Invalid insurance?
Discussion
While discussing the pros and cons of laser jammers/garage door openers and radar detectors at work today, a colleague directed me to an article he'd recently found on Hantsweb > www.hants.gov.uk/regulatory/busadvice/auto.html
I was a little disturbed when I read this piece “A vehicle user found operating with non-complaint equipment would technically be invalidating his insurance and could be prosecuted in the event of an accident” as I use both a jammer and a detector (maybe not for much longer), and neither of them appear to have an E-mark, does this mean that my insurance may be invalid?
Does anyone have knowledge of this European Directive 95/54/EC, and/or the implications?
I was a little disturbed when I read this piece “A vehicle user found operating with non-complaint equipment would technically be invalidating his insurance and could be prosecuted in the event of an accident” as I use both a jammer and a detector (maybe not for much longer), and neither of them appear to have an E-mark, does this mean that my insurance may be invalid?
Does anyone have knowledge of this European Directive 95/54/EC, and/or the implications?
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff