RE: PH2 Tested: BMW K1600GT

RE: PH2 Tested: BMW K1600GT

Wednesday 13th April 2011

PH2 Tested: BMW K1600GT

Goodwin gets his gammy leg over a tasty German six pot


That's not Yonah - that's a publicity shot...
That's not Yonah - that's a publicity shot...
The six-cylinder Honda CBX came out in 1978 when I was sixteen. A local rich bloke bought one as soon as they were available and I nearly fainted with excitement when I first saw him riding it through Woking. He went past me a few times as I walked to the train station on my way to college, until eventually it got too much and I started carrying my helmet with me. The next time I saw him I stood in the middle of the road, flagged him down and told him that I had to have a go on the back. It was worth it. Smooth, and for the time blisteringly quick. Sounded pretty good, too, but not as good as the newest six pot on the block. Wind the new BMW 1600GT's motor up to its 8,500rpm red line and it sounds absolutely fantastic. A bit like a 911, in fact.

He's behind the third bush on the right
He's behind the third bush on the right
We first saw this engine on BMW's Concept 6 naked show bike in 2009 and it hasn't taken the company long to slot it into a pukka production machine. The 158bhp 1,649cc motor is a relatively long stroke unit with bore and stroke measurements of 72mm x 67.5mm which is less oversquare than most modern engines, especially those on sports bikes. But then BMW wasn't setting out to build a high revving superbike engine. The S1000RR has got that covered. For a sports touring bike with the emphasis on touring, low-down torque is more important than outright horsepower. A longer stroke is good news for torque but has another advantage, too: it makes for a taller and narrower engine. So the block is kept as narrow as possible. All the six-cylinder engine's ancillaries are placed inboard of the ends of the crankshaft, which also keeps overall width to a minimum. It feels like a big heavy bike, and certainly isn't narrow, but the centre of gravity is nice and low down so once you're moving you don't notice the weight. In town it's an easy bike to manage above walking pace. I've got a temporarily knackered left knee thanks to a skiing misjudgement that has all the strength of warm ice cream but manhandling the K1600 was never a problem.


Two models are available, the more sporty GT and the GTL for serious touring. We're riding the GT and after 250 miles in one day of ripping along the coast from Bournemouth and then back towards Brighton and many miles on blissfully quiet mid-week Sussex roads I wouldn't shirk from a London-Cannes blast in one day. The GTL has a slightly lower seat height, handlebars that are a shorter reach, a top box including pillion back rest, softer suspension and a slightly larger fuel tank. I'd be perfectly happy riding the GT all day long and can't imagine that the GTL would be that much more comfortable. The GTL also has a larger windscreen, which is an option of the GT anyway (I presume ours has it because if the screen were any bigger you could show films on it).

If you love gadgets you're going to love this bike. The standard £14,965 GT comes with a lot of toys but there's plenty more to add from the options list, much of which is fitted to the test bike. Sat nav, which is a brilliant device on a touring bike, BMW's ESA (Electronic Suspension Adjustment), an audio system including a handy cubbyhole for your iPod or 'phone including a socket so that you can play music. We've got the SE version of the GT which costs £15,765 and comes with adaptive headlamp, traction control and tyre pressure control. I didn't ride the bike at night so can't comment on the headlamp system but it's pretty clever. It knows from the GPS where the bike is and when aproaching a crossroads, for example, and shines light either side of the bike onto the side roads.


Standard on all models is a Power Mode button which gives riders the choice between rain, normal and dynamic settings. The K1600GT (and GTL) is the first bike to be fitted by a pure fly-by-wire throttle. Yes, other machines have fly-by-wire, but the K1600 is the first bike to not be fitted with a failsafe cable that closes the throttle. If you're not happy with that concept then I recommend that you never travel in the new A380 Airbus because like the BMW it is entirely fly-by wire.

