Taxation kills off UK gas field

Taxation kills off UK gas field

Author
Discussion

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

206 months

Monday 2nd May 2011
quotequote all
mik.ross said:
loafer123 said:
thinfourth2 said:
Could someone please explain why

Raising the tax on bankers so they shutdown UK operations is bad

but

Raising the tax on the oil industry so they shutdown UK operations is good
Banks and bankers employ Triston-very-plum, the blue tie wearer.

Oil and gas employs, "them ruffians up North" who would be skint without us financial gurus in London.
Fixed that for you.
It would be funny if it wasn't true

Cameron is lining up to dump Scotland

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

206 months

Monday 2nd May 2011
quotequote all
loafer123 said:
thinfourth2 said:
loafer123 said:
Banks and bankers can move.

Oil and gas reserves cannot.
You are right the field can't move

However

The operators of the field can choose to cap the well and bog off to another field in another country instead of doing well stimulation or other methods to keep the well running.

Once the well has been killed and capped you are going to have to spend alot to get it running again.

Operators can choose not to drill test wells and don't need BOPs etc

A large manufacturer of BOPs based in northern england has just made a 3rd of their production staff redundant.

I am getting enquiries about field abandonment operations.

Oil companies can and do fk off to more friendly countries

So i ask again


Why is it okay to tax oil companies until they move out of the UK but not okay to tax bankers until they leave.?
My answer is the same.

I'm not advocating it, I'm just telling you why they act the way they do.
Your answer is still wrong

And the fact still is if you abandon a field it is normally hugely expensive to get it flowing again

sharpfocus

13,812 posts

193 months

Monday 2nd May 2011
quotequote all
Bankers can't move or oil and gas reserves can?

WhoseGeneration

4,090 posts

209 months

Monday 2nd May 2011
quotequote all
Now, why is not the current Goverenment trying to ensure energy sufficiency, provided from sources within it's remit?

Globs

13,841 posts

233 months

Monday 2nd May 2011
quotequote all
WhoseGeneration said:
Now, why is not the current Goverenment trying to ensure energy sufficiency, provided from sources within it's remit?
Because that would be sensible and in our best interest.

Caulkhead

4,938 posts

159 months

Monday 2nd May 2011
quotequote all
thinfourth2 said:
Caulkhead said:
Get back to me when they stop 'considering' and start acting. Pure economic sabre-rattling by the oil companies IMHO.
it must of been my imagination that BOP production has been scaled back

And why can't we start taxing the bankers until they start to leave

Apart from they fund the blue ties
The same bankers that got the bailout from Gordon Brown because the labour party was £14m in debt and they were on the edge of foreclosing with the structure of the labour party meaning the leader was personally liable?

Anyway, as usual you're missing the point. We in England are preparing for Scottish independence by destroying the north sea oil industry. We realise it will hurt, but it will be worth it to watch that smug tt Salmond run out of oil-based excuses. smile

powerstroke

10,283 posts

162 months

Monday 2nd May 2011
quotequote all
Caulkhead said:
The same bankers that got the bailout from Gordon Brown because the labour party was £14m in debt and they were on the edge of foreclosing with the structure of the labour party meaning the leader was personally liable?

Anyway, as usual you're missing the point. We in England are preparing for Scottish independence by destroying the north sea oil industry. We realise it will hurt, but it will be worth it to watch that smug tt Salmond run out of oil-based excuses. smile
No it wont happen there is going to be a arc of prosperity from Ireland thru scotland and to Iceland, Norway biggrin Well that's what the salmond twunt said a year or so agohehe

WhoseGeneration

4,090 posts

209 months

Monday 2nd May 2011
quotequote all
Globs said:
Because that would be sensible and in our best interest.
Meaning we have another st Government?

hidetheelephants

25,486 posts

195 months

Monday 2nd May 2011
quotequote all
powerstroke said:
Caulkhead said:
The same bankers that got the bailout from Gordon Brown because the labour party was £14m in debt and they were on the edge of foreclosing with the structure of the labour party meaning the leader was personally liable?

