RE: Jaguar E-Type Reborn | PH Review

RE: Jaguar E-Type Reborn | PH Review

Thursday 17th December 2020

Jaguar E-Type Reborn | PH Review

A 60-year-old, good-as-new E-Type is just about as joyous as things get



As a Brit, is it possible to not like the Jaguar E-Type? It's surely up there with sugary tea, toad-in-the-hole and David Beckham as one of our national institutions, revered near enough universally and acknowledged around the globe as idiosyncratically British. Personally, however, a roadgoing E-Type has never tickled my pickle like it does for so many. That a Lightweight or one of the Eagle cars does blow my hair back shows how close it is, but as standard I've always found them a bit narrow, a bit too dainty and rather too chromey.

There's always that concern with old cars, too, that they'll offer up rather more in terms of stress than they will reward and enjoyment - the cool, caddish dream made into a hot, sticky nightmare. It should be said, however, that this view is from never having driven an E-Type; so what better car to start with, then, than Jaguar's very own Reborn one?

First announced back in 2017, the E-Type Reborn programme followed similar initiatives for early Land Rovers and Range Rovers. Put simply, it was to make the cars as good as new once more, using the skills and expertise of JLR Classic. The Reborns weren't to be restomods - there are plenty out there offering those services - but rather a realisation of what a new, completely stock E-Type could be. The 1960s put back together in the 21st century, in other words; the 10 cars sourced retaining as many original parts as possible, with Jaguar Classic technicians restoring and repairing rather than replacing.


If body panels did need renewing, they were sourced from Classic's reverse engineered panel programme and treated to the same spot welding as would have been used to fit them back in the day. With build records and original drawings held by Jag's Heritage Trust, the Reborn E-Types are as close to original specification as anyone can realistically claim to produce. And it isn't hard to see the appeal of what should effectively be a box-fresh E-Type, built by Jaguar themselves.

Of course, it looks utterly spectacular. Though still not quite enough to have your correspondent weak at the knees, there's no arguing with the execution: it really does look freshly assembled, gleaming and glistening like a brand new car. The E-Type looks smaller than ever, too, especially alongside 2021 Jaguars, almost like a drivable toy or one of those enormous scale models for collectors - it is tiny.

That point is forced home beyond any doubt inside. What was probably an ideal fit for those of a Norman Dewis stature is certainly what might be termed snug for those much larger. As in shoes can't be worn. And what you think is the armrest is the passenger seat. But, still, what an environment to be hemmed into: the Smiths dials are wonderful, the wooden steering wheel predictably evocative and the one nod to modernity - the DAB and nav-equipped media system - is seamlessly integrated into the dash.


The E-Type starts quite literally on the button, ignition primed with the key and big straight-six firing without hesitation or delay. Don't go thinking it's too easy, however; the clutch is stiff, reverse on the four-speed gearbox whole yards from any other gear and visibility tricky given you're hunched over the wheel. This was a time, of course, when men were men and sports cars were sports cars - a little hard work was all part of the experience. Moreover, delicate and ornate though that steering wheel looks, the lack of power assistance makes it a proper heave at manoeuvring speed.

Truthfully, by this point any notion of cool is out of the wind-down window: you're driving without shoes on, huffing and puffing over a three-point turn and squashed in like a parent who's stolen a go-kart. But who cares? This is an E-Type, an E-Type Reborn no less, perhaps the most famous sports car Britain has ever produced - it's going to be enjoyed, come what may.

The E-Type beguiles even at walking speed, with the view out over that louvred bonnet and a mellow burble emanating from the engine. That was to be expected; what's rather more surprising is just how together the old Jag feels, immediately and impressively. It doesn't squeak or rattle, and the pedals are precise and feelsome when encountering junctions for the first time. Or maybe all cars feel like this in socks. Point is the Reborn works for someone with modern driving sensibilities - it doesn't need kid gloves or the footwork of a ballerina to operate and enjoy.


