Gunmen attack prison van in France, free pris, kill guards

Gunmen attack prison van in France, free pris, kill guards

Author
Discussion

Abbott

2,492 posts

205 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
Tango13 said:
He was facing some serious charges relating to a kidnapping and death? Makes me wonder if he was going to talk to reduce his sentence so the gang grabbed him to prevent him talking, maybe he's already been 'silenced' by the gang?
That makes sense. There are a lot of different levels of vehicle, used by the penal administration, that can be seen on the roads in France. If he really was a drugs gang master criminal then he would probably been transported in a higher level of secure vehicle and supporting armed entourage.
However if silencing him was the goal then a bullet in the head, on the spot, would have led to a simpler exit from the scene.

Petrus1983

8,964 posts

164 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
CrgT16 said:
We should have a special skill unit separate from police to tackle this seriously. The segregation from mainstream police is needed to minimise risk of corruption. It needs serious thinking.
What - like MI5?

Feel desperately sorry for the guards who were effectively executed. Atleast one of them was young and leaves 2 young children behind.

I used to love Paris - but for over a decade it's not the city it once was. Hopefully they can track these scum down quickly - but it wouldn't surprise me if they just vanish.

croyde

23,201 posts

232 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
I can't get my head around shooting the guards.

Surely pointing a weapon and shouting would have been enough for compliance. Can't see that the guards would have been paid enough to risk their lives.

Did a guard shoot first?

BikeBikeBIke

8,411 posts

117 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
croyde said:
I can't get my head around shooting the guards.

Surely pointing a weapon and shouting would have been enough for compliance. Can't see that the guards would have been paid enough to risk their lives.

Did a guard shoot first?
A heck of a risk to give them a chance to surrender, they might just open up. So it's dispicable but not irrational.

Tango13

8,537 posts

178 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
Abbott said:
Tango13 said:
He was facing some serious charges relating to a kidnapping and death? Makes me wonder if he was going to talk to reduce his sentence so the gang grabbed him to prevent him talking, maybe he's already been 'silenced' by the gang?
That makes sense. There are a lot of different levels of vehicle, used by the penal administration, that can be seen on the roads in France. If he really was a drugs gang master criminal then he would probably been transported in a higher level of secure vehicle and supporting armed entourage.
However if silencing him was the goal then a bullet in the head, on the spot, would have led to a simpler exit from the scene.
If the bosses break him out they can tell their minions he's in hiding which creates loyalty in the lower ranks, the fact that he's face down in a shallow grave doesn't need to be revealed.

Execute him on the spot and the minions will think 'If I get arrested I'm fked either way so may as well talk and take my chances'

poo at Paul's

14,218 posts

177 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
After one of the Paris / french shooting attrocities, (i cannot recall which), French police and security did something crazy like 6,000 raids on know addresses within a week or 10 days, and recovered 1500 odd illegal weapons, mostly guns.
It occurred to me that that is some strike rate, and at the beginning of the operation, they knew who all these people were and where they lived. And yet, just let them seemingly live in peace until nudged into action.
Shocking incident but there's st loads of guns in mainland Europe and plenty of nutjobs happy to use them.

Abbott

2,492 posts

205 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
poo at Paul's said:
After one of the Paris / french shooting attrocities, (i cannot recall which), French police and security did something crazy like 6,000 raids on know addresses within a week or 10 days, and recovered 1500 odd illegal weapons, mostly guns.
It occurred to me that that is some strike rate, and at the beginning of the operation, they knew who all these people were and where they lived. And yet, just let them seemingly live in peace until nudged into action.
Shocking incident but there's st loads of guns in mainland Europe and plenty of nutjobs happy to use them.
I am not suggesting that there are no go areas in the banlieu around Paris but these areas do have to be treated cautiously. There a number of incidents where police have provoked a backlash, leading to weeks of demonstrations, vehicles set on fire etc etc. Having said that given a clear situation like this there is not the same level anti police feeling so they just go in and kick the doors down.

poo at Paul's

14,218 posts

177 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
Abbott said:
poo at Paul's said:
After one of the Paris / french shooting attrocities, (i cannot recall which), French police and security did something crazy like 6,000 raids on know addresses within a week or 10 days, and recovered 1500 odd illegal weapons, mostly guns.
It occurred to me that that is some strike rate, and at the beginning of the operation, they knew who all these people were and where they lived. And yet, just let them seemingly live in peace until nudged into action.
Shocking incident but there's st loads of guns in mainland Europe and plenty of nutjobs happy to use them.
I am not suggesting that there are no go areas in the banlieu around Paris but these areas do have to be treated cautiously. There a number of incidents where police have provoked a backlash, leading to weeks of demonstrations, vehicles set on fire etc etc. Having said that given a clear situation like this there is not the same level anti police feeling so they just go in and kick the doors down.
So whilst they ognore what is right in front of their faces for years and years, things like this happen. If they were out doing 10 days of kicking doors in once a month or so, there would be far less weapons out there.

s1962a

5,434 posts

164 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
poo at Paul's said:
So whilst they ognore what is right in front of their faces for years and years, things like this happen. If they were out doing 10 days of kicking doors in once a month or so, there would be far less weapons out there.
This sounds a bit like Liverpool. Could it be more about letting the lower level crims go so they can go after the big bosses?

