
quotequote all
"springs" not sprins.

"including Bilstein shocks with H&R sprins"