RE: Driven: BMW 635d Convertible Edition Sport

RE: Driven: BMW 635d Convertible Edition Sport

Monday 5th October 2009

Driven: BMW 635d Convertible Edition Sport

A boulevard cruiser with a turbodiesel engine? The hairdressers will be unimpressed...


Yes, we know it's on a 57 plate...
Yes, we know it's on a 57 plate...
Diesel. Bangle. Convertible. These are not words that you would expect to sit together with ease, and yet BMW manages to meld them together in the 635d Convertible.

BMW has been slotting its deeply impressive twin-turbo 2993cc diesel six into the 6-series cab for quite a while now, but this is the first time we've been able to get our hands on the new 635d Edition Sport.

This is an optional package that takes the £59,705 635d Convertible up to an impressive £63,275, making it comfortably the most expensive way to get this engine fitted to a BMW. The Edition Sport package brings some subtle styling tweaks, stiffer anti-roll bars for 10 per cent firmer front suspension and 30 per cent firmer rear suspension.

...but at least the badge says 635d...
...but at least the badge says 635d...
The Edition Sport bits - available on all 6-series models bar the M6 - firm up the suspension without drastically affecting the ride quality, and so body roll is marginally reduced. But this is still most definitely not a car for flinging at your favourite B-road with abandon. Its handling is secure and surefooted, but you'd hardly call it fun and precise.

Think of it as a long-distance high-speed cruiser and the 6-series cab works a lot better. In fact, that's where the six-pot diesel begins to make sense. Weighing-in at 1935kg it weighs almost 80kg more than a Porsche Panamera, despite being a barely adequate 2+2 convertible, but the 6-series cab is more or less single-handedly rescued by what is possibly one of the greatest engines of the 21st century.

Interior shot of our actual car
Interior shot of our actual car
The 282bhp twin-turbo diesel nestling in the engine bay not only blesses the lardy loafer with a fine turn of effortless speed - 0-62mph is done in 5.9sec, while the surging 428lb ft of torque makes for plenty of mid-range punch - but it also metes its power out frugally. BMW claims a combined 39.2mpg, meaning that the 635d cab ought to be capable of 600 miles between fill-ups. The fact that the engine goes about its business with a gurgling throb and barely a hint of diesel clatter (unless cold) is merely icing on the cake.

The looks might be a sticking point, however. The 6-series is the high-water mark of Chris Bangle-era design and therefore isn't blessed with the most graceful lines. The best we can say about it is that the design is that it's imposing. It would certainly be hard to call it pretty.

Oh, and it's just a small thing but why, in such an expensive car, is there not a cupholder? Or was it so ingeniously hidden I couldn't find it? Answers on a postcard please...

So the 635d Convertible Edition Sport is a capable, quick, refined and frugal vehicle, whose only real weaknesses are controversial looks and the apparent absence of a cupholder. But does that mean it's any good? It ought to, but that doesn't necessarily follow.

In the end it's really a question of who's actually going to want the 635d Convertible. Image-conscious boulevardiers are hardly going to want a 'd' on the rump of their car, however good the engine is. Those interested in the engine's economy are far more likely to buy it installed in a 3-series or 5-series. And those who actually want a decent-handling diesel 6-series really would be better served with the significantly cheaper coupe.

The 635d Convertible is actually a bit like communism; it's a nice idea in theory, but in practise nobody really wants it. There are precious few better engines out there, but there are plenty more appropriate applications of it.



 

Author
Discussion

Papa Hotel

Original Poster:

12,760 posts

194 months

Monday 5th October 2009
quotequote all
Should be great remapped.

mccarn

641 posts

209 months

Monday 5th October 2009
quotequote all
Papa Hotel said:
Should be great remapped.


laugh was just thinking the same.

collateral

7,238 posts

230 months

Monday 5th October 2009
quotequote all
Nearly 2 tonnes eek

Menguin

3,776 posts

233 months

Monday 5th October 2009
quotequote all
Papa Hotel said:
Should be great crushed.

