Star Wars: Rogue One

Author
Discussion

CooperD

2,894 posts

179 months

Tuesday 3rd January 2017
quotequote all
Saw it earlier today and really enjoyed it.

ukaskew

10,642 posts

223 months

Tuesday 3rd January 2017
quotequote all
I must be very lucky, seen around 20 films at my local Odeon this year and not run into any issues whatsoever. Maybe sitting in Row D helps (the first row of the main tier, the only one with leg room), as there is rarely anyone in front to disturb me with phone light etc.

I can't remember the last time anyone actually annoyed me in the cinema.

amare32

2,417 posts

225 months

Wednesday 4th January 2017
quotequote all
Just watched it for the 2nd time today - enjoyed it even more than the first viewing as I could take in the plot and details more. Having read the book Catalyst before I watched it, I already had a good understanding of the characters especially the relationship between Galen and Krennic. The film is richer experience having read the book but as a standalone film, it'll still be a good film for the neutrals to watch although a crawl for exposition would help them understand the plot of RO.

I'm a massive SW fan since I was a kid and so far I would rank my favourite in the following order:

1. Empire
2. Rogue One
3. Force Awakens
4. Sith
5. Return of the Jedi
6. A New Hope
7. Phantom Menace
8. Attack of the Clones

Can't wait for Episode 8 now! I just hope Disney would can the young Han Solo spin off as NO ONE is fit to replace Han. I was hoping that Rogue One wouldn't bomb and glad it turned out great but I really hope that the Solo movie turns out to be trash.

CrutyRammers

13,735 posts

200 months

Wednesday 4th January 2017
quotequote all
Quickmoose said:
I much prefer joining or adding my thoughts after watching it than getting too involved in the hype....anyway...watched it yesterday.
I thought it certainly one of the better more enjoyable efforts.
BUT (tiny spoilers ahead)
I am getting tired of the same mini-arc single film as part of a larger arc.
kid loses parents, joins a human/robot duo, ends up in a big machine with a long drop in it whilst the guys fly along a path looking for a weak spot...red leader this and that...
I forgive it because it's done well...but I can't take much more.
I really liked the CGI'd characters...took me a while to cotton on.
I liked the droid too, as said he walks the line well between funny and effective.
^^^^ this is what I'm talking about.

anonymous-user

56 months

Wednesday 4th January 2017
quotequote all
i liked it, needed a touch more humor, and didn't notice much cgi. the beach scenes reminded me of war films, albeit a lighter version, first half was slow but picked up, shame a lot of character die, but still a solid 8/10.

i think you can over analyse films like this, take it for what it is and it was enjoyable.

Edited by The Spruce goose on Wednesday 4th January 23:36

Ahbefive

11,657 posts

174 months

Thursday 5th January 2017
quotequote all
The Spruce goose said:
i liked it, needed a touch more humor
I massively disagree with this. Putting loads of cheap gags etc in a film is how to ruin it and make it cheesy. I'm very glad that they refrained from that, too many films are spoilt that way.

anonymous-user

56 months

Thursday 5th January 2017
quotequote all
Ahbefive said:
I massively disagree with this. Putting loads of cheap gags etc in a film is how to ruin it and make it cheesy. I'm very glad that they refrained from that, too many films are spoilt that way.
a touch isn't loads thou, a touch just to balance it against all the morbidity, and comic relief would be there to take add an oasis of laughter in a dark film, after all the body counts and bleakness.

CrutyRammers

13,735 posts

200 months

Thursday 5th January 2017
quotequote all
The Spruce goose said:
Ahbefive said:
I massively disagree with this. Putting loads of cheap gags etc in a film is how to ruin it and make it cheesy. I'm very glad that they refrained from that, too many films are spoilt that way.
a touch isn't loads thou, a touch just to balance it against all the morbidity, and comic relief would be there to take add an oasis of laughter in a dark film, after all the body counts and bleakness.
I thought they got the humour about right - the droid fulfilled that role nicely.

Matt_N

8,906 posts

204 months

Thursday 5th January 2017
quotequote all
CrutyRammers said:
I thought they got the humour about right - the droid fulfilled that role nicely.
My thoughts too.

Ahbefive

11,657 posts

174 months

Thursday 5th January 2017
quotequote all
Matt_N said:
CrutyRammers said:
I thought they got the humour about right - the droid fulfilled that role nicely.
My thoughts too.
Yep me too. Adding loads of laughs is just a way to make a serious film cheesy and ruin it.

I thought it was well judged as it was.

Otispunkmeyer

12,689 posts

157 months

Thursday 5th January 2017
quotequote all
Made my way through the original 3 and enjoyed them. Moved onto the prequels.... deary deary me. And Jar Jar Binks isn't even the worst of it. No one in Phantom Menace appears to have any kind of energy in them. Flat as a pancake. No conviction. Its like they were doing a first reading but instead filmed it and called it a wrap.

wjb

5,100 posts

133 months

Thursday 5th January 2017
quotequote all
My wife and I took our son to see Rogue One yesterday, it was a treat for his 8th birthday.

He's a big star wars fan and loved the film, understood the plot (did well there) and timeline.

He said the best bit was the ending and wanted to watch ep4 again afterwards smile

My wife enjoyed it, she's not a star wars fan but watched 3-6 last year before going to see 7.

She thought it was "the best one" which is interesting as it comes from purely a review of the film without nostalgia tinted glasses.