That impression is maintained - is increased, if anything - with speed. There's the feel and the immersion and the joy of driving of a classic car, but (as it was meant to) with fewer of the usual drawbacks. It brakes straight and true, all four gears engage without drama, it steers slowly but not lazily; the E-Type feels classic yet in a properly endearing way, a pleasant reminder of how things used to be rather than a ghastly throwback to cars of toil and trouble.

As it has been for more than half a century, the engine is at the centre of the E-Type appeal. This Reborn is a 4.2-litre model, boasting in the region of 270hp and 285lb ft; with a kerbweight of less than 1,200kg - that's more than enough performance for the car to feel really potent, but it's the delivery of that speed that's memorable. It will bimble along at very low revs without fuss, but every extra centimetre of accelerator travel (remember when the throttle had feel? And weight?) brings with it a commensurate increase in performance, the speed building abundantly and generously as revs climb. Certainly it still feels brisk in 2020; in the 1960s it must have been like a rocket.

And the sound is divine. It's everything we love about straight-sixes - the smoothness and melodic nature - combined with all that's good about classics, bringing a raw edge to the noise, some authentic volume and overrun gurgles that are impossible not to smile about. This is surely why people make allowances for E-Types that maybe aren't so fit - that engine, its hearty delivery and sweet sonics, would cover all manner of flaws.


Herein, however, is the joy of the Reborn E-Type. Because there's everything you'd expect to find in Jaguar's most famous car, alongside a level of finesse and cohesion that you probably wouldn't. It corners and cruises and stops and goes not like a modern car, but like you've time travelled back to 1963. And that turns out to be as good as - if not better than - anyone dared dream. The Reborn doesn't come cheap, with the 10 cars costing in the region of £300k depending on options, but then who better to revitalise an E-Type than Jaguar Classic?

As a beautifully judged amalgamation of classic style and contemporary attention to detail, it's a captivating thing. With the E-Type turning 60 next year, don't be surprised to see a lot more affection directed Jaguar's way. After a fleeting drive in this one, you can count on one more person joining the love-in.


SPECIFICATION | JAGUAR E-TYPE REBORN

Engine: 4,235cc, straight-six
Transmission: 4-speed manual, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 270@5,400rpm
Torque (lb ft): 284@4,000rpm
0-62mph: c. 7 secs
Top speed: c. 150mph
Weight: 1,170kg
MPG: N/A
CO2: N/A
Price: £295,000







Author
Discussion

sege

Original Poster:

561 posts

223 months

Thursday 17th December 2020
quotequote all
Wow.

What a thing. That makes every car priced over 300k look pointless to me.
I'd want to drive it to know for sure, but there's a good chance that, price no object, I'd have this over anything else ever.
Eagles must be amazing also, and perhaps the way to go, but this has a purity in being original spec that sounds like it would be delicious.

That's just shot right to the top of my lottery win dream garage wish list. In the meantime the side profile shot just became my desktop background.

What a way to use your last ever gallon of petrol.

bigothunter

11,338 posts

61 months

Thursday 17th December 2020
quotequote all
The pinnacle of motoring before joy of the open road was lost forever - absolutely fabulous bow

blue al

961 posts

160 months

Thursday 17th December 2020
quotequote all
Has be closer to a sub 6 second 0-60 with the quoted power and weight?

A warm hot-hatch was quicker than that 20 years ago with fwd and 100hp less ?

Or is this a case of just underplaying it


Edited by blue al on Thursday 17th December 07:00

NNH

1,520 posts

133 months

Thursday 17th December 2020
quotequote all
blue al said:
Has be closer to a sub 6 second 0-60 with the quoted power and weight?

A warm hot-hatch was quicker than that 20 years ago with fwd and 100hp less ?

