CV19 - Cure worse than the disease? (Vol 3)

CV19 - Cure worse than the disease? (Vol 3)

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

TheDrBrian

5,444 posts

224 months

Sunday 12th July 2020
quotequote all
RSTurboPaul said:
sambucket said:
RSTurboPaul said:
I don't think I've spoken to a single person that 'doesn't mind' wearing a mask and 'feels more comfortable'. Most people I have spoken to have said they dread it being compulsory and probably won't go into the shops.

The couple of times I've had to wear it (medical procedure and opticians) it has been stifling and I have ripped it off the second I could.

Sure but your friends are probably not representative of the average UK shopper who is scared of COVID.

f someone is terrified of catching covid, they will feel more comfortable shopping if everyone else is wearing a mask. And if wearing a mask themselves is a condition of entry, they are more likely to feel comfortable with that condition, if they are not in the minority. Given the choice they would probably not wear the mask in exchange for not looking silly, as terrified as they are, vanity comes first.
So the people with a brain and analytical capacity are required to subjugate themselves to intrusive and burdensome mandatory rules so that the people who get their news from facebook don't feel scared?

Why not have it so that those who are scared (or are vulnerable) can wear masks if they want, to feel like they are 'protecting' themselves, and everyone else can use their own judgement?

This position that we must all cater for the lowest common denominator, rather than uplifting those at the bottom, is dragging society down.

I'm not sure you can speak for the nation of 'average UK shoppers'. My mother most certainly is not a 'tin foil hat conspiracy theorist' or a raging sociopath, and neither are her friends, yet mask wearing is not something attractive to them.
Don’t argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

survivalist

5,726 posts

192 months

Sunday 12th July 2020
quotequote all
The Spruce Goose said:
ORD said:


There’s no credible argument for anything but opening up as fast as possible. It’s insane that it’s taking us months and months. By the time it’s normal again, we’ll
be into the flu season.

Utterly moronic approach.
Well that was Trump's strategy and look at America now.
I see a lot of talk about cases, but what about deaths? Are they increasing in America? If not, is it case of time lag? Or that those who are infected aren’t vulnerable to the disease?

Condi

17,352 posts

173 months

Sunday 12th July 2020
quotequote all
survivalist said:
I see a lot of talk about cases, but what about deaths? Are they increasing in America? If not, is it case of time lag? Or that those who are infected aren’t vulnerable to the disease?
Good question. At the moment it looks like time lag. Roughly 2 weeks from infection to death seems to be normal, so this week will give us a better idea. As you say, if 100,000 people are getting it then recovering just fine its not as much of an issue.

anonymous-user

56 months

Sunday 12th July 2020
quotequote all
survivalist said:
I see a lot of talk about cases, but what about deaths? Are they increasing in America? If not, is it case of time lag? Or that those who are infected aren’t vulnerable to the disease?
only way is amount of people in ICUS, it is not uncommon for people to be in them for months.

i think Florida ICUs maxed out now, it is looking very grim for the USA and they wanted to open quickly.

survivalist

5,726 posts

192 months

Sunday 12th July 2020
quotequote all
Condi said:
survivalist said:
I see a lot of talk about cases, but what about deaths? Are they increasing in America? If not, is it case of time lag? Or that those who are infected aren’t vulnerable to the disease?
Good question. At the moment it looks like time lag. Roughly 2 weeks from infection to death seems to be normal, so this week will give us a better idea. As you say, if 100,000 people are getting it then recovering just fine its not as much of an issue.
2 weeks seems low to me, unless you’re talking about people in retirement homes who aren’t being hospitalised. Didn’t it take 4-6 weeks for the impact of social distancing and the lockdown to have an impact here?

It’s an interesting and very relevant point though. Lots of stuff in the news about the fruit pickers in Herefordshire contracting Covid 19, but it seems they are just isolating currently. If none are hospitalised then it’s not a massive issue unless they are in contact with the vulnerable (unlikely).

EddieSteadyGo

12,211 posts

205 months

Sunday 12th July 2020
quotequote all
survivalist said:
I see a lot of talk about cases, but what about deaths? Are they increasing in America? If not, is it case of time lag? Or that those who are infected aren’t vulnerable to the disease?
There are quite a few different situations in America. Some states maintained a more strict lockdown, some maintained social distancing, and some opened straight back up as normal.

Those states which opened back as normal have seen a very large increase in cases. There are way more tests being completed now, so that explains part of the increase. However, the increasing % of positive tests suggested there is also a large increase in the infection rate.

Many of these new infections are in younger age groups, so the vast majority are unaffected. However, we are starting see an increase in deaths from those states which opened back up e.g. Texas and Florida.

https://www.google.com/search?q=florida+covid+deat...
https://www.google.com/search?q=texas+covid+deaths


survivalist

5,726 posts

192 months

Sunday 12th July 2020
quotequote all
The Spruce Goose said:
survivalist said:
I see a lot of talk about cases, but what about deaths? Are they increasing in America? If not, is it case of time lag? Or that those who are infected aren’t vulnerable to the disease?
only way is amount of people in ICUS, it is not uncommon for people to be in them for months.

i think Florida ICUs maxed out now, it is looking very grim for the USA and they wanted to open quickly.
It will also depend on ICU capacity through. Can’t really be compared to the UK though as they have a private healthcare system.

