RE: Land Rover Discovery Sport P250 MHEV | Driven

RE: Land Rover Discovery Sport P250 MHEV | Driven

Friday 13th September 2019

2020 Land Rover Discovery Sport MHEV | PH Review

The updated Disco gets a stiffer body and 48v tech. Enough to close the gap on its many, many rivals?



You get the impression Land Rover's heavily updated Discovery Sport couldn't have come soon enough for the brand, what with its arch rivals, the Audi Q5 and BMW X3, so obviously fresher in appearance. Arguably the most notable USP of the pre-update model was its superior off-road credentials, but most buyers in this segment will be less concerned with departure angles and more interested in tax brackets and ISOFIX points. That's why the changes applied to the 2020 car are significant - they're of the sort that your average 5+2 seat SUV buyer can appreciate. And for us, they promise to make noticeable improvements to performance as well - both on- and off-road.

So what's new? The structure beneath that now-familiar body has been upgraded to JLR's new PTA underpinnings, shared with the Evoque and equipped with a solidly mounted subframe at the front, which has helped to increase rigidity by around 10 per cent. Then there's the new 48-volt electric architecture, familiar from other JLR applications although new to the Disco Sport, which enables the use of mild hybrid hardware under the bonnet, where you'll also find new Ingenium engines. Last but by no means least there's the fitment of digital cabin tech, which takes the Disco Sport's interior from dated to up-to-date in a single swoop. It all amounts to a pretty big effort; particularly for something that constitutes a mid-life facelift.

It's fair to say the design changes don't do much to illustrate the advances made beneath the skin. That's not to say they're insignificant - a Velar-esque front end and new LED lighting certainly sharpen things up - but the overall appearance is familiar. It hasn't lost the thick tyre walls, fist-sized arch gaps and decidedly old-school silhouette - and that's a good thing. Inside it's the arrival of those new displays - a 10-inch touchscreen (standard across the range) and, in pricier models like our Sport R-Dynamic S test car, a 12-inch TFT instrument cluster - that immediately marks out the revised Discovery. As a non-Range Rover, the Disco Sport's climate controls aren't integrated into a lower digital screen as they are in the Evoque, but the way the twin rotary dials switch between temperature, fan speed and drive modes adds some razzle dazzle.


On the move, the presence of the 250hp 2.0-litre petrol's MHEV hardware is obvious enough, as the Disco Sport is quicker off the mark than you might expect. The claimed 7.6-second to 62mph time feels entirely believable. The nine-speed ZF auto definitely has a smoothness to each upshift although, once-rolling, the near two-tonne car's progress feels more acceptable than impressive. The powertrain is refined, at any rate, with laudably low engine noise, but you'll want to think ahead when it comes to overtaking. Still, at least the ZF transmission is quick to respond, so much so that there's modest value in using the steering wheel mounted paddles. There's sufficient brawniness for a two-tonne maximum towing capacity, although those wanting to consistently carry extra weight around would be wise to consider the 240hp diesel MHEV.

Repeat buyers are unlikely to complain about the way the latest Disco Sport rides or steers. With optional variable dampers equipped, the high-riding SUV has no problem balancing suppleness and body control. Helped along by squidgier tyres than the Evoque typically wears, the Disco absorbs cracks and ridges without complaint, and stays composed over crests. Switch to Sport mode (if you must) and body roll is limited to a few degrees, making for a secure but still supple ride; press on in this mode and the Land Rover does well, with a small amount of safety understeer backed by plentiful mechanical grip and very well weighted steering.

Realistically, that brings the Disco's on-road performance in line with its rivals rather than outright trouncing them. It saves that for off-road, where 212mm of ground clearance and a 25-degree approach angle ensures a standout level of mid-sized SUV capability. Terrain Response 2, Land Rover's latest all-singing technology does the heaviest lifting (helped along by the presence of optional active torque vectoring) juggling the power and available traction to such an extent that all you're really called upon to do is steer.


No less impressive is the new 'X-Ray' view, which uses the cameras mounted on the front and flanks to build a view of your surroundings and the ground beneath the car. By moving the image of the surface ahead as the car creeps forward, you're given a view on the screen which aids navigation over things like narrow bridges. It works well out in the wild - although we suspect the kit will spend most of its time showing its owner precisely where the nearest kerb is...