Fully spec your K and you'll have a lot of things to play with and a lot of buttons to press. With the roads full of car drivers talking on their mobiles, programming sat navs, eating sandwiches and generally not looking out for bikes, it's never been more crucial to keep alert and observant on a bike. Maybe I'm getting old (or simply want to get older) but unless you're riding in rural France or in the middle of nowhere I'd recommend that you set up the systems before riding off. I reckon the fly-by-wire system could do with a software tweak as there's a slight disconnected feel as you wind open throttle which you don't get on the S1000RR. It's most noticeable in the rain mode, which I wouldn't bother with anyway because the power delivery with this engine is so smooth.


Even on Sussex's most bendy roads (you might know the famous biker's A272) I kept the suspension in Comfort mode after I'd automatically switched to Sport assuming that it would be best for these switchback roads. Comfort seems to better suit fast riding because it absorbs small bumps and keeps the bike more stable.

Another difference between GT an GTL is that the latter has a higher all up weight allowance (560kg as opposed to 540kg for the GT) which also means that it has its top speed restricted to 136mph whereas the GT will go on to 155mph. Of course it hardly matters. When the K1600s were on their way there was talk of prices near £20k. At £16,515 the GTL isn't exactly cheap but it's not outrageous for a fully kitted heavyweight tourer. As I said, I'd be happy with the GT. It's got a brilliant balance between sportiness and long legged touring ability. Using the fuel computer I averaged 40mpg between motorway and country roads so the GT's 5.3 gallon tank should give a range of around 210-220 miles which is enough for the UK and Europe. I'd give the audio system a miss, which saves almost £1,500, and choose instead the GTL's large electrically adjustable screen. With a bit of fiddling it's easy to find the right screen height that keeps most of the wind off your torso but that isn't so high that it causes buffeting and instability.

There was a K1600GT at the press bike centre fitted with Akrapovic pipes which must sound fantastic. You don't see many full-on touring bikes equipped with sports or loud exhausts (except Harleys, of course), but then not many tourers have engines as wonderful as the K1600's. There wasn't a whole lot wrong with the four-cylinder K1300 GT and it's tempting to view the new six-potter as nothing more than a marketing gimmick. It's more than that, though, those extra cylinders have turned it into something a bit special.





Author
Discussion

bob1179

Original Poster:

14,107 posts

209 months

Tuesday 12th April 2011
quotequote all
I love the idea of a new six banger, however, I don't fancy a big Tourer, will BMW put this engine into something a bit more mental?

smile

Mermaid

21,492 posts

171 months

Tuesday 12th April 2011
quotequote all
Good write-up

How much does it weigh?

Motorrad

6,811 posts

187 months

Tuesday 12th April 2011
quotequote all
I like it, will be ideal in about ten years when it's cheaper and I'm old enough to ride a bike like that.

Yonah

5 posts

230 months

Tuesday 12th April 2011
quotequote all
Sorry Mermaid,

She weighs 319kg with 90 per cent fuel and no panniers. A lot in other words.

3doorPete

9,917 posts

234 months

Tuesday 12th April 2011
quotequote all
In a performance naked chassis with about 70kg lopped off please.

jp-speed-triple

1,504 posts

187 months

Tuesday 12th April 2011
quotequote all
Nice, but not sure about the choice of paint colour.

Would like a try on one, but would need to be an extended (say, to Spain and back over three weeks) test ride.

Motorrad

6,811 posts

187 months

Tuesday 12th April 2011
quotequote all
Yonah said:
Sorry Mermaid,

She weighs 319kg with 90 per cent fuel and no panniers. A lot in other words.
So if the weight limit is 540kilos how do BMW expect their usual demographic for this sort of bike (50+, Tuetonic, a wurst and sauerkraut stuffer and weighing in at 115kilos), his fat wife and all their luggage to come in below the max?

Touring version it is then!