The USA is grim if you’re poor. Imagine more so than ever at the moment. The problem is if you’re poor under lock down you are most likely balancing working to pay for rent and food against getting the virus .

anonymous-user

56 months

Sunday 12th July 2020
quotequote all
Condi said:
survivalist said:
I see a lot of talk about cases, but what about deaths? Are they increasing in America? If not, is it case of time lag? Or that those who are infected aren’t vulnerable to the disease?
Good question. At the moment it looks like time lag. Roughly 2 weeks from infection to death seems to be normal, so this week will give us a better idea. As you say, if 100,000 people are getting it then recovering just fine its not as much of an issue.

grumbledoak

31,589 posts

235 months

Sunday 12th July 2020
quotequote all
EddieSteadyGo said:
Those states which opened back as normal have seen a very large increase in cases. There are way more tests being completed now, so that explains part of the increase. However, the increasing % of positive tests suggested there is also a large increase in the infection rate.
Sadly it looks like the positive % rate is getting gamed in FL:
https://alachuachronicle.com/covid-test-positivity...

Everything in the US is about Nov 3rd now.

EddieSteadyGo

12,211 posts

205 months

Sunday 12th July 2020
quotequote all
The Spruce Goose said:
only way is amount of people in ICUS, it is not uncommon for people to be in them for months.

i think Florida ICUs maxed out now, it is looking very grim for the USA and they wanted to open quickly.
ICU capacity can be flexed. And there are lots of states who can help.

The situation for the US isn't homogeneous - different states have different policies.

What I think we can say with certainty is that covid hasn't burnt out or gone away. If you remove social distancing and allow large groups, it surges back quickly.

I've said it a few times now, but if we look at the current rules applied in Sweden, that shows the type of measures required to keep R<1. Masks are only the answer if you don't want to do social distancing imo.

EddieSteadyGo

12,211 posts

205 months

Sunday 12th July 2020
quotequote all
grumbledoak said:
EddieSteadyGo said:
Those states which opened back as normal have seen a very large increase in cases. There are way more tests being completed now, so that explains part of the increase. However, the increasing % of positive tests suggested there is also a large increase in the infection rate.
Sadly it looks like the positive % rate is getting gamed in FL:
https://alachuachronicle.com/covid-test-positivity...

Everything in the US is about Nov 3rd now.
Yes, I'm sure there is some of that going on. But does it explain all of the increase in positive test rate? I think not.

Elysium

13,934 posts

189 months

Sunday 12th July 2020
quotequote all
Andy888 said:
Alucidnation said:
Kids are pretty resilient and I suspect most of them loved the home schooling.
You suspect wrongly. They’re also very sociable characters and thrive and learn from being in the company of others of all ages. Home schooling has been a farce. There was very little schooling about it.
Funny you should say that. I’ve just been talking to family and found out that my niece had a bit of a meltdown last week. A levels next year and the schools are basically going overboard with work to make up for a lack of teaching. So she is struggling with some stuff and drowning with the sheer volume of it.

No extra curricular stuff obviously and an effort to meet up with friends. A pivotal moment in a young persons life turned into a world of stress.

The people responsible for it should be ashamed.

survivalist

5,726 posts

192 months

Sunday 12th July 2020
quotequote all
EddieSteadyGo said:
grumbledoak said:
EddieSteadyGo said:
Those states which opened back as normal have seen a very large increase in cases. There are way more tests being completed now, so that explains part of the increase. However, the increasing % of positive tests suggested there is also a large increase in the infection rate.
Sadly it looks like the positive % rate is getting gamed in FL:
https://alachuachronicle.com/covid-test-positivity...

Everything in the US is about Nov 3rd now.
Yes, I'm sure there is some of that going on. But does it explain all of the increase in positive test rate? I think not.
If it’s true of course it would. Declared honestly if per 100 tests, 30 of the tests are positive then your percentage of positive tests is 30% and the logical conclusion is that 70% are negative. If you test 100 people but only declare 50% of the negatives you can now say that out of 65 tests 30 are positive - so now 46% are positive.

That excludes the concept of inconclusive test results, which should also be declared.

Elysium

13,934 posts

189 months

Sunday 12th July 2020
quotequote all
sambucket said:
RSTurboPaul said:
I don't think I've spoken to a single person that 'doesn't mind' wearing a mask and 'feels more comfortable'. Most people I have spoken to have said they dread it being compulsory and probably won't go into the shops.

The couple of times I've had to wear it (medical procedure and opticians) it has been stifling and I have ripped it off the second I could.

Sure but your friends are probably not representative of the average UK shopper who is scared of COVID.

f someone is terrified of catching covid, they will feel more comfortable shopping if everyone else is wearing a mask. And if wearing a mask themselves is a condition of entry, they are more likely to feel comfortable with that condition, if they are not in the minority. Given the choice they would probably not wear the mask in exchange for not looking silly, as terrified as they are, vanity comes first.
The level of logical acrobatics required to come to that conclusion is quite something.