That's fine, of course. And the Discovery Sport is fine, too. Making it better on road while maintaining the car's class-leading performance off it was probably high on Land Rover's to-do list, and it has admirably seen to both. Its weakness - despite the manufacturer's efforts - is located in the engine bay; not because the MHEV tech is bad, but because its rivals are noticeably better. An Audi Q5 45 TFSI would likely leave the Discovery for dead - and consume less fuel while doing it (if the efficiency claims for both are to be believed). Still, as ever, there's an element of horses for courses here, and the Land Rover's advantages in ride comfort, onboard tech and true ruggedness distinguish it from the competition. It remains the best genuine SUV of the segment. By far.


SPECIFICATION - LAND ROVER DISCOVERY SPORT P250 MHEV

Engine: 1,997cc 4-cyl turbo, petrol, synchronous claw pole motor
Transmission: 9-speed automatic, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 249@5,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 269@11,400,4,500rpm
0-62mph: 7.6sec
Top speed: 140mph
Weight: 1,942 (DIN)
MPG: 28.4-30.5
CO2: 183-185g/km
Price: £41,375

Search for a Land Rover Discovery Sport here













Author
Discussion

sidesauce

Original Poster:

2,475 posts

218 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
Not keen on those light clusters. Also, something about the proportions of the body in relation to the wheels is just, well, a bit "off"...

Gandahar

9,600 posts

128 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
I wonder how many sales of this the Defender will eat into?

Land Rovers rather hazy boundaries might now be shown up with something new and flavour of the month.



garypotter

1,502 posts

150 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
Still the ugliest rear end in the SUV 4x4 market
I hope Land Rover have got rid of the keyless system.

SFO

5,169 posts

183 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
Looks better with the black plastic wheel arch etc

too much colour coding looks odd

SidewaysSi

10,742 posts

234 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
This Disco is a crap looking thing isn't it?

Defender for me - at least you can hose down the interior.

scottygib553

531 posts

95 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
Interior is a big improvement, probably the weakest part of the original.

RacerMike

4,205 posts

211 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
SidewaysSi said:
This Disco is a crap looking thing isn't it?

Defender for me - at least you can hose down the interior.
Not sure if people are realising, but this is the small, Disco Sport nee Freelander, not the Disco 5 which I suspect will suffer from Defender sales.

DoctorX

7,288 posts

167 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
Hated the front and rear lights on the old one so this is a big improvement. Still wouldn’t buy one though.

The Vambo

6,643 posts

141 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
The segment differentiation and branding is horrific, I can never remember what class of car this is.

Is it a Freelander replacement? If it is, it's like BMW selling an X5 sport that is actually a X3.

I do actually really like it but I don't understand it.

RicksAlfas

13,396 posts

244 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
The Vambo said:
The segment differentiation and branding is horrific, I can never remember what class of car this is.

Is it a Freelander replacement? If it is, it's like BMW selling an X5 sport that is actually a X3.

I do actually really like it but I don't understand it.
Yes, it replaced the Freelander a few years ago.
If you really have to categorise everything, this is an X3 and a Discovery is an X5.

RacerMike

4,205 posts

211 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
RicksAlfas said:
Yes, it replaced the Freelander a few years ago.
If you really have to categorise everything, this is an X3 and a Discovery is an X5.
And I don’t believe it’s a JLR specific thing. Audi and BMW are just as bad if not worse. I get lost between what the Q1, Q2, Q3, Q5, Q7, Q8, X2, X3, X5, X6 and X7 are. I’ve probably missed some in there too...

RicksAlfas

13,396 posts

244 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
RacerMike said:
And I don’t believe it’s a JLR specific thing. Audi and BMW are just as bad if not worse. I get lost between what the Q1, Q2, Q3, Q5, Q7, Q8, X2, X3, X5, X6 and X7 are. I’ve probably missed some in there too...
Mercedes are the same as well. I don't think it matters. It's great to have plenty of choice. Choose the car which suits your needs, doesn't matter what pre-conceived sector or category it fits into.

HighwayStar

4,257 posts

144 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
The Vambo said:
The segment differentiation and branding is horrific, I can never remember what class of car this is.

Is it a Freelander replacement? If it is, it's like BMW selling an X5 sport that is actually a X3.

I do actually really like it but I don't understand it.
I get what you're saying but at the end of the day if you're after one of their cars you'd go to a Land Rover showroom, check them all out and chose the one that best suits your needs/wallet. Or not. Simples wink

Digsy

104 posts

213 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
PMSL @ the generic Disco 5 bashing comments despite this being a Disco Sport. I reckon days of Defender bashing have wound folk up into a frenzy, desperate to be the first to tell the world how much they hate something... ;-)

The Vambo

6,643 posts

141 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
RacerMike said:
And I don’t believe it’s a JLR specific thing. Audi and BMW are just as bad if not worse. I get lost between what the Q1, Q2, Q3, Q5, Q7, Q8, X2, X3, X5, X6 and X7 are. I’ve probably missed some in there too...
I've no interest in Audi yet their lineup makes sense to me (mostly).

A Q with the same number as a saloon/hatch is the SUV version of that car.

A Q with an even number is a sports rolleyes SUV of the number below.

Same with 3 series/ X3.

Only Landrover would have the name of their medium model in their small model's name.

And you can almost hear anyone who works in sales/marketing/branding pissing themselves laughing at the name doesn't matter, just choose in the showroom suggestions.

I feel like 300bhp/ton. laugh



Edited by The Vambo on Friday 13th September 11:42

Drekly

755 posts

58 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
Digsy said:
PMSL @ the generic Disco 5 bashing comments despite this being a Disco Sport. I reckon days of Defender bashing have wound folk up into a frenzy, desperate to be the first to tell the world how much they hate something... ;-)
For balance I think this new Disco Sport looks great, they've absolutely nailed it. Probably the best value product in their range. No way would I choose a hideous Q5 or X3 over this.

As for range overlap, I wouldn't bet against them bringing out a smaller Freelander (in price segment if not size) type replacement to cover the bottom rung of the SUV market. They've almost created a gap themselves now by pushing the Evoque and Disco Sport a little more upmarket.
https://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/new-cars/baby-s...
That would sell like hotcakes, they could even build one with a hosedown interior for people obsessed with staging dirty protests inside their vehicle.

Edited by Drekly on Friday 13th September 11:55

FWDRacer

3,564 posts

224 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
DoctorX said:
Hated the front and rear lights on the old one so this is a big improvement. Still wouldn’t buy one though.
Preconceptions means you are missing out on a brilliant (and for LR) affordable family do-all vehicle. No hot hatch but they steer confidently, so can be hustled along and they ride very well. They tow brilliantly. Breadth of capability is the key. You wouldn't even tow a piffling trailer tent with an X3.

w824gb3

257 posts

222 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
The article is wrong. This facelift Disco sport is still on the same underpinnings as the current model which was modified Freelander 2, which itself can be traced back to the 2007 Mondeo.

JonnyVTEC

3,005 posts

175 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
w824gb3 said:
The article is wrong. This facelift Disco sport is still on the same underpinnings as the current model which was modified Freelander 2, which itself can be traced back to the 2007 Mondeo.
Apart from the middle floor and front end, yeah? and the rear end that was different at Disco Sport launch?

Drekly

755 posts

58 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
w824gb3 said:
The article is wrong. This facelift Disco sport is still on the same underpinnings as the current model which was modified Freelander 2, which itself can be traced back to the 2007 Mondeo.
It looks like Autocar have got it wrong as well
"You see, in addition to giving the Discovery Sport a subtly tweaked exterior and a new interior that looks and feels far more Range Rover-like than ever before, Land Rover has completely replaced the architecture upon which it’s based. Originally, this was a fairly heavily reengineered version of the LR-MS platform that underpinned the first-generation Range Rover Evoque, but this has now been done away with and replaced by Land Rover’s latest Premium Transverse Architecture (PTA) - the same platform that, funnily enough, also underpins the second-generation Evoque."