How Far Will House Prices Fall? [Volume 6]

[Macron]

Neither really comparable to a 700k refurb.

[JagLover]

okgo said:

Stuff is moving. If it’s decent.

Yes

As mentioned before I am monitoring a specific 1/4 mile radius and something came up that I was interested in and then sold within two days. Stuff that is listed at prices that would have looked high at peak tends to just sit there.

[brickwall]

JagLover said:

okgo said:

Stuff is moving. If it’s decent.

Yes

As mentioned before I am monitoring a specific 1/4 mile radius and something came up that I was interested in and then sold within two days. Stuff that is listed at prices that would have looked high at peak tends to just sit there.

Same as what I’m seeing.

Good stuff (not needing work) listed at a sensible discount to peak goes very quickly, and close to/at list. “Sensible discount” tends to be 10-15%.

Vendors seeking peak pricing are disappointed and the houses just sit there. I’m aware of one house that’s been listed for £1.4M for 6 months, they’ve had 2 offers at +/- £1.2M. Vendors are holding on because “the neighbours sold for £1.375M”.

[gotoPzero]

People just dont get it do they, the people who sold at higher price also paid a higher price for their next place.
Does my head in!

[ooid]

skwdenyer said:

princeperch said:

https://www.rightmove.co.uk/house-prices/details/e...

This was the one I sold. If the new vendor gets 700k for the one that's just gone up for sale, the new purchaser will have "lost" a loft conversion in the space of a year.

Interesting. According to house metrics, yours is the same size as #81. Not sure of the data source but clearly not right - I’m guessing it is EPC data or similar.

The problem there beyond the total GIA, is the supply. If you search that specific Forest Gate postcode, and more specifically only 0.25 mile radius, there are only 8-9 properties available, and only one of them can be ideal (which is what PP posted). I know the area, and I spent a few months looking there a few years ago, even though different times, it was nearly impossible to get the right property without a bidding war. Very specific streets there ideal to settle in permanently. Go further north-east less than a mile, other side of Wanstead Flats, sort of similar but much better looking properties literally would start now min. 900k or 1mil I guess.

[okgo]

gotoPzero said:

People just dont get it do they, the people who sold at higher price also paid a higher price for their next place.
Does my head in!

That would mean all house prices fell equally.

[Caddyshack]

okgo said:

gotoPzero said:

People just dont get it do they, the people who sold at higher price also paid a higher price for their next place.
Does my head in!

That would mean all house prices fell equally.

It often doesn’t mean that at all as different bits of the market rise and fall at different rates. The stamp duty changes stratified the market as well as movements in the general population due to tax or other financial factors like demographics.

I spoke to a few agents last week and around here £800k properties are flying off the shelf where as £400k and £1.3m+ are slow…so your 1.3m property could need a big cut to get it sold and your down-size to an £800k means you over[any due to demand in that sector.

[princeperch]

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2023/04/09/uk...

It's almost as if the telegraph has shorted the market the amount of doom and gloom they are constantly publishing.

The bloke in the article looks exactly like the type of bloke to come steaming into a deal kicking everyone in the nuts after finding out they are one step away from insolvency.

[Diderot]

princeperch said:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2023/04/09/uk...

It's almost as if the telegraph has shorted the market the amount of doom and gloom they are constantly publishing.

The bloke in the article looks exactly like the type of bloke to come steaming into a deal kicking everyone in the nuts after finding out they are one step away from insolvency.

I read that this morning over my porridge and thought the author was obviously in the market to buy a property and desperately trying to talk everything down.

[G-wiz]

Diderot said:

princeperch said:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2023/04/09/uk...

It's almost as if the telegraph has shorted the market the amount of doom and gloom they are constantly publishing.

The bloke in the article looks exactly like the type of bloke to come steaming into a deal kicking everyone in the nuts after finding out they are one step away from insolvency.

I read that this morning over my porridge and thought the author was obviously in the market to buy a property and desperately trying to talk everything down.

Which part of that article is inaccurate?

[brickwall]

G-wiz said:

Diderot said:

princeperch said:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2023/04/09/uk...