Or is this a case of just underplaying it


Edited by blue al on Thursday 17th December 07:00
I think it's down to a tall 1st and 2nd gear, and maybe "period-appropriate" traction from the tyres

PushedDover

5,666 posts

54 months

Thursday 17th December 2020
quotequote all
Great fun - and agreeing with up there ^^^^^^ more interesting than anything else to sink £300k of real money in (i.e. not PCP'ing)
It will also remain great fun for far far longer than the latest unusable power of a sub 3sec super car.



For example - Your own £300k: This or Mac 720S anyone ?

NJJ

435 posts

81 months

Thursday 17th December 2020
quotequote all
The perfect antithesis to the shouty, look at me Knightsbridge supercar brigade.

Numeric

1,400 posts

152 months

Thursday 17th December 2020
quotequote all
Gosh - it was cars like this that first turned me into a lover of all things automotive as a child in the 70's

Then I drove a few and all illusions disappeared - a new Transit was better - then I ended up in an environment where we called cars units and measured them in thousands and the stylist knocked out another consumer clinic friendly box... yawn...

So thank you PH for a lovely and wonderful early Christmas present article introducing me to... a thing of utter beauty, a thing that drives really well, a thing that costs only (yes I mean that) 300k so is out of my reach but still within the reach of dreams, a thing that makes me feel like a child again, tugging at my dad's sleeve and shouting 'look dad, an E-type'


(Note: I often drive in socks - the good lord gave me flippers instead of feet - who needs to heel and toe (what is that - always a mystery to me??) when you can brake with you big toe and cover the throttle with your little toe, and it does bring you closer, but highlights the difference in cars and their interaction with the human)

Edited by Numeric on Thursday 17th December 07:40

sam greenock

294 posts

121 months

Thursday 17th December 2020
quotequote all
"As a Brit, is it possible to not like the Jaguar E-Type? It's surely up there with sugary tea, toad-in-the-hole and David Beckham as one of our national institutions......"

I think the author will find that David Beckham isn't a "national institution" in Wales, Northern Ireland or Scotland, although I suspect he'll probably have to have it explained to him why that is

Same with "toad-in-the-hole" - can't say I've ever fallen over the mass queues in eateries in Glasgow, Derry, Colraine Cardiff, or Lerwick all after "toad-in-the-hole" I've never even seen it on a menu

The car is glorious though


V41LEY

2,895 posts

239 months

Thursday 17th December 2020
quotequote all
I’m intrigued by that row of classic jags stacked up in the last pic. Are they customer restorations or new ‘old’ cars ?

Iamnotkloot

1,436 posts

148 months

Thursday 17th December 2020
quotequote all
I must be a heathen. I simply don’t like standard e-types, always find the wheels tucked inwards too much, amongst other annoyances .
However, an Eagle lightweight (or original Jag lightweight), yes please.

Baddie

618 posts

218 months

Thursday 17th December 2020
quotequote all
blue al said:
Has be closer to a sub 6 second 0-60 with the quoted power and weight?

A warm hot-hatch was quicker than that 20 years ago with fwd and 100hp less ?

Or is this a case of just underplaying it


Edited by blue al on Thursday 17th December 07:00
265 BHP was claimed for both 3.8 and 4.2 in the day, but was measured by a different standard. 210-220 is more like it. Also compared to the hatches referred to, it’s much older drivetrain tech, much narrower tyres and tall 1st and 2nd. Still, all that torque spread and the lightness means they’re reasonably handy. IIRC the original road test described leaving a 30 limit in second and hitting 70 (in second) 6 seconds later.

For me that would be much more enjoyable than going from 35-60 in 1 second in a 488 Tributo.

ettore

4,144 posts

253 months

Thursday 17th December 2020
quotequote all
V41LEY said:
I’m intrigued by that row of classic jags stacked up in the last pic. Are they customer restorations or new ‘old’ cars ?
That’s Jaguar Classic - they’re a mixture of JLR owned and some customer cars.

ettore

4,144 posts

253 months

Thursday 17th December 2020
quotequote all
sam greenock said:
"As a Brit, is it possible to not like the Jaguar E-Type? It's surely up there with sugary tea, toad-in-the-hole and David Beckham as one of our national institutions......"