Abbott

2,492 posts

205 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
poo at Paul's said:
Abbott said:
poo at Paul's said:
After one of the Paris / french shooting attrocities, (i cannot recall which), French police and security did something crazy like 6,000 raids on know addresses within a week or 10 days, and recovered 1500 odd illegal weapons, mostly guns.
It occurred to me that that is some strike rate, and at the beginning of the operation, they knew who all these people were and where they lived. And yet, just let them seemingly live in peace until nudged into action.
Shocking incident but there's st loads of guns in mainland Europe and plenty of nutjobs happy to use them.
I am not suggesting that there are no go areas in the banlieu around Paris but these areas do have to be treated cautiously. There a number of incidents where police have provoked a backlash, leading to weeks of demonstrations, vehicles set on fire etc etc. Having said that given a clear situation like this there is not the same level anti police feeling so they just go in and kick the doors down.
So whilst they ognore what is right in front of their faces for years and years, things like this happen. If they were out doing 10 days of kicking doors in once a month or so, there would be far less weapons out there.
I don't think that anyone who is prepared to attack 2 vans, driven by armed police, in broad daylight will have any problems to get hold of firearms.

RSbandit

2,633 posts

134 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
Hunt the perpetrators down and bury them …only way to send a message to such scum.

deadtom

2,594 posts

167 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
poo at Paul's said:
After one of the Paris / french shooting attrocities, (i cannot recall which), French police and security did something crazy like 6,000 raids on know addresses within a week or 10 days, and recovered 1500 odd illegal weapons, mostly guns.
It occurred to me that that is some strike rate, and at the beginning of the operation, they knew who all these people were and where they lived. And yet, just let them seemingly live in peace until nudged into action.
[pure speculation]

Maybe they keep a close eye on, but don't arrest the lower orders who just have a gun for 'protection' who, if they use it at all, would only likely be shooting other gang members, in the hope it will lead them to the bigger fish in the organisation who pose a bigger threat to real people?

Similar logic to not always arresting users and low level drug dealers

However if that is what they do, clearly it didn't work this time frown

[/pure speculation]

What a wretched, brutal thing though. The criminals were absolutely not messing about, and hopefully the French authorities are similarly robust in catching and dealing with them.

g4ry13

17,281 posts

257 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
Tango13 said:
He was facing some serious charges relating to a kidnapping and death? Makes me wonder if he was going to talk to reduce his sentence so the gang grabbed him to prevent him talking, maybe he's already been 'silenced' by the gang?
One would think it is easier to use a gang member already inside to "silence" him rather than stage an ambush of prison vehicles using semi-automatic weapons and attract all that publicity if that were the objective.

BikeBikeBIke

8,411 posts

117 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
g4ry13 said:
Tango13 said:
He was facing some serious charges relating to a kidnapping and death? Makes me wonder if he was going to talk to reduce his sentence so the gang grabbed him to prevent him talking, maybe he's already been 'silenced' by the gang?
One would think it is easier to use a gang member already inside to "silence" him rather than stage an ambush of prison vehicles using semi-automatic weapons and attract all that publicity if that were the objective.
It's a meaningless distinction. You've got to get him out of the van to be sure of killing him and once you've done that you might as well rescue him as kill him.

Equally if you genuinely want to rescue him you still get the fringe benefit that he won't dob you in.

Edited by BikeBikeBIke on Wednesday 15th May 12:57

Abbott

2,492 posts

205 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
RSbandit said:
Hunt the perpetrators down and bury them …only way to send a message to such scum.
Given the level of violence in the attack it would be no surprise that the police will deploy with maximum lethal force to get them.
Just hope that no innocent people get caught up in it all.

Southerner

1,475 posts

54 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
Earthdweller said:
It’s hard to tell but it doesn’t look like a fully armoured transport van, just a normal soft skin one

From the video there only seems to be one escorting vehicle following behind, not a full protection bubble around it

It doesn’t look like a very high risk prisoner movement to me

It seems maybe the risk assessment was wrong
I thought very much the same! It seems an odd concept, lightly armoured and very little protection yet running on blue lights. Here we seem to do either ‘bog standard’ in a van on its own, or high security with a hell of a convoy - surely a prisoner is either a risk or not?!

768

13,921 posts

98 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
Petrus1983 said:
CrgT16 said:
We should have a special skill unit separate from police to tackle this seriously. The segregation from mainstream police is needed to minimise risk of corruption. It needs serious thinking.
What - like MI5?
Probably more the National Crime Agency.

Earthdweller

Original Poster:

13,706 posts

128 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
Southerner said:
Earthdweller said:
It’s hard to tell but it doesn’t look like a fully armoured transport van, just a normal soft skin one

From the video there only seems to be one escorting vehicle following behind, not a full protection bubble around it

It doesn’t look like a very high risk prisoner movement to me

It seems maybe the risk assessment was wrong
I thought very much the same! It seems an odd concept, lightly armoured and very little protection yet running on blue lights. Here we seem to do either ‘bog standard’ in a van on its own, or high security with a hell of a convoy - surely a prisoner is either a risk or not?!
There are thousands of prisoner movements every day in the U.K. 99% of which are just in multiple occupancy cell vans

All are risk assessed and there have been mistakes and prisoners have been released but very rare

For high risk and very high risk there are a range of options .. from high speed covert runs, through CAT A convoys to defendants appearing via video link from prisons or one of the court rooms inside the high security designated counter terrorist cell blocks within certain police stations dotted across the country

One thing for certain a U.K. CAT A convoy would never be in such a vulnerable position and have very significant fire power to respond to any attack

gotoPzero

17,448 posts

191 months

IanH755

1,879 posts

122 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
This is a UK CAT A convoy for comparison - A dozen plus vehicles all filled with rifle armed Police, plus cut-off groups etc for the highest category Crims.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iwlbpsox298

So whilst the UK has had attacks on much lower class (CAT C etc) "convoys", where there's just a prison Van and nothing else, a full on CAT A convoy is a different kettle of fish!