It's almost as if the telegraph has shorted the market the amount of doom and gloom they are constantly publishing.

The bloke in the article looks exactly like the type of bloke to come steaming into a deal kicking everyone in the nuts after finding out they are one step away from insolvency.

I read that this morning over my porridge and thought the author was obviously in the market to buy a property and desperately trying to talk everything down.

Which part of that article is inaccurate?

I fundamentally agree with the analysis. However the open questions are
- How many households fall into distress from interest rate hikes?
- How many (non-distressed) homeowners decide to sit tight and not sell, restricting supply?

I think actually we’re seeing it now in some areas. Where I’m looking the transactions that are actually happening prices agreed are 10-15% lower than peak. This will take 6-9 months to show up in the stats, so combined with inflation I wouldn’t the surprised if we are looking at a 25-30% drop in real terms by the end of the year.

But equally there are a lot of transactions not being agreed with vendors unwilling to accept the prices buyers are offering.

Could things fall further? Perhaps.

Equally, if the labour market remains tight then we could see nominal wages increase 10% over the next 18 months, which will increase affordability, reduce distress and undo some of the 10-15% nominal drop we are seeing right now.

[Mojooo]

To what extent is the housing market based on feel? If we all feel its going tits up will prices go down or will ultimately the lack of supply keep prices reasonably stable

The price rises since Covid are stupid - I saw a 2 bed house rise 40k in 2 years (was 260k then was 300k) - so a drop to that level is the minimum I'd want but ideally something more substantial.

[Fusion777]

Is there a lack of supply, or has there just been an excess of people stretching to afford housing?

[Mojooo]

Fusion777 said:

Is there a lack of supply, or has there just been an excess of people stretching to afford housing?

I assume so

I suspect there are a lot of people like me who want to buy a house but have been put off by high prices. If prices came down they might go back up again as people start trying to buy at cheaper prices.

[okgo]

But now you’re just paying the difference in interest?

Best idea is just to buy a house when you can and need one.

[Diderot]

G-wiz said:

Diderot said:

princeperch said:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2023/04/09/uk...

It's almost as if the telegraph has shorted the market the amount of doom and gloom they are constantly publishing.

The bloke in the article looks exactly like the type of bloke to come steaming into a deal kicking everyone in the nuts after finding out they are one step away from insolvency.

I read that this morning over my porridge and thought the author was obviously in the market to buy a property and desperately trying to talk everything down.

Which part of that article is inaccurate?

It’s a forecast, they’re always inaccurate without a De Lorean and a Mr Fusion system, especially when economists are casting the runes.

[xeny]

okgo said:

But now you’re just paying the difference in interest?
.

In abstract isn't it better to buy when rates are high and prices are low than when rates are low and prices high?

Falling rates may lead to higher prices (easy to sell and scope for capital appreciation) and lower monthlies.

Rising rates may lead to lower prices (so it is hard to sell) and higher monthlies.

[brickwall]

xeny said:

In abstract isn't it better to buy when rates are high and prices are low than when rates are low and prices high?

Falling rates may lead to higher prices (easy to sell and scope for capital appreciation) and lower monthlies.

Rising rates may lead to lower prices (so it is hard to sell) and higher monthlies.

Yes.
(If you can afford it)

[okgo]

It’s also up for debate in my eyes how ‘cheap’ decent stuff is right now. Mostly as what I see is perhaps sitting unless it’s rare but minimal reductions, very few seem to be going full fire sale from what I see.

[brickwall]

I don’t think we’ll see much “full fire sale”.
a) There won’t be masses in distress. Whilst a lot of people will see significant rate rises as fixes end, this is spread over a long period and the majority will have enough headroom in their income to cover it, especially if they extend the term.
b) Banks will try to avoid repossession if they can possibly do so. And in most cases there will be significant equity in the property.

The two big unknowns are
- How many people levered up and bought at the peak? They are most at risk. However they’re also the most likely to have a 5-year fix.
- What happens to the labour market? If it remains tight then people will keep their jobs and see 5% (close to inflation) pay rises over the next year or two - that will really help affordability. But if people start losing jobs then it’s a very different situation.