She's wrong obviously hehe but still an interesting point of view, I really enjoyed it personally, been in the dark since the first trailer as I hate all the hype and spoilers. I'll watch it a couple more times before I give a final judgement but a solid 8/10 for now.

Edited by wjb on Thursday 5th January 11:39

Halb

53,012 posts

185 months

Thursday 5th January 2017
quotequote all
Otispunkmeyer said:
No conviction. Its like they were doing a first reading but instead filmed it and called it a wrap.
I do think this happened.
Lucas is not known as a people director, and he himself has said as much (I think). He is a pretty decent cinematographer.

PeteB0

956 posts

248 months

Friday 6th January 2017
quotequote all
I've seen it twice now and have since re-watched Ep4-6: I think it is right up there with the best Star Wars films, although by no means perfect.

I agree with some of the comments on character development, and the first act of the film. Reading the Catalyst book helps a lot with both, but a little more exposition in the first act (or just a crawl...) would help the casual viewers a lot. I had no problem with the CGI, and I thought the level of humour introduced with K2SO was about right.

For those that have commented that the ending might not quite match with the start of Ep4, IMO it's ambiguous enough for me to accept that some time (days or weeks) passed between the two allowing for the slight differences. If we want to talk about piecing together story arcs fully, you only have to watch the original films again (and certainly the prequels) to spot far more obvious mismatches, and that was with Lucas and his 'plan'.

darth_pies

697 posts

219 months

Friday 6th January 2017
quotequote all
Halb said:
I do think this happened.
Lucas is not known as a people director, and he himself has said as much (I think). He is a pretty decent cinematographer.
Its definitely true. Used to work with a guy who was on the crew for Attack of the Clones. He had nothing but bad things to say about the lazy, shot-reverse-shot, one-take approach of George Lucas on the prequels. He said the big man would just sit in his chair next to a green screen, give the actors no direction and just chain pints of latte while telling everyone that the film would look great once they 'fixed' everything the actors did with CGI. This is why Ewan McGregor etc have such bad memories of working on the films...they knew it sucked and were given nothing to work with and no direction.

Watch the Red Letter Media 'Plinkett' reviews which are the most thorough deconstruction of the hundreds of things that are bad with the Prequels. (Although i actually disagree with RLM for once on Rogue One, which is 8/10 for me!)

https://www.youtube.com/user/RedLetterMedia/playli...

Halb

53,012 posts

185 months

Friday 6th January 2017
quotequote all
darth_pies said:
Its definitely true. Used to work with a guy who was on the crew for Attack of the Clones. He had nothing but bad things to say about the lazy, shot-reverse-shot, one-take approach of George Lucas on the prequels. He said the big man would just sit in his chair next to a green screen, give the actors no direction and just chain pints of latte while telling everyone that the film would look great once they 'fixed' everything the actors did with CGI. This is why Ewan McGregor etc have such bad memories of working on the films...they knew it sucked and were given nothing to work with and no direction.

Watch the Red Letter Media 'Plinkett' reviews which are the most thorough deconstruction of the hundreds of things that are bad with the Prequels. (Although i actually disagree with RLM for once on Rogue One, which is 8/10 for me!)

https://www.youtube.com/user/RedLetterMedia/playli...
Haha. Ewan gives a horrible performance. I've chatted about this before, in the prequels I reckon only Ian and Neeson give good performances, as the two old know what they are doing actors, who do all their prep and turn up day one all sorted. Ewan can be forgiven for maybe a few scenes in the first one, but by the second he should have known, yet his performance doesn't change.
Star Wars had more older actors around, it also shows the ability of Harrison Ford, who oozed charisma off the screen.


RLM media has pointed out some accute flaws with Rogue One for me, but overall I disagree with them.


durbster

10,362 posts

224 months

Saturday 7th January 2017
quotequote all
darth_pies said:
Its definitely true. Used to work with a guy who was on the crew for Attack of the Clones. He had nothing but bad things to say about the lazy, shot-reverse-shot, one-take approach of George Lucas on the prequels. He said the big man would just sit in his chair next to a green screen, give the actors no direction and just chain pints of latte while telling everyone that the film would look great once they 'fixed' everything the actors did with CGI. This is why Ewan McGregor etc have such bad memories of working on the films...they knew it sucked and were given nothing to work with and no direction.
Peter Serafinowitz said the same. He talked about it, and the shock of seeing the final film, on the RHLSTP podcast:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0wHqNi3x5M

I love how he describes the opening crawl biggrin

anonymous-user

56 months

Saturday 7th January 2017
quotequote all
the one thing i was thinking about, this is a film set in the star wars world, not really a star wars film, more an action film. the other films are story tales.

interloper

2,747 posts

257 months

Saturday 7th January 2017
quotequote all
I really must get around to watching this ere filum. It has occurred to me that this isn't the first "none cannon" Star Wars movie...

The first one was "Caravan of Courage: An Ewok Adventure" I trust R1 is a bit better than that?!

Halb

53,012 posts

185 months

Saturday 7th January 2017
quotequote all
It's canon, it's just not involving any main characters, they're gonna be the peripheral characters.

durbster said:
Peter Serafinowitz said the same. He talked about it, and the shock of seeing the final film, on the RHLSTP podcast:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0wHqNi3x5M

I love how he describes the opening crawl biggrin
Christ what an indictment! hehe
I've heard the, 'make him sound evil' direction before...and Terry Stamp getting a stylus, or whatever the fk it ws. laugh
that was a funny podcast

Way back in the 90s, I actually sent a letter to Lucas asking to be in the new Star Wars. biggrin