We'l have your car if your not insured! 23.09.04

[bogush]

Northernboy said:

bogush said: Whatever. Yes, well argued that man. Brilliant. What is it you do again?

Run rings round you in an argument, it would appear.

What I actually said was:

bogush said:

Northernboy said: bogush said: No, that is the way it is SUPPOSED to work. Hence my post. Do try to keep up! OK, please give me an example of a case where someone has been convicted of speeding for doing 60 in a 70. Try reading the papers: There's been a couple of thousand discovered to have been done by one camera just recently. There have also been people done for doing under 30, under 20, under 10 and even one or two under 5mph if I recall correctly. Northernboy said: And I can keep up just fine, thanks Clearly you can't. Northernboy said: I'm just struggling to throttle back my brain to your level. Whatever.

You were wrong in your assumptions.

You have no reasoned response to any of my points.

So you have to attack the messenger.


If you care to check back you will see that I attack the message, whilst pointing up the fact that the messenger is wrong.


Not quite the same thing as either what you accuse me of, or what you are doing.

Is it?

Do try to keep up!

[marcos maniac]

Oh dear is someone getting the wrong end of the stick again

[bogush]

Northernboy said:

bogush said: I find your finely crafted little pieces so amusing that I'm sure that if you and gone were to get together your offspring would be a wit. As I said, you are fine when you lay on the insults, but not so happy when someone responds in kind. Hypocrisy is never pretty.

No, what is said was:

bogush said:

Northernboy said: bogush said: Which bit of "safe" did you miss, gone? With observation skills like that, I hope you don't drive. And with attitudes and reasoning like yours, I hope that you don't breed. Or are crass insults only ok when you provide them? So, as well as not reading the papers before making your intelligent and reasoned comments, you don't bother to read the posts before responding with your polite and complimentary contributions. I find your finely crafted little pieces so amusing that I'm sure that if you and gone were to get together your offspring would be a wit.

But I am impressed that you actually got the insult (did you have to get together with one of your mates?).

Or did you just guess it was an insult?


Would you like to point out exaxtly where I started to lay on the insults?

And where I wasn't so happy when someone responds in kind?

But you are right about one thing:

Hypocrisy is never pretty.

[marcos maniac]

[bogush]

marcos maniac said:

If it is so boring:

Why join in?

[tvrgit]

TripleS said:

Bogush, I agree with some of the things you say but I wish you'd moderate your tone a bit.

Have to agree.

I also agree with some of what you say, and I can see why you are so ardent in your cause, and that's fine. I have some causes like that as well and pursue them as best I can.

But I don't think that battering the crap out of everybody who holds a different view (even, in some cases, if the view is only slightly different) endears many people to your cause.

You are clearly intelligent and well-informed in your subject, but I have to say that you do come across as slightly too full of yourself, and with a tendency to think that everybody else is a moron just because they don't necessarily scan the newspapers for every bit of data you have.

I am not trying to start a fight, I am merely pointing out, word to the wise stylee, that if you participated, instead of trying to dominate, you might get on a lot better.

Think about it, eh?

Cheers

[PetrolTed]

I'm disappointed that some of you can't rise above the more tedious contributions in this thread and reply with intelligent debate.

Sinking to the lowest common denominator to continue the discussion is rather immature.

Please consider your responses in future. You've ruined this thread