Hooli

32,278 posts

200 months

Tuesday 12th April 2011
quotequote all
Those adaptive headlights sound annoying. Just put all the damn lights on with mainbeam, it's why a mainbeam switch exists! I bet those lights just for sideroads would be dead handy around tight bends as well, but BMW know best...

tonym911

16,523 posts

205 months

Tuesday 12th April 2011
quotequote all
From a C of G perspective it's interesting that they eschewed the Gold Wing flat-six format in favour of the CBX-style transverse format (albeit with an almost horizontal block). Hope they've got the cooling sorted on the centre pots, it all looks a bit tight in there. You're right about the impact of the CBX too Col. We got Phil Read in to test ours on SuperBike and I'll never forget the sight of him coming over the Snake hump at Chobham practically vertical. All you could see was a vast width of finned alloy, a ludicrously narrow front tyre and the tip of Ready's helmet (sic). It might seem ho-hum now but wheelies were still a novelty back then. Hoisting a right mofo of one with a CBX was properly outlandish. We caught a lot of flies in our gobs that day.

Steve Evil

10,659 posts

229 months

Tuesday 12th April 2011
quotequote all
Hooli said:
Those adaptive headlights sound annoying. Just put all the damn lights on with mainbeam, it's why a mainbeam switch exists! I bet those lights just for sideroads would be dead handy around tight bends as well, but BMW know best...
I think it means they rotate round, so will follow the curve of the road etc.

tonym911

16,523 posts

205 months

Tuesday 12th April 2011
quotequote all
Toit, Goldmember style, like this


MarJay

2,173 posts

175 months

Tuesday 12th April 2011
quotequote all
Bagsie a crashed one for a Caterfield style kit car please.

Mad Jock

1,272 posts

262 months

Tuesday 12th April 2011
quotequote all
I had a sit on one at my local Motorrad dealer the other day. I threw my leg over, and pulled it upright off its side stand, and nearly dropped it. It was far easier to pick up than I imagined, and I used too much muscle to get it upright. It was on its way over to the other side when I caught it.
My GS is in for a service tomorrow, so we'll see if they offer me their demo for the day as a courtesy bike. While I'm very curious about this beast, it's off my radar for now.
As one of the journos in a bike mag says, it's a fantastic cross continent tourer, but you're buggered if your final destination ends with a gravel drive!

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

255 months

Tuesday 12th April 2011
quotequote all
Hooli said:
Those adaptive headlights sound annoying. Just put all the damn lights on with mainbeam, it's why a mainbeam switch exists! I bet those lights just for sideroads would be dead handy around tight bends as well, but BMW know best...
They aren't "steering" headlamps, they simply rotate to maintain the same beam pattern when cranked over. Nothing but advantages for both the rider and other road users here.

twizellb

2,774 posts

212 months

Tuesday 12th April 2011
quotequote all
Their was one at Rothbury on sunday, it was long enough to be continuedeek
Truly fking massive.

stuart-b

3,643 posts

226 months

Tuesday 12th April 2011
quotequote all
twizellb said:
Their was one at Rothbury on sunday, it was long enough to be continuedeek
Truly fking massive.
What an expression hehe

rog007

5,759 posts

224 months

Wednesday 13th April 2011
quotequote all
"Wind the new BMW 1600GT's motor up to its 8,500rpm red line and it sounds absolutely fantastic. A bit like a 911, in fact."

I must have a problem then, 'cos my 996 turbo sounds sh**e!

Silver993tt

9,064 posts

239 months

Wednesday 13th April 2011
quotequote all
3doorPete said:
In a performance naked chassis with about 70kg lopped off please.
and costing max £10k

3doorPete

9,917 posts

234 months

Wednesday 13th April 2011
quotequote all
Silver993tt said:
3doorPete said:
In a performance naked chassis with about 70kg lopped off please.
and costing max £10k
..and the engine canted forward about 30 degrees less.

Don't want much do we?

Silver993tt

9,064 posts

239 months

Wednesday 13th April 2011
quotequote all
Well, bike prices have gone up steeply over the last couple of years. I would have thought that in an economic slowdown/recession that prices would have fallen since these are luxury items to the majority.