RE: VW Passat Estate R-Line Edition | Driven

RE: VW Passat Estate R-Line Edition | Driven

Tuesday 12th November 2019

2020 VW Passat Estate R-Line Edition | UK Review

A Passat wagon has always made eminent sense; adding 272hp has done the formula no harm at all



You know those car ads, the ones which feature a sharply specced new model cruising through an implausibly tranquil city? They’re often set at night, when the crisp lines and angular features common to so many modern machines look sharpest, and see the protagonist taking advantage of all of their new steed’s most noteworthy features as heads turn and admiring glances are exchanged.

Well, as I slink home from PH HQ in VW’s new Passat Estate R-Line, that’s where I find myself. The refreshed styling, Moonstone Grey paint and ‘Edition Black’ trim are handsome without appearing too OTT. The interior is equally well appointed, with a slick design centred around a crisp 9.2-inch touch screen. And as I pass beneath the glowing edifice of the South Bank IMAX, and slip by the crowds of warmly-wrapped commuters outside Waterloo, the refined cabin, heated seats and eight-speaker stereo combine to create the kind of cool, calm, comfortable little world that any marketing exec would be proud to convey.


This is how far the Passat has come. There have been go-faster editions before (W8, anyone?) but the latest sharp-suited generation - unveiled at the Geneva show in March - feels like it has earned a proper range-topper. The car driven here develops 272hp and 258lb ft from its 2.0-litre petrol four which, when paired with Volkswagen’s ubiquitous seven-speed DSG and 4Motion all-wheel drive system, is enough to see it to 62 in 5.8 seconds and on to a top speed of 155mph. No, the formula is not by any means revolutionary - being identical to the drivetrain aboard the Skoda Superb Sportline Plus we drove not so long ago. But it is new to the Passat.

So what sets it apart? Well, the badge, for one thing. Despite Skoda’s continued rise in universal esteem there will still be those who’d rather their neighbours saw a Volkswagen parked on their driveway. More substantively, though, it does feel a little lighter on its toes, a touch more agile in the corners, too. Where the Skoda is the consummate cushy cruiser, able to devour the miles with the best of them, the VW retains a little more driver focus; turn in is sharper, feedback a little greater, pedal response a touch more immediate.


This is all to the car’s benefit. Travelling the length of the M4 and back - where it returned 38.8mpg - the Passat still showed itself to be perfectly comfortable stretching its legs, and the refinement which stood it in such good stead in London proved equally as laudable as the capital fell into the distance. Once in the real world, a far cry from the bright lights of a slow-moving city, it proved no less likeable.

Under grey Welsh skies, covered in mud and grime and pressed into continual service, the Passat promptly revealed the unflappable nature that makes it VW’s second most popular model. The estate in particular, which across all eight (yes, eight) variants now offered in the UK, apparently outsells the saloon two to one. It’s easy to see why.


At various times it transported four adults to lunch – the three-zone climate control with separate controls for the rear seats proving popular – carried the dog to her walk, when she seemed perfectly content with the comfort of the boot, and, with the rear seats down, swallowed an entire Ikea bookshelf and several boxes of books. So what? I hear you cry, that’s what any decent wagon does. True, but not many can do so at this price point, while offering this level of refinement, this range of tech or – once your cargo has been deposited – this level of easy-going engagement. The R-Line Edition also strikes a noteworthy balance between desirability and usability; would you really want to expose an S6 or E53 to such abuse?

Then the heavens opened – or rather refused to close  - the inclement weather near continuous from the Severn Bridge to the Irish Sea. Muddy, slippery, leaf-littered rural roads make for the perfect place to catch out temporary all-wheel drive systems, but VW’s latest 4Motion arrangement remained nonchalantly capable throughout. The car didn’t even blink upon arriving at a flooded bend, merrily fording it in the face of retreating crossover drivers. Another win for the traditional estate over the unnecessary ‘off-roader’, without even considering the fact that the aforementioned Billy bookcase only had to be hoisted half the distance off the ground to be put in the back.


Not that any of this is a surprise. The Passat has quietly become an utterly dependable family workhorse, and now fills out VW’s reputation for well-built, well-equipped and thoroughly capable cars almost as well as the Golf below it. That the addition of features like Apple CarPlay and Android Auto to that all-important infotainment screen now allows owners to more seamlessly merge their in-car experience with their day-to-day one only makes things more pleasant. Much the same could be said about the fitment of that familiar powertrain, which makes the Passat no fire-breather, but adds a seamless sort of briskness to its long list of amenable features.

Buyers in the mood for this kind of car certainly aren’t entirely devoid of options. Those in need of slightly less room will likely opt for a Golf R or Focus ST estate, which deliver a slightly more angular experience – and at eye-level with the Passat, the Skoda Superb Sportline and Vauxhall Insignia GSI are both worthy enough rivals. But the R-Line does enough to ensure that the segment’s benchmark is now VW-shaped.


