RE: Mercedes SLK32 AMG | Spotted

RE: Mercedes SLK32 AMG | Spotted

Wednesday 4th December 2019

Mercedes SLK32 AMG | Spotted

A 350hp, drop-top AMG, one of less than 200 in the country and costing £8k? Interesting...



Although it's now faced almost a quarter of a century of derisory comments - and bowed out of production - the Mercedes-Benz SLK was a significant little car. While the market has since moved back to fabric roofs for most convertibles thanks to technology advances, the SLK kick-started that convertible era offering the best of both worlds: drop-top, wind-in-the-hair thrills, with metal roof security. You only need look at the amount of cars that adopted the coupe-convertible configuration to see what a clever idea it was.

The SLK's problem - at least according to contemporary reports - is that rather too much time seemed to be dedicated to the roof and not to the rest of the car. Its engines weren't as nice as a Z3, and its handling not nearly as good as a Boxster's.

But, as is often the way, priorities and attitudes change over time. This is an example of the range-topping SLK32 AMG a car introduced in 2001 with a supercharged version of Merc's 3.2 V6 making 354hp and 332lb ft. If that still seems a lot now, that's because it is - a 718 Boxster S only makes 350hp and 310lb ft, by way of comparison. This was when superchargers dominated at AMG, with this engine also in the C32 AMG, followed by the blown 5.4 V8 in the contemporary SL and E55s. Believe it or not, the SLK32, with a five-speed automatic gearbox, was capable of 0-100mph in 11.2 seconds. Now you're more interested, right?


Moreover, the 32 wasn't a complete duffer. Sure, those who really loved driving would sacrifice the speed and buy a Boxster instead - you knew that was coming - but the SLK got a four-star rating from evo, it beat a Z3 M Roadster in an Autocar twin-test and, when Classic & Sports Car brought the pair together again just two months ago the SLK was described as having a "driving experience vastly more modern" than its BMW adversary.

Those after a 21st century Z3 M - when the S54 engine was introduced - in 2019 will pay handsomely for the privilege: this 81,000-mile car is for sale at £16,950. Our spotted, by contrast, is newer, has fewer miles and is less than half the price, at £7,995.

For a car this fast and this rare - fewer than 300 were ever registered in the UK - that doesn't seem bad. The advert is short on detail, and this era of Mercedes was of course notorious for their rustiness, but it's certainly easy to see the temptation in an old-school AMG hot rod roadster. Especially so when the other (fairly uninspiring) options at this money are considered: various old BMWs, the odd 350Z, TTs and A4s...For those people that don't want a Porsche, and are willing to accept some compromises, the SLK looks an interesting alternative. Just be prepared for those well-versed jokes...


SPECIFICATION - MERCEDES-BENZ SLK32 AMG

Engine: 3,199cc, supercharged V6
Transmission: 5-speed automatic, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 354@6,100rpm
Torque (lb ft): 332@4,400rpm
MPG: 18.2
CO2: N/A
First registered: 2002
Recorded mileage: 79,000
Price new: £43,000
Yours for: £7,995

See the original advert here

Author
Discussion

sidesauce

Original Poster:

2,480 posts

219 months

Wednesday 4th December 2019
quotequote all
I'd save more money up for an SLK 55 with the V8.

Captain_Morgan

1,229 posts

60 months

Wednesday 4th December 2019
quotequote all
sidesauce said:
I'd save more money up for an SLK 55 with the V8.
But that nose...

pti

1,704 posts

145 months

Wednesday 4th December 2019
quotequote all
I've been eyeing these up for about 18 months now. I'm sorely tempted.

cerb4.5lee

30,734 posts

181 months

Wednesday 4th December 2019
quotequote all
I'm liking this, decent numbers and performance figures. Plus I love a rare car.

Mercedes obsession with an auto gearbox just annoys me a little bit.

soad

32,912 posts

177 months

Wednesday 4th December 2019
quotequote all
pti said:
I'm sorely tempted.
Article mentions a “blown 5.4 V8”, I quite fancy that (E55). laugh

AmosMoses

4,042 posts

166 months

Wednesday 4th December 2019
quotequote all
Surely anyone who wants one of these would go for an SLK55 instead?

pti

1,704 posts

145 months

Wednesday 4th December 2019
quotequote all
AmosMoses said:
Surely anyone who wants one of these would go for an SLK55 instead?
It's the rarity factor that appeals.