Crusoe

4,087 posts

243 months

Monday 5th October 2009
quotequote all
believe the silver bits on the transmission tunnel are your pop out cup holders

Garlick

40,601 posts

252 months

Monday 5th October 2009
quotequote all
Crusoe said:
believe the silver bits on the transmission tunnel are your pop out cup holders
Indeed. We found them, not sure why Riggers didn't.

va1o

16,072 posts

219 months

Monday 5th October 2009
quotequote all
Good review, but BMW have tweaked the 6-series once or twice since 2007, how come you didn't have a 59-plate press car?

Garlick

40,601 posts

252 months

Monday 5th October 2009
quotequote all
va1o said:
Good review, but BMW have tweaked the 6-series once or twice since 2007, how come you didn't have a 59-plate press car?
We did have a later plate car finished in white, but the pictures we had taken were 'lost' so we had to use the BMW supplied pics that feature the 57 plater.

Apologies.

RobCrezz

7,892 posts

220 months

Monday 5th October 2009
quotequote all
Garlick said:
va1o said:
Good review, but BMW have tweaked the 6-series once or twice since 2007, how come you didn't have a 59-plate press car?
We did have a later plate car finished in white, but the pictures we had taken were 'lost' so we had to use the BMW supplied pics that feature the 57 plater.

Apologies.
So you lost the photos, and Riggers couldn't find the cup holders... some automotive journalists! wink

Garlick

40,601 posts

252 months

Monday 5th October 2009
quotequote all
RobCrezz said:
Garlick said:
va1o said:
Good review, but BMW have tweaked the 6-series once or twice since 2007, how come you didn't have a 59-plate press car?
We did have a later plate car finished in white, but the pictures we had taken were 'lost' so we had to use the BMW supplied pics that feature the 57 plater.

Apologies.
So you lost the photos, and Riggers couldn't find the cup holders... some automotive journalists! wink
I blame Riggers, he couldn't find the cupholders when we could hehe As for the photos, well that's another story.....

Gsink

47 posts

201 months

Monday 5th October 2009
quotequote all
Does anyone actually know any hairdressers who can afford such a car?

Papa Hotel

Original Poster:

12,760 posts

194 months

Monday 5th October 2009
quotequote all
Gsink said:
Does anyone actually know any hairdressers who can afford such a car?
That Nicky Clark girl.

ExPat2B

2,157 posts

212 months

Monday 5th October 2009
quotequote all
Posting a drive of this car is editorial trolling. =-)

kambites

69,105 posts

233 months

Monday 5th October 2009
quotequote all
Gsink said:
Does anyone actually know any hairdressers who can afford such a car?
Plenty, although in my experience the 911 is usually the car of choice for rich hair dressers. Then again, the 911 is usually the car of choice for rich everythings.

It's a shame that diesels have the stigma attached to them that they do, because in big GTs they really do make a long of sense.

Edited by kambites on Monday 5th October 12:12

Alex

9,978 posts

296 months

Monday 5th October 2009
quotequote all
Diesel? Convertible?

Does not compute.

RobCrezz

7,892 posts

220 months

Monday 5th October 2009
quotequote all
Garlick said:
RobCrezz said:
Garlick said:
va1o said:
Good review, but BMW have tweaked the 6-series once or twice since 2007, how come you didn't have a 59-plate press car?
We did have a later plate car finished in white, but the pictures we had taken were 'lost' so we had to use the BMW supplied pics that feature the 57 plater.

Apologies.
So you lost the photos, and Riggers couldn't find the cup holders... some automotive journalists! wink
I blame Riggers, he couldn't find the cupholders when we could hehe As for the photos, well that's another story.....
biggrin

130R

6,889 posts

218 months

Monday 5th October 2009
quotequote all
I've never been keen on the convertible, there seems to be quite a few of them around though. It would look ok driving around Miami or LA I suppose.

North West Tom

11,596 posts

189 months

Monday 5th October 2009
quotequote all
Such a beautiful car cloud9

OnTheOverrun

3,965 posts

189 months

Monday 5th October 2009
quotequote all
North West Tom said:
Such a beautiful car cloud9
www.specsavers.com

hehe

AKA8

1,799 posts

239 months

Monday 5th October 2009
quotequote all
If you've got £60k+ to spend on a cabrio, why wouldn't you get a decent petrol V8? The mind boggles.