"We want more cameras"

Author
Discussion

Streetcop

Original Poster:

5,907 posts

240 months

Thursday 14th October 2004
quotequote all
The numbers of safety camera partnerships, Gatsos, Truvelos and SPECS will continue while people keep asking for them..

West Yorkshire's Safety Camera Partnership states:

You might be surprised at how many concerned individuals, community groups and neighbourhood representatives contact us every month to ask if we can help improve local conditions by setting up safety cameras.

In all cases, we will see if the roads concerned meet the Government's criteria for the installation of fixed or mobile cameras. If they don't, there may be other engineering-based solutions that we can offer. Or we can put people in touch with useful organisations.

We are concerned to hear from anyone with a view on speed control safety cameras and road safety. It is only with consensus that we can move forward in reducing road deaths and injuries. If you disagree with what we're trying to achieve, it does matter to us and we must find a way to debate the issues fully. That is what we are trying to do with the information we issue and that we display on our website.


Street

Streetcop

Original Poster:

5,907 posts

240 months

Thursday 14th October 2004
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:

Streetcop said:
"We want more cameras"



NO WE DON'T


Oh yes we.....

Oh....No.....we don't. Do we? Sorry..

Street

Streetcop

Original Poster:

5,907 posts

240 months

Thursday 14th October 2004
quotequote all
Trafpol still need to deal with speeders...be it following vascar checks or laser guns...

Street

Streetcop

Original Poster:

5,907 posts

240 months

Thursday 14th October 2004
quotequote all
safespeed said:

Streetcop said:
Trafpol still need to deal with speeders...be it following vascar checks or laser guns...



So long as you don't act like a machine, I'll be happy.



Like I said the other day....It was a 40mph zone and I was only stopping those at 50mph....

Those 45-49 got a stern look and the four finger salute...

Street

The four finger salute is where I hold four finger up on my left hand, thus indicating 40mph. They all seemed to understand and they winced past me

Streetcop

Original Poster:

5,907 posts

240 months

Thursday 14th October 2004
quotequote all
Spot on Reg..

Streetcop

Original Poster:

5,907 posts

240 months

Thursday 14th October 2004
quotequote all
lunarscope said:

Streetcop said:


Like I said the other day....It was a 40mph zone and I was only stopping those at 50mph....

Those 45-49 got a stern look and the four finger salute...

Street

The four finger salute is where I hold four finger up on my left hand, thus indicating 40mph. They all seemed to understand and they winced past me



What sign do you use in a 20mph zone ?




20mph isn't enforced in law...

Street

Streetcop

Original Poster:

5,907 posts

240 months

Thursday 14th October 2004
quotequote all
IOLAIRE said:

Depends whether you were in the Tufty Club!!






Street

Streetcop

Original Poster:

5,907 posts

240 months

Thursday 14th October 2004
quotequote all
Safespeed...

Have a read at some of the posts in the last 10 mins about people who used to get stopped regularly by the police when there were loads of Trafpol..

Now there are loads of cameras and with GPS and radar detectors...their licences are clean....

Street

Streetcop

Original Poster:

5,907 posts

240 months

Thursday 14th October 2004
quotequote all
safespeed said:

I was talking with a bunch of seriously mad bikers. They thought speed cameras were just great because they could ride as nutty as they wanted between them.

The kind of attitude that makes plenty of Trafpol give little if no discretion to speeding bikers.

safespeed said:
The bottom line is that the group of folk nicked by speed cameras is NOT the group who use speed dangerously - it's pretty random.


What?

Camera debate aside...Why isn't it the group that speed dangerously?

Could it be that whenever I've done people for speeding, that is the first time they've ever done it?

It's a bit like the no seat belt merchant. "I normally always wear it"...

Either I'm the luckiest police officer in the world to catch everybody the first time they commit an offence, or each of them is the unluckiest as the first time they do something wrong they get caught..

safespeed said:
Now Trafpol, by complete contrast, have a statistically proven nose for trouble. You just have to remember to use your instincts and your experience all the time.


That's all very well...but scrotes and such like don't cause that many crashes. They drive about like Miss Daisy because they don't want to draw attention. Of course, there are exceptions....

Where the vast majority of KSI collisions involve 'decent' people in 'decent' cars.....

Street

Streetcop

Original Poster:

5,907 posts

240 months

Thursday 14th October 2004
quotequote all
I must be a bad one then....as I can't tell the difference 100% of the time...or even 50% of the time....

Streetcop

Original Poster:

5,907 posts

240 months

Thursday 14th October 2004
quotequote all
safespeed said:

Streetcop said:
I must be a bad one then....as I can't tell the difference 100% of the time...or even 50% of the time....



I bet you can. I bet if you see a vehicle and think there's a problem there usually will be. I bet you just have to trust your instincts more.


Absolutely..but that's for scrotes with no insurance or no licence...or wanted on warrant...or drugs in the car...etc etc....

I have an excellent record for that...and have a good reputuation in my police station...(I'm proud..as reputation are easy to come by and hard to shake in the police)..

BUT,
I can't tell when I've stopped someone for simple speeding whether or not they are a good driver or not...

Street

Streetcop

Original Poster:

5,907 posts

240 months

Thursday 14th October 2004
quotequote all
WildCat said:

You saying that these scrotes who do not have licences are "toppest drivers" Liebchen?

No I'm just saying for every scrote KSI..there are 20 KSIs involving decent people in decent cars...

WildCat said:
As for the decent folk who are unlucky enough to be involved in accident - the very people who would benefit and take note of COAST if given such advice by you if you pull them


I often do stop many people and give them advice...However, sad as it is.....people tend to learn when they're hit in the pocket.....sad but true..

Street

Streetcop

Original Poster:

5,907 posts

240 months

Saturday 16th October 2004
quotequote all
TripleS said:

Streetcop said:
I can't tell when I've stopped someone for simple speeding whether or not they are a good driver or not...

Street



Surely you can if you've followed them for a short while.

If you merely stop them after pointing your hair dryer at them that's rather less of a guide to their driving ability, speed limit compliance apart.

Best wishes all,
Dave.


I was really referring to the 'hairdryer' incidents...

Street

Streetcop

Original Poster:

5,907 posts

240 months

Saturday 16th October 2004
quotequote all
which is why you are done for 'exceeding the speed limit' and not 'dangerous driving'



Street

Streetcop

Original Poster:

5,907 posts

240 months

Saturday 16th October 2004
quotequote all
People walking around with knives in their pockets haven't caused any injuries, yet..



Street

Streetcop

Original Poster:

5,907 posts

240 months

Sunday 17th October 2004
quotequote all
Mad Moggie said:

Streetcop said:
People walking around with knives in their pockets haven't caused any injuries, yet..



Street



And should they do - then we have deliberate intent to do harm - mens rea


You don't need any of that....ask your army of BiB, lawyer, judges, politician family members...

Don't need deliberate intent or the bandying of the term 'mens rea' it's an offence...per se!

Street