"Offical Warning" from the Police

[Pit Pony]

Monkeylegend said:

Nibbles_bits said:

Monkeylegend said:

That's the official PH way of dealing with things, should work.

Is it not the PH way to dominate the doorway??

Yep, and the stairs.

The only thing PH men don't dominate is their woman.

Unless she let's him as part of a sexual fantasy.

[Nibbles_bits]

freedman said:

Nibbles_bits said:

Now that there doesn't appear to be any mention of V3......I do think it's a possibility that V2 caused the collision deliberately.

Considering your earlier comment - it's also possible that the investigation hasn't been completed to a satisfactory standard.

If you thought they caused the crash deliberately why didnt you say that at the time?

You only seem to have come to that conclusion after receiving a letter, that was pretty irrelevant

I can only tell the Officer facts -

"Hello Officer. The car in front had stopped. They say there was a vehicle swerved into their lane. I didn't see the other car"

Clearly that Officer didn't follow that up, and appears to have either been told a different story by V2 or, accepted the fact that V3 did swerve towards V2, but not recorded it.

[Vanden Saab]

BertBert said:

Pit Pony said:

Yes Toe. Well pedandiced

pedanted?

pedanticed...
If you type Pedandiced into google it links to this thread...

[NFT]

Nibbles_bits said:

freedman said:

Nibbles_bits said:

Now that there doesn't appear to be any mention of V3......I do think it's a possibility that V2 caused the collision deliberately.

Considering your earlier comment - it's also possible that the investigation hasn't been completed to a satisfactory standard.

If you thought they caused the crash deliberately why didnt you say that at the time?

You only seem to have come to that conclusion after receiving a letter, that was pretty irrelevant

I can only tell the Officer facts -

"Hello Officer. The car in front had stopped. They say there was a vehicle swerved into their lane. I didn't see the other car"

Clearly that Officer didn't follow that up, and appears to have either been told a different story by V2 or, accepted the fact that V3 did swerve towards V2, but not recorded it.

Did he even note it?, The page layout and persistent presence of blank spaces as you turn the pages isn't due to a printing error.

I would make sure your concerns are duly noted, put in writing and able to be confirmed later should an unfortunate incident occur on the roads.

[Nibbles_bits]

NFT said:

Nibbles_bits said:

freedman said:

Nibbles_bits said:

Now that there doesn't appear to be any mention of V3......I do think it's a possibility that V2 caused the collision deliberately.

Considering your earlier comment - it's also possible that the investigation hasn't been completed to a satisfactory standard.

If you thought they caused the crash deliberately why didnt you say that at the time?

You only seem to have come to that conclusion after receiving a letter, that was pretty irrelevant

I can only tell the Officer facts -

"Hello Officer. The car in front had stopped. They say there was a vehicle swerved into their lane. I didn't see the other car"

Clearly that Officer didn't follow that up, and appears to have either been told a different story by V2 or, accepted the fact that V3 did swerve towards V2, but not recorded it.

Did he even note it?, The page layout and persistent presence of blank spaces as you turn the pages isn't due to a printing error.

I would make sure your concerns are duly noted, put in writing and able to be confirmed later should an unfortunate incident occur on the roads.

I don't know that it was noted.
The little information I received from what the Officer did report doesn't mention V3.

Unfortunately with the roadside CRaSH report it's very easy to "skip" steps. For example, I've only ever taken 1 roadside statement, skipping those sections with 'N/A'