Anyway, as usual you're missing the point. We in England are preparing for Scottish independence by destroying the north sea oil industry. We realise it will hurt, but it will be worth it to watch that smug tt Salmond run out of oil-based excuses. smile
No it wont happen there is going to be a arc of prosperity from Ireland thru scotland and to Iceland, Norway biggrin Well that's what the salmond twunt said a year or so agohehe
I don't hold any great regard for big Eck, but he hasn't played the 'arc of prosperity' card for a good 3 years. He's an opportunist, not a schmuck.

Pesty

42,655 posts

258 months

Monday 2nd May 2011
quotequote all
thinfourth2 said:
Globs said:
They do, UKIP got 8% of the vote in the last election.
And how many MPs

NIL

How many MPs did the green party get

ONE

Going off topic
Sounds like a really good reason to vote for AV

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

264 months

Tuesday 3rd May 2011
quotequote all
Pesty said:
thinfourth2 said:
Globs said:
They do, UKIP got 8% of the vote in the last election.
And how many MPs

NIL

How many MPs did the green party get

ONE

Going off topic
Sounds like a really good reason to vote for AV
So would the number of blood sucking useless non productive parasites then go up?

slow_poke

1,855 posts

236 months

Tuesday 3rd May 2011
quotequote all
Mojocvh said:
So would the number of blood sucking useless non productive parasites then go up?
No, the overall numbers won't change. They'll just be wearing different coloured ties.

Olf

11,974 posts

220 months

Tuesday 3rd May 2011
quotequote all
To all those complaining about the rich oil company and how they should suck it up... A few of points:

Who wins if the oil company does well? To an extent the employees but not in the same way that bank employees do - no - maybe think instead about the tax take and the shareholders. The shareholders being you and me and pretty much any one else with a pension. Not to mention all the interrelationships that exist in the British economy on the back of a successful oil and gas industry.

How hard is this drilling for oil business? Maybe ask Tony Hayward. Big profits maybe but you'd have to be a blind idiot not to appreciate the implications of getting it wrong, human life first and foremost and then untold environmental and economic damage, the extent of which could bring Britains largest company literally to it's knees overnight. Name me another industry, outside of energy, that faces that risk.

Speaking of wedges... How thick do you like your thin end? A government that introduces a game changing tax overnight, without warning, consultation or regard for short/medium business plans, needs a nice fat slap round the chops. Try whacking that on the tourist industry or steel, or motor or any other industry you care to mention. It's simply un-acceptable to feck around so profoundly with the fiscal regime in such a short time.

Why kill the sacred cow? Lord knows we're not good at much in the UK now but one thing we're still good at is plundering the deep for oil and gas. Why risk one of those last nuggets of British industry that has managed to withstand the ineptitude of all governments to date... Just.

Edited by Olf on Tuesday 3rd May 02:25

Globs

13,841 posts

233 months

Tuesday 3rd May 2011
quotequote all
slow_poke said:
Mojocvh said:
So would the number of blood sucking useless non productive parasites then go up?
No, the overall numbers won't change. They'll just be wearing different coloured ties.
Sad but true. The big problem with AV as I see it is the same reason the Tories do not want it.
Labour's second choice will be LibDem
Libdem's second choice will be Labour

So you may never get a Tory majority ever again.




Now with this in mind lets look at the Tory party: GIving all power to the EU (check), keeping the quangos (check), not really grasping the reality of the UK debt load (check). So it comes down really to whether the Tories are that relevant anymore, and if a few UKIP people (more likely with AV I think) would counterbalance the inrush of luvvy lefties and their imbecilic ideas.

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

264 months

Tuesday 3rd May 2011
quotequote all
Globs said:
slow_poke said:
Mojocvh said:
So would the number of blood sucking useless non productive parasites then go up?
No, the overall numbers won't change. They'll just be wearing different coloured ties.
Sad but true. The big problem with AV as I see it is the same reason the Tories do not want it.
Labour's second choice will be LibDem
Libdem's second choice will be Labour

So you may never get a Tory majority ever again.




Now with this in mind lets look at the Tory party: GIving all power to the EU (check), keeping the quangos (check), not really grasping the reality of the UK debt load (check). So it comes down really to whether the Tories are that relevant anymore, and if a few UKIP people (more likely with AV I think) would counterbalance the inrush of luvvy lefties and their imbecilic ideas.
I just wish there were some UKIP North of the border. That WOULD finally kill of the useless Scottish conservatives once and for all.