I think the author will find that David Beckham isn't a "national institution" in Wales, Northern Ireland or Scotland, although I suspect he'll probably have to have it explained to him why that is

Same with "toad-in-the-hole" - can't say I've ever fallen over the mass queues in eateries in Glasgow, Derry, Colraine Cardiff, or Lerwick all after "toad-in-the-hole" I've never even seen it on a menu

The car is glorious though
Chip McChip

Andy83n

387 posts

63 months

Thursday 17th December 2020
quotequote all
Iamnotkloot said:
I must be a heathen. I simply don’t like standard e-types, always find the wheels tucked inwards too much, amongst other annoyances .
However, an Eagle lightweight (or original Jag lightweight), yes please.
Agreed, just doesn't look right at all from most angles, especially with the standard track & wheels.

Kipsrs

440 posts

50 months

Thursday 17th December 2020
quotequote all
What is all the hype about an e-type, why do people think they are so beautiful? Just asking, as I can’t see it.
I must be one of the only people who don’t actually like the e-types shape I much prefer the earlier 120’s, 140’s and 150’s looks, they just look more ‘finished’ and graceful.
Be nice to have a reborn 140!
I’d still be, what some may say, a heathen, and buy something newer or a more visually appealing vintage with £300k

wab172uk

2,005 posts

228 months

Thursday 17th December 2020
quotequote all
I'm guessing I'm going to be in a minority here, but ....... I've never liked the E-Type.

I know as a car enthusiast, I'm supposed to fall in love with it. But I don't. Proportions look all wrong to me.

Rumblestripe

2,975 posts

163 months

Thursday 17th December 2020
quotequote all
blue al said:
Has be closer to a sub 6 second 0-60 with the quoted power and weight?

A warm hot-hatch was quicker than that 20 years ago with fwd and 100hp less ?

Or is this a case of just underplaying it


Edited by blue al on Thursday 17th December 07:00
No, this is a case of missing the point entirely.

Stick with your hatchback kiiddo, these are for grown-ups.

Iamnotkloot

1,436 posts

148 months

Thursday 17th December 2020
quotequote all
Now if we were talking about one of these......Eagle E-type 'low=drag'


Callum43

294 posts

53 months

Thursday 17th December 2020
quotequote all
I think the only issue with an E-Type from a looks point of view is the inset wheels . A Lightweight always had it just right . Other than that , and bearing in mind how it made everything else on the market that was remotely affordable seem at the time, it still was unique then and remains so now. As a buyer of a new one back in the mid sixties it seems so strange to have been able to afford it then and now see how the market values them . Much as I love the Reborn ethos you’ve really got to want one very badly at these prices .
But how wonderful it was back in the day to be able to drive them as intended and to this day remains the quickest motoring I’ve ever had on UK roads . In retrospect the E-Type represents the spirit of those times to me and I feel fortunate to have experienced it first hand . Nostalgia over and done with for the day !

Numeric

1,400 posts

152 months

Thursday 17th December 2020
quotequote all
Andy83n said:
Iamnotkloot said:
I must be a heathen. I simply don’t like standard e-types, always find the wheels tucked inwards too much, amongst other annoyances .
However, an Eagle lightweight (or original Jag lightweight), yes please.
Agreed, just doesn't look right at all from most angles, especially with the standard track & wheels.
When I was a kid I always preferred the V12 as the track seemed to fit the body much better and it just looked more 'butch' and better matched my absolute favourite the Cobra - but as I got older I started to like the delicacy of the early cars more and more in the coupe variant - though not in the convertible which still doesn't work for me.

Of course I also have to put my phone on the floor if I need to read a text and don't have my reading glasses