SPECIFICATION - VOLKSWAGEN PASSAT ESTATE R-LINE EDITION
Engine:
1,984cc, 4-cyl turbocharged
Transmission: 7-speed dual-clutch, all-wheel drive
Power (hp): 272@5,600rpm
Torque (lb ft): 258@2,000-5,400rpm
0-62mph: 5.8sec
Top speed: 155mph
Weight: 1,680kg
MPG: 38.3
CO2: 163g/km
Price: £43,350

Inspired? Search for a Passat here.










Author
Discussion

Elmariachi

Original Poster:

48 posts

59 months

Tuesday 12th November 2019
quotequote all
I do like these but 38.8 mpg on a long run? Is that something to be proud of?

No matter it has 270bhp, it's still a brand new four pot with presumably the more efficient DSG option and I'd expect better than that.

Edited by Elmariachi on Tuesday 12th November 06:52

lee_erm

1,091 posts

193 months

Tuesday 12th November 2019
quotequote all
Passat has always struck me as the most dreary saloon available. R36 asside.

matt21

4,288 posts

204 months

Tuesday 12th November 2019
quotequote all
I like that.

I am just about to buy a 2.0 TDI Passat GT Estate. Yes dreary, but for trudging up and down motorways it’s a nice place to be

Iamnotkloot

1,426 posts

147 months

Tuesday 12th November 2019
quotequote all
Boringly safe choice but, but, it does look good in those pictures

covmutley

3,028 posts

190 months

Tuesday 12th November 2019
quotequote all
Looks ok, though very, very dull. Way behind volvo estate styling.

Dannbodge

2,165 posts

121 months

Tuesday 12th November 2019
quotequote all
Will probably be my next car after my Cupra (when we have another kid)

Should go even better after a map

flatso

1,240 posts

129 months

Tuesday 12th November 2019
quotequote all
The positioning of the screen on the centre console is completely false.

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 12th November 2019
quotequote all
I’ve got a GTE estate and it’s great for all the motorway miles. Great interior, comfy seats, especially with the massaging option.

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 12th November 2019
quotequote all
Nice looking car but I couldn't bring myself to drive a Passat. The name is surely the epitome of dull motoring?

There is a reason VW dropped it from the CC model.

thebraketester

14,227 posts

138 months

Tuesday 12th November 2019
quotequote all
Elmariachi said:
I do like these but 38.8 mpg on a long run? Is that something to be proud of?

No matter it has 270bhp, it's still a brand new four pot with presumably the more efficient DSG option and I'd expect better than that.

Edited by Elmariachi on Tuesday 12th November 06:52
For a car that size I would say it’s respectable.

Nice car. Would have to remap it’s though :-)

Augustus Windsock

3,369 posts

155 months

Tuesday 12th November 2019
quotequote all
Just been pedalling a Passat estate as a courtesy car after my car was written off following a nasty RTA
Loads of space, great build quality and nice level of standard kit
Admittedly ‘mine’ was just the 1.5tsi with DSG and flappy paddles but it was good at its job, I guess.
My teenagers loved the rear seat space and also the option to change the temperature setting for the rear area but ‘3 zone climate control’? I’d expect it to have the option to change the fan speed and air distribution to face or feet to have that moniker (as some manufacturers provide)
Not sure I’d have this above a well specc’d Superb sportline estate with the same running gear though

BigChiefmuffinAgain

1,062 posts

98 months

Tuesday 12th November 2019
quotequote all
Augustus Windsock said:
Just been pedalling a Passat estate as a courtesy car after my car was written off following a nasty RTA
Loads of space, great build quality and nice level of standard kit
Admittedly ‘mine’ was just the 1.5tsi with DSG and flappy paddles but it was good at its job, I guess.
My teenagers loved the rear seat space and also the option to change the temperature setting for the rear area but ‘3 zone climate control’? I’d expect it to have the option to change the fan speed and air distribution to face or feet to have that moniker (as some manufacturers provide)
Not sure I’d have this above a well specc’d Superb sportline estate with the same running gear though
Agreed - not sure why you would take this over a Skoda. New Octavia looks an even better bet...

SidewaysSi

10,742 posts

234 months

Tuesday 12th November 2019
quotequote all
thebraketester said:
Elmariachi said:
I do like these but 38.8 mpg on a long run? Is that something to be proud of?

No matter it has 270bhp, it's still a brand new four pot with presumably the more efficient DSG option and I'd expect better than that.

Edited by Elmariachi on Tuesday 12th November 06:52
For a car that size I would say it’s respectable.