Krikkit

26,541 posts

182 months

Wednesday 4th December 2019
quotequote all
Captain_Morgan said:
sidesauce said:
I'd save more money up for an SLK 55 with the V8.
But that nose...
Better than the galloping rust on these!

Tommie38

758 posts

195 months

Wednesday 4th December 2019
quotequote all
The issue with these is that they all rust. Even one that has had a quick tidy up (like this one probably has, nobody puts in new metal) will be rusting again in 12 months.

I think for the money that one makes no sense. A very high mileage SLK55 would be similar.

Far better to buy a rough example and enjoy the performance at much less cost I think.

cerb4.5lee

30,734 posts

181 months

Wednesday 4th December 2019
quotequote all
Love the bonnet bulges on these as well, and they remind of the mk5 RS2000 I had with them.

Lockhouse

262 posts

200 months

Wednesday 4th December 2019
quotequote all
As an aside I believe this was the same engine/chassis as the Chrysler Crossfire SRT. The SRT being much underrated IMHO.

paulyv

1,020 posts

124 months

Wednesday 4th December 2019
quotequote all
Captain_Morgan said:
But that nose...
But that noise.

To be fair I rather like these too now their styling has turned the corner, but the AMG would a stretch too far. I would consider the smaller engines and smaller initial outlay - there's some bargains about still.

NorthernSky

985 posts

118 months

Wednesday 4th December 2019
quotequote all
That Oxford Green Z3M with the S54 caught my eye a while back, what a fine looking thing, and a great example of a good clear advert too - if a little bit sparse on actual details!

I'd take that over the Mercedes in a flash. The fact it is essentially double the price reflects, to me anyway, the exceptional engine, manual gearbox and gorgeous looks!

only1ian

689 posts

195 months

Wednesday 4th December 2019
quotequote all
I was looking at these only the other day!! However a SL500 of the R230 or one of these!

RobM77

35,349 posts

235 months

Wednesday 4th December 2019
quotequote all
sidesauce said:
I'd save more money up for an SLK 55 with the V8.
I've driven several of these and absolutely love them. As the article says for the 32, they're a victim of the culture in the motoring press to declare a 'winner' in all group tests. The 55 (I've not driven a 32) will never be the most agile or best handling car, or even the fastest, but it's a hugely practical and useful crossover between a GT and a sports car. Outside of group tests on deserted moorland roads, the 55 just works so, so well. Plus, the whole time you get that glorious V8 soundtrack.

s m

23,243 posts

204 months

Wednesday 4th December 2019
quotequote all
The saloons with this drivetrain were also extremely fast for the time
Unobtrusive looking .....but Lotus Carlton performance

I can attest to the Impreza Turbo humbling performance off the lights as a friend had a saloon for a year or so

KPB1973

920 posts

100 months

Wednesday 4th December 2019
quotequote all
Interesting car, but that dealership gets a lot of negative reviews and a fair few suspicious ones.

Alex_225

6,264 posts

202 months

Wednesday 4th December 2019
quotequote all
only1ian said:
I was looking at these only the other day!! However a SL500 of the R230 or one of these!
The SLK is probably a safer bet and that's from someone who's other half owned an R230 SL. Lovely car, gorgeous looking but fragile and expensive to fix, which you will have to in one way or another haha.

xjay1337

15,966 posts

119 months

Wednesday 4th December 2019
quotequote all
Captain_Morgan said:
sidesauce said:
I'd save more money up for an SLK 55 with the V8.
But that nose...
I agree with Mr Sauce

I think the newer SLK55 looks much better! Just personal taste.

RobM77

35,349 posts

235 months

Wednesday 4th December 2019
quotequote all
xjay1337 said:
Captain_Morgan said:
sidesauce said:
I'd save more money up for an SLK 55 with the V8.
But that nose...
I agree with Mr Sauce

I think the newer SLK55 looks much better! Just personal taste.
There were also significant updates to the chassis, which made it more of a driver's car. In my humble opinion you can still feel the weight of the folding hard top up high, whether its up or down, and the Z4 and Boxster remain the sharper drive; but the SLK is a great package and I love the 55, of which I've driven several.