So people are scared of COVID, but they won’t wear a mask because they are more scared that they will look silly. You want everyone to wear a mask to make them feel less self conscious?

Anyone who genuinely feels that COVID is going to kill them, but are more bothered about appearance than safety is a fking idiot.

I’m now wondering what you will come up with next?

EddieSteadyGo

12,211 posts

205 months

Sunday 12th July 2020
quotequote all
Elysium said:
The level of logical acrobatics required to come to that conclusion is quite something.

So people are scared of COVID, but they won’t wear a mask because they are more scared that they will look silly. You want everyone to wear a mask to make them feel less self conscious?

Anyone who genuinely feels that COVID is going to kill them, but are more bothered about appearance than safety is a fking idiot.

I’m now wondering what you will come up with next?
Probably he will claim he isn't following any of the covid rules himself (including wearing a mask) and will claim he likes taking drugs. Or maybe that was last week's boast....

anonymous-user

56 months

Sunday 12th July 2020
quotequote all
EddieSteadyGo said:
Elysium said:
The level of logical acrobatics required to come to that conclusion is quite something.

So people are scared of COVID, but they won’t wear a mask because they are more scared that they will look silly. You want everyone to wear a mask to make them feel less self conscious?

Anyone who genuinely feels that COVID is going to kill them, but are more bothered about appearance than safety is a fking idiot.

I’m now wondering what you will come up with next?
Probably he will claim he isn't following any of the covid rules himself (including wearing a mask) and will claim he likes taking drugs. Or maybe that was last week's boast....
I'm not sure of your point Eddie. Are you just being pointlessly mean, or is there a point buried in there somewhere?

As I said, adherence was perhaps 5% on the 9th in Scotland, and 95% on the 10th. If you look at the polls. Over 60% were calling for mandated mask. I'm just trying to explain the gap.

Seems quite simple to me. Facebook is full of people complaining shops are unsafe because no one wears masks, people cough on the apples. But they are too vain and selfish to wear a mask themselves. Because they know enough about masks to understand it's not meant to protect the wearer. It's meant to stop them breathing on everything and reducing spread. (they are clever enough to understand this at least).

No way are they going to be in the minority who wears a mask. But if everyone wears them, party time.






Sticks.

8,831 posts

253 months

Sunday 12th July 2020
quotequote all
I watched the build up to the F1 GP today. Drivers interviewed for a few minutes in turn, each one wearing a mask. Without fail, every driver touched his face multiple times.

That's working well then.

EddieSteadyGo

12,211 posts

205 months

Sunday 12th July 2020
quotequote all
sambucket said:
I'm not sure of your point Eddie. Are you just being pointlessly mean, or is there a point buried in there somewhere?
You posted last week saying you personally didn't follow any of the covid rules - I thought that was somewhat ironic considering your enthusiasm for lockdowns and mask wearing for everyone else. Some might say you were being a little inconsistant, or even hypocritical?


RSTurboPaul

10,601 posts

260 months

Sunday 12th July 2020
quotequote all
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-5...

BBC said:
A petition calling for the end to cancer treatment delays forced by the coronavirus pandemic has topped 100,000 signatures in hours.


Craig and Mandy Russell set up the campaign after their daughter Kelly Smith, 31, from Macclesfield, Cheshire died from bowel cancer in June.

Her life was "dramatically" cut short by treatment delays, they said.

Government action is being called for after scientists suggested delays could cause 35,000 excess cancer deaths.

The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) has insisted cancer patients have been treated as a "priority" during the pandemic.


The online petition is part of Mr and Mrs Russell's campaign called Catch Up With Cancer with campaign group Radiotherapy4Life.

"The government and senior NHS leaders need to react to this national tragedy in cancer services," the petition states.

"Sadly it is too late for Kelly, but there's still time to save others."


Ms Smith, a beautician, was diagnosed with stage four bowel cancer in 2017 but her parents said her chemotherapy treatment was stopped in March, halfway through a cycle.

Mr Russell said she was "responding very well" to it but medics thought it an "appropriate time" to take a break because of the risk of catching Covid-19.

Within weeks the cancer accelerated radically, he said.

"Having that finality from a treatment point of view left her very angry and very scared," Mr Russell added.


Professor Pat Price, founder of the Radiotherapy4Life campaign, said: "We have to get cancer services up and running much quicker than the end of the year and boost radiotherapy services to play a vital role in catching up with cancer."

The DHSC said that during the pandemic cancer patients have been a "priority, with urgent and essential tests and treatments going ahead in a safe way for thousands of patients".

anonymous-user

56 months

Sunday 12th July 2020
quotequote all
EddieSteadyGo said:
You posted last week saying you personally didn't follow any of the covid rules - I thought that was somewhat ironic considering your enthusiasm for lockdowns and mask wearing for everyone else. Some might say you were being a little inconsistant, or even hypocritical?
I don't follow any of the rules personally, no. Glad it amuses you, I guess.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED