If Ireland had been on our side in WWII...

If Ireland had been on our side in WWII...

Author
Discussion

Bushmaster

Original Poster:

27,480 posts

294 months

Friday 30th January 2009
quotequote all
In typical PH fashion, let's re-write history and see what would have happened...

In the Second World War it is fairly well-known that the Irish republic was neutral, preferring to sit on the sidelines and not to get involved in the desperate struggle against Nazi Germany.

Thus the 'goodies' were denied the use of Irish ports and harbours, airfields, resources, etc. RAF aircraft forced to land in Ireland were impounded and kept for the Irish air force.

So what would have nbeen the effect if Ireland HAD joined the side of right?

Possibly:

Battle of the Atlantic - we would have won much earlier as we could have used bases in Ireland. The Merchant Navy would not have suffered such huge losses and the Allies would have received many more resources (food, ammo, tanks, etc), which would have considerably shortened the war.

The USA would have entered the war much earlier under pressure from its Irish politicians.

D Day would have happened much earlier, possibly 1942.

The Holocaust wouldn't have swung into full-scale operation.

The re-invasion of Europe / invasion of Germany might have been bloodier as the Germans would have been attacked when not weakened by five years of war.


What else?


Note - some Irishmen did join the British armed forces on an individual basis...this should not be forgotten



Martial Arts Man

6,663 posts

201 months

Friday 30th January 2009
quotequote all
Only thing to bear in mind is that circa 1939, Ireland was just full of fields. biggrin

My father was born in 1944 in Ireland; he likens it to a pre-industrialised nation. Coupled with their tiny tiny population, I think their help with anything other than foodstuffs would have been minimal.

MAM

P.S. Not sure the Irish themselves would have been too keen to help out the "Cromwellian baby murderers" either.

Sixpackpert

4,883 posts

229 months

Friday 30th January 2009
quotequote all
Plenty of spuds available for the troops!

FlossyThePig

4,133 posts

258 months

Friday 30th January 2009
quotequote all
Bushmaster said:
What else?
The RAF wouldn't have needed so many planes as all the pilots could sit on the flying pigs.

MK4 Slowride

10,028 posts

223 months

Friday 30th January 2009
quotequote all
Guiness extra cold would've appeared in British pubs maybe 1 or 2 days earlier.

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

259 months

Friday 30th January 2009
quotequote all
Martial Arts Man said:
. Not sure the Irish themselves would have been too keen to help out the "Cromwellian baby murderers" either.
An estimated 90 odd thousand from both north and south volunteered to fight against the axis.

Eric Mc

123,914 posts

280 months

Friday 30th January 2009
quotequote all
Let's get the facts right.

Tne Republic did not come into existence until 1948. During the 1939-45 period, the 26 counties were know officuially as "Eire".

I would hazard a guess that far more Irishmen served with the Allies in WW2 vouluntarilly BECAUSE it was neutral than would have served if the Irish government had taken the country to war.

Ireland's main contribution to the war effort (apart from the prvoision of men to the Allies - which happened anyway) would have been the use of ports and airfields - but that would have meant the basing of "foreign" troops on Irish soil - which would have been unacceptable to a large porortion of the Irish considering it was only 18 years after independence (and only a few years since the Royal Navy ahd pulled out of the Treaty Ports).

Ironically, the Navy withdrew from the treaty ports for UK domestic reasons as much as for Irish reasons. This was one of the biggest mistakes made by the Baldwin government and would have greatly affected Ireland's involvement in the war if those ports ahd still been available to them.

Martial Arts Man

6,663 posts

201 months

Friday 30th January 2009
quotequote all
Einion Yrth said:
Martial Arts Man said:
. Not sure the Irish themselves would have been too keen to help out the "Cromwellian baby murderers" either.
An estimated 90 odd thousand from both north and south volunteered to fight against the axis.
Do you know the breakdown of that figure into North and South?

My gut feeling is that the majority will have come from the North....I stand ready to be corrected though.

MAM

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

259 months

Friday 30th January 2009
quotequote all
Martial Arts Man said:
Einion Yrth said:
Martial Arts Man said:
. Not sure the Irish themselves would have been too keen to help out the "Cromwellian baby murderers" either.
An estimated 90 odd thousand from both north and south volunteered to fight against the axis.
Do you know the breakdown of that figure into North and South?

My gut feeling is that the majority will have come from the North....I stand ready to be corrected though.

MAM
The article I was reading suggested it broke out about evens.

Martial Arts Man

6,663 posts

201 months

Friday 30th January 2009
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Let's get the facts right.

Tne Republic did not come into existence until 1948. During the 1939-45 period, the 26 counties were know officuially as "Eire".

I would hazard a guess that far more Irishmen served with the Allies in WW2 vouluntarilly BECAUSE it was neutral than would have served if the Irish government had taken the country to war.

Ireland's main contribution to the war effort (apart from the prvoision of men to the Allies - which happened anyway) would have been the use of ports and airfields - but that would have meant the basing of "foreign" troops on Irish soil - which would have been unacceptable to a large porortion of the Irish considering it was only 18 years after independence (and only a few years since the Royal Navy ahd pulled out of the Treaty Ports).

Ironically, the Navy withdrew from the treaty ports for UK domestic reasons as much as for Irish reasons. This was one of the biggest mistakes made by the Baldwin government and would have greatly affected Ireland's involvement in the war if those ports ahd still been available to them.
Thanks for the info EMc; do you know how many airfields/ports we are talking about here?