Nice car. Would have to remap it’s though :-)
I got 36 mpg from my Forester STI on a long run recently. It has no aerodynamics and another 50bhp.

Of course no one would cross shop but I thought new cars were meant to give it all?

MC Bodge

21,628 posts

175 months

Tuesday 12th November 2019
quotequote all
Dannbodge said:
Will probably be my next car after my Cupra (when we have another kid)

Should go even better after a map
Because its only shortfall is a lack of power?

chris4652009

1,572 posts

84 months

Tuesday 12th November 2019
quotequote all
covmutley said:
Looks ok, though very, very dull. Way behind volvo estate styling.
Yeah. The latest Volvo estates do look fantastic cool

thebraketester

14,227 posts

138 months

Tuesday 12th November 2019
quotequote all
SidewaysSi said:
thebraketester said:
Elmariachi said:
I do like these but 38.8 mpg on a long run? Is that something to be proud of?

No matter it has 270bhp, it's still a brand new four pot with presumably the more efficient DSG option and I'd expect better than that.

Edited by Elmariachi on Tuesday 12th November 06:52
For a car that size I would say it’s respectable.

Nice car. Would have to remap it’s though :-)
I got 36 mpg from my Forester STI on a long run recently. It has no aerodynamics and another 50bhp.

Of course no one would cross shop but I thought new cars were meant to give it all?
Unless you did the exact same route at the exact same speeds as the reviewer then your comparison is meaningless. ( I know you know that)

I would guess that you can easily get over 40 from these if you pootle along at ~55mph.

J4CKO

41,558 posts

200 months

Tuesday 12th November 2019
quotequote all
Elmariachi said:
I do like these but 38.8 mpg on a long run? Is that something to be proud of?

No matter it has 270bhp, it's still a brand new four pot with presumably the more efficient DSG option and I'd expect better than that.

Edited by Elmariachi on Tuesday 12th November 06:52
"Ye Cannae change the laws of physics"

IC engines, whatever you do are pretty inefficient, this a two tonne car near enough when its transporting a couple of people and some stuff, no matter what is done to try and make it more efficient its still burning fossil fuel to move all that weight.I think all the efficiency savings on IC engines have happened, Mazda keep trying but the new 3 has met fairly lukewarm reviews and hasnt really moved efficiency forward that much, pissing into the wind compared to just fitting an electric motor*

Shame its pegged back by 30/40 bhp, never understood that, 200 odd kilo lighter Golf R gets the full whack but the bigger car gets the power held back, still its a remap away (I expect ) from 370/380 bhp.


  • Am aware of the downsides of that approach.



Thales

619 posts

57 months

Tuesday 12th November 2019
quotequote all
Mmmmmm DSG farts

greenarrow

3,592 posts

117 months

Tuesday 12th November 2019
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
Elmariachi said:
I do like these but 38.8 mpg on a long run? Is that something to be proud of?

No matter it has 270bhp, it's still a brand new four pot with presumably the more efficient DSG option and I'd expect better than that.

Edited by Elmariachi on Tuesday 12th November 06:52
"Ye Cannae change the laws of physics"

IC engines, whatever you do are pretty inefficient, this a two tonne car near enough when its transporting a couple of people and some stuff, no matter what is done to try and make it more efficient its still burning fossil fuel to move all that weight.I think all the efficiency savings on IC engines have happened, Mazda keep trying but the new 3 has met fairly lukewarm reviews and hasnt really moved efficiency forward that much, pissing into the wind compared to just fitting an electric motor*

Shame its pegged back by 30/40 bhp, never understood that, 200 odd kilo lighter Golf R gets the full whack but the bigger car gets the power held back, still its a remap away (I expect ) from 370/380 bhp.


  • Am aware of the downsides of that approach.
This is very true. After all these years your typical (non performance orientated) petrol car averages somewhere between 40-50MPG in mixed use. Some a bit more, some a bit less.

I had a 99BHP Focus 1.0 Ecobooost on loan recently, I was pretty happy with its true (rather than OBD) 52MPG over a week of 40 mile commute mostly at optimum cruising speed and mixed urban driving, as it bested my previous diesel - and that was whilst trying to drive fairly economically. However, I then bought a cheap 19 year old Focus 1.6 as a banger commuter car which has averaged a true 42MPG over the same regime with no real attention paid to economy driving. That's a difference to me of £6.55 per week - wow! Not huge efficiency gains really over a period of 20 years....


Edited by greenarrow on Tuesday 12th November 09:34

scottygib553

531 posts

95 months

Tuesday 12th November 2019
quotequote all
The facelift has made this much more appealing with some subtle tweaks. I'd certainly consider one but as other have mentioned the V60 is bit more exciting looking but (here at least) appears much more expensive to buy/finance.