MAM

Poledriver

29,125 posts

209 months

Friday 30th January 2009
quotequote all
But what about the German 'U' boats which the Irish gave safe haven and safe passage to. That isn't being neutral!

s2art

18,942 posts

268 months

Friday 30th January 2009
quotequote all
The Irish economy would have benefited hugely, food production in Ireland would have skyrocketed, reducing the (basically groundless) fear of being starved out in the UK. Much more friendly relations between the UK and Ireland after the war, possibly leading to resolving the differences in N.I. much sooner than happened in reality. etc etc.

Edited by s2art on Friday 30th January 13:39

Eric Mc

123,914 posts

280 months

Friday 30th January 2009
quotequote all
There are no official figures. The MINIMUM estimated figure for volunteers from SOUTH of the border is 45,000. There were also over 100,000 Irishmen working as construction workers in Britain - mainly used on the building of airfields.

Another factor often overlooked was the role of Irish merchant seamen - hundreds of whom died. Although neutral, Irish shipping did supply foodstuffs and other material to the UK. Consequently, Irish ships were listed as "targets" by the U-Boats.

On at least one occasion, an Irish ship was sunk by the RAF - who mistook the tricolour for the Italian flag. The RAF apologised.

Martial Arts Man

6,663 posts

201 months

Friday 30th January 2009
quotequote all
Einion Yrth said:
Martial Arts Man said:
Einion Yrth said:
Martial Arts Man said:
. Not sure the Irish themselves would have been too keen to help out the "Cromwellian baby murderers" either.
An estimated 90 odd thousand from both north and south volunteered to fight against the axis.
Do you know the breakdown of that figure into North and South?

My gut feeling is that the majority will have come from the North....I stand ready to be corrected though.

MAM
The article I was reading suggested it broke out about evens.
I am surprised by that. 45 thousand troops wouldn't have made a huge impact though me thinks. Of course, every little helps.

Could this unofficial contribution be the reason why the Uboat harbouring, alluded to in another post, was allowed?

MAM

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

259 months

Friday 30th January 2009
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
On at least one occasion, an Irish ship was sunk by the RAF - who mistook the tricolour for the Italian flag. The RAF apologised.
I'll bet that helped no end.

Eric Mc

123,914 posts

280 months

Friday 30th January 2009
quotequote all
Martial Arts Man said:
Eric Mc said:
Let's get the facts right.

Tne Republic did not come into existence until 1948. During the 1939-45 period, the 26 counties were know officuially as "Eire".

I would hazard a guess that far more Irishmen served with the Allies in WW2 vouluntarilly BECAUSE it was neutral than would have served if the Irish government had taken the country to war.

Ireland's main contribution to the war effort (apart from the prvoision of men to the Allies - which happened anyway) would have been the use of ports and airfields - but that would have meant the basing of "foreign" troops on Irish soil - which would have been unacceptable to a large porortion of the Irish considering it was only 18 years after independence (and only a few years since the Royal Navy ahd pulled out of the Treaty Ports).

Ironically, the Navy withdrew from the treaty ports for UK domestic reasons as much as for Irish reasons. This was one of the biggest mistakes made by the Baldwin government and would have greatly affected Ireland's involvement in the war if those ports ahd still been available to them.
Thanks for the info EMc; do you know how many airfields/ports we are talking about here?

MAM
No airfields - there were very few in Irealnd pre WW2.

The main port was the Navy bases at Yaughal and Cobh (formerly Queenstown), Co. Cork.

Swilly

9,699 posts

289 months

Friday 30th January 2009
quotequote all
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/374962...

In true PH fashion lets all just ignore the truth......

Eric Mc

123,914 posts

280 months

Friday 30th January 2009
quotequote all
Martial Arts Man said:
Einion Yrth said:
Martial Arts Man said:
Einion Yrth said:
Martial Arts Man said:
. Not sure the Irish themselves would have been too keen to help out the "Cromwellian baby murderers" either.
An estimated 90 odd thousand from both north and south volunteered to fight against the axis.
Do you know the breakdown of that figure into North and South?

My gut feeling is that the majority will have come from the North....I stand ready to be corrected though.

MAM
The article I was reading suggested it broke out about evens.
I am surprised by that. 45 thousand troops wouldn't have made a huge impact though me thinks. Of course, every little helps.

Could this unofficial contribution be the reason why the Uboat harbouring, alluded to in another post, was allowed?

MAM
Not wanting to drag up this hoary old topic again - but what could the Irish have done about this? Their army was small and underequipped. Their navy was tiny (as it still is) with only one or two ships.
The airforce (the Irish Air Corps) was also tiny and for the first half of the war was using obsolete biplanes (Gloster Galdiators).
During the war. the British SOLD some Hurricanes to the Irish.

slow_poke

1,855 posts

249 months

Friday 30th January 2009
quotequote all
Well. Where to start with this one?

I suppose it's right to start with the part of Ireland that was fully involved in WW2. Northern Ireland. You know, the bit of Ireland that's up top there.

Allied aircraft may have been interned, but Allied aircrew were quietly slipped back to the UK in civvies via Belfast. Axis aircrew spent the duration interned.

Don't forget the Donegal Air Corridor, where beligerent Allied aircraft were permitted to fly unhindered over Free State territory. Flying Boats stationed on Lough Erne found it useful. Have a read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donegal_Corridor

Don't forget that the Free State had less that 20 years earlier undergone a War Of Independence and a Civil War. Not to mention having the center of Dublin levelled in 1916. Is it any wonder they wanted to sit out the latest war, if only to assert their own independance?

Finall, it's a bit over the top to blame the Irish for all the bad things listed in the OP, just cos they weren't involved.

Eric Mc

123,914 posts

280 months

Friday 30th January 2009
quotequote all
Swilly said:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/374962...

In true PH fashion lets all just ignore the truth......
A good article and certainly chimes with my understanding of the situation.